Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study evaluates the efficacy of Hilotherm therapy on the incidence of swelling and pain following the surgical removal of lower wisdom teeth. All participants will have two lower wisdom teeth removed, with the Hilotherm cooling face mask only applied to one side of the patients' face for 60 minutes post-operatively, thus the patient being their own control.
How does Hilotherm therapy affect post-operative pain and swelling after surgical wisdom tooth removal?
Wisdom tooth removal is one of the most common minor oral surgical procedures. The most widely experienced post-operative complications include pain and swelling, and so any research into how these effects can be minimised is of utmost importance to improve the quality of care we can deliver to our patients.
Our research is investigating the efficacy of Hilotherm therapy, which uses pre-shaped plastic facial masks through which water circulates at a controlled temperature, to reduce the experience of post-operative pain and swelling.
The Hilotherm face mask will be placed immediately after the surgery, while the patient is in the recovery area and will be worn on ONE side of the face, this being randomised using a computer programme and decided at the time of surgery. It will be worn for one hour after wisdom tooth removal. We will then use 3D photography analysis of the patients face to assess the extent of swelling, their assessment of pain using a visual analogue scale, and their overall satisfaction with Hilotherm therapy. These measurements will be recorded at:
Day 0 - 60 minutes post-op after patient has worn Hilotherm cooling mask Day 3 Day 10 Day 24
The person analysing the 3D images will be blinded to the side of the intervention.
All patients undergoing wisdom tooth removal on both sides, of similar surgical difficulty, to be carried out under a General Anaesthetic of the Daycase Unit of One Hospital will be eligible. Both extractions will be carried out by the same surgeon. Participants who undergo complications during or after the procedure will be excluded from our study. Extractions which end up being too dissimilar will also be excluded, and patients unsuitable for use of the Hilotherm mask (for example allergies) will also not be considered. Any patients with immune system affecting diseases, and patients who suffer allergic reactions to pharmaceutical agents will also not be considered.
No other elements of treatment will be changed from normal protocol.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hilotherm cooling face mask | Experimental | Use of Hilotherm cooling face mask post-operatively following surgical wisdom tooth removal to evaluate the incidence of pain and swelling |
|
| No Hilotherm | No Intervention | No intervention following surgical wisdom tooth removal (same patient), therefore the patient is their own control. |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hilotherm cooling face mask | Device | Hilotherapy - use of an external cooling device; a facial mask through which water circulates at a controlled temperature, allowing continuous cooling of the face, and is thought to reduce post-operative swelling and pain. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in post-operative swelling using 3D photography analysis | Extent of swelling on the side of wisdom tooth removal with the intervention compared with the side without the intervention | Day 0 (pre/60 min post op), Days 3, 10, 24. |
| Change in pain intensity using visual analogue scale | Self-reported pain intensity using visual analogue scale at time intervals as above, comparing the side of wisdom tooth removal with intervention vs the side of wisdom tooth removal without intervention | Day 0 (60 min post-op), Days 3, 10, 24. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Patient satisfaction | Patient satisfaction questionnaire to ask them to assess and compare side with intervention versus side without intervention. Did they feel it made a big difference to their post-operative pain and swelling, and to the speed with which they felt they could return to normal life (eg work?) | Day 24 |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kathy Fan, PhD, FDSRSC, FRCSEd, FRCS OMFS | Contact | +44 208 302 2678 | 4148 | kfan@nhs.net |
| Meera Pajpani, BDS MJDF RCS Eng | Contact | +44 7866 026 341 | meera.pajpani@nhs.net |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Kathy Fan, PhD, FDSRSC, FRCSEd, FRCS OMFS | Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Queen Marys Hospital, Kings College London NHS Foundation Trust | Recruiting | Sidcup | Kent | DA146LT | United Kingdom |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided