Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The aim of this study is to assess interobserver and intraobserver variability of the Amsterdam Stool Scale in clinical practice. After passing a stool by the child participating in the study it will be assessed using the Amsterdam Stool Scale independently by one of the parents and the medical doctor. At the same time a parent will take 2 photos that will be independently evaluated by another doctor.
INTRODUCTION:
Description of stool appearance is important in clinical practice. Parents are often asked to evaluate stool of their child. At present parents also take more frequently photos using smartphone camera when they are concerned with child's stool appearance and show it to their doctors. To make stool evaluation easier there have been stool form scales created. One of this is Amsterdam Stool Scale that enables stool assessment of children who are not yet toilet trained. This scale facilitates to describe amount, consistency and color of the stool.
AIM:
To assess interobserver and intraobserver variability of the Amsterdam Stool Scale in clinical practice.
METHODS:
After passing a stool by the child participating in the study, within a short-time interval (<5 min), the stool will be assessed independently by one of the parents and the medical doctor. At the same time a parent will take 2 photos with phone camera. The photographs then will be independently evaluated by another doctor who will be unaware of both the "in vivo" stool appraisal and child condition.
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS:
Then the interobserver (between a parent, the doctor and the doctor assessing photograph) variability will be evaluated by calculating the kappa (κ) statistics for nominal data for the stool consistency, amount and color separately.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Children 1-18 months of age | Children aged between 1 month and 18 months admitted to the Department of Pediatrics The Medical University of Warsaw |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stool Assessment | Other | After passing a stool by the child participating in the study, within a short-time interval (<5 min), the stool will be assessed independently by one of the parents and the medical doctor. At the same time a parent will take 2 photos with phone photographic camera. Then the photographs will be independently evaluated by another doctor who will be unaware of both the "in vivo" stool appraisal and child condition. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Interrater Variability (IV) | The outcome measures were interrater variability in the stool assessment by the parent and MD1 made in vivo and in the assessment by the parent in vivo and by MD2 based on the photograph(s). The IV was evaluated by calculating the proportion of exact agreement and the κ statistics for nominal data (colour) and weighted κ values for items in which there is a natural ordering of categories (consistency and amount). Correlation, based on the value of kappa (κ), was categorized as poor (κ ≤ 0.2), fair (0.21 ≤ κ ≤ 0.40), moderate (0.41 ≤ κ ≤ 0.60), good (0.61 ≤ κ ≤ 0.80) or excellent (0.81 ≤ κ ≤ 1.00). | <5min after defecation |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
The group will be selected from the children admitted to the Department of Pediatrics The Medical University of Warsaw
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Department of Paediatrics, The Medical University of Warsaw | Warsaw | Poland |
Not provided
This study was conducted at the Department of Paediatrics of the Medical University of Warsaw between September 2014 and February 2015.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Children 2-18 Months of Age | Children aged between 2 and 18 months of age, who were not toilet trained, admitted to the Department of Pediatrics The Medical University of Warsaw Stool Assessment: After passing a stool by the child participating in the study, within the shortest possible time (<5 min), the stool will be assessed independently and simulataneously by one of the parents and the medical doctor. They were unaware of the evaluation results made by the other. At the same time 2 photos were taken with smartphone camera. Then the photographs were subsequently evaluated by the other physician (MD2), who was unaware of the in vivo stool evaluation. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Children between 2 and 18 months of age who were not toilet trained were eligible for the study. Exclusion criteria included parental inability to understand the study procedure and lack of parental consent to participate.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Children 2-18 Months of Age | Children between 2 and 18 months of age who were not toilet trained |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Interrater Variability (IV) | The outcome measures were interrater variability in the stool assessment by the parent and MD1 made in vivo and in the assessment by the parent in vivo and by MD2 based on the photograph(s). The IV was evaluated by calculating the proportion of exact agreement and the κ statistics for nominal data (colour) and weighted κ values for items in which there is a natural ordering of categories (consistency and amount). Correlation, based on the value of kappa (κ), was categorized as poor (κ ≤ 0.2), fair (0.21 ≤ κ ≤ 0.40), moderate (0.41 ≤ κ ≤ 0.60), good (0.61 ≤ κ ≤ 0.80) or excellent (0.81 ≤ κ ≤ 1.00). | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | kappa value | <5min after defecation |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Children 2-18 Months of Age | Children aged between 2 and 18 months of age, who were not toilet trained, admitted to the Department of Pediatrics The Medical University of Warsaw Stool Assessment: After passing a stool by the child participating in the study, within the shortest possible time (<5 min), the stool will be assessed independently and simulataneously by one of the parents and the medical doctor. They were unaware of the evaluation results made by the other. At the same time 2 photos were taken with smartphone camera. Then the photographs were subsequently evaluated by the other physician (MD2), who was unaware of the in vivo stool evaluation. |
Not provided
Not provided
Limitations of our study included the lack of external validity. Children were recruited in only one paediatric department. Only one physician conducted stool assessment in vivo and only one physician evaluated photographs.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Katarzyna Wojtyniak | Medical University of Warsaw | (+48) 223179536 | wojtyniakkasia@gmail.com |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| month |
|
| Gender | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 100 |
| 0 |
| 100 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided