Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Horizontal meniscus tears meeting specified criteria will be repaired by any commonly used suture technique. Subjects will be followed for 2 years to evaluate the effectiveness of the repair, by assessing the re-operation rate, and by assessing improvements in knee pain and knee function.
Potential subjects will undergo Screening for eligibility based on Inclusion/Exclusion criteria. Screening will include an x-ray of the injured knee and evaluation of an MRI of the injured knee within 6 months prior to the scheduled procedure. During the procedure, the meniscal tear will be evaluated by arthroscopy to determine if the tear meets study requirements. If the meniscal tear is determined to meet inclusion/exclusion criteria, the subject will be considered enrolled. If any inclusion/exclusion criteria is not met, the subject will be considered a screen failure and will not be enrolled. For enrolled subjects, specific information regarding the repair and repair technique will be collected during the procedure, including still and video images.
Subjects will be contacted 7-15 days post-procedure for safety follow-up. Subjects will return for follow-up visits at approximately post-procedure Days 90, 185, 365 and 730. Identical questionnaires will be completed at each visit to assess knee pain and knee function. Safety information will be collected at each post-procedure visit. Additionally, an in-office arthroscopy of the treated knee will be performed at participating sites at Day 185, an MRI of the treated knee will be performed at Day 365 and an X-ray of the treated knee will be performed at Day 730. The patient will exit the study at the Day 730 visit.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment | Experimental | Suture-based meniscal repair |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Suture-based meniscal repair | Device | Suture-based meniscal repair |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Freedom From Re-operation of the Index Meniscus Repair Site (Incidence of Subjects Requiring Re-operation) | Occurrence of any re-operation of study knee to treat previously repaired meniscal tear during the 2 years following the study procedure. | 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Knee Pain and Function by Completion of International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Evaluation Form (IKDC Knee Evaluation) at 3 Months, 6 Months, 1 Year, and 2 Years | Change in knee pain and function will be measured by completion of The International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective score. The IKDC Score was developed to detect improvement or deterioration in symptoms, function, and sports activities due to knee impairment, including patients with meniscal injuries. There are three domains: 1) symptoms, including pain, stiffness, swelling, locking/catching, and giving way (7 items), 2) sports and daily activities (10 items), and 3) current knee function and knee function prior to knee injury (1 item, not included in the score). Responses vary for each item. The possible score ranges from 0-100, where 100 = no limitation with daily or sporting activities and the absence of symptoms. |
Not provided
Screening Inclusion Criteria:
Subjects of either gender may be eligible for inclusion in the study only if they meet all of the following criteria:
Arthroscopy Inclusion Criteria:
Consented subjects may be included in the study only if, upon arthroscopic inspection, their meniscal study lesion meets all of the following criteria established by the International Society of Arthroscopy, Knee Surgery and Orthopaedic Sports Medicine (ISAKOS) (see Appendix 1):
Screening Exclusion Criteria:
Subjects will be excluded from the study for any of the following reasons:
Arthroscopy Exclusion Criteria:
Subjects will be excluded from the study if their study meniscus lesion meets any of the following criteria at arthroscopy:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Peter R Kurzweil, MD | Memorial Orthopedic Surgical Group Long Beach | Principal Investigator |
| Darvin Griffin | Smith & Nephew, Inc. | Study Chair |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CORE Orthopaedic Medical Center | Encinitas | California | 92024 | United States | ||
| Memorial Orthopedic Surgical Group Long Beach |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 25108905 | Background | Kurzweil PR, Lynch NM, Coleman S, Kearney B. Repair of horizontal meniscus tears: a systematic review. Arthroscopy. 2014 Nov;30(11):1513-9. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.05.038. Epub 2014 Aug 6. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The planned sample size of 30 subjects was accrued for the Safety Population (SAF); however, a total of 4 subjects were excluded to comprise the Analysis Population (AS) due to late screen failure (eligibility criteria) or withdrawal by the subject.
Subjects enrolled at clinics from 19NOV2014 until 08NOV2017; last subject visit was 18NOV2019
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Treatment | Suture-based meniscal repair Suture-based meniscal repair: Suture-based meniscal repair |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Treatment | Suture-based meniscal repair Suture-based meniscal repair: Suture-based meniscal repair |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Freedom From Re-operation of the Index Meniscus Repair Site (Incidence of Subjects Requiring Re-operation) | Occurrence of any re-operation of study knee to treat previously repaired meniscal tear during the 2 years following the study procedure. | Overall number of participants analyzed indicates total number of participants enrolled in the Safety Population (SAF) at 6 months that provided data. Number analyzed for each time frame indicates all data available starting at 6 months. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years |
|
Enrollment through end of study (2 years)
Adverse events were collected & reported as complications per the protocol. A complication was any untoward medical occurrence, unfavorable and unintended sign (including clinically significant abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or condition experienced by the subject and temporally associated with the procedure whether or not considered related to the procedure. The Sponsor then reviewed all AEs and classified per ISO, using the higher level of classification, whether it be Site or Sponsor.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Treatment | Suture-based meniscal repair Suture-based meniscal repair: Suture-based meniscal repair |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Knee pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Neuropathy | Nervous system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
No limitations reported.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kirsten Wall | Smith+Nephew, Inc. | 720-338-9460 | Kirsten.wall@smith-nephew.com |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Dec 16, 2014 | Aug 20, 2020 | Prot_000.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Sep 5, 2019 | Aug 20, 2020 | SAP_001.pdf |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years |
| Change in Knee Pain and Function by the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS): Pain Score at 3 Months, 6 Months, 1 Year, and 2 Years | Change in knee pain and function will be measured by completion the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). There are five patient-relevant subscales of the KOOS, and each are scored separately: Pain (9 items), ADL function (17 items), Sport and Recreation Function (5 items), Symptoms (7 items), and Quality of Life (4 items). A Likert scale is used and all items have five possible answer options scored from 0 (no problems) to 4 (extreme problems). Each of the 5 scores is calculated as the sum of the items included and then each score is transformed to a 0-100 scale, with 0 representing extreme knee problems and 100 representing no knee problems as common in orthopedic assessment scales and generic measures. An aggregate score is not calculated so that each of the 5 dimensions can be assess separately. | Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years |
| Change in Daily Living (ADL) Score at 3 Months, 6 Months, 1 Year, and 2 Years | Change in knee pain and function will be measured by completion the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). There are five patient-relevant subscales of the KOOS, and each are scored separately: Pain (9 items), ADL function (17 items), Sport and Recreation Function (5 items), Symptoms (7 items), and Quality of Life (4 items). A Likert scale is used and all items have five possible answer options scored from 0 (no problems) to 4 (extreme problems). Each of the 5 scores is calculated as the sum of the items included and then each score is transformed to a 0-100 scale, with 0 representing extreme knee problems and 100 representing no knee problems as common in orthopedic assessment scales and generic measures. An aggregate score is not calculated so that each of the 5 dimensions can be assess separately. | Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years |
| Change in Knee Pain and Function by the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS): Sport and Recreation Function (Sport) Score at 3 Months, 6 Months, 1 Year, and 2 Years | Change in knee pain and function will be measured by completion the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). There are five patient-relevant subscales of the KOOS, and each are scored separately: Pain (9 items), ADL function (17 items), Sport and Recreation Function (5 items), Symptoms (7 items), and Quality of Life (4 items). A Likert scale is used and all items have five possible answer options scored from 0 (no problems) to 4 (extreme problems). Each of the 5 scores is calculated as the sum of the items included and then each score is transformed to a 0-100 scale, with 0 representing extreme knee problems and 100 representing no knee problems as common in orthopedic assessment scales and generic measures. An aggregate score is not calculated so that each of the 5 dimensions can be assess separately. | Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years |
| Change in Knee Pain and Function by the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS): Symptom Score at 3 Months, 6 Months, 1 Year, and 2 Years | Change in knee pain and function will be measured by completion the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). There are five patient-relevant subscales of the KOOS, and each are scored separately: Pain (9 items), ADL function (17 items), Sport and Recreation Function (5 items), Symptoms (7 items), and Quality of Life (4 items). A Likert scale is used and all items have five possible answer options scored from 0 (no problems) to 4 (extreme problems). Each of the 5 scores is calculated as the sum of the items included and then each score is transformed to a 0-100 scale, with 0 representing extreme knee problems and 100 representing no knee problems as common in orthopedic assessment scales and generic measures. An aggregate score is not calculated so that each of the 5 dimensions can be assess separately. | Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years |
| Change in Knee Pain and Function by the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS): Quality of Life (QOL) Score at 3 Months, 6 Months, 1 Year, and 2 Years | Change in knee pain and function will be measured by completion the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). There are five patient-relevant subscales of the KOOS, and each are scored separately: Pain (9 items), ADL function (17 items), Sport and Recreation Function (5 items), Symptoms (7 items), and Quality of Life (4 items). A Likert scale is used and all items have five possible answer options scored from 0 (no problems) to 4 (extreme problems). Each of the 5 scores is calculated as the sum of the items included and then each score is transformed to a 0-100 scale, with 0 representing extreme knee problems and 100 representing no knee problems as common in orthopedic assessment scales and generic measures. An aggregate score is not calculated so that each of the 5 dimensions can be assess separately. | Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years |
| Change in Knee Pain and Function by Lysholm Knee Questionnaire at 3 Months, 6 Months, 1 Year, and 2 Years | Change in knee pain and function will be measured by completion of the Lysholm Knee Questionnaire. This tool measures the domains of symptoms and complaints and functioning of daily activities. The scale consists of 8 item and is scaled from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating fewer symptoms and higher level of functioning. | Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years |
| Change in Knee Pain and Function by Tegner Activity Scale at 3 Months, 6 Months, 1 Year, and 2 Years | Change in knee pain and function will be measured by completion of the Tegner activity scale. The Tegner activity scale was designed as a score of activity level to complement other functional scores for patients with ligamentous injuries. The Tegner activity scale is a numerical scale ranging from 0 to 10. Each value indicates the ability to perform specific activities. An activity level of 10 corresponds to participation in competitive sports, including soccer, football, and rugby at the elite level; an activity level of 6 points corresponds to participation in recreational sports; and an activity level of 0 is assigned if a person is on sick leave or receiving a disability pension because of knee problems. An activity level of 5 to 10 is recorded only if the patient participates in recreational or competitive sports. | Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years |
| Long Beach |
| California |
| 90806 |
| United States |
| Andrews Research and Education Foundation, INC | Gulf Breeze | Florida | 32561 | United States |
| OrthoIndy South | Greenwood | Indiana | 46143 | United States |
| Mayo Clinic | Rochester | Minnesota | 55905 | United States |
| The Ohio State University | Columbus | Ohio | 43221 | United States |
| University of Virginia | Charlottesville | Virginia | 22908 | United States |
| Winchester Medical Center | Winchester | Virginia | 22601 | United States |
| Re-operation |
|
| Incarceration |
|
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| Height | Mean | Standard Deviation | inches |
|
| Weight | Mean | Standard Deviation | pounds (lb) |
|
| Body Mass Index | Mean | Standard Deviation | kg/m^2 |
|
