Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Pending final analysis for termination
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The main hypothesis of this study is to demonstrate that the use of the ConfirmMDx for Prostate Cancer test in previously biopsied patients improves urologists' patient management by reducing unnecessary repeat biopsies, attendant procedure costs, and potential adverse events in men being considered for a repeat procedure.
The results of the study will reveal the clinical utility of this test by analyzing the physicians' use of negative or positive assays compared to patients managed using SOC methods without assay findings. The repeat biopsy rate at 12 months from study entry will be used for the primary endpoint analysis. All patients will be followed for 24 months from the date of the previous negative biopsy to evaluate an extended period of observation to track repeat biopsies and cancer detection.
The primary objective of this study is to demonstrate a lower repeat biopsy rate by using the negative results of ConfirmMDx for Prostate Cancer in practice rather than current SOC. All patients will have the tissue from their previous negative biopsy tested with the assay. Only data from Cases (informed of ConfirmMDx assay results) and Controls (blinded of the ConfirmMDx assay result) patients with negative test results will be used for the primary objective.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Case | All patients will have the tissue from their previous negative biopsy tested with the assay. Cases are defined as those subjects who receive the ConfirmMDx assay results. | ||
| Control | All patients will have the tissue from their previous negative biopsy tested with the assay. Controls are defined as subjects who will be blinded to the ConfirmMDx assay results. |
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| The primary objective is to demonstrate the clinical utility of the ConfirmMDx test | The primary objective is to demonstrate a lower repeat biopsy rate by using the negative results of ConfirmMDx for Prostate Cancer in practice rather than current SOC. | 2 years |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Compare rebiopsy rates assay negative results in cases and controls | Comparison of rebiopsy rates of Cases and Controls with assay negative results at the end of follow up of 24 months from the date of the previous biopsy. | 2 years |
| Compare rebiopsy rates in assay positive group vs standard of care |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Males aged 40 to 75 years old* that underwent a previous cancer-negative prostate biopsy within 15 months and being considered for a repeat biopsy due to persistent or elevated cancer-risk factors
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Urology Centers of Alabama | Homewood | Alabama | 35209 | United States | ||
| Genesis Research LLC |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Archived FFPE prostate biopsy core tissue to be analyzed for this study must have been collected from a previous, histologically confirmed cancer-negative biopsy. Patients were considered at risk for prostate cancer due to elevated serum PSA levels, abnormal digital rectal exam or other risk factor.
Only archived tissues will be used in this study: no new procedures to obtain new samples from the patient will be done.
Comparison of rebiopsy rates in assay positive results group vs. SOC (blinded) positive assay group. |
| 2 years |
| Compare rebiopsy rates of case and controls | Comparison of overall rates of rebiopsies of the entire Case vs. Control Cohorts | 2 years |
| Analyse cancer detection rates | Analysis of cancer detection rates in ConfirmMDx positive and negative arms versus those of Controls | 2 years |
| Evaluate clinical utility and cost savings by using the ConfirmMDx test | Evaluate clinical resource utilization, medical complications, and cost impact across groups | 2 years |
| Compare rebiopsy rates assay positive results in cases and controls | Evaluate prostate cancer detection rates after repeat biopsy in the Case and Controls positive and negative groups at the end of 24 months after the previous negative biopsy date. | 2 years |
| San Diego |
| California |
| 92123 |
| United States |
| Skyline Urology | Torrance | California | 90505 | United States |
| Urology Center of Colorado | Denver | Colorado | 80211 | United States |
| First Urology, PSC | Jeffersonville | Indiana | 47130 | United States |
| Regional Urology, LLC | Shreveport | Louisiana | 71106 | United States |
| Chesapeake Urology Research Associates | Towson | Maryland | 21204 | United States |
| Michigan Institute of Urology | Troy | Michigan | 48084 | United States |
| Associated Medical Professionals of NY | Syracuse | New York | 13210 | United States |
| Oregon Urology Institute | Springfield | Oregon | 97477 | United States |
| Lancaster Urology | Lancaster | Pennsylvania | 17604 | United States |
| Carolina Urological Research Center | Myrtle Beach | South Carolina | 29572 | United States |
| Urology Associates, P.C. | Nashville | Tennessee | 37209 | United States |
| Urology Clinics of North Texas, PLLC | Dallas | Texas | 75231 | United States |
| Urology San Antonio Research | San Antonio | Texas | 78229 | United States |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011471 | Prostatic Neoplasms |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005834 | Genital Neoplasms, Male |
| D014565 | Urogenital Neoplasms |
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D005832 | Genital Diseases, Male |
| D000091662 | Genital Diseases |
| D000091642 | Urogenital Diseases |
| D011469 | Prostatic Diseases |
| D052801 | Male Urogenital Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided