A 5-item self-report questionnaire that assesses the extent to which various activities dependent upon vision are affected by MS-related visual problems. Scores range from 0-15, with higher scores indicating a greater impact of visual problems on daily activities. Effect size is reported (quantified difference between baseline and time point). The larger the absolute value, the stronger the effect. Cohen's guidelines for social sciences indicate 0.10 as a "small" effect size, 0.30 as a "medium" effect size, and 0.50 as a "large" effect size.

A self-report scale that assesses the ways in which pain and unpleasant sensation interfere with mood, ability to walk or move, sleep, work, recreation, and enjoyment of life. This assessment is used for subjects who have pain. Scores can range from 6-30. Items are scaled so that higher scores indicate a greater impact of pain on a patient's mood and behavior. Symptom specific test, only used for participants who presented symptom. Effect size is reported (quantified difference between baseline and time point). The larger the absolute value, the stronger the effect. Cohen's guidelines for social sciences indicate 0.10 as a "small" effect size, 0.30 as a "medium" effect size, and 0.50 as a "large" effect size.

A 4-item self-report scale to evaluate the impact of bladder control on lifestyle. This assessment is used for subjects with bladder issues. Scores can range from 0-22, with higher scores indicating greater bladder control problems. Symptom specific test, only used for participants who presented symptom. Effect size is reported (quantified difference between baseline and time point). The larger the absolute value, the stronger the effect. Cohen's guidelines for social sciences indicate 0.10 as a "small" effect size, 0.30 as a "medium" effect size, and 0.50 as a "large" effect size.

A 5-item self-report scale to evaluate the impact of bowel control on lifestyle. This assessment is used for subjects with bowel issues. Scores can range from 0-26, with higher scores indicating greater bowel control problems. Symptom specific test, only used for participants who presented symptom. Effect size is reported (quantified difference between baseline and time point). The larger the absolute value, the stronger the effect. Cohen's guidelines for social sciences indicate 0.10 as a "small" effect size, 0.30 as a "medium" effect size, and 0.50 as a "large" effect size.

A brief, clinician-administered test that helps determine the neuropsychological status of adults who have neurologic injury or disease such as dementia, head injury, and stroke. This tool consists of a battery of tests. Raw scores are transformed to a 0-120 scale, with a higher score indicating higher function. Effect size is reported (quantified difference between baseline and time point). The larger the absolute value, the stronger the effect. Cohen's guidelines for social sciences indicate 0.10 as a "small" effect size, 0.30 as a "medium" effect size, and 0.50 as a "large" effect size.

Clinician measures how far the individual can walk until fatigue requires him/her to stop. Longer distances demonstrate improvement. Performance-based and tested in participants who possessed the ability to perform the assessment. Effect size is reported (quantified difference between baseline and time point). The larger the absolute value, the stronger the effect. Cohen's guidelines for social sciences indicate 0.10 as a "small" effect size, 0.30 as a "medium" effect size, and 0.50 as a "large" effect size.

Assessed by timing the first 25 feet that the person walked. Performance-based and tested in participants who possessed the ability to perform the assessment. Effect size is reported (quantified difference between baseline and time point). The larger the absolute value, the stronger the effect. Cohen's guidelines for social sciences indicate 0.10 as a "small" effect size, 0.30 as a "medium" effect size, and 0.50 as a "large" effect size.

A 12-item self-report measure of the impact of MS on a person's walking. Raw scores are transformed to a 0-100 scale. A reduction in score indicates improvement. Effect size is reported (quantified difference between baseline and time point). The larger the absolute value, the stronger the effect. Cohen's guidelines for social sciences indicate 0.10 as a "small" effect size, 0.30 as a "medium" effect size, and 0.50 as a "large" effect size.

A standardized clinical assessment of gross upper limb dexterity. Subjects move small blocks from one side of a box to the other within a time period (one minute). Each side is tested separately. The score is the number of blocks moved from 0-150. A higher score indicates improvement. Effect size is reported (quantified difference between baseline and time point). The larger the absolute value, the stronger the effect. Cohen's guidelines for social sciences indicate 0.10 as a "small" effect size, 0.30 as a "medium" effect size, and 0.50 as a "large" effect size.

