Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Study to Evaluate Non-Invasive Subcutaneous Fat Reduction in the Submental Area using Cryolipolysis.
Healthy adult men and women with submental skin fold thickness > 1cm who desire reduction of submental fat.
Non-invasive treatment for subcutaneous fat reduction in the submental area.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| CoolSculpting Treatment | Experimental | The intervention is the CoolSculpting System. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CoolSculpting System | Device |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Safety of CoolScupting in the Submental Area | Safety of the Zeltiq CoolSculpting device will be assessed by measuring the incidence of device- and/or procedure-related adverse events. Adverse event reports are collected from the time of enrollment through the 12 week follow-up visit. | Time of enrollment through12 week post-final treatment follow-up |
| Percentage of Correct Identification of Pre-treatment Photographs | Change in the treated vs. untreated areas will be assessed by observation of changes in surface contour and/or fat volume by an independent photo review of pre-treatment and post-treatment images of the treated areas. Reviewers will be practicing dermatologists or plastic surgeons. All reviewers will be blinded to post-treatment vs. baseline untreated area. The order in which images will be presented will be randomized; for each subject placement of the baseline, pre-treatment image will be randomized for each pair of subject images. Reviewers will be asked to select the baseline photos for each subject photo series and record selections on a data collection form. Criteria for evaluable photos for the purposes of the independent review: subject completed treatment regimen; subject has complete set of baseline photos; subject has a complete set of post-treatment photos; photos were taken using Zeltiq standard procedure. | 12 week post-final-treatment |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in the Fat Layer of the Treated Area as Measured by Ultrasound | Change in the fat layer thickness will be calculated by comparison of pre-treatment and 16 week post-treatment ultrasound measurements taken in the area treated with the device. The Sponsor's standardized techniques for obtaining ultrasound imaging will be used. Results indicate the fat layer reduction in cm. | 12 weeks post-final treatment |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Lori Brandt, BSN | Zeltiq Aesthetics | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laser & Skin Surgery Center of Northern California | Sacramento | California | 95816 | United States | ||
| Zel Skin & Laser Specialists |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | CoolSculpting Treatment | Subjects treated with Coolsculpting for subcutaneous fat reduction in the submental area |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Subjects treated with CoolSculpting for subcutaneous fat reduction in the submental area
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | CoolSculpting Treatment | Subjects treated with CoolSculpting for fat reduction in the submittal area |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Safety of CoolScupting in the Submental Area | Safety of the Zeltiq CoolSculpting device will be assessed by measuring the incidence of device- and/or procedure-related adverse events. Adverse event reports are collected from the time of enrollment through the 12 week follow-up visit. | As-treated population of 60 subjects who received CoolSculpting treatment for subcutaneous fat reduction in the submental area. | Posted | Number | incidence of device- and/or procedure AE | Time of enrollment through12 week post-final treatment follow-up |
|
Adverse event data was collected from enrollment through the 12-week final follow-up visit.
Anticipated deaths = 0 participants Unanticipated deaths = 0 participants
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | CoolSculpting Treatment | Subjects treated with Coolsculpting for subcutaneous fat reduction in the submental area |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Food poisoning | Gastrointestinal disorders | Non-systematic Assessment | Food poisoning reported as moderate in severity. No relationship to CoolSculpting System or procedure. |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pinched nerve | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kerrie Jiang, Executive Director, Regulatory, Clinical and Medical Affairs | Zeltiq Aesthetics, Inc. an Allergan Affiliate | (925) 621-7462 | Kerrie.Jiang@allergan.com |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Subject Satisfaction With CoolScupting in the Submental Area | Subject satisfaction as assessed by questionnaires administered at 12 weeks post-final treatment. The questionnaire will ask the subject about their treatment experience and the efficacy of the treatment. | 12 weeks post-final treatment |
| Edina |
| Minnesota |
| 55424 |
| United States |
| EpiCentre Skin and Laser Center | Plano | Texas | 75024 | United States |
| Participants |
|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Full Range | years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| Units |
|---|
| Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
| Primary | Percentage of Correct Identification of Pre-treatment Photographs | Change in the treated vs. untreated areas will be assessed by observation of changes in surface contour and/or fat volume by an independent photo review of pre-treatment and post-treatment images of the treated areas. Reviewers will be practicing dermatologists or plastic surgeons. All reviewers will be blinded to post-treatment vs. baseline untreated area. The order in which images will be presented will be randomized; for each subject placement of the baseline, pre-treatment image will be randomized for each pair of subject images. Reviewers will be asked to select the baseline photos for each subject photo series and record selections on a data collection form. Criteria for evaluable photos for the purposes of the independent review: subject completed treatment regimen; subject has complete set of baseline photos; subject has a complete set of post-treatment photos; photos were taken using Zeltiq standard procedure. | Subjects included in the analysis group (58) received full treatment; treatment was interrupted for 2 subjects not included in this population. | Posted | Number | percentage of correcty identified photos | 12 week post-final-treatment | photo pairs | photo pairs |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in the Fat Layer of the Treated Area as Measured by Ultrasound | Change in the fat layer thickness will be calculated by comparison of pre-treatment and 16 week post-treatment ultrasound measurements taken in the area treated with the device. The Sponsor's standardized techniques for obtaining ultrasound imaging will be used. Results indicate the fat layer reduction in cm. | Evaluable ultrasound images were available for 57 of the 59 subjects completing the 12 week follow-up visit. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | cm fat layer reduction post-procedure | 12 weeks post-final treatment |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Subject Satisfaction With CoolScupting in the Submental Area | Subject satisfaction as assessed by questionnaires administered at 12 weeks post-final treatment. The questionnaire will ask the subject about their treatment experience and the efficacy of the treatment. | As-treated population of subjects who received CoolSculpting for subcutaneous fat reduction of the submental area who completed a Subject Satisfaction Questionnaire at the 12-week final follow-up visit. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 12 weeks post-final treatment |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 60 |
| 2 |
| 60 |
| 15 |
| 60 |
|
| Skin Cancer | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | Non-systematic Assessment | Skin cancer on back, reported as severe. Not related to CoolSculpting System or procedure. |
|
| Upper respiratory infection | Infections and infestations | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Influenza | Infections and infestations | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Broken finger | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Pneumonia | Infections and infestations | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Torn meniscus | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Hives | General disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Urinary tract infection | Infections and infestations | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Cold | General disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Prolonged erythema | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Cold sore | General disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Hyper pigmentation | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Breast infection | Infections and infestations | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Back of throat fullness sensation | General disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Food Poisoning | Gastrointestinal disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Skin cancer | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Strongly Agree/Agree Procedure made more youthful |
|
| Strongly Agree/Agree chin looked more toned |
|
| Strongly Agree/Agree appearance has improved |
|
| Effect from procedure More Than Expected/Expected |
|
| Would recommend procedure to a friend |
|
| Feel less self-conscious about chin fat |
|