Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
DESIGN: Single-centre, feasibility study AIMS: The aim of this study is to evaluate the acceptability and pre-operative impact on functional capacity of a trimodal prehabilitation program in a cohort of patients undergoing aneurysm repair.
This will enable the design (feasibility and power) of a large scale Randomised Controlled Trial.
Expected outcomes
POPULATION: Patients undergoing planned elective aortic surgery procedures
ELIGIBILITY: Adult patients (over 18 years) undergoing elective open and endovascular aneurysm repair with capacity to consent and physical fitness to undergo an pre-operative exercise programme DURATION: 1 year from 1st June 2014
Proposed intervention - The introduction of a biopsychosocial intervention before surgery. The physical exercise programme will be a prescribed exercise training twice per week which will be supported by a physical therapist and vascular nurse specialist. A trained clinical psychologist will also deliver a brief psychological intervention based on cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) techniques in two sessions to modify illness, surgical preparation and rehabilitation beliefs. Lastly patients will be counselled and referred to smoking cessation services as appropriate by the vascular nurse specialist.
Baseline information will include patient demographics and medical history, quality of life assessment using SF-36 forms, hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS) and exercise testing by a standardised 6-minute walk test Information immediately pre-operatively will be collected to include a repeat assessment of physical function with a 6-minute walk test, SF-36 assessment and HADS scores. Smoking cessation rate will be collected.
A pre and post-intervention group will be studied over a 1-year period. We will report on the eligibility, acceptability and pre-operative effect of this trimodal rehabilitation programme.
AIM AND EXPECTED IMPACT
This is a non-randomised pre-post intervention pilot study to understand the acceptability and pre-operative effects of a combined physical, psychological and social prehabilitation package in patients undergoing aneurysm repair. This will enable the design (feasibility and power) of a large scale Randomised Controlled Trial.
Our hypotheses include:
PARTICIPANT ENTRY: PATIENTS
PRE-REGISTRATION EVALUATIONS The research team will identify eligible patients for recruitment into the study via clinic lists, multidisciplinary meetings and referral letters before the patient attends their clinic appointment. Only adult patients undergoing aortic surgery will be selected. Patient information leaflets will be given to selected patients and patients will be given the opportunity to read them and ask questions before deciding whether or not to participate.
INCLUSION CRITERIA
EXCLUSION CRITERIA
WITHDRAWRAL CRITERIA The patient will be made aware that they may withdraw from the study at any time without providing a reason; their care and treatment will not be affected
STUDY DESIGN The acceptability of this programme will be studied and the pre-operative impact on functional capacity will be assessed in a comparator (pre-intervention) and post-intervention group.
Patients
Patients from Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust Vascular Unit undergoing aortic aneurysm repair will be recruited.
Study Protocol
Our current vascular pre-operative assessment service is an established nurse led service, run by a dedicated aortic clinical nurse specialist. The prehabilitation would run in conjunction with the current pre-operative screening measures currently in place - which include dobutamine stress echocardiography, renal assessment and pulmonary function tests.
-Phase 1 - Comparator (pre-intervention) evaluation
Patients undergoing present standard of care - i.e. standard work-up for aneurysm repair without nurse-led prehabilitation strategy, who meet inclusion and exclusion criteria will be given a patient information leaflet, informed they are in the pre-intervention group and consented for inclusion in the study as detailed above.
At the baseline appointment, on the same day as work-up tests, information will be collected on standardised data collection sheets to include:
Information immediately pre-operatively will be collected the day before operation (our standard admission is the day before) to include a repeat assessment of physical function with a 6-minute walk test, Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEFR), SF-36 assessment and HADS scores. Smoking cessation rate over the pre-operative period will be collected. The aneurysm repair will proceed as standard of care, and will be unchanged from standard practice.
-Phase 2 - Intervention
Proposed intervention - The introduction of a biopsychosocial intervention before surgery. The physical exercise programme will be prescribed exercise training twice per week which will be supported by our vascular nurse specialist, previously shown to have a small effect on length of stay in cardiac patients [12].
A trained specialist (a registered psychologist) will also deliver a brief psychological intervention based on cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) techniques in two sessions to modify illness, surgical preparation and rehabilitation beliefs. This psychological intervention has been shown to be effective in encouraging claudicants to initiate and continue exercise training [13].
Lastly patients will be counselled and referred to smoking cessation services as appropriate.
Phase 2 protocol - During an initial set-up phase comprehensive information booklets will be developed to instruct the patient on these three modes of prehabilitation.
Patients who are eligible for the study will be approached in the same way as patients studied in the comparator group. At the baseline study visit, the same baseline information will be collected as for the comparator group i.e.:
At the baseline appointment, on the same day as work-up tests, information will be collected on standardised data collection sheets to include:
In addition patients will receive:
Patients will receive a telephone follow-up with the nurse specialist at week 2 and week 4 to evaluate progress and to encourage compliance with the programme. Between weeks 5-6 the patient will have a further session with the clinical psychologist, just prior to admission for treatment, to prepare them for their impending hospitalisation.
Again, information immediately pre-operatively will be collected to include a repeat assessment of physical function with a 6-minute walk test, Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEFR), SF-36 assessment and HADS score. In addition, patients will be asked to fill out a questionnaire assessing compliance with and acceptability of the prehabilitation programme. Smoking cessation rate will be collected.
Data Collection
The following demographic data will be recorded on standardised data collection forms for each patient, collected from patient records and the patient interviews:
Functional capacity may be usually expressed in metabolic equivalents (METs), where one MET is defined as the oxygen consumption of a 70-kg man at rest. Greater than 7 METs of activity tolerance is considered excellent, whereas less than 4 METs is considered poor activity tolerance.
The Duke Activity Status Index suggests questions that correlate with MET levels; for example, walking on level ground at about 4 miles per hour or carrying a bag of groceries up a flight of stairs expends approximately 4 METs of activity. This system is used by the Cleveland clinic for pre-operative cardiac evaluation. It allows a pre-operative assessment of physical function to assess predicted ability to cope at home after surgery. A brief, self-completed questionnaire (Appendix 1) can provide a standardized assessment of functional status that correlates well with an objective measure of maximal exercise capacity [14].
Post-operative data will be collected for patients in order to plan for a further study based on reducing length of stay.
At base line visit and prior to operation each patient will be assessed using:
An event log will be recorded for each patient throughout the study period.
Patients undergoing intervention will be asked to complete a short questionnaire on compliance and acceptability of the prehabilitation programme.
ANALYSIS Completed data collection sheets will be analysed for omissions and missing data completed before being logged onto a central database and analysed by the research team at Imperial College, London, St. Mary's Campus.
The two groups will be compared using simple statistical methods. We intend to analyse and report on the following
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-intervention | No Intervention | Patients treated as standard before intervention | |
| Post-intervention arm = Prehabilitation | Active Comparator | Introduction of rehabilitation program |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Post-intervention arm = Prehabilitation | Behavioral | Introduction of a physical exercise training programme, psychological counselling and smoking cessation advice |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| The Number of Patients Who Accepted Inclusion Into a Pre-operative Prehabilitation Programme | This describes the number of people within the study who were in the pre-habilitation study arm that accepted and completed the pre-habilitation training | Collected at screening |
| Change From Baseline in Metabolic Equivalents (METS) at Six Weeks | • Metabolic equivalent level is a measure of physical fitness. One MET is defined as 3.5 mL 02 uptake/kg per minute which is the resting oxygen uptake in a sitting position. The achieved exercise capacity in METs has been shown to be predictive in older adult population of survival with higher MET levels associated with improved survival," or similar definition that is accurate and appropriate. | Collected at baseline and (expected) 6 weeks |
| Decrease in Anxiety and Depression Scores (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) | HADS is a validated questionnaire consisting of 7 statements relating to anxiety and 7 statements relating to depression. Each statement is scored between 0 and 3 giving a total score of up to 21 for each section. A score of 0-7 is assumed to be normal and score greater than this suggestive of a mood disorder | Collected at baseline and (expected) 6 weeks |