A standardized clinical assessment of gross upper limb dexterity. Subjects move small blocks from one side of a box to the other within a time period (one minute). Each side is tested separately. The score is the number of blocks moved from 0-150. A higher score indicates improvement. Effect size is reported (quantified difference between baseline and time point). The larger the absolute value, the stronger the effect. Cohen's guidelines for social sciences indicate 0.10 as a "small" effect size, 0.30 as a "medium" effect size, and 0.50 as a "large" effect size.

A 29-item self-report tool that measures the impact of MS on day-to-day life. There are 3 scores, physical, psychological, and total score. Raw scores are transformed to a 0-100 scale. A higher score indicates a greater impact of disease on daily function. Effect size is reported (quantified difference between baseline and time point). The larger the absolute value, the stronger the effect. Cohen's guidelines for social sciences indicate 0.10 as a "small" effect size, 0.30 as a "medium" effect size, and 0.50 as a "large" effect size.

A 29-item self-report tool that measures the impact of MS on day-to-day life. There are 3 scores, physical, psychological, and total score. Raw scores are transformed to a 0-100 scale. A higher score indicates a greater impact of disease on daily function. Effect size is reported (quantified difference between baseline and time point). The larger the absolute value, the stronger the effect. Cohen's guidelines for social sciences indicate 0.10 as a "small" effect size, 0.30 as a "medium" effect size, and 0.50 as a "large" effect size.

A self-report tool that assesses the perceived impact of fatigue on daily activities. Consists of 21 items selected from the Fatigue Impact Scale. Scored on a 0-84 scale. A higher score indicates a greater impact of fatigue on daily activities. Effect size is reported (quantified difference between baseline and time point). The larger the absolute value, the stronger the effect. Cohen's guidelines for social sciences indicate 0.10 as a "small" effect size, 0.30 as a "medium" effect size, and 0.50 as a "large" effect size.

The GMFM a standardized observational instrument that measures change in gross motor function. Subscales include lying & rolling; sitting; crawling & kneeling; standing; and walking, running & jumping. For the complete test, the raw scores are converted to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating greater functional mobility. The items that we used were scored on a 0-3 scale and changes reported in percent improvement. Performance-based and tested in participants who possessed the ability to perform the assessment. Effect size is reported (quantified difference between baseline and time point). The larger the absolute value, the stronger the effect. Cohen's guidelines for social sciences indicate 0.10 as a "small" effect size, 0.30 as a "medium" effect size, and 0.50 as a "large" effect size.

Measures and quantifies changes in trunk control during functional sitting. It was quickly determined that this test duplicated the TIS and was difficult to score objectively so the decision was made not to use it for the study. Performance-based and tested in participants who possessed the ability to perform the assessment.

An 8 item assessment that quantifies the ability to perform transfers. It has been validated in persons with stroke and a mixed neurologic population (43% MS). Score is a 0-40 scale. A higher score indicates higher function. Performance-based and tested in participants who possessed the ability to perform the assessment. Effect size is reported (quantified difference between baseline and time point). The larger the absolute value, the stronger the effect. Cohen's guidelines for social sciences indicate 0.10 as a "small" effect size, 0.30 as a "medium" effect size, and 0.50 as a "large" effect size.

Participants with MS are assessed by a clinician using the Kurtzke Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS). Scores range 0-10 (higher numbers indicate greater disability). Participants scoring 1-4.5 can walk without aid, 5.0-7.0 are walking impaired, scores of 7.5+ indicate wheelchair restriction. EDSS draws on the Kurtzke Functional Systems Scores (FSS) that assess 7 physiologic systems affected by MS. FSS ranges from 0-10 in each subsystem, where higher numbers indicate greater levels of dysfunction. The resulting EDSS characterizes the overall ability of the individual.

Secondary Progressing MS (SPMS) follows an initial Relapsing-Remitting (RRMS) diagnosis (~85 percent of initial MS diagnoses), characterized by relapses of increased disease activity and worsening symptoms, followed by remissions when the disease does not progress. SPMS is characterized as a gradual increase in disability as the disease progresses, with or without evidence of relapse or changes in an MRI scan. Primary Progressive MS (PPMS) is occurs in ~15 percent of initial MS diagnoses and presents as a steady progression of the disease with no clear relapses or remissions.

Clinician measures standing balance for up to 30 seconds in each of 5 conditions: feet 10 cm apart, feet together, stride stance, tandem stance, and single leg stance with eyes open and eyes closed. Total score is the sum of all 5 conditions. Higher scores indicate better balance. Performance-based and tested in participants who possessed the ability to perform the assessment. Effect size is reported (quantified difference between baseline and time point). The larger the absolute value, the stronger the effect. Cohen's guidelines for social sciences indicate 0.10 as a "small" effect size, 0.30 as a "medium" effect size, and 0.50 as a "large" effect size.

Effect sizes from baseline reported for 4 subjects with EDSS 6.5 - 7.0. It was postulated that the physical limitations of two subjects with EDSS score of 7.5 presented special challenges to measuring changes in function with the available assessment mechanisms for this clinical population.

A 5-item self-report questionnaire that assesses the extent to which various activities dependent upon vision are affected by MS-related visual problems. Scores range from 0-15, with higher scores indicating a greater impact of visual problems on daily activities. Effect size is reported (quantified difference between baseline and time point). The larger the absolute value, the stronger the effect. Cohen's guidelines for social sciences indicate 0.10 as a "small" effect size, 0.30 as a "medium" effect size, and 0.50 as a "large" effect size.

Effect sizes from baseline reported for 4 subjects with EDSS 6.5 - 7.0. It was postulated that the physical limitations of two subjects with EDSS score of 7.5 presented special challenges to measuring changes in function with the available assessment mechanisms for this clinical population.

A self-report scale that assesses the ways in which pain and unpleasant sensation interfere with mood, ability to walk or move, sleep, work, recreation, and enjoyment of life. This assessment is used for subjects who have pain. Scores can range from 6-30. Items are scaled so that higher scores indicate a greater impact of pain on a patient's mood and behavior. Symptom specific test, only used for participants who presented symptom. Effect size is reported (quantified difference between baseline and time point). The larger the absolute value, the stronger the effect. Cohen's guidelines for social sciences indicate 0.10 as a "small" effect size, 0.30 as a "medium" effect size, and 0.50 as a "large" effect size.

Effect sizes from baseline reported for 4 subjects with EDSS 6.5 - 7.0. It was postulated that the physical limitations of two subjects with EDSS score of 7.5 presented special challenges to measuring changes in function with the available assessment mechanisms for this clinical population.

A 4-item self-report scale to evaluate the impact of bladder control on lifestyle. This assessment is used for subjects with bladder issues. Scores can range from 0-22, with higher scores indicating greater bladder control problems. Symptom specific test, only used for participants who presented symptom. Effect size is reported (quantified difference between baseline and time point). The larger the absolute value, the stronger the effect. Cohen's guidelines for social sciences indicate 0.10 as a "small" effect size, 0.30 as a "medium" effect size, and 0.50 as a "large" effect size.

Effect sizes from baseline reported for 4 subjects with EDSS 6.5 - 7.0. It was postulated that the physical limitations of two subjects with EDSS score of 7.5 presented special challenges to measuring changes in function with the available assessment mechanisms for this clinical population.

A 5-item self-report scale to evaluate the impact of bowel control on lifestyle. This assessment is used for subjects with bowel issues. Scores can range from 0-26, with higher scores indicating greater bowel control problems. Symptom specific test, only used for participants who presented symptom. Effect size is reported (quantified difference between baseline and time point). The larger the absolute value, the stronger the effect. Cohen's guidelines for social sciences indicate 0.10 as a "small" effect size, 0.30 as a "medium" effect size, and 0.50 as a "large" effect size.

Effect sizes from baseline reported for 4 subjects with EDSS 6.5 - 7.0. It was postulated that the physical limitations of two subjects with EDSS score of 7.5 presented special challenges to measuring changes in function with the available assessment mechanisms for this clinical population.

A brief, clinician-administered test that helps determine the neuropsychological status of adults who have neurologic injury or disease such as dementia, head injury, and stroke. This tool consists of a battery of tests. Raw scores are transformed to a 0-120 scale, with a higher score indicating higher function. Effect size is reported (quantified difference between baseline and time point). The larger the absolute value, the stronger the effect. Cohen's guidelines for social sciences indicate 0.10 as a "small" effect size, 0.30 as a "medium" effect size, and 0.50 as a "large" effect size.

Effect sizes from baseline reported for 4 subjects with EDSS 6.5 - 7.0. It was postulated that the physical limitations of two subjects with EDSS score of 7.5 presented special challenges to measuring changes in function with the available assessment mechanisms for this clinical population.

Clinician measures how far the individual can walk until fatigue requires him/her to stop. Longer distances demonstrate improvement. Performance-based and tested in participants who possessed the ability to perform the assessment. Effect size is reported (quantified difference between baseline and time point). The larger the absolute value, the stronger the effect. Cohen's guidelines for social sciences indicate 0.10 as a "small" effect size, 0.30 as a "medium" effect size, and 0.50 as a "large" effect size.

Effect sizes from baseline reported for 4 subjects with EDSS 6.5 - 7.0. It was postulated that the physical limitations of two subjects with EDSS score of 7.5 presented special challenges to measuring changes in function with the available assessment mechanisms for this clinical population.

Assessed by timing the first 25 feet that the person walked. Performance-based and tested in participants who possessed the ability to perform the assessment. Effect size is reported (quantified difference between baseline and time point). The larger the absolute value, the stronger the effect. Cohen's guidelines for social sciences indicate 0.10 as a "small" effect size, 0.30 as a "medium" effect size, and 0.50 as a "large" effect size.

Effect sizes from baseline reported for 4 subjects with EDSS 6.5 - 7.0. It was postulated that the physical limitations of two subjects with EDSS score of 7.5 presented special challenges to measuring changes in function with the available assessment mechanisms for this clinical population.

A 12-item self-report measure of the impact of MS on a person's walking. Raw scores are transformed to a 0-100 scale. A reduction in score indicates improvement. Effect size is reported (quantified difference between baseline and time point). The larger the absolute value, the stronger the effect. Cohen's guidelines for social sciences indicate 0.10 as a "small" effect size, 0.30 as a "medium" effect size, and 0.50 as a "large" effect size.

Effect sizes from baseline reported for 4 subjects with EDSS 6.5 - 7.0. It was postulated that the physical limitations of two subjects with EDSS score of 7.5 presented special challenges to measuring changes in function with the available assessment mechanisms for this clinical population.

A standardized clinical assessment of gross upper limb dexterity. Subjects move small blocks from one side of a box to the other within a time period (one minute). Each side is tested separately. The score is the number of blocks moved from 0-150. A higher score indicates improvement. Effect size is reported (quantified difference between baseline and time point). The larger the absolute value, the stronger the effect. Cohen's guidelines for social sciences indicate 0.10 as a "small" effect size, 0.30 as a "medium" effect size, and 0.50 as a "large" effect size.

Effect sizes from baseline reported for 4 subjects with EDSS 6.5 - 7.0. It was postulated that the physical limitations of two subjects with EDSS score of 7.5 presented special challenges to measuring changes in function with the available assessment mechanisms for this clinical population.

A standardized clinical assessment of gross upper limb dexterity. Subjects move small blocks from one side of a box to the other within a time period (one minute). Each side is tested separately. The score is the number of blocks moved from 0-150. A higher score indicates improvement. Effect size is reported (quantified difference between baseline and time point). The larger the absolute value, the stronger the effect. Cohen's guidelines for social sciences indicate 0.10 as a "small" effect size, 0.30 as a "medium" effect size, and 0.50 as a "large" effect size.

Effect sizes from baseline reported for 4 subjects with EDSS 6.5 - 7.0. It was postulated that the physical limitations of two subjects with EDSS score of 7.5 presented special challenges to measuring changes in function with the available assessment mechanisms for this clinical population.

A 29-item self-report tool that measures the impact of MS on day-to-day life. There are 3 scores, physical, psychological, and total score. Raw scores are transformed to a 0-100 scale. A higher score indicates a greater impact of disease on daily function. Effect size is reported (quantified difference between baseline and time point). The larger the absolute value, the stronger the effect. Cohen's guidelines for social sciences indicate 0.10 as a "small" effect size, 0.30 as a "medium" effect size, and 0.50 as a "large" effect size.

