Protective Efficacy of Flublok® Quadrivalent Versus Licensed Inactivated Influenza Vaccine in Adults ≥50 Years of Age

Comparison of the Protective Efficacy of Flublok® Quadrivalent Versus Licensed Inactivated Influenza Vaccine (IIV4) in Healthy, Medically Stable Adults ≥50 Years of Age

The goal of this study is to establish that Flublok Quadrivalent is non-inferior to fully licensed (traditional approval status) quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV4) in protecting against laboratory-confirmed clinical influenza disease in the ≥50 year age population.

The goal of this study is to establish that Flublok Quadrivalent is non-inferior to fully licensed (traditional approval status) quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV4) in protecting against laboratory-confirmed clinical influenza disease in the ≥50 year age population. Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction (rtPCR) will be used to confirm influenza infection and to type the strains involved, as molecular methodologies have been demonstrated to be more sensitive than other more traditional methodologies, e.g. culture. For rtPCR-positive clinical samples, reserved aliquots will be processed for culture, so that antigenic similarity to the HA present in study vaccines can be tested.

In various clinical studies the investigators demonstrated that the immune response against the influenza A viruses is improved as a result of the higher hemagglutinin content. Furthermore, influenza virus disease and hospitalization associated with influenza-related illness in older adults (> 50 years) was considerably reduced (90%) following vaccination with TIV, even though the circulating influenza A strain was antigenically dissimilar to that in the vaccine. However, more recently Skowronski et al. reported that the low influenza vaccine effectiveness in 2012-2013 was not associated with antigenic drift but was instead related to mutations in the egg-adapted H3N2 vaccine strain. Flublok manufactured using recombinant technology does not contain the mutations responsible for the reported lower effectiveness and may thus offer improved protection when mutations such as those described are induced in the process of adapting the influenza virus to growth in eggs.

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Ambulatory adults aged 50 and older.
2. Medically stable, as determined by medical history and targeted physical examination. "Medically stable" is defined as no change in diagnoses or chronic medications (dose or class) for medical reasons in the 3 months prior to study.
3. Absence of underlying conditions that make participation in the study contrary to the subject's best interest.
4. Able to understand and comply with planned study procedures.
5. Provides written informed consent prior to initiation of any study procedure.

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Known contraindication to either study vaccine (see product package inserts)
2. Receipt of any other influenza vaccine within 180 days prior to enrollment in this study.
3. Underlying disease or ongoing therapy that might cause immunocompromise, e.g. cytotoxic agents or supraphysiologic doses of corticosteroids, such that response to vaccination might be sub-optimal.