Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The goal of this study is to evaluate how standard-of-care outpatient rehabilitation is delivered and how variation in care delivery mechanisms relates to clinical outcomes, service utilization, and value in patients receiving physical or occupational therapy. The study will focus on patients with musculoskeletal (MSK) conditions receiving physical or occupational therapy.
The focus is to use existing standard-of-care documentation in a physical therapy (PT) electronic medical record (EMR) to evaluate patient characteristics, interventions delivered, utilization management, and clinical outcomes in routine outpatient PT care, in order to generate evidence to improve clinical effectiveness and quality of care. Researchers will compare different care delivery mechanisms to see if variations lead to significant differences in outcomes.
Participants will have their standard-of-care documentation analyzed, including routine clinical measures, objective/functional measures, and patient-reported outcomes. They will not be directly involved in research interventions or randomization. This study does not involve a research intervention, randomization, or alteration of clinical care. It is a retrospective cohort study analyzing existing standard-of-care documentation from ATI's physical therapy EMR.
Data are collected via the investigators proprietary electronic medical record system and are synthetic to the clinical process that is, the data are collected in real-time with patients and the scores are immediately provided to the treating therapist as well as archived for later Registry and scientific use.
Musculoskeletal (MSK) conditions are prevalent1 and contribute substantially to healthcare utilization and cost. Physical therapy is a non-surgical, non-pharmacological intervention that can be clinically effective and cost-effective for many MSK presentations, with a large proportion of patients improving without requiring escalation of care. In the context of evolving reimbursement and value-based care pressures, it is increasingly important to understand the clinical effectiveness, utilization patterns, and value implications of PT as delivered in routine outpatient practice. (1-6)
To address these priorities, investigators from ATI and the University of South Carolina are interested in evaluating how standard-of-care outpatient rehabilitation is delivered and how variation in care delivery mechanisms relates to clinical outcomes, service utilization, and value. In this retrospective study, we will conduct secondary analyses of existing standard-of-care documentation within ATI's PT EMR, without altering clinical care or interacting with patients. Care delivery mechanisms of interest include, but are not limited to: (1) delivery mode (in-clinic, telehealth, remote therapeutic moderating (RTM), and hybrid models when documented); (2) use of care extenders (PTAs/Technicians) when identifiable in documentation; (3) specialty service lines and provider qualifications (e.g., Women's Health, Hand Therapy, Vestibular Therapy, Work Comp/Work Hardening, advanced training/certifications); and (4) types of interventions delivered (e.g., exercise therapy, manual therapy, therapeutic modalities), as documented as part of routine care. (7-9)
ATI is a large national outpatient MSK provider delivering physical and occupational therapy services. Investigators have previously used ATI clinical outcomes resources (e.g., the ATI EMR) to characterize care patterns, evaluate outcomes and measurement properties, and explore predictors of utilization behaviors such as canceled visits. The present protocol extends this work by leveraging existing standard-of-care EMR documentation to evaluate patient characteristics, interventions delivered, utilization management patterns, and clinical and objective/functional outcomes in routine outpatient care, producing evidence to inform clinical effectiveness, quality improvement, implementation efforts, and policy-relevant value questions. (4,10-13)
This study is a retrospective cohort study existing standard-of-care documentation from the ATI physical therapy EMR (including routinely collected clinical measures, objective/functional measures, and patient-reported outcomes) for patients receiving physical or occupational therapy beginning January 1, 2016. All interventions referenced in the dataset represent usual care delivered as part of clinical practice and were not assigned for research purposes.
Primary Objective: To use existing standard-of-care documentation in a physical therapy (PT) electronic medical record (EMR) to evaluate patient characteristics, interventions delivered, utilization management, and clinical outcomes in routine outpatient PT care, in order to generate evidence to improve clinical effectiveness and quality of care
Specific Aims Clinical Research (effectiveness in real-world practice)
1)Use retrospective EMR data to evaluate the real-world effectiveness of standard-of-care PT services (including prevention programs, interventions, and educational efforts) for prevalent MSK conditions by examining changes in routinely captured clinical outcomes, objective/functional measures, and patient-reported outcomes over an episode of care.
Heath Policy (Value, cost-efficiency, and care pathways) Use retrospective EMR data to examine PT utilization management and its association with quality, effectiveness, and cost-efficiency across care pathways and practice patterns (e.g., visit authorization patterns, visit frequency, episode duration, time to evaluation, gaps in care, and discharge disposition). When available within the data environment, analyses will also evaluate downstream indicators of value such as opioid utilization, return to function/work/sport, and relationships between outcomes and utilization/cost to inform value-based care and payer-relevant questions.
Implementation and Quality Improvement (Adoption + data quality) Evaluate implementation and sustainability of routine clinical practices by assessing patterns of adoption of assessments/interventions, variation in care delivery, completeness of outcome capture (PROMs/objective tests), patient satisfaction, and resource/service utilization-informing strategies to improve consistent data capture and quality.
Sports Medicine (Athlete lifecycle + RTS decision-making) Among sports/athlete episodes (as identifiable in the EMR), evaluate the effectiveness of sports medicine rehabilitation services across the athlete lifecycle-including risk screening where captured, rehabilitation outcomes, and criteria-based return-to-sport/return-to-function outcomes when documented.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arm, Shoulder and Hand injuries | Pre- and post-treatment outcomes of care as measured by the DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) via physical therapy | ||
| Lumbar spine injuries | Pre- and post-treatment outcomes of care as measured by the Modified Oswestry (lumbar spine) via physical therapy | ||
| Knee injuries | Pre- and post-treatment outcomes of care as measured by the Knee Outcome Survey via physical therapy | ||
| Foot and ankle injuries | Pre- and post-treatment outcomes of care as measured by the Foot & Ankle Ability Measure via physical therapy | ||
| Hip and lower extremity injuries | Pre- and post-treatment outcomes of care as measured by the Lower Extremity Functional Scale via physical therapy | ||
| Neck injuries | Pre- and post-treatment outcomes of care as measured by the Neck Disability Index Questionnaire via physical therapy |
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in functional status | 60 days |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in global health status | 60 days |
Not provided
This study involves retrospective secondary analysis of existing standard-of-care documentation from ATI's outpatient rehabilitation EMR. There will be no prospective data collection, no recruitment, and no interaction with patients.
After a patient's episode of care is completed (discharge or last recorded visit), the PI will identify eligible encounters based on prespecified inclusion/exclusion criteria (e.g., outpatient PT/OT services at ATI on or after January 1, 2016.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
All patients presenting ith orthopedic rehabilitation needs
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Natalie Myers, PhD, ATC | ATI Physical Therapy and Institute for Musculoskeletal Advancement | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATI Physical Therapy and Institute for Musculoskeletal Advancement | Downers Grove | Illinois | 60515 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 29073842 | Background | Denninger TR, Cook CE, Chapman CG, McHenry T, Thigpen CA. The Influence of Patient Choice of First Provider on Costs and Outcomes: Analysis From a Physical Therapy Patient Registry. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2018 Feb;48(2):63-71. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2018.7423. Epub 2017 Oct 26. | |
| 32285130 | Background | Lutz AD, Brooks JM, Chapman CG, Shanley E, Stout CE, Thigpen CA. Risk Adjustment of the Modified Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire and Neck Disability Index to Benchmark Physical Therapist Performance: Analysis From an Outcomes Registry. Phys Ther. 2020 Apr 17;100(4):609-620. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzaa019. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D005356 | Fibromyalgia |
| D006261 | Headache |
| D008209 | Lymphedema |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
| D009135 | Muscular Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| 41214483 | Background | Lutz AD, Rodriguez S, DeBuck KF, Denninger TR, Myers LM, Myers NL. Work Conditioning: The Appropriate Stepped Physical Therapy Care for Injured Workers in Physically Demanding Roles: A Retrospective Cohort Study. J Occup Environ Med. 2026 May 1;68(5):385-390. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000003611. Epub 2025 Nov 11. |
| 34813956 | Background | Lutz AD, Windsor BA, Shanley E, Denninger TR, Harrington SE, Thigpen CA. A comparison of treatment signatures of high and low performing physical therapists for patients with lower back pain: analysis of spine care from a physical therapy outcomes registry. Spine J. 2022 May;22(5):847-856. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.11.008. Epub 2021 Nov 20. |
| 36325612 | Background | Hawley-Hague H, Lasrado R, Martinez E, Stanmore E, Tyson S. A scoping review of the feasibility, acceptability, and effects of physiotherapy delivered remotely. Disabil Rehabil. 2023 Nov;45(23):3961-3977. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2022.2138574. Epub 2022 Nov 2. |
| 41288021 | Background | Domingues B, Pereira AP, Pradhan A, Zidde C, Janela D, Marramaque C, Bento V, Yanamadala V, Cohen SP, Belz L, Wang K, Correia FD, Costa F. Digital Versus In-Person Physical Therapy in Adults With Musculoskeletal Conditions: Retrospective Matched-Cohort Analysis of Surgery and Low-Value Surgical Rates. J Med Internet Res. 2025 Dec 17;27:e82573. doi: 10.2196/82573. |
| 38461844 | Background | Hinman RS, Campbell PK, Kimp AJ, Russell T, Foster NE, Kasza J, Harris A, Bennell KL. Telerehabilitation consultations with a physiotherapist for chronic knee pain versus in-person consultations in Australia: the PEAK non-inferiority randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2024 Mar 30;403(10433):1267-1278. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)02630-2. Epub 2024 Mar 7. |
| 31603709 | Background | Demont A, Bourmaud A, Kechichian A, Desmeules F. The impact of direct access physiotherapy compared to primary care physician led usual care for patients with musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review of the literature. Disabil Rehabil. 2021 Jun;43(12):1637-1648. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1674388. Epub 2019 Oct 11. |
| 26678447 | Background | Burge E, Monnin D, Berchtold A, Allet L. Cost-Effectiveness of Physical Therapy Only and of Usual Care for Various Health Conditions: Systematic Review. Phys Ther. 2016 Jun;96(6):774-86. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20140333. Epub 2015 Dec 17. |
| 40541444 | Background | Lentz TA, Ikeaba U, Alhanti B, Lutz A, George SZ, Cook C, Thigpen C. Self-reported disability trajectories and their predictors among patients receiving care by physical therapists for musculoskeletal conditions: a retrospective analysis of registry data. BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 20;15(6):e099315. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099315. |
| 32125402 | Background | Dieleman JL, Cao J, Chapin A, Chen C, Li Z, Liu A, Horst C, Kaldjian A, Matyasz T, Scott KW, Bui AL, Campbell M, Duber HC, Dunn AC, Flaxman AD, Fitzmaurice C, Naghavi M, Sadat N, Shieh P, Squires E, Yeung K, Murray CJL. US Health Care Spending by Payer and Health Condition, 1996-2016. JAMA. 2020 Mar 3;323(9):863-884. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.0734. |
| 36574617 | Background | McConaghy K, Klika AK, Apte SS, Erdemir A, Derwin K, Piuzzi NS. A Call to Action for Musculoskeletal Research Funding: The Growing Economic and Disease Burden of Musculoskeletal Conditions in the United States Is Not Reflected in Musculoskeletal Research Funding. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2023 Mar 15;105(6):492-498. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.22.00693. Epub 2022 Nov 9. |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
| D012216 | Rheumatic Diseases |
| D009468 | Neuromuscular Diseases |
| D010146 | Pain |
| D008206 | Lymphatic Diseases |
| D006425 | Hemic and Lymphatic Diseases |