Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 46330337 | Registry Identifier | ISRCTN | |
| 13461 | Registry Identifier | UKCRN | |
| 12/WM/0187 | Other Identifier | NRES |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| LifeCell | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
ROCSS is a randomised controlled trial of the placement of a biological mesh at the site of stoma closure. Our hypothesis is that reinforcing the stoma closure site with a collagen mesh (StratticeĀ®) is superior to the standard technique in preventing herniation at 2 years.
Closure of complex and contaminated abdominal wounds is challenging and carries risks, including wound dehiscence and incisional hernias. Use of biological meshes in these situations may provide a safe method of reducing these complications, especially long-term incisional hernias. ROCSS will use stoma site closure as a model for biological mesh placement during any difficult contaminated abdominal wall closures.
Hernia at the site of stoma closure occurs in up to 30% of patients and is associated with adverse effects on quality of life. In up to 10% of cases, patients are submitted to complex re-operation which carries significant morbidity. Not all patients will report symptoms or undergo repair, as they do not wish to have a further major operation. Incisional hernias at the site of stomas closure form an important and well defined subgroup. If there is a measurable benefit from mesh insertion, elective use of a collagen mesh would warrant consideration in the closure of other difficult, contaminated abdominal wounds. This study will also provide useful information on the value of using a CT scan as an early diagnostic tool of herniation, which could then be used in future abdominal wall studies as a surrogate endpoint for clinical hernia.
ROCSS aims to assess whether a biological mesh (collagen tissue matrix) reduces the incidence of clinically detectable stoma closure site hernias at two years compared to standard closure techniques. The primary outcome is Occurrence of clinically detectable hernias at two years post randomisation. Other outcomes include surgical re-intervention rate, surgical complications at 30 days post-operation and 1 year post-randomisation, quality of life and post-operative pain, cost-benefit analysis and radiological hernia rate at one year post-randomisation (an exploratory analysis will compare radiological hernia rate at 1 year with clinical hernia rate at 2 years to assess the value of using a CT scan as an early diagnostic tool of incisional hernias).
Randomisation is 1:1 between StratticeĀ® mesh vs. standard closure. The sample size for the trial is 560 (80% power, 10% dropout/crossover, 40% proportional reduction - 25% to 15%) and recruitment will be over 2 years from at least 30 centres. ROCSS will be a double blind (observer blind) randomised controlled trial with a CT scan at one year and clinical follow up at 2 years. Cost benefit analysis and quality of life analysis will be performed at 2 years. The sample size will be reviewed prior to reaching target and may be increased 790 (90% power, 20% dropout/crossover, 40% proportional reduction - 25% to 15%).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Strattice⢠Reconstructive Tissue Matrix | Active Comparator | Strattice(TM) Reconstructive Tissue Matrix will be placed intra-peritoneally fashion. Once correctly placed, the fascia above will be closed using Prolene, PDS or Nylon (surgeon preference, but excluding Vicryl). |
|
| Standard closure | Active Comparator | Fascial closure will be the preferred technique of the surgeon without mesh reinforcement. The technique recommended is the fascia should be closed with Prolene, PDS or nylon sutures; Vicryl should not be used for the fascia. This technique can include either interrupted or continuous sutures. Closure of the muscle, soft tissues and skin is up to the discretion of the operating surgeon. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strattice⢠Reconstructive Tissue Matrix | Device | The protocol preference is for the mesh to be placed intra-peritoneally fashion (i.e. below the peritoneum). Anchoring bites will be taken in four to six sites of peritoneum (e.g. using 2-0 PDS) and the mesh will be 'parachuted' into place. Once correctly placed, the fascia above will be closed using Prolene, PDS or Nylon (surgeon preference, but excluding Vicryl). Infiltration of up to 40ml 0.25% Marcaine for infiltration into the fascial layer is recommended. The remainder of the closure will be at the surgeon's discretion. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Rate of clinically detectable hernias at two years post-randomisation. | Two years post-randomisation. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Radiological hernia rate at one year post-randomisation. | An exploratory analysis will also compare radiological hernia rate at 1 year with clinical hernia rate at 2 years to assess the value of using a CT scan as an early diagnostic tool of incisional hernias. | One year post-randomisation. |
| Incidence of developing a symptomatic hernia evaluated at 12 and 24 months postrandomisation. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Dion G Morton, MD | Professor of Colorectal Surgery | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hvidovre Hospital | Copenhagen | Denmark | ||||
| Academisch Medisch Centrum |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 32035551 | Derived | Reinforcement of Closure of Stoma Site (ROCSS) Collaborative and West Midlands Research Collaborative. Prophylactic biological mesh reinforcement versus standard closure of stoma site (ROCSS): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2020 Feb 8;395(10222):417-426. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32637-6. | |
| 26924621 | Derived |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Trial website | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Standard Closure | Procedure | The non-intervention arm for fascial closure will be the preferred technique of the surgeon without mesh reinforcement. The fascia should be closed with Prolene, PDS or nylon sutures; Vicryl should not be used for the fascia. The remainder of the closure will be at the surgeon's discretion. |
|
The clinical detection of hernias defined by palpable fascial defects, and global weaknesses around closed stoma sites without palpable fascial defects, will be recorded. Patient-reported hernia symptoms including a local lump or pain at the site of the stoma closure will also be collected. |
| One and two years post-randomisation. |
| Surgical re-intervention rates at 2 years post-randomisation. | Two years post-randomisation. |
| Surgical complications, including wound infections and seroma formation, at 30 days postoperatively and at 1 year post-randomisation. | 30 days postoperatively, 1 year post randomisation |
| Quality of life assessed using EuroQol EQ-5D at baseline, 30 days post-operatively, 12 and 24 months post-randomisation. | Baseline, 30 days post-operatively, one and two years post-randomisation |
| Pain assessed using a 100 point visual analogue scale at baseline, 30 days postoperatively, 12 and 24 months post-randomisation. | Baseline, 30 days post-operatively, one and two years post-randomisation |
| Costs per hernia clinically detected at 2 years post-randomisation. | Two years post-randomisation. |
| Two-year and long-term costs per additional quality adjusted life (QALY) year gained. | Two-year post-randomisation |
| Amsterdam |
| Netherlands |
| Tameside General Hospital | Ashton-under-Lyne | United Kingdom |
| Royal United Hospital Bath | Bath | United Kingdom |
| Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust | Birmingham | United Kingdom |
| Queen Elizabeth Hospital | Birmingham | United Kingdom |
| Sandwell General Hospital | Birmingham | United Kingdom |
| Pilgrim Hospital | Boston | United Kingdom |
| Bristol Royal Infirmary | Bristol | United Kingdom |
| Broomfield Hospital | Chelmsford | United Kingdom |
| St Peters Hospital | Chertsey | United Kingdom |
| Chesterfield Royal Hospital | Chesterfield | United Kingdom |
| Western Sussex Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust | Chichester | United Kingdom |
| University Hospital Coventry | Coventry | United Kingdom |
| Doncaster Royal Infirmary | Doncaster | United Kingdom |
| Dorset Country Hospital | Dorchester | United Kingdom |
| James Paget University Hospital | Great Yarmouth | United Kingdom |
| St Marks Hospital | Harrow | United Kingdom |
| Raigmore Hospital | Inverness | United Kingdom |
| University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust | Leicester | United Kingdom |
| Macclesfield District General Hospital | Macclesfield | United Kingdom |
| Queen Elizabeth the Queen Mother Hospital | Margate | United Kingdom |
| Norfolk & Norwich University Hospital | Norwich | United Kingdom |
| Queens Medical Centre | Nottingham | United Kingdom |
| Salisbury District Hospital | Salisbury | United Kingdom |
| University Hospital of North Tees | Stockton-on-Tees | United Kingdom |
| Royal Stoke University Hospital | Stoke-on-Trent | United Kingdom |
| Kings Mill Hospital | Sutton in Ashfield | United Kingdom |
| Manor Hospital | Walsall | United Kingdom |
| Royal Albert Edward Infirmary | Wigan | United Kingdom |
| New Cross Hosptial | Wolverhampton | United Kingdom |
| Worcestershire Royal Hospital | Worcester | United Kingdom |
| Wythenshawe Hosptial | Wythenshawe | United Kingdom |
| Yeovil District Hospital | Yeovil | United Kingdom |
| York Hospital | York | United Kingdom |
| Reinforcement of Closure of Stoma Site (ROCSS) Collaborative and the West Midlands Research Collaborative. Feasibility study from a randomized controlled trial of standard closure of a stoma site vs biological mesh reinforcement. Colorectal Dis. 2016 Sep;18(9):889-96. doi: 10.1111/codi.13310. |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006547 | Hernia |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D020763 | Pathological Conditions, Anatomical |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided