Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
BIOTRONIK received FDA approval to transition the ongoing Sentus QP Study to a new EP PASSION real-world data methodology.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Biotronik, Inc. | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The QP ExCELs study is designed to confirm safety and efficacy of the BIOTRONIK Sentus OTW QP left ventricular leads to satisfy FDA requirements for regulatory approval of the leads in the US. The Sentus OTW QP leads received FDA approval on May 4, 2017.
Long-term safety of the BIOTRONIK Sentus OTW QP left ventricular leads will be confirmed during the ongoing post approval phase (US sites only).
A protocol update was implemented on September 6, 2019 to transition the long-term follow up for the ongoing Sentus QP Study to a new EP PASSION real-world data methodology.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sentus QP left ventricular lead | Other | Subjects consented and implanted with a Sentus QP left ventricular lead. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sentus QP left ventricular lead | Device | Implantation of quadripolar left ventricular lead in patients with CRT-D indication |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Sentus QP Related Complication-free Rate Through 6 Months | The purpose of primary endpoint 1 is to evaluate the Sentus QP related complication-free rate through 6 months post-implant. This is evaluated as a percentage of participants without a complication. | 6 months |
| Percentage of Participants With Acceptable Pacing Threshold of Sentus QP Lead in Permanently Programmed Vector at 3 Months | The purpose of primary endpoint 2 is to evaluate the LV lead pacing threshold for the permanently programmed pacing vector at 3 months post-implant.This was evaluated by performing an exact, binomial test comparing the percentage of participants with acceptable pacing thresholds to a performance goal of 88%. LV threshold values of less than or equal to 2.5 V at 0.4 ms in the permanently programmed vector are considered acceptable. | 3 months |
| Sentus QP Related Complication-free Rate | The purpose of primary endpoint 3 is to evaluate the Sentus QP related complication-free rate through study termination (post approval phase). This is evaluated as a percentage of participants without a complication. | Up to 4 years |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Sentus QP Acceptable Pacing Threshold in Permanently Programmed Vector at 3 Months Per Lead Model | The purpose of the secondary endpoint is to evaluate the LV lead pacing threshold for the permanently programmed pacing vector at 3 months post-implantation in the two different lead types, Sentus OTW QP L and Sentus OTW QP S. This was evaluated as the number of participants with an acceptable pacing threshold out of the total number of patients for each lead model. LV threshold values of less than or equal to 2.5 V at 0.4 ms in the permanently programmed vector is considered acceptable. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Antonio Curnis, Prof. | Spedali Civili - Universita di Brescia, Italy | Study Chair |
| Mattias Roser, Dr. | Charité CBF Berlin, Germany | Study Chair |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fairhope | Alabama | United States | ||||
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Sentus QP Left Ventricular Lead | Participants consented and implanted with a Sentus QP left ventricular lead and CRT-D, plus participants that were consented but did not receive a Sentus QP lead or CRT-D. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Feb 1, 2017 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| 3 months |
| Sentus QP Acceptable Pacing Threshold in Novel Vectors at 3 Months | The purpose of this secondary endpoint is to evaluate the number of participants with at least one acceptable LV lead pacing threshold in a novel pacing vector at 3 months post-implantation. This was evaluated as the number of participants with at least one acceptable LV pacing threshold in a novel pacing vector out of the total number of participants with completed novel pacing threshold testing. LV threshold values of less than or equal to 2.5 V at 0.4 ms in a novel pacing vector is considered acceptable. | 3 months |
| Sentus QP Acceptable R-wave Sensed Amplitude at 3 Months Per Lead Model | The purpose of this secondary endpoint is to evaluate acceptable LV lead sensing amplitude at 3 months post-implantation. This was evaluated as the number of participants with an acceptable LV sensing amplitude out of the total number of participants. R-wave sensed mean amplitude of greater than or equal to 2 mV is considered acceptable. | 3 months |
| Sentus QP Acceptable Pacing Impedance at 3 Months Per Lead Model | The purpose of this secondary endpoint is to evaluate the acceptable LV lead pacing impedance at 3 months post-implantation. This was evaluated as the number of participants with an acceptable LV pacing impedance out of the total participants. LV impedance values of greater than 200 Ohms and less than 2000 Ohms is considered acceptable. | 3 months |
| Sentus QP Time to Complication | The purpose of this secondary is to evaluate the Sentus related complication-free rate through 6 months post-implant by the Kaplan-Meier method. The below table shows Kaplan-Meier estimates of the estimated freedom from Sentus related complications at 180 days. | 6 months |
| Sentus QP Related Complication-free Rate Per Lead Model | The purpose of secondary endpoint 7 is to evaluate the Sentus QP related complication-free rate through study termination (post approval phase). This is evaluated as percentage of participants without a complication per lead model. | Up to 4 years |
| Individual Sentus QP Adverse Event Rates | The purpose of secondary endpoint 8 is to evaluate the rate of individual types of adverse events related to the Sentus QP lead through study termination (post approval phase). This is evaluated as the percentage of participants with a specific adverse event out of the total participants. | Up to 4 years |
| Number of Participants Successfully Reprogrammed to Resolve Phrenic Nerve Stimulation or High Pacing Threshold | The purpose of this secondary endpoint is to evaluate the number of participants in whom phrenic nerve stimulation or high LV pacing threshold was be successfully resolved by reprogramming of the LV pacing vector. This is evaluated as the number of participants with successful reprogramming out of all participants experiencing phrenic nerve stimulation or high LV pacing threshold. LV pacing threshold resulting in invasive intervention, or, in the absence of intervention, a lead threshold that has increased two fold from the chronic threshold value, and is unable to achieve a 2:1 safety margin at follow-up is considered a high LV pacing threshold. | 12 months |
| Anchorage |
| Alaska |
| United States |
| Chula Vista | California | United States |
| Inglewood | California | United States |
| Rancho Mirage | California | United States |
| Aurora | Colorado | United States |
| Washington D.C. | District of Columbia | United States |
| Orlando | Florida | 32803 | United States |
| Orlando | Florida | 32806 | United States |
| Pensacola | Florida | United States |
| Tampa | Florida | 33613 | United States |
| Atlanta | Georgia | United States |
| Chicago | Illinois | United States |
| Joliet | Illinois | United States |
| Fort Wayne | Indiana | United States |
| Iowa City | Iowa | United States |
| Kansas City | Kansas | United States |
| Lexington | Kentucky | 40503 | United States |
| Lexington | Kentucky | 40536 | United States |
| New Orleans | Louisiana | United States |
| Bangor | Maine | United States |
| Boston | Massachusetts | United States |
| Burlington | Massachusetts | United States |
| Fall River | Massachusetts | United States |
| Worcester | Massachusetts | United States |
| Ann Arbor | Michigan | United States |
| Detroit | Michigan | United States |
| Ypsilanti | Michigan | United States |
| Tupelo | Mississippi | United States |
| Kansas City | Missouri | United States |
| Saint Charles | Missouri | United States |
| Springfield | Missouri | United States |
| St Louis | Missouri | 63110 | United States |
| St Louis | Missouri | 63136 | United States |
| Kalispell | Montana | United States |
| Browns Mills | New Jersey | United States |
| Englewood | New Jersey | United States |
| Hackensack | New Jersey | United States |
| Neptune City | New Jersey | United States |
| Brooklyn | New York | United States |
| Flushing | New York | United States |
| New York | New York | 10016 | United States |
| New York | New York | 10021 | United States |
| New York | New York | 10025 | United States |
| New York | New York | 10029 | United States |
| The Bronx | New York | United States |
| Valhalla | New York | United States |
