Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| NCI-2015-00191 | Registry Identifier | CTRP (Clinical Trial Reporting Program) | |
| 2014-0185 | Other Identifier | M D Anderson Cancer Center | |
| P30CA016672 | U.S. NIH Grant/Contract | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| National Cancer Institute (NCI) | NIH |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This clinical trial assesses whether a newly designed algorithm which looks at the genomic signature of each patient's tumor to predict their sensitivity to standard of care treatment verses being placed on a personally designed treatment trial can improve the responses in patients with newly diagnosed triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Testing the primary tumor biopsy for certain proteins and monitoring the lymphocyte infiltration into the tumors may help doctors determine the sub-type of TNBC, and direct treatments that may work well. It is not yet known whether assigning treatment based on the patient's tumor classification will improve how well the tumor responds.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:
I. To conduct a prospective single arm, non-randomized trial to determine the impact of implementation of a research platform that includes diagnostic imaging to assess response to the initial phase of neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with subtyping of TNBC in order to select the appropriate targeted therapy trial to complete neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients found to have chemo-insensitive disease by imaging.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. Measured as defined by Standardized Definitions for Efficacy End Points (STEEP) criteria using the following prioritization: distant recurrence free interval (DRFI), recurrence free survival (RFS), distant relapse-free survival (DRFS), overall survival (OS), invasive disease free survival (IDFS), disease free survival including ductal carcinoma in situ (DFS-DCIS).
II. Evaluate the rates of enrollment into clinical trials for patients identified as having chemotherapy insensitive disease.
III. Evaluate the frequency of pathologic response rates (pCR, RCB I-III residual disease) in patients identified as chemotherapy sensitive versus insensitive.
IV. Determine the estimates of DRFI, RFS, DRFS, IDFS and DFS-DCIS at 3 years, and OS at 5 and 10 years in all patients.
X. Determine the pathologic response based on molecular characterization. XI. Determine the estimates of DRFI, RFS, DRFS, IDFS and DFS-DCIS at 3 years, and OS at 5 and 10 years.
XII. Subset analyses of pathologic response and 3-year DRFI, RFS, DRFS, IDFS, and DFS-DCIS.
XIII. Compare the results of pathologic node-negative status (sentinel and/or non-sentinel nodes) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy according to a genomic predictor of nodal response to NACT, in subsets defined by pre-treatment clinical nodal status.
EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES:
I. Future re-analysis of residual samples using a customized genomic diagnostic platform (integrated "prospective-retrospective" biomarker analysis) to predict chemotherapy sensitivity.
II. Generation and subsequent molecular characterization of patient derived xenograph (PDX) models.
III. Clinical diagnostic development studies using residual samples (fresh and/or formalin-fixed) within the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA)-compliant Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory, and patient derived xenographs (PDX) to formally evaluate the clinical validity and utility of future clinical genomic diagnostic tests that would predict both response, recurrence, and survival from the treatments used in this clinical trial (correlative "retrospective-prospective" biomarker analyses).
IV. Correlative science studies to identify molecular therapeutic targets for treatment-insensitive TNBC using residual samples and PDX models.
V. Correlation of tumor features or changes as measured by diagnostic imaging to determine potential predictors of treatment response.
VI. Determine polymerase chain reaction (pCR) rates in a cohort of patients who undergo surgical resection after achieving complete radiological response after 4 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC).
OUTLINE: Patients are assigned to 1 of 3 arms.
ARM A: Patients undergo baseline molecular and immunohistochemistry (IHC) evaluation of their tumor biopsy, and receive the results. Patients then receive standard anthracycline-based chemotherapy and undergo standard ultrasound at baseline, after 2 cycles, after 4 cycles of treatment, and after completion of treatment (before surgery). Patients and physicians are notified of the results of the molecular evaluation. Patients may then choose to continue with standard taxane +/- platinum-based chemotherapy or participate in an experimental clinical trial designed to match the molecular profile and triple-negative subtype. Patients with tumors predicted to be insensitive to chemotherapy are advised to participate in a clinical trial treating their tumor subtype.
ARM B: Patients undergo baseline molecular and IHC evaluation of their tumor biopsy, and receive the results. Patients then receive standard anthracycline-based chemotherapy and undergo standard ultrasound at baseline, after 2 cycles, and after 4 cycles of treatment. Patients and physicians are notified of the results of the molecular evaluation. Patients may then choose to continue with standard taxane +/- platinum-based chemotherapy or participate in an experimental clinical trial designed to match the molecular profile and triple-negative subtype. Patients with tumors predicted to be insensitive to chemotherapy are advised to participate in a clinical trial treating their tumor subtype.
ARM C: Patients undergo baseline molecular and IHC evaluation of their tumor biopsy, and receive the results. Patients then receive standard anthracycline-based chemotherapy with immunotherapy and undergo standard ultrasound at baseline, after 2 cycles, and after 4 cycles of treatment. Patients and physicians are notified of the results of the molecular evaluation. Patients may then choose to continue with standard taxane +/- platinum-based chemotherapy or participate in an experimental clinical trial designed to match the molecular profile and triple-negative subtype. Patients with tumors predicted to be insensitive to chemotherapy are advised to participate in a clinical trial treating their tumor subtype.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up for up to 5 years.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arm A (predictive results given) | Experimental | Patients undergo baseline molecular and IHC evaluation of their tumor biopsy, and receive the results. Patients then receive standard anthracycline-based chemotherapy and undergo standard ultrasound at baseline, after 2 cycles, after 4 cycles of treatment, and after completion of treatment (before surgery). Patients and physicians are notified of the results of the molecular evaluation. Patients may then choose to continue with standard taxane +/- platinum-based chemotherapy or participate in an experimental clinical trial designed to match the molecular profile and triple-negative subtype. Patients with tumors predicted to be insensitive to chemotherapy are advised to participate in a clinical trial treating their tumor subtype. |
|
| Arm B (predictive results given) | Experimental | Patients undergo baseline molecular and IHC evaluation of their tumor biopsy, and receive the results. Patients then receive standard anthracycline-based chemotherapy and undergo standard ultrasound at baseline, after 2 cycles, and after 4 cycles of treatment. Patients and physicians are notified of the results of the molecular evaluation. Patients may then choose to continue with standard taxane +/- platinum-based chemotherapy or participate in an experimental clinical trial designed to match the molecular profile and triple-negative subtype. Patients with tumors predicted to be insensitive to chemotherapy are advised to participate in a clinical trial treating their tumor subtype. |
|
| Arm C (predictive results given) | Experimental | Patients undergo baseline molecular and IHC evaluation of their tumor biopsy, and receive the results. Patients then receive standard anthracycline-based chemotherapy with immunotherapy and undergo standard ultrasound at baseline, after 2 cycles, and after 4 cycles of treatment. Patients and physicians are notified of the results of the molecular evaluation. Patients may then choose to continue with standard taxane +/- platinum-based chemotherapy or participate in an experimental clinical trial designed to match the molecular profile and triple-negative subtype. Patients with tumors predicted to be insensitive to chemotherapy are advised to participate in a clinical trial treating their tumor subtype |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chemotherapy | Drug | Receive standard chemotherapy |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Response rate | A one-sided z-test will be used to compare the response rates of the treatment and control arms. The study will have 80% power to detect an increase in the response rate of 14.2 percentage points assuming a control arm response rate of 50% at the 0.05 significance level allowing for two interim tests for both futility and superiority. | Up to 5 years |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Survival | Will estimate the cumulative incidence function using Aalen-Johansen method with appropriate 96% confidence intervals. | Up to 5 years |
| Frequency of tumors | Will estimate the relative frequency to triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) subsets (BRCA+, mesenchymal, androgen receptor [AR]+ and basal-like) classified withing each predication cohort and report both point estimates and simultaneous multinomial 95% confidence intervals based on the method of Goodman. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
The patient has diagnosis of stage IV disease or is found to have stage IV disease prior to initiation of chemotherapy
Prior history of invasive cancer within 5 years of study entry or history of metastatic cancer; exceptions include non-metastatic, curatively treated basal and squamous cell carcinoma of the skin
Prior excisional biopsy of the primary invasive breast cancer
Patients with hematomas or biopsy site changes that limit response assessment of the primary tumor by diagnostic imaging
Patients not eligible for chemotherapy with taxane and/or anthracycline based chemotherapy regimens
Prior therapy with - chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy
Grade II or higher neuropathy
Patients with Zubrod performance status of > 2
Patients with history of serious cardiac events defined as:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Clinton Yam | M.D. Anderson Cancer Center | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD Anderson in The Woodlands | Conroe | Texas | 77384 | United States | ||
| M D Anderson Cancer Center |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 42093035 | Derived | Seth S, Yam C, Huo L, Lim B, Rinkenbaugh AL, White JB, Ravenberg EE, Song X, Litton JK, Tripathy D, Valero V, Damodaran S, Arun B, Ueno NT, Lucci A, Thompson AM, Mittendorf EA, Rauch GM, Adrada B, Candelaria RP, Ding Q, Powell RT, Abuhadra NK, Zhang J, Futreal A, Draetta GF, Piwnica-Worms H, Symmans WF, Chang JT, Moulder SL. The ARTEMIS trial identifies immune activation as a key predictor of neoadjuvant chemotherapy response in triple-negative breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2026 May 6;28(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s13058-026-02290-z. | |
| 39558017 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
|
| Immunotherapy | Other | Receive standard immunotherapy |
|
|
| Laboratory Biomarker Analysis | Other | Correlative studies |
|
| Lymph Node Biopsy | Procedure | Undergo baseline lymph node evaluation |
|
|
| Ultrasonography | Procedure | Undergo standard ultrasound |
|
|
| Up to 5 years |
| Houston |
| Texas |
| 77030 |
| United States |
| MD Anderson West Houston | Houston | Texas | 77079 | United States |
| MD Anderson League City | League City | Texas | 77573 | United States |
| MD Anderson in Sugar Land | Sugar Land | Texas | 77478 | United States |
| Derived |
| Wang X, Zhao L, Song X, Wu X, Krishnamurthy S, Semba T, Shao S, Knafl M, Coffer LW 2nd, Alexander A, Vines A, Bopparaju S, Woodward WA, Chu R, Zhang J, Yam C, Loo LWM, Nasrazadani A, Huong LP, Woodman SE, Futreal A; Rare Tumor Initiative Team; Tripathy D, Ueno NT. Genomic and transcriptomic analyses identify distinctive features of triple-negative inflammatory breast cancer. NPJ Precis Oncol. 2024 Nov 18;8(1):265. doi: 10.1038/s41698-024-00729-0. |
| 39503605 | Derived | Stowers CE, Wu C, Xu Z, Kumar S, Yam C, Son JB, Ma J, Tamir JI, Rauch GM, Yankeelov TE. Combining Biology-based and MRI Data-driven Modeling to Predict Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. Radiol Artif Intell. 2025 Jan;7(1):e240124. doi: 10.1148/ryai.240124. |
| 38484209 | Derived | Basho RK, Zhao L, White JB, Huo L, Bassett RL, Mittendorf EA, Thompson A, Litton JK, Ueno N, Arun B, Lim B, Valero V, Tripathy D, Zhang J, Adrada BE, Santiago L, Ravenberg E, Seth S, Yam C, Moulder SL, Damodaran S. Comprehensive Analysis Identifies Variability in PI3K Pathway Alterations in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Subtypes. JCO Precis Oncol. 2024 Mar;8:e2300124. doi: 10.1200/PO.23.00124. |
| 37547448 | Derived | Chen H, Ding Q, Khazai L, Zhao L, Damodaran S, Litton JK, Rauch GM, Yam C, Chang JT, Seth S, Lim B, Thompson AM, Mittendorf EA, Adrada B, Virani K, White JB, Ravenberg E, Song X, Candelaria R, Arun B, Ueno NT, Santiago L, Saleem S, Abouharb S, Murthy RK, Ibrahim N, Routbort MJ, Sahin A, Valero V, Symmans WF, Tripathy D, Wang WL, Moulder S, Huo L. PTEN in triple-negative breast carcinoma: protein expression and genomic alteration in pretreatment and posttreatment specimens. Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2023 Aug 2;15:17588359231189422. doi: 10.1177/17588359231189422. eCollection 2023. |
| 37505106 | Derived | Hwang KP, Elshafeey NA, Kotrotsou A, Chen H, Son JB, Boge M, Mohamed RM, Abdelhafez AH, Adrada BE, Panthi B, Sun J, Musall BC, Zhang S, Candelaria RP, White JB, Ravenberg EE, Tripathy D, Yam C, Litton JK, Huo L, Thompson AM, Wei P, Yang WT, Pagel MD, Ma J, Rauch GM. A Radiomics Model Based on Synthetic MRI Acquisition for Predicting Neoadjuvant Systemic Treatment Response in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. Radiol Imaging Cancer. 2023 Jul;5(4):e230009. doi: 10.1148/rycan.230009. |
| 35914239 | Derived | Wu C, Jarrett AM, Zhou Z, Elshafeey N, Adrada BE, Candelaria RP, Mohamed RMM, Boge M, Huo L, White JB, Tripathy D, Valero V, Litton JK, Yam C, Son JB, Ma J, Rauch GM, Yankeelov TE. MRI-Based Digital Models Forecast Patient-Specific Treatment Responses to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. Cancer Res. 2022 Sep 16;82(18):3394-3404. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-22-1329. |
| 35507014 | Derived | Yam C, Abuhadra N, Sun R, Adrada BE, Ding QQ, White JB, Ravenberg EE, Clayborn AR, Valero V, Tripathy D, Damodaran S, Arun BK, Litton JK, Ueno NT, Murthy RK, Lim B, Baez L, Li X, Buzdar AU, Hortobagyi GN, Thompson AM, Mittendorf EA, Rauch GM, Candelaria RP, Huo L, Moulder SL, Chang JT. Molecular Characterization and Prospective Evaluation of Pathologic Response and Outcomes with Neoadjuvant Therapy in Metaplastic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2022 Jul 1;28(13):2878-2889. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-3100. |
| 34253579 | Derived | Yam C, Yen EY, Chang JT, Bassett RL, Alatrash G, Garber H, Huo L, Yang F, Philips AV, Ding QQ, Lim B, Ueno NT, Kannan K, Sun X, Sun B, Parra Cuentas ER, Symmans WF, White JB, Ravenberg E, Seth S, Guerriero JL, Rauch GM, Damodaran S, Litton JK, Wargo JA, Hortobagyi GN, Futreal A, Wistuba II, Sun R, Moulder SL, Mittendorf EA. Immune Phenotype and Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2021 Oct 1;27(19):5365-5375. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-0144. |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001943 | Breast Neoplasms |
| D064726 | Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D001941 | Breast Diseases |
| D012871 | Skin Diseases |
| D017437 | Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D004358 | Drug Therapy |
| D007167 | Immunotherapy |
| D000276 | Adjuvants, Immunologic |
| D021701 | Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy |
| D019220 | High-Energy Shock Waves |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D013812 | Therapeutics |
| D056747 | Immunomodulation |
| D001691 | Biological Therapy |
| D007155 | Immunologic Factors |
| D045505 | Physiological Effects of Drugs |
| D020228 | Pharmacologic Actions |
| D020164 | Chemical Actions and Uses |
| D001706 | Biopsy |
| D003581 | Cytodiagnosis |
| D003584 | Cytological Techniques |
| D019411 | Clinical Laboratory Techniques |
| D019937 | Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures |
| D003933 | Diagnosis |
| D013048 | Specimen Handling |
| D003949 | Diagnostic Techniques, Surgical |
| D013514 | Surgical Procedures, Operative |
| D008197 | Lymph Node Excision |
| D008919 | Investigative Techniques |
| D000069453 | Ultrasonic Waves |
| D013016 | Sound |
| D011840 | Radiation, Nonionizing |
| D011827 | Radiation |
| D055585 | Physical Phenomena |
Not provided
Not provided