Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Inadequate rate of enrollment
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This is an international multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial (RCT) of single-agent intralesional PV-10 versus systemic chemotherapy or intralesional oncolytic viral therapy to assess treatment of locally advanced cutaneous melanoma in patients who (1) are not candidates for targeted therapy and (2) are not candidates for an immune checkpoint inhibitor. Subjects in the comparator arm will receive the Investigator's choice of dacarbazine (DTIC), temozolomide (TMZ) or intralesional talimogene laherparepvec as determined by Investigator preference and standard of care in the Investigator's country or region. Effectiveness will be assessed by comparison of progression-free survival (PFS) between all intent-to-treat (ITT) subjects in the two study treatment arms.
Subjects will be randomized using a 2:1 treatment allocation (i.e. two-thirds of the subjects will receive PV-10).
Subjects in the comparator arm who have completed at least 1 cycle of study treatment and who meet the study protocol definition of disease progression but do not have evidence of visceral metastases will be eligible to enter the crossover portion of the study and receive PV-10. Subjects crossing over must meet all study inclusion and exclusion criteria for clinical laboratories, thyroid function, concurrent or intercurrent illness and pregnancy at the time of crossover.
Assessment of progression will be performed by an Independent Review Committee (IRC) based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) ver. 1.1 criteria. Events signaling progression include increase in size and/or number of lesions, distant or nodal disease progression, or death. All secondary endpoints involving disease response and progression will be based on the IRC determination.
An interim assessment of efficacy and safety will be performed by the IRC when 50% of the events required for the primary endpoint have occurred.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| PV-10 | Experimental | Subjects will receive intralesional PV-10 to all Study Lesions on study Day 1. PV-10 should be re-administered at 28-day intervals until complete response, disease progression or study termination occurs. |
|
| Chemotherapy or Oncolytic Viral Therapy | Active Comparator | Subjects will receive (a) dacarbazine (intravenously at 850 m/m2) or temozolomide (orally at 200 mg/m2 daily for 5 consecutive days), administered at consecutive 28-day intervals, or (b) intralesional talimogene laherparepvec administered on an initial 21 interval followed by consecutive 14 day intervals, until complete response, disease progression or study termination occurs. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PV-10 (10% rose bengal disodium) | Drug |
| ||
| Dacarbazine, temozolomide or talimogene laherparepvec |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Progression-free Survival (PFS) | PFS was estimated via Kaplan-Meier analysis using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST v1.1) criteria. Subjects who did not have an event of progression or death were censored at their last assessment date. Assessment of progression was performed by the sponsor based on review of lesion measurement and clinical progression data reported by each investigator. Events signaling progression included increase in size and/or number of study lesions, onset of visceral metastatic disease, and death. For target lesions (assigned prior to randomization), complete response (CR) required disappearance of all target lesions; partial response (PR) required >= 30% decrease in sum of the longest diameter (SLD) of all target lesions; progressive disease (PD) required >=20% increase in SLD of target lesions. Non-target lesions were followed for CR, PD, or non-CR/non-PD status using equivalent thresholds. Progression occurred when PD was observed in either target or non-target lesion. | Assessed every 12 weeks until disease progression, withdrawal of consent, or study termination; progression detected between formal assessments was documented at the time of detection; median follow-up time for PFS was 26.6 weeks, maximum was 125.8 weeks. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Complete Response Rate (CRR) | CRR was assessed using RECIST v1.1 criteria, and required disappearance of all target and non-target lesions. | Assessed every 12 weeks until disease progression, withdrawal of consent, or study termination; median follow-up time for CRR was 26.6 weeks, maximum was 125.8 weeks. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Domain Scores From Baseline Using the Patient Reported Skindex-16 Instrument | In this exploratory endpoint, changes in Skindex-16 self-assessment scores were evaluated vs Day 1 baseline domain scores: symptom domain (items 1-4); emotional domain (items 5-11); and functioning domain (items 12-16). The Skindex-16 instrument solicits response to the extent of bother during the preceding week by 16 items (e.g., itching, hurting, worry, impact on daily activities), using a score from 0 (never bothered) to 6 (always bothered) for each item. Item scores are transformed to 0 to 100 scale, and domain scores are calculated as the average of the item scores comprising the domain. A lower domain score at baseline signifies lower impact of that domain; a decrease in domain score from baseline signifies improvement in that domain. Median baseline score and change from baseline over the study interval is presented for each domain. |
Inclusion Criteria:
Age 18 years or older, male or female
Histologically or cytologically confirmed melanoma
Recurrent, satellite or in-transit locally advanced cutaneous or subcutaneous melanoma metastases (i.e., American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Stage IIIB, IIIC or Stage IV M1a with no active nodal metastases)
At least 1 measurable Target Lesion that can be accurately measured by calipers or computed tomography (CT) consisting of:
No lesion > 50 mm in longest diameter; and no more than 50 lesions
Calculated required PV-10 dose ≤ 15 mL (based on total tumor burden)
Performance Status: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 0-2
Not a candidate for treatment with an immune checkpoint inhibitor (e.g., failed or did not tolerate prior therapy, or due to co-morbidities, pre-existing autoimmune disease, drug unavailability or standard of care)
Not a candidate for targeted therapy with BRAF or combined BRAF/MEK inhibitors (e.g., failed or did not tolerate prior therapy, BRAF V600 wild-type or due to drug unavailability or standard of care)
Clinical Laboratories:
Thyroid function abnormality ≤ Grade 2
Candidate for at least one comparator drug:
Exclusion Criteria:
Presence or history of visceral melanoma metastasis
Presence of active nodal metastases (e.g., radiologic or clinical evidence of current nodal disease)
Presence of more than 50 melanoma lesions
Radiation therapy to any Study Lesion within 6 weeks of initial study treatment.
Chemotherapy or other systemic cancer therapy within 4 weeks of initial study treatment (6 weeks for nitrosoureas or mitomycin), or regional chemotherapy (limb infusion or perfusion) within 12 weeks of initial study treatment
Immunotherapy for cancer within 4 weeks of initial study treatment
Local treatment (e.g., surgery, cryotherapy, laser ablation) to any Study Lesion within 4 weeks of initial study treatment
Anti-tumor vaccine therapy within 6 weeks of initial study treatment.
Investigational agents within 4 weeks of initial study treatment.
Concurrent or Intercurrent Illness:
Pregnancy:
Contraindication for all comparators:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Eric Wachter, Ph.D. | Provectus Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. | Study Director |
| Sanjiv Agarwala, M.D. | St Luke's University Hospital and Health Network | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sharp Memorial Hospital - Clinical Oncology Research | San Diego | California | 92123 | United States | ||
| Mount Sinai Comprehensive Cancer Center |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Enrollment open: Apr 2015; first patient treated: Nov 2015; last patient visit completed: Apr 2019
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | PV-10 (10% Rose Bengal Disodium) | Subjects received intralesional PV-10 to all Study Lesions on study Day 1. PV-10 was re-administered at 28-day intervals until complete response, disease progression or study termination. |
| FG001 | Chemotherapy or Oncolytic Viral Therapy (Dacarbazine, Temozolomide or Talimogene Laherparepvec) |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Mar 27, 2018 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Blinded review by independent review committee (IRC) for primary and key secondary endpoints.
| Drug |
|
| Duration of Complete Response (DCR) |
DCR was estimated via Kaplan-Meier analysis for participants achieving a complete response, and was defined as the interval from first complete response to disease progression or death; responders who did not have an event of progression or death were censored at their last assessment date. Complete response was assessed using RECIST v1.1 criteria, and required disappearance of all target and non-target lesions. |
| Assessed every 12 weeks until disease progression, withdrawal of consent, or study termination; median follow-up time for DCR was 26.7 weeks, maximum was 77.7 weeks. |
| Overall Survival (OS) | OS was documented at 12 week intervals commencing on withdrawal from active study participation. Documentation was made by subject clinic visit or other personal contact, telephonic contact, review of medical records, or other unequivocal evidence of survival status. OS was estimated via Kaplan-Meier analysis, and was defined as the interval from randomization to death; subjects who did not have an event of death were censored at their last assessment date. | Assessed every 12 weeks upon withdrawal from active study participation until death, withdrawal of consent, or study termination; median follow-up time for survival was 82.4 weeks, maximum was 167.0 weeks. |
| Number of Participants With Adverse Events | Safety and tolerability were assessed by monitoring the frequency, duration, severity and attribution of adverse events and evaluating changes in laboratory values and vital signs. | Assessed every 4 weeks until 28 days after last treatment; median duration of treatment was 11.8 and 9.5 weeks in each treatment group, respectively. |
| Assessed at baseline (Day 1 at start of study treatment) and at the end of each treatment cycle (every 4 or 6 weeks) until disease progression, withdrawal of consent, or study termination; median follow-up time was 26.6 weeks, maximum was 125.8 weeks. |
| Miami Beach |
| Florida |
| 33140 |
| United States |
| Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute | Tampa | Florida | 33612 | United States |
| Washington University School of Medicine - Dermatology | St Louis | Missouri | 63110 | United States |
| Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center | Lebanon | New Hampshire | 03756 | United States |
| Atlantic Health System | Morristown | New Jersey | 07960 | United States |
| Wake Forest Baptist Health | Winston-Salem | North Carolina | 27157 | United States |
| Oklahoma Cancer Specialists and Research Institute | Tulsa | Oklahoma | 74146 | United States |
| St Luke's University Hospital and Health Network | Easton | Pennsylvania | 18045 | United States |
| Penn State Hershey Cancer Institute | Hershey | Pennsylvania | 17033 | United States |
| M.D. Anderson Cancer Center | Houston | Texas | 77030 | United States |
| Huntsman Cancer Institute | Salt Lake City | Utah | 84112 | United States |
| Unité Cancéro-Dermatologie, Hôtel-Dieu CHU Nantes | Nantes | France |
| Institut Claudius Regaud, IUCT ONCOPOLE | Toulouse | 31059 | France |
| Klinik für Dermatologie, Venerologie und Allergologie Charite Universitätsmedizin Berlin | Berlin | Germany |
| Klinik für Dermatologie Universitätsklinikum Essen Studienzentrum | Essen | Germany |
| Klinik für Dermatologie, Venerologie und Allergologie Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein Hautkrebszentrum | Kiel | Germany |
| Hautklinik Klinikum der Johannes Gutenberg Universität Hautkrebszentrum | Mainz | Germany |
| IRCCS Instituto Nazionale Tumori "Fondazione Giovanni Pascale" | Naples | Italy |
| Istituto Dermopatico dell'Immacolata (IDI IRCCS) | Rome | Italy |
| Azienda Sanitaria Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese | Siena | Italy |
| Centro de Estudios y Prevención del Cancer A.C. | Juchitán de Zaragoza | Oaxaca | 70000 | Mexico |
| Neurociencias Estudios Clínicos S.C. | Culiacán | Sinaloa | 80020 | Mexico |
Subjects received (a) dacarbazine (intravenously at 850 m/m2) or temozolomide (orally at 200 mg/m2 daily for 5 consecutive days), administered at consecutive 28-day intervals, or (b) intralesional talimogene laherparepvec administered on an initial 21 interval followed by consecutive 14 day intervals, until complete response, disease progression or study termination. |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | PV-10 | Subjects received intralesional PV-10 to all Study Lesions on study Day 1. PV-10 was re-administered at 28-day intervals until complete response, disease progression or study termination. |
| BG001 | Chemotherapy or Oncolytic Viral Therapy | Subjects received (a) dacarbazine (intravenously at 850 m/m2) or temozolomide (orally at 200 mg/m2 daily for 5 consecutive days), administered at consecutive 28-day intervals, or (b) intralesional talimogene laherparepvec administered on an initial 21 interval followed by consecutive 14 day intervals, until complete response, disease progression or study termination. |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Age, Continuous | Median | Full Range | years |
| |||||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Stage at Baseline | Disease burden was assessed at baseline to characterize melanoma disease stage according to the AJCC 2009 staging system, where stage (I-IV) is based on TNM classification: T refers to tumor size, N refers to lymph node involvement, and M represents metastasis (spread) to other parts of the body. The staging number represents a sum of the TNM classification: a lower stage (i.e., I or II) represents better the prognosis for the patient; the higher the stage (i.e., III or IV), the worse the prognosis. Participants were not stratified according to stage. | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Progression-free Survival (PFS) | PFS was estimated via Kaplan-Meier analysis using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST v1.1) criteria. Subjects who did not have an event of progression or death were censored at their last assessment date. Assessment of progression was performed by the sponsor based on review of lesion measurement and clinical progression data reported by each investigator. Events signaling progression included increase in size and/or number of study lesions, onset of visceral metastatic disease, and death. For target lesions (assigned prior to randomization), complete response (CR) required disappearance of all target lesions; partial response (PR) required >= 30% decrease in sum of the longest diameter (SLD) of all target lesions; progressive disease (PD) required >=20% increase in SLD of target lesions. Non-target lesions were followed for CR, PD, or non-CR/non-PD status using equivalent thresholds. Progression occurred when PD was observed in either target or non-target lesion. | Subjects receiving PV-10 upon crossover from comparator are not included in the analysis population. Response data from one study center were censored due to resignation of the principal investigator. Because the study was terminated prior to achievement of pre-specified efficacy thresholds (i.e., out of a planned 225 subjects only 20 initiated study treatment), the small number of subjects enrolled precludes scientifically meaningful interpretation of PFS. | Posted | Median | Full Range | Months | Assessed every 12 weeks until disease progression, withdrawal of consent, or study termination; progression detected between formal assessments was documented at the time of detection; median follow-up time for PFS was 26.6 weeks, maximum was 125.8 weeks. |
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Complete Response Rate (CRR) | CRR was assessed using RECIST v1.1 criteria, and required disappearance of all target and non-target lesions. | Subjects receiving PV-10 upon crossover from comparator are not included in the analysis population. Response data from one study center were censored due to resignation of the principal investigator. Because the study was terminated prior to achievement of pre-specified efficacy thresholds (i.e., out of a planned 225 subjects only 20 initiated study treatment), the small number of subjects enrolled precludes scientifically meaningful interpretation of CRR. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | No | Assessed every 12 weeks until disease progression, withdrawal of consent, or study termination; median follow-up time for CRR was 26.6 weeks, maximum was 125.8 weeks. |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Duration of Complete Response (DCR) | DCR was estimated via Kaplan-Meier analysis for participants achieving a complete response, and was defined as the interval from first complete response to disease progression or death; responders who did not have an event of progression or death were censored at their last assessment date. Complete response was assessed using RECIST v1.1 criteria, and required disappearance of all target and non-target lesions. | Subjects receiving PV-10 upon crossover from comparator are not included in the analysis population. Response data from one study center were censored due to resignation of the principal investigator. | Posted | Median | 95% Confidence Interval | Months | Assessed every 12 weeks until disease progression, withdrawal of consent, or study termination; median follow-up time for DCR was 26.7 weeks, maximum was 77.7 weeks. |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Overall Survival (OS) | OS was documented at 12 week intervals commencing on withdrawal from active study participation. Documentation was made by subject clinic visit or other personal contact, telephonic contact, review of medical records, or other unequivocal evidence of survival status. OS was estimated via Kaplan-Meier analysis, and was defined as the interval from randomization to death; subjects who did not have an event of death were censored at their last assessment date. | Subjects were analyzed according to treatment group assignment at randomization. | Posted | Median | 95% Confidence Interval | Months | Assessed every 12 weeks upon withdrawal from active study participation until death, withdrawal of consent, or study termination; median follow-up time for survival was 82.4 weeks, maximum was 167.0 weeks. |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Adverse Events | Safety and tolerability were assessed by monitoring the frequency, duration, severity and attribution of adverse events and evaluating changes in laboratory values and vital signs. | PV-10 safety population includes two subjects who received PV-10 upon crossover after progression on comparator. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Assessed every 4 weeks until 28 days after last treatment; median duration of treatment was 11.8 and 9.5 weeks in each treatment group, respectively. |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other Pre-specified | Change in Domain Scores From Baseline Using the Patient Reported Skindex-16 Instrument | In this exploratory endpoint, changes in Skindex-16 self-assessment scores were evaluated vs Day 1 baseline domain scores: symptom domain (items 1-4); emotional domain (items 5-11); and functioning domain (items 12-16). The Skindex-16 instrument solicits response to the extent of bother during the preceding week by 16 items (e.g., itching, hurting, worry, impact on daily activities), using a score from 0 (never bothered) to 6 (always bothered) for each item. Item scores are transformed to 0 to 100 scale, and domain scores are calculated as the average of the item scores comprising the domain. A lower domain score at baseline signifies lower impact of that domain; a decrease in domain score from baseline signifies improvement in that domain. Median baseline score and change from baseline over the study interval is presented for each domain. | Subjects receiving PV-10 upon crossover from comparator are included in the analysis population for PV-10 (after crossover). Response data from one study center were censored due to resignation of the principal investigator. Because the study was terminated prior to achievement of pre-specified efficacy thresholds (i.e., out of a planned 225 subjects only 20 initiated study treatment), the small number of subjects enrolled precludes scientifically meaningful interpretation of Skindex data. | Posted | Median | Standard Error | Scores on a Scale (0-100) | Assessed at baseline (Day 1 at start of study treatment) and at the end of each treatment cycle (every 4 or 6 weeks) until disease progression, withdrawal of consent, or study termination; median follow-up time was 26.6 weeks, maximum was 125.8 weeks. |
|
All adverse events occurring between signing the informed consent form and 28 days following final administration of study drug, or that occurred at any time that might be at least possibly related to study drug, were followed until: 1. the event resolved; 2. the subject was lost to follow-up; 3. the event was otherwise explained; or 4. no further improvement or worsening was expected. Median duration of treatment was 11.8 and 9.5 weeks in each treatment group, respectively.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | PV-10 | Subjects received intralesional PV-10 to all Study Lesions on study Day 1. PV-10 should be re-administered at 28-day intervals until complete response, disease progression or study termination. PV-10 (10% rose bengal disodium) PV-10 safety population includes two subjects who received PV-10 upon crossover after progression on comparator | 0 | 14 | 0 | 14 | 13 | 14 |
| EG001 | Chemotherapy or Oncolytic Viral Therapy | Subjects received (a) dacarbazine (intravenously at 850 m/m2) or temozolomide (orally at 200 mg/m2 daily for 5 consecutive days), administered at consecutive 28-day intervals, or (b) intralesional talimogene laherparepvec administered on an initial 21 interval followed by consecutive 14 day intervals, until complete response, disease progression or study termination. Dacarbazine, temozolomide or talimogene laherparepvec | 0 | 8 | 1 | 8 | 6 | 8 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glomerulonephritis | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA (23.0) | Systematic Assessment | A subject receiving oncolytic viral therapy experienced Grade 3 glomerulonephritis manifest as elevated creatinine commencing with the final dose of study drug and resolving to Grade 1 within 4 weeks; study treatment was discontinued permanently. |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Injection site pain | General disorders | MedDRA (23.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Injection sit oedema | General disorders | MedDRA (23.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Injection site pruritus | General disorders | MedDRA (23.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Injection site discharge | General disorders | MedDRA (23.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Injection site erythema | General disorders | MedDRA (23.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Injection site discolouration | General disorders | MedDRA (23.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Injection site inflammation | General disorders | MedDRA (23.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Injection site ulcer | General disorders | MedDRA (23.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Injection site reaction | General disorders | MedDRA (23.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Fatigue | General disorders | MedDRA (23.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Injection site haemorrhage | General disorders | MedDRA (23.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Injection site infection | General disorders | MedDRA (23.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Injection site rash | General disorders | MedDRA (23.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Chills | General disorders | MedDRA (23.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Influenza like illness | General disorders | MedDRA (23.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Lethargy | General disorders | MedDRA (23.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pyrexia | General disorders | MedDRA (23.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Faeces discoloured | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (23.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Lip dry | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (23.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (23.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (23.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Eschar | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (23.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dermatitis bullous | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (23.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dry skin | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (23.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Purpura | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (23.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dry eye | Eye disorders | MedDRA (23.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Eye pain | Eye disorders | MedDRA (23.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Lacrimation increased | Eye disorders | MedDRA (23.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Arthralgia | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (23.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vision blurred | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (23.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Acute kidney injury | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA (23.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Lymphopenia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA (23.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
Planned accrual was 225 subjects. However, due to slow accrual during a period of rapid change in global drug development for cutaneous melanoma, the study was terminated early after 20 subjects initiated study treatment. Because the study was terminated prior to achievement of pre-specified efficacy thresholds, the planned central independent review was not conducted and the small number of subjects precluded formal analysis and scientifically meaningful interpretation of efficacy parameters.
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eric Wachter, Chief Technology Officer | Provectus Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. | 865-769-4011 | 23 | wachter@pvct.com |
| Nov 2, 2021 |
| Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D008545 | Melanoma |
| D012008 | Recurrence |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D018358 | Neuroendocrine Tumors |
| D017599 | Neuroectodermal Tumors |
| D009373 | Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal |
| D009370 | Neoplasms by Histologic Type |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D009380 | Neoplasms, Nerve Tissue |
| D018326 | Nevi and Melanomas |
| D012878 | Skin Neoplasms |
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D012871 | Skin Diseases |
| D017437 | Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases |
| D020969 | Disease Attributes |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012395 | Rose Bengal |
| D003606 | Dacarbazine |
| D000077204 | Temozolomide |
| C000629782 | talimogene laherparepvec |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005452 | Fluoresceins |
| D013141 | Spiro Compounds |
| D006844 | Hydrocarbons, Cyclic |
| D006838 | Hydrocarbons |
| D009930 | Organic Chemicals |
| D014966 | Xanthenes |
| D006575 | Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring |
| D000072471 | Heterocyclic Compounds, Fused-Ring |
| D006571 | Heterocyclic Compounds |
| D011083 | Polycyclic Compounds |
| D014226 | Triazenes |
| D007093 | Imidazoles |
| D001393 | Azoles |
| D006573 | Heterocyclic Compounds, 1-Ring |
Not provided
Not provided
| >=65 years |
|
| Male |
|
| Asian |
|
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
|
| Black or African American |
|
| White |
|
| More than one race |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
| Italy |
|
| France |
|
| IV-M1a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
Subjects received intralesional PV-10 to all Study Lesions on study Day 1. PV-10 should be re-administered at 28-day intervals until complete response, disease progression or study termination. |
| OG001 | Chemotherapy or Oncolytic Viral Therapy | Subjects received (a) dacarbazine (intravenously at 850 m/m2) or temozolomide (orally at 200 mg/m2 daily for 5 consecutive days), administered at consecutive 28-day intervals, or (b) intralesional talimogene laherparepvec administered on an initial 21 interval followed by consecutive 14 day intervals, until complete response, disease progression or study termination. |
|
|