Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Pisa® Farmacéutica | UNKNOWN |
| Laboratorios de Productos Éticos C.E.I.S.A. | UNKNOWN |
| Laboratorio Elea Phoenix S.A. | INDUSTRY |
| Tecnoquimicas S.A |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This is a multicenter, double-blind, randomized study comparing the efficacy, pharmacokinetics (PK)/pharmacodynamics (PD), safety and immunogenicity profile of RTXM83 (rituximab biosimilar) vs reference rituximab (MabThera®), both with CHOP, as first-line treatment of Diffuse-Large-B-Cell-Lymphoma (DLBCL).
Rituximab biosimilar and MabThera® were both administered intravenously on Day 1 of each 3-week cycle with CHOP chemotherapy for six cycles. Two additional cycles of treatment were permitted at the Investigator's discretion. Patients were followed up for 9 months after last study dose.
The primary endpoint of the investigation is to determine if the response rate obtained with RTXM83 combined with CHOP is non inferior to the response rate obtained with reference rituximab combined with CHOP.
The present study is a non inferiority trial and the study hypothesis is the following: H0: pc ≥ pe + δ vs. H1: pc < pe + δ where, pe: proportion of successes in the experimental group (RTXM83+CHOP) pc: proportion of successes in the control group (Reference Rituximab+CHOP) Type I error: the difference pc-pe is less than δ when in fact the difference is greater than or equal to δ ie, the investigators choose the experimental treatment when the control treatment is actually substantially better.
Type II error: the difference -pe is greater than or equal to δ when it is actually lest than δ ie, the investigators choose the control treatment when the experimental treatment is essentially just as good.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| RTXM83 | Experimental | Active Ingredient: Rituximab (Biosimilar) |
|
| MabThera | Active Comparator | Active Ingredient: Rituximab |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RTXM83 | Biological | Rituximab biosimilar (RTXM83) will be administered in combination with CHOP chemotherapy regimen (Cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2, Doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 and Vincristine 1.4 mg/m2 up to a maximum of 2 mg on Day 1 plus Prednisone 40 mg/m2 or 100 mg per day from Day 1 to 5) at a dose of 375 mg/m2 on Day 1 of each 3 week cycle, for 6 cycles, although the administration of 2 additional cycles may be allowed. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Response Rate (RR) Achieved After Cycle 6 With RTXM83 Plus CHOP Compared to the RR Obtained With Mabthera® Plus CHOP (R-CHOP) in Patients With DLBCL | Per International Working Group (IWG) revised criteria for Malignant Lymphomas (Cheson et al. 2007) and assessed by positron-emission tomography scan, or by computed tomography scan and/or magnetic resonance imaging if Positron Emission Tomography (PET) scan was not feasible. Tumor response was classified according to the International Working Group criteria, as Complete Remission (CR): Complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms if present before therapy; Partial Response (PR): At least a 50% decrease in sum of the product of the diameters of up to six of the largest dominant nodes or nodal masses; Stable disease (SD) or; Progressive disease. Response rate was the sum of CR and PR. | Tumor response assessed after Cycle 6 or at the end of treatment |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| AUC 0-∞ (h μg/mL) at Cycle 1 of RTXM83 and Mabthera® | Compare the pharmacokinetic (PK) parameter (AUC 0-∞) calculated from start of the first infusion until start of the second infusion (i.e. at Cycle 1) in a population PK model. For the PK similarity assessments, regulatory guidelines on bioequivalence were followed whereby two treatments are judged not to be different from one another if the 90% confidence interval (CI) of the ratio between the geometric means of the measure (AUC 0-∞ ) falls completely within the range 80%-125%. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Susana Millán, Phd | mAbxience Research S.L. | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hosp. Interzonal "R" Carrillo | Ciudadela | Bariloche | Argentina | |||
| Clinica Radiologica del Sur |
An additional cohort of 16 patients was added (as per Iran local regulatory requirements) to the planned sample of 256 patients. The extension cohort of Iran was only considered for safety analysis.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | RTXM83 | Rituximab biosimilar (RTXM83) was administered in combination with CHOP chemotherapy regimen (Cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2, Doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 and Vincristine 1.4 mg/m2 up to a maximum of 2 mg on Day 1 plus Prednisone 40 mg/m2 or 100 mg per day from Day 1 to 5) at a dose of 375 mg/m2 on Day 1 of each 3 week cycle, for 6 cycles. Administration of 2 additional cycles was allowed as per Investigator's criteria. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| UNKNOWN |
| Innogene Kalbiotech Pte. Ltd | INDUSTRY |
| Libbs Farmacêutica LTDA | INDUSTRY |
| Key Oncologics (Pty) Ltd | UNKNOWN |
| Nanolek LLC | OTHER |
| Actoverco | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
|
| Mabthera | Biological | Mabthera will be administered in combination with CHOP chemotherapy regimen (Cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2, Doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 and Vincristine 1.4 mg/m2 up to a maximum of 2 mg on Day 1 plus Prednisone 40 mg/m2 or 100 mg per day from Day 1 to 5) at a dose of 375 mg/m2 on Day 1 of each 3 week cycle, for 6 cycles, although the administration of 2 additional cycles may be allowed. |
|
|
| Cycle 1 (first dose): Day 1 (pre-dose, mid-infusion), Day 8 and Day 15 |
| AUC 0-∞ (h μg/mL) at Cycle 6 of RTXM83 and Mabthera® | Compare the PK parameter (AUC 0-∞) calculated from start of the first infusion until Day 21 of administration of Cycle 6 in a population PK model. For the PK similarity assessments, regulatory guidelines on bioequivalence were followed whereby two treatments are judged not to be different from one another if the 90% confidence interval (CI) of the ratio between the geometric means of the measure (AUC 0-∞ ) falls completely within the range 80%-125%. | Cycle 6 (last dose): Day 1, Day 8, Day 15 and Day 21 |
| Cmax (μg/mL) at Cycle 1 of RTXM83 and Mabthera® | Compare the PK parameter (Cmax) calculated from start of the first infusion until start of the second infusion (i.e. at Cycle 1) in a population PK model. For the PK similarity assessments, regulatory guidelines on bioequivalence were followed whereby two treatments are judged not to be different from one another if the 90% confidence interval (CI) of the ratio between the geometric means of the measure (Cmax) falls completely within the range 80%-125%. | Cycle 1 (first dose): Day 1 (pre-dose, mid-infusion), Day 8 and Day 15 |
| Cmax (μg/mL) at Cycle 6 of RTXM83 and Mabthera® | Compare the PK parameter (Cmax) calculated from start of the first infusion until Day 21 of administration of Cycle 6 in a population PK model. For the PK similarity assessments, regulatory guidelines on bioequivalence were followed whereby two treatments are judged not to be different from one another if the 90% confidence interval (CI) of the ratio between the geometric means of the measure (AUC 0-∞ ) falls completely within the range 80%-125%. | Cycle 6 (last dose): Day 1, Day 8, Day 15 and Day 21 |
| Percentage Change From Baseline in Pharmacodynamic (PD) Markers (CD19+ and CD20+ Cells) Blood Counts of RTXM83 and Mabthera® | CD19 and CD20 are proteins found on the cell surface of B cells, and they can be detected in peripheral blood by flow cytometry. Flow cytometry of peripheral blood was performed for immediate analysis of cells with cluster of differentiation 19 (CD19+) and CD20+. To compare the percent Change From Baseline ((Cycle 1 pre-dose) in pharmacodynamic markers (CD19+ and CD20+ Cells) in Peripheral Blood achieved in RTXM83 and Mabthera® arms at Cycle 1 end of infusion (EOI), 6 months and 9 months after last dose of treatment. | Up to follow-up 3 (FU3); 9 months after last dose of treatment |