Effect sizes from baseline reported for 4 subjects with EDSS 6.5 - 7.0. It was postulated that the physical limitations of two subjects with EDSS score of 7.5 presented special challenges to measuring changes in function with the available assessment mechanisms for this clinical population.

A 29-item self-report tool that measures the impact of MS on day-to-day life. There are 3 scores, physical, psychological, and total score. Raw scores are transformed to a 0-100 scale. A higher score indicates a greater impact of disease on daily function. Effect size is reported (quantified difference between baseline and time point). The larger the absolute value, the stronger the effect. Cohen's guidelines for social sciences indicate 0.10 as a "small" effect size, 0.30 as a "medium" effect size, and 0.50 as a "large" effect size.

Effect sizes from baseline reported for 4 subjects with EDSS 6.5 - 7.0. It was postulated that the physical limitations of two subjects with EDSS score of 7.5 presented special challenges to measuring changes in function with the available assessment mechanisms for this clinical population.

A self-report tool that assesses the perceived impact of fatigue on daily activities. Consists of 21 items selected from the Fatigue Impact Scale. Scored on a 0-84 scale. A higher score indicates a greater impact of fatigue on daily activities. Effect size is reported (quantified difference between baseline and time point). The larger the absolute value, the stronger the effect. Cohen's guidelines for social sciences indicate 0.10 as a "small" effect size, 0.30 as a "medium" effect size, and 0.50 as a "large" effect size.

Effect sizes from baseline reported for 4 subjects with EDSS 6.5 - 7.0. It was postulated that the physical limitations of two subjects with EDSS score of 7.5 presented special challenges to measuring changes in function with the available assessment mechanisms for this clinical population.

The GMFM a standardized observational instrument that measures change in gross motor function. Subscales include lying & rolling; sitting; crawling & kneeling; standing; and walking, running & jumping. For the complete test, the raw scores are converted to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating greater functional mobility. The items that we used were scored on a 0-3 scale and changes reported in percent improvement. Performance-based and tested in participants who possessed the ability to perform the assessment. Effect size is reported (quantified difference between baseline and time point). The larger the absolute value, the stronger the effect. Cohen's guidelines for social sciences indicate 0.10 as a "small" effect size, 0.30 as a "medium" effect size, and 0.50 as a "large" effect size.

Effect sizes from baseline reported for 4 subjects with EDSS 6.5 - 7.0. It was postulated that the physical limitations of two subjects with EDSS score of 7.5 presented special challenges to measuring changes in function with the available assessment mechanisms for this clinical population.

Measures and quantifies changes in trunk control during functional sitting. It was quickly determined that this test duplicated the TIS and was difficult to score objectively so the decision was made not to use it for the study. Performance-based and tested in participants who possessed the ability to perform the assessment.

The Slump Test was ultimately not used because the investigators decided to use the TIS instead. The TIS was realized to be the more appropriate assessment of the two, and the investigators wanted to avoid both data redundancy and test fatigue

An 8 item assessment that quantifies the ability to perform transfers. It has been validated in persons with stroke and a mixed neurologic population (43% MS). Score is a 0-40 scale. A higher score indicates higher function. Performance-based and tested in participants who possessed the ability to perform the assessment. Effect size is reported (quantified difference between baseline and time point). The larger the absolute value, the stronger the effect. Cohen's guidelines for social sciences indicate 0.10 as a "small" effect size, 0.30 as a "medium" effect size, and 0.50 as a "large" effect size.

Effect sizes from baseline reported for 4 subjects with EDSS 6.5 - 7.0. It was postulated that the physical limitations of two subjects with EDSS score of 7.5 presented special challenges to measuring changes in function with the available assessment mechanisms for this clinical population.

VNG is a standardized eye tracking test used to measure static and dynamic eye movement control to detect oculomotor abnormalities typically associated with degenerative neurological disorders, particularly in the brainstem and cerebellum. The subject wears goggles while an infrared video camera monitors and records eye movement as the eyes follow a dot on a computer screen.

The VNG was exploratory and opportunistic. The results are not available as the software to perform the quantitative data analysis is still under development.

The subject reported that the stimulation seemed to ease the symptoms of TN when she resumed training