Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| S56798 | Registry Identifier | Medical Ethics Committee UZ KU Leuven |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc | OTHER |
| University Ghent | OTHER |
| Vrije Universiteit Brussel | OTHER |
| Agentschap voor Innovatie door Wetenschap en Technologie |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
BACKGROUND Nursing homes are important locations for palliative care. Through comprehensive geriatric assessments (CGAs), evaluations can be made of the palliative care needs of nursing home residents. The interRAI Palliative Care instrument (interRAI PC) is a CGA that evaluates diverse palliative care needs of adults in all healthcare settings. The evaluation results in Client Assessment Protocols (CAPs: indications of problems that need addressing) and Scales (e.g. Palliative Index for Mortality (PIM)) which can be used to design, evaluate and adjust care plans. This study aims to examine the effect of using the interRAI PC on the quality of palliative care in nursing homes. Additionally, it aims to evaluate the feasibility and validity of the interRAI PC.
METHODS This study covers phases 0, I and II of the Medical Research Council (MRC) framework for designing and evaluating complex interventions, with a longitudinal, quasi-experimental pretest-posttest design and with mixed methods of evaluation. In phase 0, a systematic literature search is conducted. In phase I, the interRAI PC instrument is adapted for use in Belgium and implemented on the BelRAI-website and a practical training is developed. In phase II, the intervention is tested in fifteen nursing homes. Participating nursing homes fill out the interRAI PC during one year for all residents receiving palliative care. Using a pretest-posttest design with quasi-random assignment to the intervention or control group, the effect of the interRAI PC on the quality of palliative care is evaluated with the Palliative care Outcome Scale (POS). Psychometric analysis is conducted to evaluate the predictive validity of the PIM and the convergent validity of the CAP 'Mood' of the interRAI PC. Qualitative data regarding the usability and face validity of the instrument are collected.
DISCUSSION This is the first study to evaluate the validity and effect of the interRAI PC in nursing homes, following a methodology based on the MRC framework. This approach improves the study design and implementation and will contribute to a higher generalizability of results. The final result will be a psychometrically evaluated CGA for nursing home residents receiving palliative care.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| interRAI Palliative Care | Other | 15 experimental nursing homes:
|
|
| No interRAI Palliative Care | No Intervention | 15 control nursing homes: - Caregivers of control nursing homes do not receive the intervention and provide care as usual |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| interRAI PC | Other | PREPARATORY PHASE
IMPLEMENTATION PHASE
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| The effect of using the interRAI PC instrument on the quality of palliative care in nursing homes evaluated by the Palliative care Outcome Scale (POS) | Using a pretest-posttest design with quasi-random assignment to the intervention or control group, the effect of the interRAI PC on the quality of palliative care is evaluated with the Palliative care Outcome Scale (POS) | 1 year |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| The validity of the interRAI PC for use in nursing homes assessed by Psychometric analysis | Psychometric analysis is conducted to evaluate the predictive validity of the Palliative Index for Mortality (PIM) of the interRAI PC and the convergent validity of the CAP 'Mood' of the interRAI PC. Qualitative data regarding the face validity of the instrument are collected through focus groups, interviews and field notes |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Kirsten Hermans | KU Leuven, LUCAS | Principal Investigator |
| Nele Spruytte | KU Leuven, LUCAS | Principal Investigator |
| Joachim Cohen | End-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) & Ghent University | Principal Investigator |
| Chantal Van Audenhove | KU Leuven, LUCAS | Principal Investigator |
| Anja Declercq | KU Leuven, LUCAS | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KU Leuven, LUCAS | Leuven | Vlaams-Brabant | 3000 | Belgium |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 24569081 | Background | Hermans K, De Almeida Mello J, Spruytte N, Cohen J, Van Audenhove C, Declercq A. A comparative analysis of comprehensive geriatric assessments for nursing home residents receiving palliative care: a systematic review. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2014 Jul;15(7):467-476. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2014.01.002. Epub 2014 Feb 22. | |
| 25479633 | Derived |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
|
| 1 year |
| The feasibility of the interRAI C for use in nursing homes assessed through focus groups, interviews and field notes | Qualitative data regarding the feasibility of the instrument are collected through focus groups, interviews and field notes | 1 year |
| Hermans K, Spruytte N, Cohen J, Van Audenhove C, Declercq A. Informed palliative care in nursing homes through the interRAI Palliative Care instrument: a study protocol based on the Medical Research Council framework. BMC Geriatr. 2014 Dec 5;14:132. doi: 10.1186/1471-2318-14-132. |