| Comparable Safety Profile in Both Treatment Arms | Compare the frequency and severity of treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) reported in each treatment arm. | Up to FU3; 9 months after last dose of treatment |
| Comparable Immunogenicity Profile Between RTXM83 and Mabthera® | Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) developed de novo (seroconversion) after 6 cycles of treatment and 9 months of follow-up. | Up to FU3; 9 months after last dose of treatment |
| Event Free Survival (EFS) in RTXM83 Arm and Mabthera® Arm | Time from randomization to any of the following events: progressive disease, no achievement of CR, PR associated with treatment in excess of that per protocol, SD, relapse after achievement of CR, or death from any cause, whichever comes first. | Up to FU3; 9 months after last dose of treatment |
| Cipolletti |
| Río Negro Province |
| Argentina |
| Clinica Viedma | Viedma | Río Negro Province | Argentina |
| Hospital Britanico | Buenos Aires | Argentina |
| Hospital Gral. de Agudos Donación Francisco Santojanni | Buenos Aires | Argentina |
| Instituto Roffo | Buenos Aires | Argentina |
| Centro Oncologico Riojano Integral (CORI) | Córdoba | Argentina |
| Hospital Nacional de Clinicas | Córdoba | Argentina |
| Hospital Privado de Cordoba | Córdoba | Argentina |
| Sanatorio Allende | Córdoba | Argentina |
| Ctr. Oncologico de Rosario | Rosario | Argentina |
| Inst. Cardiovascular Rosario | Rosario | Argentina |
| Instituto de Hematología y Medicina Clínica Dr. Rubén Dávoli | Rosario | Argentina |
| Sanatorio Parque | Rosario | Argentina |
| Hospital Angel Padilla | San Miguel de Tucumán | Argentina |
| Fundación ARS Médica | San Salvador de Jujuy | Argentina |
| Hospital J. B. Iturraspe | Santa Fe | Argentina |
| Hospital de Caridade de Ijuí | Ijuí | Rio Grande do Sul | Brazil |
| Hospital da Cidade de Passo Fundo | Passo Fundo | Rio Grande do Sul | Brazil |
| Hospital São Lucas da PUCRS | Porto Alegre | Rio Grande do Sul | Brazil |
| Hospital Clinicas Porto Alegre | Pôrto Alegre | Rio Grande do Sul | Brazil |
| Hospital Santa Marcelina | Itaquera | São Paulo | Brazil |
| Hospital Amaral Carvalho Jaú | Jaú | São Paulo | Brazil |
| Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto da Universidade de São Paulo-HCFMRP | Ribeirão Preto | São Paulo | Brazil |
| CEPHO - Centro de Estudos e Pesquisas de Hematologia e Oncologia / Faculdade de Medicina do ABC | Santo André | São Paulo | Brazil |
| Fundação Antônio Prudente - AC Camargo Câncer Center | São Paulo | São Paulo | Brazil |
| Hospital das Clinicas-UFMG | Belo Horizonte | Brazil |
| UNICAMP-Univ Zeferino Vaz | Campinas | Brazil |
| Hospital Uniao Oeste Paranaense de Estudos e Comabte ao Cancer (UOPECCAN) | Cascavel | Brazil |
| Hospital Erasto Gaertner CEPEP | Curitiba | Brazil |
| Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade Federal de Goiás | Goiânia | Brazil |
| Santa Casa de Porto Alegre | Porto Alegre | Brazil |
| Hospital Universitário Clemente Fraga Filho - UFRJ | Rio de Janeiro | Brazil |
| Instituto COI de Educação e Pesquisa | Rio de Janeiro | Brazil |
| Instituto Est. de Hematologia Arthur de Siqueira Cavalcanti | Rio de Janeiro | Brazil |
| Monte Tabor - Hospital São Rafael | Salvador | Brazil |
| Hospital de Base de São José | São José do Vale do Rio Preto | Brazil |
| Centro de Pesquisa do Instituto Brasileiro de Controle do Câncer - IBCC | São Paulo | Brazil |
| Hospital Clinica Faculdade Medicina USP | São Paulo | Brazil |
| Inst. Nacional de Cancerologia | Bogotá | Colombia |
| Fundación Valle de Lili | Cali | Colombia |
| Hospital Pablo Tobon Uribe | Medellín | Colombia |
| Srinivasam Cancer Care Hospital | Bangalore | India |
| Cancer Institute | Chennai | India |
| Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre | Delhi | India |
| Bibi General Hospital&Canc Ct | Hyderabad | India |
| Birla Cancer Center - SMS Hospital | Jaipur | India |
| Health Point Multi-specialty Hospital | Kolkata | India |
| Institute of Hematology and Transfusion Medicine | Kolkata | India |
| Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose Cancer Research Institute | Kolkata | India |
| Acharya Tulsi Regional Cancer Treatment and Research Institute | Madurai | India |
| Guru Hospital | Madurai | India |
| Meenakshi Mission Hospital | Madurai | India |
| Kailash Cancer Hospital and Research Centre | Vadodara | India |
| Dr. Hasan Sadikin Hospital | Bandung | Indonesia |
| Dharmais N. C. Center | Jakarta | Indonesia |
| Imam Khomeini Complex Hospital - Cancer Institute | Tehrān | Iran |
| Hospital Sultanah Aminah | Johor Bahru | Malaysia |
| University Malaya Medical Centre - UMMC | Kuala Lumpur | 59100 | Malaysia |
| Mount Miriam Cancer Hospital | Pulau Pinang | 11200 | Malaysia |
| Hospital Pulau Pinang | Pulau Pinang | Malaysia |
| Insituto Nacional de Cancerología | Mexico City | Mexico |
| Instituto Privado de Hematologia e Investigaciona Clinica | Asunción | Paraguay |
| Cebu Doctors University Hospital | Cebu | Philippines |
| Perpetual Succour Hospital | Cebu | Philippines |
| Davao Doctors Hospital | Davao City | Philippines |
| National Kidney and Transplant Institute | Quezon City | Philippines |
| Veterans Memorial Medical Center | Quezon City | Philippines |
| Arkhangelsk Clinical Oncology Dispensary | Arkhangelsk | Russia |
| Kursk regional clinical oncology dispensary | Kursk | Russia |
| N.N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Cente | Moscow | Russia |
| National Medical Surgical Center n.a. N.I. Pirogov | Moscow | Russia |
| Murmansk regional oncology dispensary | Murmansk | Russia |
| State Budgetary Healthcare Institution of Stavropol region "Pyatigorsk oncology center" | Pyatigorsk | Russia |
| Rostov Scientific Research Oncology Institute | Rostov-on-Don | Russia |
| Russian Research Center for Radiology and Surgical Technologies | Saint Petersburg | Russia |
| Saint-Petersburg State Budgetary Institution "City Clinical Oncology Dispensary" | Saint Petersburg | Russia |
| Scientific Research Institute of Oncology n.a. N.N. Petrov | Saint Petersburg | Russia |
| Oncology Center # 2 | Sochi | Russia |
| Komi Republican Oncology Dispensary | Syktyvkar | Russia |
| State Healthcare Institution of Tula region "Tula regional clinical hospital" | Tula | Russia |
| Republican Clinical Oncology Dispensary | Ufa | Russia |
| Volgograd Regional Clinical Oncology Center | Volgograd | Russia |
| Tygerberg Academic Hosp | Cape Town | South Africa |
| Rainbow Oncology Centre | eManzimtoti | South Africa |
| GVI Oncology | Port Elizabeth | South Africa |
| Chris Hani Baragwanath Hospital | Soweto | South Africa |
| FG001 | MabThera | MabThera was administered in combination with CHOP chemotherapy regimen (Cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2, Doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 and Vincristine 1.4 mg/m2 up to a maximum of 2 mg on Day 1 plus Prednisone 40 mg/m2 or 100 mg per day from Day 1 to 5) at a dose of 375 mg/m2 on Day 1 of each 3 week cycle, for 6 cycles. Administration of 2 additional cycles was allowed as per Investigator's criteria. |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | RTXM83-CHOP | Patients treated with Rituximab biosimilar in combination with CHOP chemotherapy |
| BG001 | MabThera-CHOP | Patients treated with Rituximab in combination with CHOP chemotherapy |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Median | Inter-Quartile Range | years |
| |||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Initial disease stage (Ann Arbor Staging) | The stage depends on both the place where the malignant tissue is located and on systemic symptoms due to the lymphoma. Ann Arbor Stage=I: Best condition; Ann Arbor Stage=IV: Worst condition Stage I: cancer located in a single region; Stage II: cancer located in 2 separate regions that are confined to one side of the diaphragm; Stage III: cancer spreading to both sides of the diaphragm; Stage IV: diffuse or disseminated involvement of one or more extralymphatic organs. | Count of Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||||||
| Presence of extra nodal lesions | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Performance Status according to Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) | Measure Description: ECOG=0: Fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction; ECOG =1: Restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature; | Count of Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||||||
| Age-adjusted International Prognostic Index (IPI) | Age-adjusted IPI is a simplified index for comparing patients within an age group (i.e. 60 or younger, or over 60) and includes the evaluation of 3 clinical factors: Ann Arbor stage III or IV disease; ECOG performance status >=2 and ; increased serum lactate dehydrogenase levels. The sum of the points allotted correlates with the following risk groups: Low risk (0 points) - 5-year survival of 83%; Low-intermediate risk (1 point) - 5-year survival of 69%; High-intermediate risk (2 points) - 5-year survival of 46%; High risk (3 points) - 5-year survival of 32%. | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Response Rate (RR) Achieved After Cycle 6 With RTXM83 Plus CHOP Compared to the RR Obtained With Mabthera® Plus CHOP (R-CHOP) in Patients With DLBCL | Per International Working Group (IWG) revised criteria for Malignant Lymphomas (Cheson et al. 2007) and assessed by positron-emission tomography scan, or by computed tomography scan and/or magnetic resonance imaging if Positron Emission Tomography (PET) scan was not feasible. Tumor response was classified according to the International Working Group criteria, as Complete Remission (CR): Complete disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms if present before therapy; Partial Response (PR): At least a 50% decrease in sum of the product of the diameters of up to six of the largest dominant nodes or nodal masses; Stable disease (SD) or; Progressive disease. Response rate was the sum of CR and PR. | The Intent-to-treat (ITT) population and the Per Protocol (PP) population | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | Tumor response assessed after Cycle 6 or at the end of treatment |
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | AUC 0-∞ (h μg/mL) at Cycle 1 of RTXM83 and Mabthera® | Compare the pharmacokinetic (PK) parameter (AUC 0-∞) calculated from start of the first infusion until start of the second infusion (i.e. at Cycle 1) in a population PK model. For the PK similarity assessments, regulatory guidelines on bioequivalence were followed whereby two treatments are judged not to be different from one another if the 90% confidence interval (CI) of the ratio between the geometric means of the measure (AUC 0-∞ ) falls completely within the range 80%-125%. | Posted | Geometric Least Squares Mean | Geometric Coefficient of Variation | ng.h/mL | Cycle 1 (first dose): Day 1 (pre-dose, mid-infusion), Day 8 and Day 15 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | AUC 0-∞ (h μg/mL) at Cycle 6 of RTXM83 and Mabthera® | Compare the PK parameter (AUC 0-∞) calculated from start of the first infusion until Day 21 of administration of Cycle 6 in a population PK model. For the PK similarity assessments, regulatory guidelines on bioequivalence were followed whereby two treatments are judged not to be different from one another if the 90% confidence interval (CI) of the ratio between the geometric means of the measure (AUC 0-∞ ) falls completely within the range 80%-125%. | Posted | Geometric Least Squares Mean | Geometric Coefficient of Variation | ng.h/mL | Cycle 6 (last dose): Day 1, Day 8, Day 15 and Day 21 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Cmax (μg/mL) at Cycle 1 of RTXM83 and Mabthera® | Compare the PK parameter (Cmax) calculated from start of the first infusion until start of the second infusion (i.e. at Cycle 1) in a population PK model. For the PK similarity assessments, regulatory guidelines on bioequivalence were followed whereby two treatments are judged not to be different from one another if the 90% confidence interval (CI) of the ratio between the geometric means of the measure (Cmax) falls completely within the range 80%-125%. | Posted | Geometric Least Squares Mean | Geometric Coefficient of Variation | μg/mL | Cycle 1 (first dose): Day 1 (pre-dose, mid-infusion), Day 8 and Day 15 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Cmax (μg/mL) at Cycle 6 of RTXM83 and Mabthera® | Compare the PK parameter (Cmax) calculated from start of the first infusion until Day 21 of administration of Cycle 6 in a population PK model. For the PK similarity assessments, regulatory guidelines on bioequivalence were followed whereby two treatments are judged not to be different from one another if the 90% confidence interval (CI) of the ratio between the geometric means of the measure (AUC 0-∞ ) falls completely within the range 80%-125%. | Posted | Geometric Least Squares Mean | Geometric Coefficient of Variation | μg/mL | Cycle 6 (last dose): Day 1, Day 8, Day 15 and Day 21 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage Change From Baseline in Pharmacodynamic (PD) Markers (CD19+ and CD20+ Cells) Blood Counts of RTXM83 and Mabthera® | CD19 and CD20 are proteins found on the cell surface of B cells, and they can be detected in peripheral blood by flow cytometry. Flow cytometry of peripheral blood was performed for immediate analysis of cells with cluster of differentiation 19 (CD19+) and CD20+. To compare the percent Change From Baseline ((Cycle 1 pre-dose) in pharmacodynamic markers (CD19+ and CD20+ Cells) in Peripheral Blood achieved in RTXM83 and Mabthera® arms at Cycle 1 end of infusion (EOI), 6 months and 9 months after last dose of treatment. | Data were provided for the number of samples available at each visit. | Posted | Median | Full Range | percentage change in cells | Up to follow-up 3 (FU3); 9 months after last dose of treatment |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Comparable Safety Profile in Both Treatment Arms | Compare the frequency and severity of treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) reported in each treatment arm. | All patients receiving at least one dose of the study medication. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Up to FU3; 9 months after last dose of treatment |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Comparable Immunogenicity Profile Between RTXM83 and Mabthera® | Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) developed de novo (seroconversion) after 6 cycles of treatment and 9 months of follow-up. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Up to FU3; 9 months after last dose of treatment |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Event Free Survival (EFS) in RTXM83 Arm and Mabthera® Arm | Time from randomization to any of the following events: progressive disease, no achievement of CR, PR associated with treatment in excess of that per protocol, SD, relapse after achievement of CR, or death from any cause, whichever comes first. | Number of patients with an EFS event (progressive disease, no achievement of CR, PR associated with treatment more than that per protocol, stable disease, relapse after achievement of CR, or death from any cause, whichever comes first). | Posted | Median | 95% Confidence Interval | time (months) | Up to FU3; 9 months after last dose of treatment |
|
|
Adverse event data were collected from the study start, during the study and up to 30 days after the end of study treatment.
Graded according to the National Cancer Institute-Common Toxicity Criteria (NCI-CTC; version 4.0) and categorized using the MedDRA (version 16.0) terminology.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | RTXM83-CHOP | Patients treated with Rituximab biosimilar in combination with CHOP chemotherapy | 8 | 136 | 47 | 136 | 131 | 136 |
| EG001 | MabThera-CHOP | Patients treated with Rituximab in combination with CHOP chemotherapy | 12 | 136 | 45 | 136 | 131 | 136 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Neutropenia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA (16.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Leukopenia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA (16.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (16.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pyrexia | General disorders | MedDRA (16.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pneumonia | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (16.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Septic shock | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (16.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Lung infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (16.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Febrile neutropenia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA (16.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dehydration | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (16.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hyponatremia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (16.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pharyngeal inflammation | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (16.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Neutropenia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA (16.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Anaemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA (16.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Leukopenia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA (16.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Febrile Neutropenia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA (16.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Lymphopenia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA (16.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Thrombocytopenia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA (16.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (16.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (16.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (16.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Constipation | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (16.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal Pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (16.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Stomatitis | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (16.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal pain upper | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (16.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pyrexia | General disorders | MedDRA (16.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Fatigue | General disorders | MedDRA (16.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Asthenia | General disorders | MedDRA (16.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Oedema peripheral | General disorders | MedDRA (16.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Chills | General disorders | MedDRA (16.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pneumonia | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (16.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Urinary tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (16.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Oral candidiasis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (16.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Blood lactate dehydrogenase increased | Investigations | MedDRA (16.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Weight decreased | Investigations | MedDRA (16.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gamma-glutamyltransferase increased | Investigations | MedDRA (16.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypokalaemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (16.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypocalcaemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (16.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Decreased appetite | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (16.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hyperglycaemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (16.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hyponatraemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (16.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dyslipidaemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (16.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypoalbuminaemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (16.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pain in extremity | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (16.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Myalgia | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (16.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Neuropathy peripheral | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (16.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (16.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Paraesthesia | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (16.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cough | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (16.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dyspnoea | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (16.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Oropharyngeal pain | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (16.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Alopecia | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (16.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Susana Millan | mAbxience | +34917711500 | 9284 | Susana.Millan@mabxience.com |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D016403 | Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse |
| D008228 | Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D016393 | Lymphoma, B-Cell |
| D008223 | Lymphoma |
| D009370 | Neoplasms by Histologic Type |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D008232 | Lymphoproliferative Disorders |
| D008206 | Lymphatic Diseases |
| D006425 | Hemic and Lymphatic Diseases |
| D007160 | Immunoproliferative Disorders |
| D007154 | Immune System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000069283 | Rituximab |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D058846 | Antibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-Derived |
| D000911 | Antibodies, Monoclonal |
| D000906 | Antibodies |
| D007136 | Immunoglobulins |
| D007162 | Immunoproteins |
| D001798 | Blood Proteins |
| D011506 | Proteins |
| D000602 | Amino Acids, Peptides, and Proteins |
| D012712 | Serum Globulins |
| D005916 | Globulins |
Not provided
Not provided
| Male |
|
| Asian |
|
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
|
| Black or African American |
|
| White |
|
| More than one race |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
| Stage II |
|
| Stage III |
|
| Stage IV |
|
| Yes |
|
| 1 |
|
| Missing data |
|
| 1 |
|
| 2 |
|
| PP : Response rate (CR+PR) |
|
|
| percentage difference | 3 | 1-Sided | 95 | -13 | For the PP population | Non-Inferiority or Equivalence (legacy) | The RR, with the corresponding 95% CI, was calculated for each treatment arm and compared using Fisher's exact test at a one-sided 0.025 type I error rate. A non-inferiority margin of 13% was assumed with ≥ 80% power to detect treatment differences. Non-inferiority was concluded if the one-sided 95% CI was above the -13% margin set for the study. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|