Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
slow enrollment, outdated material
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Flexible bronchoscopes are typically reusable and therefore need high level disinfection to prevent inadvertent spread of microbial pathogens from patient to patient. The process of disinfection is time consuming and expensive. Moreover, a bronchoscope being processed may not be readily available for another patient. One solution to this problem was to use a single use disposable sheath that covers a flexible bronchoscope protecting all surfaces of the bronchoscope.(Colt, Beamis, Harrell, & Mathur, 2000). Another way to eliminate potential hazards with a reusable bronchoscope is the use of a disposable bronchoscope. Such a disposable bronchoscope has been developed (Ambu aScope, Ambu, Glen Burnie, MD) and has been used successfully for intubations in manikins(Scutt et al., 2011) and patients. (Kristensen & Fredensborg, 2013; Pujol, López, & Valero, 2010; Tvede, Kristensen, & Nyhus-Andreasen, 2012). Further advancement in the imaging and handling of this disposable flexible bronchoscope now allows for the purpose of bronchoscopy and broncho-alveolar lavage in critically ill patients with pulmonary compromise. (FDA approval: 05-11-2013 date)
The aim of the study is to compare image clarity, suction capacity, and handling performance of a reusable flexible bronchoscope to the disposable flexible bronchoscope. In addition, the investigators intend to perform a cost analysis.
Description
Patients will be monitored by standard NIBP or invasive arterial lines, ECG and oxygen saturation. All patients are intubated due to their respiratory insufficiency or for airway protection. Patients will be anesthetized for the procedure. Anesthesia will be induced with versed 2mg, fentanyl 100 µg and paralyzed with 0.1mg/kg vecuronium. Anesthesia will be maintained with propofol infusion 50-150 µg/kg/min.
Study Procedures All patients will be under general anesthesia. Standard monitoring will be applied. This includes a blood pressure cuff or an arterial line, EKG and a pulse-oximeter. Patients will receive 2 mg/kg propofol, 1µg/kg fentanyl and 0.1mg/kg vecuronium for the procedure. After induction of anesthesia the FiO2 will be turned to 1.0 and a bronchoscopy adaptor will be interposed in the breathing circuit next to the endotracheal tube. Patients will be randomized to receiving either the non-disposable bronchoscope (Storz 8402 2x, El Segundo, CA) or the single use aScope 3 first. After randomization, bronchoscopy will be started with an inspection of the trachea and carina. Next the right lung bronchial tree will be inspected systematically beginning with the right upper lobe, following with the right middle lobe and finishing with the right lower lobe. All segmental bronchi will be inspected and cleaned by suction as deemed necessary. The bronchoscope will then be removed from the bronchial tree and rinsed with saline Subsequently, the bronchoscope will be re-inserted and advanced to the basal segmental bronchi of the right lower lobe. The tip of the bronchoscope will be brought into wedge position in one of the basal segments for broncho-alveolar lavage (BAL). A saline flush of 20 ml will be administered. The flow of saline will be observed at the distal tip of the bronchoscope. After 10 seconds of maintaining a wedge position, gentle suction will be applied to collect the lavage specimen in the collection trap. This step will be repeated 4 more times (total of 80ml) to obtain an adequate specimen. The same procedure will be repeated on the left lung using the alternate bronchoscope according to randomization. At the end of the procedure, a chest radiograph will be obtained to rule out pneumothorax.
Measurements
Before starting the procedure the set up time of each bronchoscope will be recorded. The view, image, and light of each bronchoscope will be assessed, then the inspection of the upper lobe segmental bronchi will be conducted. The time of lavage and suctioning until no more specimen can be collected will be measured. The volume of the obtained specimen will be measured. The specimen will be evaluated by a blinded observer after the procedure is completed.(clear fluids, mucous secretions, viscous secretions, pus, blood etc). The blinded observer will evaluate the quality and quanity of the sample for obtaining cultures.The blinded observer will be an attending or resident from the infectious disease department.
The overall ease of handling will be rated directly after the procedure by the investigator. All bronchoscopies will be taped and view-clarity, image and light-brightness will be assessed by a second blinded observer. This blinder observer can be another investigator not present during the procedure or an internist who was not present and is part of the study team.
All assessments will be performed using a VAS scale of 0 to 10 cm as shown below. The investigator will mark directly on the scale.
We will only enroll patients who were admitted to a critical care unit at the University of Louisville and who are intubated.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Disposable bronchoscope first (aScope IV), then Reusable bronchoscope (Storz 8402 2x) | Experimental | the bronchoscope will be re-inserted and advanced to the basal segmental bronchi of the right lower lobe. The tip of the bronchoscope will be brought into wedge position in one of the basal segments for broncho-alveolar lavage (BAL). A saline flush of 20 ml will be administered. The flow of saline will be observed at the distal tip of the bronchoscope. After 10 seconds of maintaining a wedge position, gentle suction will be applied to collect the lavage specimen in the collection trap. This step will be repeated 4 more times (total of 80ml) to obtain an adequate specimen. |
|
| Reusable bronchoscope first (Storz 8402 2x), then Disposable bronchoscope (aScope IV) | Active Comparator | the bronchoscope will be re-inserted and advanced to the basal segmental bronchi of the right lower lobe. The tip of the bronchoscope will be brought into wedge position in one of the basal segments for broncho-alveolar lavage (BAL). A saline flush of 20 ml will be administered. The flow of saline will be observed at the distal tip of the bronchoscope. After 10 seconds of maintaining a wedge position, gentle suction will be applied to collect the lavage specimen in the collection trap. This step will be repeated 4 more times (total of 80ml) to obtain an adequate specimen. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bronchoscope reusable (Storz 8402 2x) | Device | Bronchoscopy and alveolar lavage |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Evaluation of Visualization of Two Different Flexible Bronchoscopes; a Disposable and a Reusable Bronchoscope | Visualization of the two bronchoscopes was measured by using a qualitative scale from 0 to 10; 0 being classified as "cannot be evaluated" and 10 being assessed as optimal visualization | 10 to 30 minutes |
| Evaluation of the Handling of Two Different Flexible Bronchoscopes, a Disposable and a Reusable Bronchoscope | Handling of the two bronchoscopes using a qualitative scale from 0 to 10; 0 being classified as "cannot be evaluated" and 10 being assessed as optimal visualization | 10-30 minutes |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Evaluation of Ability to Suction With Two Different Flexible Bronchoscopes, a Disposable and a Reusable Bronchoscope | Measured suction capability by volume retrieved after broncho-alveolar lavage with 10 ml of saline, measured in ml | 10-30 minutes |
| Evaluation of Flexibility of Two Different Flexible Bronchoscopes, a Disposable and a Reusable Bronchoscope |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
1) Patient is moribund and a bronchoscopy is very unlikely to reduce impending mortality or can avert death
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Rainer Lenhardt, MD MBA | University of Louisville School of Medicine Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of Louisville School of Medicine | Louisville | Kentucky | 40202 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1463174 | Background | Bellomo R, Tai E, Parkin G. Fibreoptic bronchoscopy in the critically ill: a prospective study of its diagnostic and therapeutic value. Anaesth Intensive Care. 1992 Nov;20(4):464-9. doi: 10.1177/0310057X9202000412. | |
| 10893377 | Background | Colt HG, Beamis JJ, Harrell JH, Mathur PM. Novel flexible bronchoscope and single-use disposable-sheath endoscope system. A preliminary technology evaluation. Chest. 2000 Jul;118(1):183-7. doi: 10.1378/chest.118.1.183. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
period August 8, 2015 to July 8, 2017 location: ICU
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Disposable Bronchoscope First (aScope IV), Then Reusable Bronchoscope (Storz 8402 2x) | Randomly controlled, either the disposable bronchoscope (aScope 4) was inserted first into the trachea and advanced into the right lung. Subsequently, a reusable bronchoscope (Storz 8402) was inserted into the trachea and advanced into the left lung. If randomization assigned the reusable bronchoscope to be inserted first, then the reusable bronchoscope was inserted into the trachea and advanced into the right lung first followed by insertion of the disposable bronchoscope and advancement into the left lung. The subsequent procedure was identical for both parts of this crossover trial and is described as follows: After insertion of the bronchoscope into the bronchial tree the scope was advanced to the basal segmental bronchi of the right or left lower lobe. The tip of the bronchoscope was brought into wedge position in one of the basal segments for broncho-alveolar lavage (BAL). A saline flush of 20 ml was administered. The flow of saline was observed at the distal tip of the bronchoscope. After 10 seconds of maintaining a wedge position, gentle suction was applied to collect the lavage specimen in the collection trap. This step was repeated 4 more times (total of 80 ml) to obtain an adequate specimen. |
| FG001 | Reusable Bronchoscope First (Storz 8402 2x), Then Disposable Bronchoscope (aScope IV) | Randomly controlled, either the reusable bronchoscope (Storz 8402) was inserted first into the trachea and advanced into the right lung. Subsequently, disposable bronchoscope (aScope 4) was inserted into the trachea and advanced into the left lung. If randomization assigned the reusable bronchoscope to be inserted first, then the reusable bronchoscope was inserted into the trachea and advanced into the right lung first followed by insertion of the disposable bronchoscope and advancement into the left lung. The subsequent procedure was identical for both parts of this crossover trial and is described as follows: After insertion of the bronchoscope into the bronchial tree the scope was advanced to the basal segmental bronchi of the right or left lower lobe. The tip of the bronchoscope was brought into wedge position in one of the basal segments for broncho-alveolar lavage (BAL). A saline flush of 20 ml was administered. The flow of saline was observed at the distal tip of the bronchoscope. After 10 seconds of maintaining a wedge position, gentle suction was applied to collect the lavage specimen in the collection trap. This step was repeated 4 more times (total of 80 ml) to obtain an adequate specimen. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
All participants were randomized to receive both intervention in a sequential order, per a cross-over study design
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Disposable Bronchoscope Insertion Followed by Reusable Bronchoscope Insertion or Vice Versa | Randomly controlled, either the disposable bronchoscope (aScope 4) was inserted first into the trachea and advanced into the right lung. Subsequently, a reusable bronchoscope (Storz 8402) was inserted into the trachea and advanced into the left lung. If randomization assigned the reusable bronchoscope to be inserted first, then the reusable bronchoscope was inserted into the trachea and advanced into the right lung first followed by insertion of the disposable bronchoscope and advancement into the left lung. The subsequent procedure was identical for both parts of this crossover trial and is described as follows: After insertion of the bronchoscope into the bronchial tree the scope was advanced to the basal segmental bronchi of the right or left lower lobe. The tip of the bronchoscope was brought into wedge position in one of the basal segments for broncho-alveolar lavage (BAL). A saline flush of 20 ml was administered. The flow of saline was observed at the distal tip of the bronchoscope. After 10 seconds of maintaining a wedge position, gentle suction was applied to collect the lavage specimen in the collection trap. This step was repeated 4 more times (total of 80 ml) to obtain an adequate specimen. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Evaluation of Visualization of Two Different Flexible Bronchoscopes; a Disposable and a Reusable Bronchoscope | Visualization of the two bronchoscopes was measured by using a qualitative scale from 0 to 10; 0 being classified as "cannot be evaluated" and 10 being assessed as optimal visualization | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | 10 to 30 minutes |
|
60 minutes
routine bronchoscopies in the ICU, potential adverse events were observed during the study period of 10-30 minutes and for one hour after the bronchoscopy
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Disposable Bronchoscope First (aScope IV), Then Reusable Bronchoscope (Storz 8402 2x) | no adverse events |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rainer Lenhardt | University of Louisville | 5028523122 | rainer.lenhardt@louisville.edu |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Jun 27, 2014 | Jul 16, 2021 | Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
| ICF | No | No | Yes | Informed Consent Form | Jun 8, 2014 | Jul 16, 2021 | ICF_001.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012131 | Respiratory Insufficiency |
| D011014 | Pneumonia |
| D001261 | Pulmonary Atelectasis |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012120 | Respiration Disorders |
| D012140 | Respiratory Tract Diseases |
| D012141 | Respiratory Tract Infections |
| D007239 | Infections |
Not provided
Not provided
The disposable aScope IV bronchoscope will be compared to the re-usable bronchoscope
Not provided
Not provided
A blinded investigator will view the bronchoscopy video and evaluate. The blinded investigator will use the same criteria the investigator who did the procedure used (Un-blinded) for the evaluation. Video will not indicate which scope was used and only indicate if it is the right or left lung they are viewing. Research coordinator will keep separate a file indicating which scope was used.
Not provided
|
| Bronchoscope disposable (aScope 4) | Device | Bronchoscopy and alveolar lavage |
|
|
Flexibility of the two bronchoscopes was measured by using a qualitative scale from 0 to 10; 0 being classified as "cannot be evaluated" and 10 being assessed as optimal flexibility |
| 10-30 minutes |
| 22192316 | Background | Estella A. [Analysis of 208 flexible bronchoscopies performed in an intensive care unit]. Med Intensiva. 2012 Aug-Sep;36(6):396-401. doi: 10.1016/j.medin.2011.11.005. Epub 2011 Dec 20. Spanish. |
| 19522159 | Background | Facciolongo N, Patelli M, Gasparini S, Lazzari Agli L, Salio M, Simonassi C, Del Prato B, Zanoni P. Incidence of complications in bronchoscopy. Multicentre prospective study of 20,986 bronchoscopies. Monaldi Arch Chest Dis. 2009 Mar;71(1):8-14. doi: 10.4081/monaldi.2009.370. |
| 12879338 | Background | Georgiades G, Myrianthefs P, Venetsanou K, Kythreoti A, Kyroudi A, Kittas C, Baltopoulos G. Temperature and serum proinflammatory cytokine changes in patients with NSCLC after BAL. Lung. 2003;181(1):35-47. doi: 10.1007/s00408-003-1001-6. |
| 16778276 | Background | Huang YC, Bassett MA, Levin D, Montilla T, Ghio AJ. Acute phase reaction in healthy volunteers after bronchoscopy with lavage. Chest. 2006 Jun;129(6):1565-9. doi: 10.1378/chest.129.6.1565. |
| 5674435 | Background | Ikeda S, Yanai N, Ishikawa S. Flexible bronchofiberscope. Keio J Med. 1968 Mar;17(1):1-16. doi: 10.2302/kjm.17.1. No abstract available. |
| 12853543 | Background | Kreider ME, Lipson DA. Bronchoscopy for atelectasis in the ICU: a case report and review of the literature. Chest. 2003 Jul;124(1):344-50. doi: 10.1378/chest.124.1.344. |
| 23495767 | Background | Kristensen MS, Fredensborg BB. The disposable Ambu aScope vs. a conventional flexible videoscope for awake intubation -- a randomised study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2013 Aug;57(7):888-95. doi: 10.1111/aas.12094. Epub 2013 Mar 15. |
| 22195599 | Background | Lucena CM, Martinez-Olondris P, Badia JR, Xaubet A, Ferrer M, Torres A, Agusti C. [Fiberoptic bronchoscopy in a respiratory intensive care unit]. Med Intensiva. 2012 Aug-Sep;36(6):389-95. doi: 10.1016/j.medin.2011.11.004. Epub 2011 Dec 22. Spanish. |
| 16374157 | Background | Perkins GD, Chatterjie S, McAuley DF, Gao F, Thickett DR. Role of nonbronchoscopic lavage for investigating alveolar inflammation and permeability in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care Med. 2006 Jan;34(1):57-64. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000190197.69945.c5. |
| 20707786 | Background | Pujol E, Lopez AM, Valero R. Use of the Ambu((R)) aScope in 10 patients with predicted difficult intubation. Anaesthesia. 2010 Oct;65(10):1037-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2010.06477.x. |
| 23842821 | Background | Du Rand IA, Blaikley J, Booton R, Chaudhuri N, Gupta V, Khalid S, Mandal S, Martin J, Mills J, Navani N, Rahman NM, Wrightson JM, Munavvar M; British Thoracic Society Bronchoscopy Guideline Group. Summary of the British Thoracic Society guideline for diagnostic flexible bronchoscopy in adults. Thorax. 2013 Aug;68(8):786-7. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2013-203629. |
| 21401543 | Background | Scutt S, Clark N, Cook TM, Smith C, Christmas T, Coppel L, Crewdson K. Evaluation of a single-use intubating videoscope (Ambu aScope ) in three airway training manikins for oral intubation, nasal intubation and intubation via three supraglottic airway devices. Anaesthesia. 2011 Apr;66(4):293-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.06647.x. Epub 2011 Feb 24. |
| 21287478 | Background | Sharif-Kashani B, Shahabi P, Behzadnia N, Mohammad-Taheri Z, Mansouri D, Masjedi MR, Zargari L, Salimi Negad L. Incidence of fever and bacteriemia following flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy: a prospective study. Acta Med Iran. 2010 Nov-Dec;48(6):385-8. |
| 8368623 | Background | Steinberg KP, Mitchell DR, Maunder RJ, Milberg JA, Whitcomb ME, Hudson LD. Safety of bronchoalveolar lavage in patients with adult respiratory distress syndrome. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1993 Sep;148(3):556-61. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/148.3.556. |
| 2298070 | Background | Tsao TC, Tsai YH, Lan RS, Shieh WB, Lee CH. Treatment for collapsed lung in critically ill patients. Selective intrabronchial air insufflation using the fiberoptic bronchoscope. Chest. 1990 Feb;97(2):435-8. doi: 10.1378/chest.97.2.435. |
| 22338623 | Background | Tvede MF, Kristensen MS, Nyhus-Andreasen M. A cost analysis of reusable and disposable flexible optical scopes for intubation. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012 May;56(5):577-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2012.02653.x. Epub 2012 Feb 16. |
| 15006953 | Background | Um SW, Choi CM, Lee CT, Kim YW, Han SK, Shim YS, Yoo CG. Prospective analysis of clinical characteristics and risk factors of postbronchoscopy fever. Chest. 2004 Mar;125(3):945-52. doi: 10.1378/chest.125.3.945. |
| Participants |
|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
|
|
|
| Primary | Evaluation of the Handling of Two Different Flexible Bronchoscopes, a Disposable and a Reusable Bronchoscope | Handling of the two bronchoscopes using a qualitative scale from 0 to 10; 0 being classified as "cannot be evaluated" and 10 being assessed as optimal visualization | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | 10-30 minutes |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Evaluation of Ability to Suction With Two Different Flexible Bronchoscopes, a Disposable and a Reusable Bronchoscope | Measured suction capability by volume retrieved after broncho-alveolar lavage with 10 ml of saline, measured in ml | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | milliliter | 10-30 minutes |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Evaluation of Flexibility of Two Different Flexible Bronchoscopes, a Disposable and a Reusable Bronchoscope | Flexibility of the two bronchoscopes was measured by using a qualitative scale from 0 to 10; 0 being classified as "cannot be evaluated" and 10 being assessed as optimal flexibility | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | 10-30 minutes |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 12 |
| 0 |
| 12 |
| 0 |
| 12 |
| EG001 | Reusable Bronchoscope First (Storz 8402 2x), Then Disposable Bronchoscope (aScope IV) | no adverse events | 0 | 12 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
Not provided
Not provided
| D008171 | Lung Diseases |