| Number of Participants With Attendance at the Physical and Psychological and Social Training Appointments of the Rehabilitation Programme (Assessed by Bespoke Questionnaire) | Collected at baseline and during the study |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| HDU/ITU Resource Use (Number of Days Stay) | Observation to power a larger intervention study | Collected at (expected) 6 weeks +hospital stay |
| LOS | Length of hospital stay after aortic surgery (number of days) - Observation to power a larger intervention study |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
- patients undergoing elective repair, willing/able to undertake a period of prehabilitation, and those able to comprehend and retain instructions regarding self-training.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Symptomatic patients or those undergoing urgent treatment (< 2 weeks)
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17013852 | Background | Rooks DS, Huang J, Bierbaum BE, Bolus SA, Rubano J, Connolly CE, Alpert S, Iversen MD, Katz JN. Effect of preoperative exercise on measures of functional status in men and women undergoing total hip and knee arthroplasty. Arthritis Rheum. 2006 Oct 15;55(5):700-8. doi: 10.1002/art.22223. | |
| 21878237 | Background |
Not provided
Not provided
This trial did not complete as expected and therefore there are no meaningful participant data to share.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Pre-intervention | Patients treated as standard before intervention |
| FG001 | Post-intervention | Patients after the institution of a physical, psychological and social training programme Prehabilitation: Introduction of a physical exercise training programme, psychological counselling and smoking cessation advice |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Baseline Pre | Baseline Characteristics of the Pre-intervention Standard of Care |
| BG001 | Baseline Post | Baseline Characteristics of the Post-intervention Prehabilitation |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | The Number of Patients Who Accepted Inclusion Into a Pre-operative Prehabilitation Programme | This describes the number of people within the study who were in the pre-habilitation study arm that accepted and completed the pre-habilitation training | Posted | Number | participants | Collected at screening |
|
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Post-intervention | Patients after the institution of a physical, psychological and social training programme Prehabilitation: Introduction of a physical exercise training programme, psychological counselling and smoking cessation advice |
Not provided
Not provided
There was a significant failure in patients undergoing METS and HADS assessment prior to surgery and therefore the results of this pilot study are limited to a lot study of whether patients accepted this intensive rehabilitation study.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colin Bicknell | Imperial Colege London | 02033126072 | alison.deslandes@imperial.nhs.uk |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001014 | Aortic Aneurysm |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000783 | Aneurysm |
| D014652 | Vascular Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
| D001018 | Aortic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Open label
Not provided
| Collected at (expected) 6 weeks +hospital stay |
| Mayo NE, Feldman L, Scott S, Zavorsky G, Kim DJ, Charlebois P, Stein B, Carli F. Impact of preoperative change in physical function on postoperative recovery: argument supporting prehabilitation for colorectal surgery. Surgery. 2011 Sep;150(3):505-14. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2011.07.045. |
| 19212103 | Background | Kim DJ, Mayo NE, Carli F, Montgomery DL, Zavorsky GS. Responsive measures to prehabilitation in patients undergoing bowel resection surgery. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2009 Feb;217(2):109-15. doi: 10.1620/tjem.217.109. |
| 23052535 | Background | Li C, Carli F, Lee L, Charlebois P, Stein B, Liberman AS, Kaneva P, Augustin B, Wongyingsinn M, Gamsa A, Kim DJ, Vassiliou MC, Feldman LS. Impact of a trimodal prehabilitation program on functional recovery after colorectal cancer surgery: a pilot study. Surg Endosc. 2013 Apr;27(4):1072-82. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2560-5. Epub 2012 Oct 9. |
| 20602503 | Background | Carli F, Charlebois P, Stein B, Feldman L, Zavorsky G, Kim DJ, Scott S, Mayo NE. Randomized clinical trial of prehabilitation in colorectal surgery. Br J Surg. 2010 Aug;97(8):1187-97. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7102. |
| 17644041 | Background | Dunckley M, Ellard D, Quinn T, Barlow J. Coronary artery bypass grafting: patients' and health professionals' views of recovery after hospital discharge. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2008 Mar;7(1):36-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcnurse.2007.06.001. Epub 2007 Jul 23. |
| 9830373 | Background | Kiecolt-Glaser JK, Page GG, Marucha PT, MacCallum RC, Glaser R. Psychological influences on surgical recovery. Perspectives from psychoneuroimmunology. Am Psychol. 1998 Nov;53(11):1209-18. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.53.11.1209. |
| 1299818 | Background | Devine EC. Effects of psychoeducational care for adult surgical patients: a meta-analysis of 191 studies. Patient Educ Couns. 1992 Apr;19(2):129-42. doi: 10.1016/0738-3991(92)90193-m. |
| 7055315 | Background | Mumford E, Schlesinger HJ, Glass GV. The effect of psychological intervention on recovery from surgery and heart attacks: an analysis of the literature. Am J Public Health. 1982 Feb;72(2):141-51. doi: 10.2105/ajph.72.2.141. |
| 18703241 | Background | Furze G, Dumville JC, Miles JN, Irvine K, Thompson DR, Lewin RJ. "Prehabilitation" prior to CABG surgery improves physical functioning and depression. Int J Cardiol. 2009 Feb 6;132(1):51-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2008.06.001. Epub 2008 Aug 15. |
| 17850308 | Background | Owen D, Bicknell C, Hilton C, Lind J, Jalloh I, Owen M, Harrison R. Preoperative smoking cessation: a questionnaire study. Int J Clin Pract. 2007 Dec;61(12):2002-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2007.01565..x. Epub 2007 Sep 10. |
| 10929164 | Background | Arthur HM, Daniels C, McKelvie R, Hirsh J, Rush B. Effect of a preoperative intervention on preoperative and postoperative outcomes in low-risk patients awaiting elective coronary artery bypass graft surgery. A randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 2000 Aug 15;133(4):253-62. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-133-4-200008150-00007. |
| 22038532 | Background | Cunningham MA, Swanson V, O'Carroll RE, Holdsworth RJ. Randomized clinical trial of a brief psychological intervention to increase walking in patients with intermittent claudication. Br J Surg. 2012 Jan;99(1):49-56. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7714. Epub 2011 Oct 28. |
| 2782256 | Background | Hlatky MA, Boineau RE, Higginbotham MB, Lee KL, Mark DB, Califf RM, Cobb FR, Pryor DB. A brief self-administered questionnaire to determine functional capacity (the Duke Activity Status Index). Am J Cardiol. 1989 Sep 15;64(10):651-4. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(89)90496-7. |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Participants |
|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Full Range | years |
|
| Sex/Gender, Customized | Number | participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Imperial Vascular Unit | Number | participants |
|
|
|
| Primary | Change From Baseline in Metabolic Equivalents (METS) at Six Weeks | • Metabolic equivalent level is a measure of physical fitness. One MET is defined as 3.5 mL 02 uptake/kg per minute which is the resting oxygen uptake in a sitting position. The achieved exercise capacity in METs has been shown to be predictive in older adult population of survival with higher MET levels associated with improved survival," or similar definition that is accurate and appropriate. | There were no patients in the pre-intervention group who underwent pre-operative METS testing | Posted | Mean | Full Range | METS | Collected at baseline and (expected) 6 weeks |
|
|
|
| Primary | Decrease in Anxiety and Depression Scores (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) | HADS is a validated questionnaire consisting of 7 statements relating to anxiety and 7 statements relating to depression. Each statement is scored between 0 and 3 giving a total score of up to 21 for each section. A score of 0-7 is assumed to be normal and score greater than this suggestive of a mood disorder | There were no patients in the pre-intervention group who underwent pre-operative HADS testing | Posted | Mean | Full Range | HADS scores | Collected at baseline and (expected) 6 weeks |
|
|
|
| Primary | Number of Participants With Attendance at the Physical and Psychological and Social Training Appointments of the Rehabilitation Programme (Assessed by Bespoke Questionnaire) | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Collected at baseline and during the study |
|
|
|
| Secondary | HDU/ITU Resource Use (Number of Days Stay) | Observation to power a larger intervention study | The number of participants where post operative HDU/ITU stay information was available was significantly reduced as this information was not collected by the study reporting team. | Posted | Mean | Full Range | Days | Collected at (expected) 6 weeks +hospital stay |
|
|
|
| Secondary | LOS | Length of hospital stay after aortic surgery (number of days) - Observation to power a larger intervention study | The number of participants where length of hospital stay information was available was significantly reduced as this information was not collected by the study reporting team. | Posted | Mean | Full Range | days | Collected at (expected) 6 weeks +hospital stay |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 12 |
| 0 |
| 12 |
| EG001 | Pre-intervention | Before the institution of a physical, psychological and social training programme | 0 | 13 | 0 | 13 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided