Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
All patients undergoing emergent endotracheal intubation (RSI) at the Emergency Department will be screened for inclusion in this clinical study. The indication of endotracheal intubation is an exclusively clinical decision and is not affected by this study protocol in any aspect.
If fulfilling the In- and exclusion criteria's, patient will be randomly assigned to one of two groups
Randomization (1:1) will be based on computer-generated codes maintained in sequentially numbered opaque envelopes that will be opened immediately before randomization.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| conventional endotracheal intubation | Active Comparator | Patients assigned to this group will be intubated using conventional Macintosh blade in adequate size. |
|
| C-MAC | Active Comparator | Patients assigned to this group will be intubated using C-MAC videolaryngoscope in adequate size. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Macintosh blade | Device | conventional endotracheal intubation |
| |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Success Rate | defined as successful placement of endotracheal tube within the trachea and | 10 minutes |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| time to intubation | defined as time between insertion of the videolaryngoscope/ Macintosh blade into the mouth until detection of end-tidal CO2 | 10 minutes |
| Laryngoscopic view | Cormack and Lehane Score |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University Hospital Zuerich, Dept of Anesthesiology | Zurich | Canton of Zurich | 8091 | Switzerland |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 25903358 | Background | Sulser S, Ubmann D, Brueesch M, Goliasch G, Seifert B, Spahn DR, Ruetzler K. The C-MAC videolaryngoscope compared with conventional laryngoscopy for rapid sequence intubation at the emergency department: study protocol. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2015 Apr 24;23:38. doi: 10.1186/s13049-015-0119-x. | |
| 27533711 | Derived |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D004630 | Emergencies |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D020969 | Disease Attributes |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| C-MAC videolaryngoscope |
| Device |
|
| 10 minutes |
| Number of intubation attempts | 10 minutes |
| Unrecognized esophageal intubation | 10 minutes |
| Ease of intubation (1-5) | o (1) very easy, (2) easy, (3) somewhat difficult, (4) difficult, (5) impossible | 10 minutes |
| Violations of the teeth | number of patients; teeth will be inspected for potential damage and documented accordingly | 10 minutes |
| Necessity of using further, alternative airway devices for successful intubation (if randomized airway device failed) | number of patients, requiring alternate device | 10 minutes |
| Maximum drop of saturation | Spo2 will be measured continuously and documented accordingly | 10 minutes |
| Sulser S, Ubmann D, Schlaepfer M, Brueesch M, Goliasch G, Seifert B, Spahn DR, Ruetzler K. C-MAC videolaryngoscope compared with direct laryngoscopy for rapid sequence intubation in an emergency department: A randomised clinical trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2016 Dec;33(12):943-948. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000525. |