A Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Controlled Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of on Severe / Very Severe COPD Patients
A Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Controlled Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of on Severe / Very Severe COPD Patients
The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of two treatments for severe / very severe COPD patients: one, conventional medicine based on 2013 Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) and Chinese Treatment Guidelines; the other, TCM treatments and conventional medicine, which have been evaluated and have certain effect.
Patients with severe or very severe COPD are more likely to suffer repeated exacerbations and more rapidly declining lung function generating increased risk of death and time to a COPD related hospitalization. Although many therapies exist and are being developed to relieve symptoms and reduce mortality in COPD, most have only been studied in moderate to very severe COPD. There are few clinical trials to compare therapeutic alternatives in severe and very sever COPD. Furthermore, some randomized controlled trials on comprehensive Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) interventions, especially based on the TCM patterns, have been the certain evidence for showing definite effect for COPD patients. In addition, a study about the effect of TCM on outcomes in mild and moderate COPD patients has been in progress and will be carried out in December 2014 (NCT01486186). Hence, corresponding to the mild to moderate COPD patients, The this study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of TCM on severe / very severe COPD patients.
This is a multi-center, randomized, double-blind, controlled study to evaluate the effectiveness of TCM on severe / very Severe COPD patients. Following a 14 day run-in period, approximately 564 subjects will be randomly assigned to conventional medicine treatment group, TCM and conventional medicine treatment group for 52 weeks. After the 52 weeks treatment period, subjects in two treatments arms will follow-up 52 weeks. The primary outcome measure is the frequency of exacerbations. The secondary efficacy measures include all-cause mortality, FEV1, dyspnea (MMRC), exercise capacity( 6MWD), quality of life ( CAT, SF-36 and COPD-PRO), and effectiveness satisfaction with treatment(ESQ-COPD) . Safety will be assessed through the collection of adverse events. There will be a total of 9 study visits (baseline, the 13, 26, 39 and 52 weeks of the treatment, the 13, 26, 39 and 52 weeks of follow-up).
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
yxqshi@163.com+86 371 66248624