| Asheville | North Carolina | United States |
| Chapel Hill | North Carolina | United States |
| Greensboro | North Carolina | United States |
| Greenville | North Carolina | United States |
| Winston-Salem | North Carolina | 27103 | United States |
| Winston-Salem | North Carolina | 27157 | United States |
| Fargo | North Dakota | United States |
| Cincinnati | Ohio | 45219 | United States |
| Columbus | Ohio | 43210 | United States |
| Columbus | Ohio | 43214 | United States |
| Toledo | Ohio | 43615 | United States |
| Bryn Mawr | Pennsylvania | United States |
| Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | United States |
| Wynnewood | Pennsylvania | United States |
| Warwick | Rhode Island | United States |
| Anderson | South Carolina | United States |
| Columbia | South Carolina | United States |
| Greenville | South Carolina | United States |
| Chattanooga | Tennessee | United States |
| Amarillo | Texas | United States |
| Fort Worth | Texas | United States |
| San Antonio | Texas | United States |
| The Woodlands | Texas | United States |
| Salt Lake City | Utah | United States |
| Burlington | Vermont | United States |
| Norfolk | Virginia | United States |
| Milwaukee | Wisconsin | United States |
| Cheyenne | Wyoming | United States |
| Flinders Medical Center | Bedford Park | Australia |
| Lyell McEwing Hospital | Elizabeth Vale | Australia |
| The Northern Hospital | Epping | Australia |
| Royal Hobart Hospital | Hobart | Australia |
| Nambour General Hospital | Nambour | Australia |
| AKH Linz | Linz | Austria |
| AKH Wien | Vienna | Austria |
| Klinikum Wels-Grieskirchen GmbH | Wels | Austria |
| Gentofte Hospital | Hellerup | Denmark |
| Odense Universitets Hospital | Odense | Denmark |
| DHZ Berlin | Berlin | Germany |
| Maria Heimsuchung Caritas Klinik Pankow | Berlin | Germany |
| Virchow Klinikum | Berlin | Germany |
| Immanuel Klinikum Herzzentrum Bernau | Bernau | Germany |
| Städtisches Krankenhaus Bielefeld Mitte | Bielefeld | Germany |
| Augusta-Kranken-Anstalt Bochum | Bochum | Germany |
| Augusta Krankenhaus Düsseldorf | Düsseldorf | Germany |
| Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf | Düsseldorf | Germany |
| Universitätsklinik Erlangen | Erlangen | Germany |
| Elisabeth Krankenhaus Essen | Essen | Germany |
| UHZ Freiburg | Freiburg im Breisgau | Germany |
| SRH Wald-Klinikum Gera gGmbH | Gera | Germany |
| Westpfalzklinikum | Kaiserslautern | Germany |
| Städtisches Klinikum St. Georg | Leipzig | Germany |
| UKSH Campus Lübeck | Lübeck | Germany |
| Marienhospital Lünen | Lünen | Germany |
| Elbekliniken Stade - Buxtehude | Stade | Germany |
| SBK Villingen Schwenningen | Villingen | Germany |
| SHG-Kliniken Völklingen | Völklingen | Germany |
| Universitätsklinikum Würzburg | Würzburg | Germany |
| HBK Zwickau | Zwickau | Germany |
| Semmelweis University | Budapest | Hungary |
| Barzilai Medical Center | Ashkelon | Israel |
| Soroka Medical Center | Beersheba | Israel |
| Rambam Medical Center | Haifa | Israel |
| Hadassah Medical Center | Jerusalem | Israel |
| Spedali Civili di Brescia | Brescia | Italy |
| Azienda Ospedaliero Sant'Anna Como | Como | Italy |
| Nusch | Bratislava | Slovakia |
| Vusch East Slovak Cardiology Institute | Košice | Slovakia |
| Hospital Clinic Provincial de Barcelona | Barcelona | Spain |
| Hospital Ramón y Cajal Madrid | Madrid | Spain |
| Kantonspital Luzern | Lucerne | Switzerland |
| University Hospital Zürich | Zurich | Switzerland |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
All participants consented with baseline data collection completed
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Sentus QP Left Ventricular Lead | Participants consented and implanted with a Sentus QP left ventricular lead and CRT-D. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Data collected and analyzed when available, not all subjects had data available for this measurement | Mean | Standard Deviation | Years |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected | Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant. | Count of Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||||||||
| Height | Data collected and analyzed when available, not all subjects had data available for this measurement | Mean | Standard Deviation | Inches |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Weight | Data collected and analyzed when available, not all subjects had data available for this measurement | Mean | Standard Deviation | Pounds |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Sentus QP Related Complication-free Rate Through 6 Months | The purpose of primary endpoint 1 is to evaluate the Sentus QP related complication-free rate through 6 months post-implant. This is evaluated as a percentage of participants without a complication. | All participants in the Pre-Market cohort, defined as the study participants who were consented and implanted with a Sentus QP LV lead on or before January 29, 2016. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | 6 months |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Percentage of Participants With Acceptable Pacing Threshold of Sentus QP Lead in Permanently Programmed Vector at 3 Months | The purpose of primary endpoint 2 is to evaluate the LV lead pacing threshold for the permanently programmed pacing vector at 3 months post-implant.This was evaluated by performing an exact, binomial test comparing the percentage of participants with acceptable pacing thresholds to a performance goal of 88%. LV threshold values of less than or equal to 2.5 V at 0.4 ms in the permanently programmed vector are considered acceptable. | All participants in the Pre-Market cohort, defined as the study participants who were consented and implanted with a Sentus QP LV lead on or before January 29, 2016, and with completed threshold testing at 3 months post-implant or with available data from remote monitoring or next visits (as pre-specified in the protocol). | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | 3 months |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Sentus QP Related Complication-free Rate | The purpose of primary endpoint 3 is to evaluate the Sentus QP related complication-free rate through study termination (post approval phase). This is evaluated as a percentage of participants without a complication. | All participants in the Post-Market cohort, which included all participants who were enrolled with planned 5 year follow-up and were successfully implanted with a Sentus QP left ventricular lead. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | Up to 4 years |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Sentus QP Acceptable Pacing Threshold in Permanently Programmed Vector at 3 Months Per Lead Model | The purpose of the secondary endpoint is to evaluate the LV lead pacing threshold for the permanently programmed pacing vector at 3 months post-implantation in the two different lead types, Sentus OTW QP L and Sentus OTW QP S. This was evaluated as the number of participants with an acceptable pacing threshold out of the total number of patients for each lead model. LV threshold values of less than or equal to 2.5 V at 0.4 ms in the permanently programmed vector is considered acceptable. | All participants in the Pre-Market cohort, defined as the study participants who were consented and implanted with a Sentus QP LV lead on or before January 29, 2016, and with completed threshold testing at 3 months post-implant. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 3 months |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Sentus QP Acceptable Pacing Threshold in Novel Vectors at 3 Months | The purpose of this secondary endpoint is to evaluate the number of participants with at least one acceptable LV lead pacing threshold in a novel pacing vector at 3 months post-implantation. This was evaluated as the number of participants with at least one acceptable LV pacing threshold in a novel pacing vector out of the total number of participants with completed novel pacing threshold testing. LV threshold values of less than or equal to 2.5 V at 0.4 ms in a novel pacing vector is considered acceptable. | All participants in the Pre-Market cohort, defined as the study participants who were consented and implanted with a Sentus QP LV lead on or before January 29, 2016, and with completed novel vector threshold testing at 3 months post-implant. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 3 months |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Sentus QP Acceptable R-wave Sensed Amplitude at 3 Months Per Lead Model | The purpose of this secondary endpoint is to evaluate acceptable LV lead sensing amplitude at 3 months post-implantation. This was evaluated as the number of participants with an acceptable LV sensing amplitude out of the total number of participants. R-wave sensed mean amplitude of greater than or equal to 2 mV is considered acceptable. | All participants in the Pre-Market cohort, defined as the study participants who were consented and implanted with a Sentus QP LV lead on or before January 29, 2016, and with completed sensing test at 3 months post-implant. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 3 months |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Sentus QP Acceptable Pacing Impedance at 3 Months Per Lead Model | The purpose of this secondary endpoint is to evaluate the acceptable LV lead pacing impedance at 3 months post-implantation. This was evaluated as the number of participants with an acceptable LV pacing impedance out of the total participants. LV impedance values of greater than 200 Ohms and less than 2000 Ohms is considered acceptable. | All participants in the Pre-Market cohort, defined as the study participants who were consented and implanted with a Sentus QP LV lead on or before January 29, 2016, and with completed impedance testing at 3 months post-implant. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 3 months |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Sentus QP Time to Complication | The purpose of this secondary is to evaluate the Sentus related complication-free rate through 6 months post-implant by the Kaplan-Meier method. The below table shows Kaplan-Meier estimates of the estimated freedom from Sentus related complications at 180 days. | All participants in the Pre-Market cohort, defined as the study participants who were consented and implanted with a Sentus QP LV lead on or before January 29, 2016. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | 6 months |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Sentus QP Related Complication-free Rate Per Lead Model | The purpose of secondary endpoint 7 is to evaluate the Sentus QP related complication-free rate through study termination (post approval phase). This is evaluated as percentage of participants without a complication per lead model. | All participants in the Post-Market cohort, which included all participants who were enrolled with planned 5 year follow-up and were successfully implanted with a Sentus QP left ventricular lead. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | Up to 4 years |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Individual Sentus QP Adverse Event Rates | The purpose of secondary endpoint 8 is to evaluate the rate of individual types of adverse events related to the Sentus QP lead through study termination (post approval phase). This is evaluated as the percentage of participants with a specific adverse event out of the total participants. | All participants in the Post-Market cohort, which included all participants who were enrolled with planned 5 year follow-up and were successfully implanted with a Sentus QP left ventricular lead. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | Up to 4 years |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants Successfully Reprogrammed to Resolve Phrenic Nerve Stimulation or High Pacing Threshold | The purpose of this secondary endpoint is to evaluate the number of participants in whom phrenic nerve stimulation or high LV pacing threshold was be successfully resolved by reprogramming of the LV pacing vector. This is evaluated as the number of participants with successful reprogramming out of all participants experiencing phrenic nerve stimulation or high LV pacing threshold. LV pacing threshold resulting in invasive intervention, or, in the absence of intervention, a lead threshold that has increased two fold from the chronic threshold value, and is unable to achieve a 2:1 safety margin at follow-up is considered a high LV pacing threshold. | All participants in the Pre-Market cohort, defined as the study participants who were consented and implanted with a Sentus QP LV lead on or before January 29, 2016, and whom experienced phrenic nerve stimulation or high LV pacing threshold. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 12 months |
|
|
Though study exit or study termination, an average of 1.2 years, and up to 4 years
According to the study protocol, sites were required to report all deaths and all adverse events that were considered related to the implant procedure, implanted pulse generator, or implanted leads. Adverse events determined to be not related to the implant procedure, implanted pulse generator, or implanted leads were not collected.
Reported adverse events were defined as a serious or 'other' adverse event according to the clinicaltrials.gov definition.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Sentus QP Left Ventricular Lead | Participants consented and implanted with a Sentus QP left ventricular lead and CRT-D. | 217 | 2,226 | 290 | 2,226 | 711 | 2,226 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cardiac perforation associated with the RA lead | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Cardiac perforation associated with the RV lead | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Cardiac perforation associated with the LV lead | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Inability to place LV lead | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| RA lead related lead dislodgement | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| RV lead related lead dislodgement | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| RV lead related elevated pacing threshold | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| RV lead impedance out of range, high impedance | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| RV lead related clinical failure | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| RV lead related mechanical failure | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| RV lead undersensing or loss of sensing | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Endocarditis associated with the RV lead | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| LV lead related lead dislodgement | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| LV lead related extracardiac stimulation | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| LV lead related mechanical failure | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| LV lead related high pacing threshold | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| LV lead related elevated pacing threshold | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| LV lead related clinical failure | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| LV lead related loss of capture | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| ICD device migration | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| ICD device related inappropriate shock or ATP | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| ICD device related electronic failure | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Twiddler's syndrome | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Implant procedure related infection | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Secondary infection | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Pocket infection | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Cardiac perforation | Surgical and medical procedures | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Arrhythmia associated with implant procedure | Surgical and medical procedures | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Hematoma | Surgical and medical procedures | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Loose set-screw | Surgical and medical procedures | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Pneumothorax | Surgical and medical procedures | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Pericarditis | Surgical and medical procedures | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Pleural effusion | Surgical and medical procedures | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Pericardial effusion | Surgical and medical procedures | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Respiratory arrest | Surgical and medical procedures | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Stroke | Surgical and medical procedures | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Cardiogenic shock | Surgical and medical procedures | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Respiratory distress | Surgical and medical procedures | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Renal failure | Surgical and medical procedures | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Wound healing disturbance | Surgical and medical procedures | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Venous occlusion | Surgical and medical procedures | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Discomfort/pain | Surgical and medical procedures | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Post surgical bleeding | Surgical and medical procedures | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Post procedure anemia | Surgical and medical procedures | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Allergy to contrast agent | Surgical and medical procedures | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Elevated WBD and labs post procedure | Surgical and medical procedures | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Inflammation and swelling at surgical site | Surgical and medical procedures | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| RA lead elevated pacing threshold | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| LV lead electrical lead failure | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| LV lead impedance out of range, high | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inability to place LV lead | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| RA lead related lead dislodgement | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| RA lead related undersensing | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| RV lead related clinical failure | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| RV lead related extracardiac stimulation | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| RV lead related high pacing threshold | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| RV lead related oversensing | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| LV lead related extracardiac stimulation | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| LV lead related elevated pacing threshold | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| LV lead related lead dislodgement | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| LV lead related loss of capture | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| LV lead impedance out of range, high impedance | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| LV lead related high pacing threshold | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| LV lead related clinical failure | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| LV lead related oversensing | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| LV lead related mechanical failure | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| LV lead related electrical failure | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| LV lead related loss of sensing | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| ICD device migration | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| ICD device related inappropriate shock or ATP | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| ICD device related housing defect | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| ICD device related high defibrillator (DFT) testing | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| ICD device related pacemaker mediated tachycardia (PMT) | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Twiddler's syndrome | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Rachet syndrome | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Implant procedure related infection | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Arrhythmia associated with implant procedure | Surgical and medical procedures | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Hematoma | Surgical and medical procedures | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Coronary sinus dissection | Surgical and medical procedures | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Loose set-screw | Surgical and medical procedures | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Pneumothorax | Surgical and medical procedures | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Pericardial effusion | Surgical and medical procedures | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Pleural effusion | Surgical and medical procedures | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Bleeding at surgical site | Surgical and medical procedures | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Allergy to surgery prep | Surgical and medical procedures | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Unsuccessful defibrillator threshold (DFT) testing | Surgical and medical procedures | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Wound healing disturbance | Surgical and medical procedures | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Venous occlusion | Surgical and medical procedures | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Discomfort/pain at surgical site | Surgical and medical procedures | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| RA lead elevated pacing threshold | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| RA lead related extracardiac stimulation | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| RA lead related thrombosis | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Pain in shoulder after system revision | Surgical and medical procedures | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Hypotension after insertion procedure | Surgical and medical procedures | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Bleeding caused by surgical prep | Surgical and medical procedures | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Fever after insertion procedure | Surgical and medical procedures | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Emesis after insertion procedure | Surgical and medical procedures | Systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Senior Manager, Scientific Affairs | BIOTRONIK, Inc. | 1-800-547-0394 | crystal.miller@biotronik.com |
| Jan 22, 2021 |
| Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006333 | Heart Failure |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006331 | Heart Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
|
|
|
|
| Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|