Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2013-004502-26 | EudraCT Number | ||
| U1111-1149-3738 | Other Identifier | WHO | |
| JapicCTI-142729 | Other Identifier | JAPIC |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This trial is conducted in Asia, Europe and the United States of America (USA). The aim of the trial is to investigate efficacy and safety of semaglutide once weekly versus placebo as add-on to basal insulin alone or basal insulin in combination with metformin in subjects with type 2 diabetes.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semaglutide 0.5 mg/Week | Experimental |
| |
| Semaglutide 1.0 mg/Week | Experimental |
| |
| Semaglutide Placebo 0.5 mg/Week | Placebo Comparator |
| |
| Semaglutide Placebo 1.0 mg/Week | Placebo Comparator |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| semaglutide | Drug | Injected subcutaneously (s.c. under the skin) once-weekly. As add-on to the pre-trial background medication. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in HbA1c (Glycosylated Haemoglobin) | Estimated mean change from baseline in HbA1c at week 30. The post-baseline responses are analysed using a mixed model for repeated measurements with treatment, country and stratification variable (HbA1c level at screening [<= 8.0% or > 8.0%] crossed with use of metformin [yes or no]; 2 by 2 levels) as fixed factors and baseline value as covariate, all nested within visit. Mean estimates are adjusted according to observed baseline distribution. Missing data was imputed using mixed model for repeated measurements. | Week 0, week 30 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Body Weight | Estimated mean change from baseline in body weight at week 30. The post-baseline responses are analysed using a mixed model for repeated measurements with treatment, country and stratification variable (HbA1c level at screening [<= 8.0% or > 8.0%] crossed with use of metformin [yes or no]; 2 by 2 levels) as fixed factors and baseline value as covariate, all nested within visit. Mean estimates are adjusted according to observed baseline distribution. Missing data was imputed using mixed model for repeated measurements. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria: - Male or female, age at least 18 years at the time of signing inform consent. For Japan: Male or female, age at least 20 years at the time of signing informed consent - Subjects diagnosed with T2DM (type 2 diabetes mellitus) and on stable diabetes treatment (plus/minus 20 percent change in total daily dose) with basal insulin (minimum of 0.25 IU/kg/day and/or 20 IU/day of: insulin glargine, insulin detemir, insulin degludec and/or NPH insulin) alone or in combination with metformin (minimum of 1500 mg/day or maximal tolerable dose) for 90 days prior to screening - HbA1c (glycosylated haemoglobin) 7.0 - 10.0 percent (53 - 86 mmol/mol) both inclusive Exclusion Criteria: - Female who is pregnant, breast-feeding or intends to become pregnant or is of child-bearing potential and not using an adequate contraceptive method throughout the trial including the 5 weeks follow-up period (adequate contraceptive measures as required by local regulation or practice). Germany: Only highly effective methods of birth control are accepted (ie one that results in less than 1% per year failure rate when used consistently and correctly such as implants, injectables, combined oral contraceptives, some intrauterine device), or sexual abstinence or vasectomised partner. Japan: Adequate contraceptive measures are abstinence (not having sex), diaphragm, condom (by the partner), intrauterine device, sponge, spermicide or oral contraceptives - Treatment with any glucose lowering agents other than stated in the inclusion criteria in a period of 90 days before screening. An exception is short-term treatment (7 days or less in total) with bolus insulin in connection with intercurrent illness - Experienced more than 3 episodes of severe hypoglycaemia within 6 months prior to screening, and/or hypoglycaemia unawareness - History of pancreatitis (acute or chronic) - Screening calcitonin value above or equal to 50 ng/L (pg/mL) - Personal or family history of medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) or multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome 2 (MEN 2) - Severe renal impairment defined as eGFR (estimated glomerular filtration rate) below 30 mL/min/1.73 m^2 per Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula (4 variable version) - Acute coronary or cerebrovascular event within 90 days before randomisation - Heart failure, New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class IV
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Global Clinical Registry (GCR, 1452) | Novo Nordisk A/S | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Phoenix | Arizona | 85018 | United States | ||
| Novo Nordisk Investigational Site |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 30865526 | Background | Rodbard HW, Bellary S, Hramiak I, Seino Y, Silver R, Damgaard LH, Nayak G, Zacho J, Aroda VR. GREATER COMBINED REDUCTIONS IN HbA1C >/=1.0% AND WEIGHT >/=5.0% WITH SEMAGLUTIDE VERSUS COMPARATORS IN TYPE 2 DIABETES. Endocr Pract. 2019 Jun;25(6):589-597. doi: 10.4158/EP-2018-0444. Epub 2019 Mar 13. | |
| Result | Rodbard H, Lingvay I, Reed J, de la Rosa R, Rose L, Sugimoto D, Araki E, Chu P-L, Wijayasinghe N, Norwood P. Efficacy and safety of semaglutide once-weekly vs placebo as add-on to basal insulin alone or in combination with metformin in subjects with type 2 diabetes (SUSTAIN 5). Diabetologia. 2016; 59: S364-5. | ||
| 29688502 |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Clinical Trials at Novo Nordisk | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
The trial was conducted at 90 sites in 5 countries, as follows: Germany: 10 sites; Japan: 6 sites; Serbia: 4 sites; Slovakia: 5 sites; United States: 65.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Semaglutide 0.5 mg | Subjects received semaglutide 0.25 mg subcutaneous (sc) injection once weekly for 4 weeks followed by semaglutide 0.5 mg once weekly up to week 30. Semaglutide injection was administered in the thigh, abdomen or upper arm, at any time of day irrespective of meals. The injections were to be administered on the same day of the week during the trial. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| placebo | Drug | Injected subcutaneously (s.c. under the skin) once-weekly. As add-on to the pre-trial background medication. |
|
| Week 0, week 30 |
| Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) | Estimated mean change from baseline in FPG at week 30. The post-baseline responses are analysed using a mixed model for repeated measurements with treatment, country and stratification variable (HbA1c level at screening [<= 8.0% or > 8.0%] crossed with use of metformin [yes or no]; 2 by 2 levels) as fixed factors and baseline value as covariate, all nested within visit. Mean estimates are adjusted according to observed baseline distribution. Missing data was imputed using mixed model for repeated measurements. | week 0, week 30 |
| Change in Insulin Dose | Estimated mean change from baseline in insulin dose at week 30 was measured in terms of ratio to baseline. Responses at week 30 are analysed using an Analysis of covariance model with treatment, country and stratification variable (HbA1c level at screening [<= 8.0% or > 8.0%] crossed with use of metformin [yes or no]; 2 by 2 levels) as fixed factors and baseline value as covariate. Mean estimates are adjusted according to observed baseline distribution. Missing data was imputed using last observation carried forward. | week 0, week 30 |
| Change in Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure | Estimated mean change from baseline in systolic and diastolic blood pressure at week 30. The post-baseline responses are analysed using a mixed model for repeated measurements with treatment, country and stratification variable (HbA1c level at screening [<= 8.0% or > 8.0%] crossed with use of metformin [yes or no]; 2 by 2 levels) as fixed factors and baseline value as covariate, all nested within visit. Mean estimates are adjusted according to observed baseline distribution. Missing data was imputed using mixed model for repeated measurements. | week 0, week 30 |
| Patient Reported Outcomes, Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ) | The DTSQs questionnaire was used to assess subjects' treatment satisfaction and contained 8 components and evaluates the diabetes treatment (including insulin, tablets and/or diet) in terms of convenience, flexibility and general feelings towards the treatment. The result presented is the 'Treatment Satisfaction' summary score, which is the sum of 6 of the 8 items of the DTSQs questionnaire. Response options range from 6 (best case) to 0 (worst case). Total scores for treatment satisfaction range from 0-36. Higher scores indicate higher satisfaction. The post-baseline responses are analysed using an ANCOVA model with treatment, country and stratification variables (HbA1c level at screening [<= 8.0% or > 8.0%] and use of metformin [yes or no]) as fixed factors and baseline value as covariate. Mean estimates are adjusted according to observed baseline distribution. Missing data was imputed using last observation carried forward. | week 0, week 30 |
| HbA1c Below 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) American Diabetes Association (ADA) Target | Percentage of subjects with HbA1C below 7.0% after 30 weeks treatment. Missing data imputed from a mixed model for repeated measurements with treatment, country and stratification variable (HbA1c level at screening [<= 8.0% or > 8.0%] crossed with use of metformin [yes or no]; 2 by 2 levels) as fixed factors and baseline value as covariate, all nested within visit. | After 30 weeks treatment |
| HbA1c Below or Equal to 6.5% (48 mmol/Mol) American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) Target | Percentage of participants with HbA1c below or equal to 6.5% after 30 weeks treatment. Missing data imputed from a mixed model for repeated measurements with treatment, country and stratification variable (HbA1c level at screening [<= 8.0% or > 8.0%] crossed with use of metformin [yes or no]; 2 by 2 levels) as fixed factors and baseline value as covariate, all nested within visit. | After 30 weeks treatment |
| Anaheim |
| California |
| 92801 |
| United States |
| Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Fresno | California | 93720 | United States |
| Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Lomita | California | 90717 | United States |
| Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Los Angeles | California | 90057-3550 | United States |
| Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Northridge | California | 91325 | United States |
| Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Poway | California | 92064 | United States |
| Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Riverside | California | 92506 | United States |
| Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Roseville | California | 95661 | United States |
| Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | San Ramon | California | 94583 | United States |
| Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Van Nuys | California | 91405 | United States |
| Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Walnut Creek | California | 94598 | United States |
| Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Waterbury | Connecticut | 06708 | United States |
| Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Bradenton | Florida | 34201 | United States |
| Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Fleming Island | Florida | 32003 | United States |
| Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Jacksonville | Florida | 32204 | United States |
| Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Port Charlotte | Florida | 33952 | United States |
| Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Spring Hill | Florida | 34609 | United States |
| Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Tampa | Florida | 33634 | United States |
| Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Roswell | Georgia | 30076 | United States |
| Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Chicago | Illinois | 60607 | United States |
| Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Chicago | Illinois | 60611 | United States |
| Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Gillespie | Illinois | 62033 | United States |
| Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Skokie | Illinois | 60077 | United States |
| Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Avon | Indiana | 46123 | United States |
| Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Greenfield | Indiana | 46140 | United States |
| Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Indianapolis | Indiana | 46254 | United States |
| Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Muncie | Indiana | 47304 | United States |
| Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Council Bluffs | Iowa | 51501 | United States |
| Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Overland Park | Kansas | 66209 | United States |
| Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Topeka | Kansas | 66606 | United States |
| Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Lexington | Kentucky | 40503 | United States |
| Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Paducah | Kentucky | 42003 | United States |
| Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Metairie | Louisiana | 70002 | United States |
| Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Rockville | Maryland | 20852 | United States |
| Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Waltham | Massachusetts | 02453 | United States |
| Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Ann Arbor | Michigan | 48106 | United States |
| Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Flint | Michigan | 48532 | United States |
| Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Kalamazoo | Michigan | 49009 | United States |
| Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Jackson | Mississippi | 39209 | United States |
| Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Las Vegas | Nevada | 89103 | United States |
| Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Las Vegas | Nevada | 89128 | United States |
| Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Teaneck | New Jersey | 07666 | United States |
| Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Albuquerque | New Mexico | 87102 | United States |
| Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | West Seneca | New York | 14224 | United States |
| Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Cincinnati | Ohio | 45245 | United States |
| Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Cincinnati | Ohio | 45246 | United States |
| Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Cincinnati | Ohio | 45255 | United States |
| Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Dayton | Ohio | 45439 | United States |
| Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Kettering | Ohio | 45429 | United States |
| Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Oklahoma City | Oklahoma | 73162-4704 | United States |
| Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Yukon | Oklahoma | 73099 | United States |
| Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Levittown | Pennsylvania | 19056-2404 | United States |
| Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | 19114 | United States |
| Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Athens | Tennessee | 37303 | United States |
| Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Bristol | Tennessee | 37620-7352 | United States |
| Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Chattanooga | Tennessee | 37411 | United States |
| Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Kingsport | Tennessee | 37660 | United States |
| Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Amarillo | Texas | 79106 | United States |
| Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Dallas | Texas | 75251 | United States |
| Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Dallas | Texas | 75390-9302 | United States |
| Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Fort Worth | Texas | 76132 | United States |
| Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Houston | Texas | 77008 | United States |
| Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Hurst | Texas | 76054 | United States |
| Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Katy | Texas | 77450 | United States |
| Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Mesquite | Texas | 75149 | United States |
| Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | San Antonio | Texas | 78224 | United States |
| Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Sugar Land | Texas | 77478 | United States |
| Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Sugar Land | Texas | 77479 | United States |
| Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Bountiful | Utah | 84010 | United States |
| Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Richmond | Virginia | 23219 | United States |
| Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Kenosha | Wisconsin | 53144 | United States |
| Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Essen | 45219 | Germany |
| Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Falkensee | 14612 | Germany |
| Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Friedrichsthal | 66299 | Germany |
| Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Hamburg | 21073 | Germany |
| Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Hamburg | 22587 | Germany |
| Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Hamburg | 22607 | Germany |
| Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Hohenmölsen | 06679 | Germany |
| Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Münster | 48145 | Germany |
| Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Rehlingen-Siersburg | 66780 | Germany |
| Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Saint Ingbert-Oberwürzbach | 66386 | Germany |
| Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Stuttgart | 70378 | Germany |
| Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Sulzbach-Rosenberg | 92237 | Germany |
| Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Ibaraki | 311-0113 | Japan |
| Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Kashiwara-shi, Osaka | 582-0005 | Japan |
| Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Kumamoto-shi, Kumamoto | 860-0811 | Japan |
| Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Miyazaki | 880-0034 | Japan |
| Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Osaka | 569-1045 | Japan |
| Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Tokyo | 103-0027 | Japan |
| Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Manati | 00674 | Puerto Rico |
| Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Belgrade | 11000 | Serbia |
| Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Kragujevac | 34000 | Serbia |
| Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Novi Sad | 21000 | Serbia |
| Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Bratislava | 833 05 | Slovakia |
| Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Košice | 040 01 | Slovakia |
| Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Levice | 93401 | Slovakia |
| Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Lučenec | 984 01 | Slovakia |
| Novo Nordisk Investigational Site | Prešov | 080 01 | Slovakia |
| Result |
| Rodbard HW, Lingvay I, Reed J, de la Rosa R, Rose L, Sugimoto D, Araki E, Chu PL, Wijayasinghe N, Norwood P. Semaglutide Added to Basal Insulin in Type 2 Diabetes (SUSTAIN 5): A Randomized, Controlled Trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2018 Jun 1;103(6):2291-2301. doi: 10.1210/jc.2018-00070. |
| 29687620 | Result | Warren M, Chaykin L, Trachtenbarg D, Nayak G, Wijayasinghe N, Cariou B. Semaglutide as a therapeutic option for elderly patients with type 2 diabetes: Pooled analysis of the SUSTAIN 1-5 trials. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 Sep;20(9):2291-2297. doi: 10.1111/dom.13331. Epub 2018 Jun 7. |
| 29766634 | Result | Ahren B, Atkin SL, Charpentier G, Warren ML, Wilding JPH, Birch S, Holst AG, Leiter LA. Semaglutide induces weight loss in subjects with type 2 diabetes regardless of baseline BMI or gastrointestinal adverse events in the SUSTAIN 1 to 5 trials. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 Sep;20(9):2210-2219. doi: 10.1111/dom.13353. Epub 2018 Jun 12. |
| 29862621 | Result | DeVries JH, Desouza C, Bellary S, Unger J, Hansen OKH, Zacho J, Woo V. Achieving glycaemic control without weight gain, hypoglycaemia, or gastrointestinal adverse events in type 2 diabetes in the SUSTAIN clinical trial programme. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 Oct;20(10):2426-2434. doi: 10.1111/dom.13396. Epub 2018 Jul 9. |
| 30615985 | Result | Aroda VR, Ahmann A, Cariou B, Chow F, Davies MJ, Jodar E, Mehta R, Woo V, Lingvay I. Comparative efficacy, safety, and cardiovascular outcomes with once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide in the treatment of type 2 diabetes: Insights from the SUSTAIN 1-7 trials. Diabetes Metab. 2019 Oct;45(5):409-418. doi: 10.1016/j.diabet.2018.12.001. Epub 2019 Jan 4. |
| 32998732 | Derived | Husain M, Bain SC, Holst AG, Mark T, Rasmussen S, Lingvay I. Effects of semaglutide on risk of cardiovascular events across a continuum of cardiovascular risk: combined post hoc analysis of the SUSTAIN and PIONEER trials. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2020 Sep 30;19(1):156. doi: 10.1186/s12933-020-01106-4. |
| 31903692 | Derived | Husain M, Bain SC, Jeppesen OK, Lingvay I, Sorrig R, Treppendahl MB, Vilsboll T. Semaglutide (SUSTAIN and PIONEER) reduces cardiovascular events in type 2 diabetes across varying cardiovascular risk. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2020 Mar;22(3):442-451. doi: 10.1111/dom.13955. Epub 2020 Feb 5. |
| 31769496 | Derived | DeSouza C, Cariou B, Garg S, Lausvig N, Navarria A, Fonseca V. Efficacy and Safety of Semaglutide for Type 2 Diabetes by Race and Ethnicity: A Post Hoc Analysis of the SUSTAIN Trials. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2020 Feb 1;105(2):dgz072. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgz072. |
| 31215727 | Derived | Jendle J, Birkenfeld AL, Polonsky WH, Silver R, Uusinarkaus K, Hansen T, Hakan-Bloch J, Tadayon S, Davies MJ. Improved treatment satisfaction in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with once-weekly semaglutide in the SUSTAIN trials. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019 Oct;21(10):2315-2326. doi: 10.1111/dom.13816. Epub 2019 Jul 12. |
| FG001 |
| Semaglutide 1.0 mg |
Subjects received semaglutide 0.25 mg sc injection once weekly for 4 weeks followed by semaglutide 0.5 mg once weekly for next 4 weeks and then semaglutide 1.0 mg once weekly up to week 30.Semaglutide injection was administered in the thigh, abdomen or upper arm, at any time of day irrespective of meals. The injections were to be administered on the same day of the week during the trial. |
| FG002 | Placebo | Subjects received placebo (matched to semaglutide) sc injection once weekly for 30 weeks. Placebo injection was administered in the thigh, abdomen or upper arm, at any time of day irrespective of meals. The injections were to be administered on the same day of the week during the trial. |
| Exposed |
|
| Premature Discontinuation of Treatment |
|
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
Analysis was performed on full analysis set which included all randomised subjects who had received at least 1 dose of randomised semaglutide or placebo.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Semaglutide 0.5 mg | Subjects received semaglutide 0.25 mg sc injection once weekly for 4 weeks followed by semaglutide 0.5 mg once weekly up to week 30. Semaglutide injection was administered in the thigh, abdomen or upper arm, at any time of day irrespective of meals. The injections were to be administered on the same day of the week during the trial. |
| BG001 | Semaglutide 1.0 mg | Subjects received semaglutide 0.25 mg sc injection once weekly for 4 weeks followed by semaglutide 0.5 mg once weekly for next 4 weeks and then semaglutide 1.0 mg once weekly up to week 30. Semaglutide injection was administered in the thigh, abdomen or upper arm, at any time of day irrespective of meals. The injections were to be administered on the same day of the week during the trial. |
| BG002 | Placebo | Subjects received placebo (matched to semaglutide) sc injection once weekly for 30 weeks. Placebo injection was administered in the thigh, abdomen or upper arm, at any time of day irrespective of meals. The injections were to be administered on the same day of the week during the trial. |
| BG003 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| ||||||||||
| Age, Customized | Number | participants |
| |||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||
| Glycosylated haemoglobin | Mean | Standard Deviation | percentage of glycosylated haemoglobin |
| ||||||||||
| Body weight | Mean | Standard Deviation | kg |
| ||||||||||
| Fasting plasma glucose | Mean | Standard Deviation | mg/dL |
| ||||||||||
| Insulin dose | Number of participants analysed=participants with available data for insulin dose at baseline. | Median | Full Range | international unit |
| |||||||||
| Diastolic Blood Pressure | Mean | Standard Deviation | mm Hg |
| ||||||||||
| Systolic Blood Pressure | Mean | Standard Deviation | mm Hg |
| ||||||||||
| Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire | The DTSQs questionnaire was used to assess subjects' treatment satisfaction and contained 8 components and evaluates the diabetes treatment (including insulin, tablets and/or diet) in terms of convenience, flexibility and general feelings towards the treatment. The result presented is the 'Treatment Satisfaction' summary score, which is the sum of 6 of the 8 items of the DTSQs questionnaire. Response options range from 6 (best case) to 0 (worst case). Total scores for treatment satisfaction range from 0-36. Higher scores indicate higher satisfaction. | Mean | Standard Deviation | scores on scale |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Change in HbA1c (Glycosylated Haemoglobin) | Estimated mean change from baseline in HbA1c at week 30. The post-baseline responses are analysed using a mixed model for repeated measurements with treatment, country and stratification variable (HbA1c level at screening [<= 8.0% or > 8.0%] crossed with use of metformin [yes or no]; 2 by 2 levels) as fixed factors and baseline value as covariate, all nested within visit. Mean estimates are adjusted according to observed baseline distribution. Missing data was imputed using mixed model for repeated measurements. | Full analysis set included all randomised subjects who had received at least 1 dose of randomised semaglutide or placebo. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | percentage of glycosylated hemoglobin | Week 0, week 30 |
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change in Body Weight | Estimated mean change from baseline in body weight at week 30. The post-baseline responses are analysed using a mixed model for repeated measurements with treatment, country and stratification variable (HbA1c level at screening [<= 8.0% or > 8.0%] crossed with use of metformin [yes or no]; 2 by 2 levels) as fixed factors and baseline value as covariate, all nested within visit. Mean estimates are adjusted according to observed baseline distribution. Missing data was imputed using mixed model for repeated measurements. | Full analysis set. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | kg | Week 0, week 30 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) | Estimated mean change from baseline in FPG at week 30. The post-baseline responses are analysed using a mixed model for repeated measurements with treatment, country and stratification variable (HbA1c level at screening [<= 8.0% or > 8.0%] crossed with use of metformin [yes or no]; 2 by 2 levels) as fixed factors and baseline value as covariate, all nested within visit. Mean estimates are adjusted according to observed baseline distribution. Missing data was imputed using mixed model for repeated measurements. | Full analysis set. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | mg/dL | week 0, week 30 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change in Insulin Dose | Estimated mean change from baseline in insulin dose at week 30 was measured in terms of ratio to baseline. Responses at week 30 are analysed using an Analysis of covariance model with treatment, country and stratification variable (HbA1c level at screening [<= 8.0% or > 8.0%] crossed with use of metformin [yes or no]; 2 by 2 levels) as fixed factors and baseline value as covariate. Mean estimates are adjusted according to observed baseline distribution. Missing data was imputed using last observation carried forward. | Full analysis set | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | ratio | week 0, week 30 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change in Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure | Estimated mean change from baseline in systolic and diastolic blood pressure at week 30. The post-baseline responses are analysed using a mixed model for repeated measurements with treatment, country and stratification variable (HbA1c level at screening [<= 8.0% or > 8.0%] crossed with use of metformin [yes or no]; 2 by 2 levels) as fixed factors and baseline value as covariate, all nested within visit. Mean estimates are adjusted according to observed baseline distribution. Missing data was imputed using mixed model for repeated measurements. | Full analysis set | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | mm Hg | week 0, week 30 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Patient Reported Outcomes, Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ) | The DTSQs questionnaire was used to assess subjects' treatment satisfaction and contained 8 components and evaluates the diabetes treatment (including insulin, tablets and/or diet) in terms of convenience, flexibility and general feelings towards the treatment. The result presented is the 'Treatment Satisfaction' summary score, which is the sum of 6 of the 8 items of the DTSQs questionnaire. Response options range from 6 (best case) to 0 (worst case). Total scores for treatment satisfaction range from 0-36. Higher scores indicate higher satisfaction. The post-baseline responses are analysed using an ANCOVA model with treatment, country and stratification variables (HbA1c level at screening [<= 8.0% or > 8.0%] and use of metformin [yes or no]) as fixed factors and baseline value as covariate. Mean estimates are adjusted according to observed baseline distribution. Missing data was imputed using last observation carried forward. | Full analysis set | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | scores on a scale | week 0, week 30 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | HbA1c Below 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) American Diabetes Association (ADA) Target | Percentage of subjects with HbA1C below 7.0% after 30 weeks treatment. Missing data imputed from a mixed model for repeated measurements with treatment, country and stratification variable (HbA1c level at screening [<= 8.0% or > 8.0%] crossed with use of metformin [yes or no]; 2 by 2 levels) as fixed factors and baseline value as covariate, all nested within visit. | Full analysis set | Posted | Number | percentage of subjects | After 30 weeks treatment |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | HbA1c Below or Equal to 6.5% (48 mmol/Mol) American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) Target | Percentage of participants with HbA1c below or equal to 6.5% after 30 weeks treatment. Missing data imputed from a mixed model for repeated measurements with treatment, country and stratification variable (HbA1c level at screening [<= 8.0% or > 8.0%] crossed with use of metformin [yes or no]; 2 by 2 levels) as fixed factors and baseline value as covariate, all nested within visit. | Full analysis set. | Posted | Number | percentage of subjects | After 30 weeks treatment |
|
From the first dose of trial product until the end of the post-treatment follow-up period.The follow-up visit was scheduled to take place 5 weeks after the date of last dose of trial product with a visit window of +7 days (maximum 36 weeks).
A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an AE that had onset date (or increased in severity) during the 'on-treatment' observation period.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Semaglutide 0.5 mg | Subjects received semaglutide 0.25 mg sc injection once weekly for 4 weeks followed by semaglutide 0.5 mg once weekly up to week 30. Semaglutide injection was administered in the thigh, abdomen or upper arm, at any time of day irrespective of meals. The injections were to be administered on the same day of the week during the trial. | 8 | 132 | 52 | 132 | ||
| EG001 | Semaglutide 1.0 mg | Subjects received semaglutide 0.25 mg sc injection once weekly for 4 weeks followed by semaglutide 0.5 mg once weekly for next 4 weeks and then semaglutide 1.0 mg once weekly up to week 30. Semaglutide injection was administered in the thigh, abdomen or upper arm, at any time of day irrespective of meals. The injections were to be administered on the same day of the week during the trial. | 12 | 131 | 54 | 131 | ||
| EG002 | Placebo | Subjects received placebo (matched to semaglutide) sc injection once weekly for 30 weeks. Placebo injection was administered in the thigh, abdomen or upper arm, at any time of day irrespective of meals. The injections were to be administered on the same day of the week during the trial. | 9 | 133 | 34 | 133 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acute coronary syndrome | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Anaemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Back pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Blood pressure increased | Investigations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Bronchitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cardiac failure | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Carotid artery stenosis | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Carotid endarterectomy | Surgical and medical procedures | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cataract | Eye disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cholecystitis acute | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Clostridium difficile colitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Coronary arterial stent insertion | Surgical and medical procedures | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Coronary artery bypass | Surgical and medical procedures | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Coronary artery disease | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Depression | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Diabetes mellitus inadequate control | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Diverticulitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Drug hypersensitivity | Immune system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Femoral artery occlusion | Vascular disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gastrooesophageal reflux disease | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypoglycaemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypoglycaemic unconsciousness | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ischaemic stroke | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Lumbar spinal stenosis | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Meningitis aseptic | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Peripheral arterial occlusive disease | Vascular disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Peripheral artery angioplasty | Surgical and medical procedures | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Peripheral artery stent insertion | Surgical and medical procedures | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pneumonia | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Procedural pain | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pyelonephritis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pyelonephritis acute | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pyrexia | General disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Schizophrenia | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Sinusitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Spondylolisthesis | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Weight decreased | Investigations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decreased appetite | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Lipase increased | Investigations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nasopharyngitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Upper respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Urinary tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
Other disclosure agreement that restricts the right of the PI to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed. At the end of the trial, one or more manuscripts for publication will be prepared collaboratively between Investigator(s) and Novo Nordisk. Novo Nordisk reserves the right to postpone publication and/or communication for less than 60 days to protect intellectual property.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Global Clinical Registry (GCR, 1452) | Novo Nordisk A/S | clinicaltrials@novonordisk.com |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003920 | Diabetes Mellitus |
| D003924 | Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D044882 | Glucose Metabolism Disorders |
| D008659 | Metabolic Diseases |
| D009750 | Nutritional and Metabolic Diseases |
| D004700 | Endocrine System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C000591245 | semaglutide |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
|
| From 65-84 years |
|
|
| 85 years and over |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Superiority or Other |
| Hierarchical testing was performed as per sequence listed below:Change in HbA1c: semaglutide 1.0 mg vs placebo. Change in HbA1c: semaglutide 0.5 mg vs placebo. Change in body weight: semaglutide 1.0 mg vs placebo. Change in body weight: semaglutide 0.5 mg vs placebo. Analysis was performed using MMRM with treatment, country and stratification variable (HbA1c at screening [≤8.0% or >8.0%] crossed with use of metformin [yes or no]; 2 by 2 levels) as fixed factors and baseline value as covariate | Mixed Models Analysis | < 0.0001 | Treatment difference | -1.35 | 2-Sided | 95 | -1.61 | -1.10 | Superiority for change in HbA1c was claimed if the upper limit of the 2-sided 95% CI for the estimated difference was below 0%. | Superiority or Other |
| OG002 | Placebo | Subjects received placebo (matched to semaglutide) sc injection once weekly for 30 weeks. Placebo injection was administered in the thigh, abdomen or upper arm, at any time of day irrespective of meals. The injections were to be administered on the same day of the week during the trial. |
|
|
| OG002 | Placebo | Subjects received placebo (matched to semaglutide) sc injection once weekly for 30 weeks. Placebo injection was administered in the thigh, abdomen or upper arm, at any time of day irrespective of meals. The injections were to be administered on the same day of the week during the trial. |
|
|
| OG002 | Placebo | Subjects received placebo (matched to semaglutide) sc injection once weekly for 30 weeks. Placebo injection was administered in the thigh, abdomen or upper arm, at any time of day irrespective of meals. The injections were to be administered on the same day of the week during the trial. |
|
|
| OG002 | Placebo | Subjects received placebo (matched to semaglutide) sc injection once weekly for 30 weeks. Placebo injection was administered in the thigh, abdomen or upper arm, at any time of day irrespective of meals. The injections were to be administered on the same day of the week during the trial. |
|
|
Subjects received semaglutide 0.25 mg sc injection once weekly for 4 weeks followed by semaglutide 0.5 mg once weekly for next 4 weeks and then semaglutide 1.0 mg once weekly up to week 30. Semaglutide injection was administered in the thigh, abdomen or upper arm, at any time of day irrespective of meals. The injections were to be administered on the same day of the week during the trial. |
| OG002 | Placebo | Subjects received placebo (matched to semaglutide) sc injection once weekly for 30 weeks. Placebo injection was administered in the thigh, abdomen or upper arm, at any time of day irrespective of meals. The injections were to be administered on the same day of the week during the trial. |
|
|
| Placebo |
Subjects received placebo (matched to semaglutide) sc injection once weekly for 30 weeks. Placebo injection was administered in the thigh, abdomen or upper arm, at any time of day irrespective of meals. The injections were to be administered on the same day of the week during the trial. |
|
|
| OG002 |
| Placebo |
Subjects received placebo (matched to semaglutide) sc injection once weekly for 30 weeks. Placebo injection was administered in the thigh, abdomen or upper arm, at any time of day irrespective of meals. The injections were to be administered on the same day of the week during the trial. |
|
|