| Body Mass Index (BMI) Group | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Knee Pain and Function by Completion of International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Evaluation Form (IKDC Knee Evaluation) at 3 Months, 6 Months, 1 Year, and 2 Years | Change in knee pain and function will be measured by completion of The International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective score. The IKDC Score was developed to detect improvement or deterioration in symptoms, function, and sports activities due to knee impairment, including patients with meniscal injuries. There are three domains: 1) symptoms, including pain, stiffness, swelling, locking/catching, and giving way (7 items), 2) sports and daily activities (10 items), and 3) current knee function and knee function prior to knee injury (1 item, not included in the score). Responses vary for each item. The possible score ranges from 0-100, where 100 = no limitation with daily or sporting activities and the absence of symptoms. | 30 participants in Safety Population (SAF) and 26 participants in Analysis Population (AS). Planned sample size of 30 participants was accrued for SAF; however, a total of 4 participants were excluded to comprise AS due to late screen failure or withdrawal by participant. Each row represents all enrolled participants at the referenced time point. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Knee Pain and Function by the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS): Pain Score at 3 Months, 6 Months, 1 Year, and 2 Years | Change in knee pain and function will be measured by completion the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). There are five patient-relevant subscales of the KOOS, and each are scored separately: Pain (9 items), ADL function (17 items), Sport and Recreation Function (5 items), Symptoms (7 items), and Quality of Life (4 items). A Likert scale is used and all items have five possible answer options scored from 0 (no problems) to 4 (extreme problems). Each of the 5 scores is calculated as the sum of the items included and then each score is transformed to a 0-100 scale, with 0 representing extreme knee problems and 100 representing no knee problems as common in orthopedic assessment scales and generic measures. An aggregate score is not calculated so that each of the 5 dimensions can be assess separately. | 30 participants in Safety Population (SAF) and 26 participants in Analysis Population (AS). Planned sample size of 30 participants was accrued for SAF; however, a total of 4 participants were excluded to comprise AS due to late screen failure or withdrawal by participant. Each row represents all enrolled participants at the referenced time point. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Daily Living (ADL) Score at 3 Months, 6 Months, 1 Year, and 2 Years | Change in knee pain and function will be measured by completion the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). There are five patient-relevant subscales of the KOOS, and each are scored separately: Pain (9 items), ADL function (17 items), Sport and Recreation Function (5 items), Symptoms (7 items), and Quality of Life (4 items). A Likert scale is used and all items have five possible answer options scored from 0 (no problems) to 4 (extreme problems). Each of the 5 scores is calculated as the sum of the items included and then each score is transformed to a 0-100 scale, with 0 representing extreme knee problems and 100 representing no knee problems as common in orthopedic assessment scales and generic measures. An aggregate score is not calculated so that each of the 5 dimensions can be assess separately. | 30 participants in Safety Population (SAF) and 26 participants in Analysis Population (AS). Planned sample size of 30 participants was accrued for SAF; however, a total of 4 participants were excluded to comprise AS due to late screen failure or withdrawal by participant. Each row represents all enrolled participants at the referenced time point. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Knee Pain and Function by the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS): Sport and Recreation Function (Sport) Score at 3 Months, 6 Months, 1 Year, and 2 Years | Change in knee pain and function will be measured by completion the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). There are five patient-relevant subscales of the KOOS, and each are scored separately: Pain (9 items), ADL function (17 items), Sport and Recreation Function (5 items), Symptoms (7 items), and Quality of Life (4 items). A Likert scale is used and all items have five possible answer options scored from 0 (no problems) to 4 (extreme problems). Each of the 5 scores is calculated as the sum of the items included and then each score is transformed to a 0-100 scale, with 0 representing extreme knee problems and 100 representing no knee problems as common in orthopedic assessment scales and generic measures. An aggregate score is not calculated so that each of the 5 dimensions can be assess separately. | 30 participants in Safety Population (SAF) and 26 participants in Analysis Population (AS). Planned sample size of 30 participants was accrued for SAF; however, a total of 4 participants were excluded to comprise AS due to late screen failure or withdrawal by participant. Each row represents all enrolled participants at the referenced time point. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Knee Pain and Function by the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS): Symptom Score at 3 Months, 6 Months, 1 Year, and 2 Years | Change in knee pain and function will be measured by completion the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). There are five patient-relevant subscales of the KOOS, and each are scored separately: Pain (9 items), ADL function (17 items), Sport and Recreation Function (5 items), Symptoms (7 items), and Quality of Life (4 items). A Likert scale is used and all items have five possible answer options scored from 0 (no problems) to 4 (extreme problems). Each of the 5 scores is calculated as the sum of the items included and then each score is transformed to a 0-100 scale, with 0 representing extreme knee problems and 100 representing no knee problems as common in orthopedic assessment scales and generic measures. An aggregate score is not calculated so that each of the 5 dimensions can be assess separately. | 30 participants in Safety Population (SAF) and 26 participants in Analysis Population (AS). Planned sample size of 30 participants was accrued for SAF; however, a total of 4 participants were excluded to comprise AS due to late screen failure or withdrawal by participant. Each row represents all enrolled participants at the referenced time point. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Knee Pain and Function by the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS): Quality of Life (QOL) Score at 3 Months, 6 Months, 1 Year, and 2 Years | Change in knee pain and function will be measured by completion the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). There are five patient-relevant subscales of the KOOS, and each are scored separately: Pain (9 items), ADL function (17 items), Sport and Recreation Function (5 items), Symptoms (7 items), and Quality of Life (4 items). A Likert scale is used and all items have five possible answer options scored from 0 (no problems) to 4 (extreme problems). Each of the 5 scores is calculated as the sum of the items included and then each score is transformed to a 0-100 scale, with 0 representing extreme knee problems and 100 representing no knee problems as common in orthopedic assessment scales and generic measures. An aggregate score is not calculated so that each of the 5 dimensions can be assess separately. | 30 participants in Safety Population (SAF) and 26 participants in Analysis Population (AS). Planned sample size of 30 participants was accrued for SAF; however, a total of 4 participants were excluded to comprise AS due to late screen failure or withdrawal by participant. Each row represents all enrolled participants at the referenced time point. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Knee Pain and Function by Lysholm Knee Questionnaire at 3 Months, 6 Months, 1 Year, and 2 Years | Change in knee pain and function will be measured by completion of the Lysholm Knee Questionnaire. This tool measures the domains of symptoms and complaints and functioning of daily activities. The scale consists of 8 item and is scaled from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating fewer symptoms and higher level of functioning. | 30 participants in Safety Population (SAF) and 26 participants in Analysis Population (AS). Planned sample size of 30 participants was accrued for SAF; however, a total of 4 participants were excluded to comprise AS due to late screen failure or withdrawal by participant. Each row represents all enrolled participants at the referenced time point. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Knee Pain and Function by Tegner Activity Scale at 3 Months, 6 Months, 1 Year, and 2 Years | Change in knee pain and function will be measured by completion of the Tegner activity scale. The Tegner activity scale was designed as a score of activity level to complement other functional scores for patients with ligamentous injuries. The Tegner activity scale is a numerical scale ranging from 0 to 10. Each value indicates the ability to perform specific activities. An activity level of 10 corresponds to participation in competitive sports, including soccer, football, and rugby at the elite level; an activity level of 6 points corresponds to participation in recreational sports; and an activity level of 0 is assigned if a person is on sick leave or receiving a disability pension because of knee problems. An activity level of 5 to 10 is recorded only if the patient participates in recreational or competitive sports. | 30 participants in Safety Population (SAF) and 26 participants in Analysis Population (AS). Planned sample size of 30 participants was accrued for SAF; however, a total of 4 participants were excluded to comprise AS due to late screen failure or withdrawal by participant. Each row represents all enrolled participants at the referenced time point. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 30 |
| 4 |
| 30 |
| 7 |
| 30 |
| Further non-repairable tear meniscus | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Swelling in knee | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Knee repair did not heal | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Knee pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Swelling of knee | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
|
| IKDC Change from Baseline at 6 months |
|
|
| IKDC Change from Baseline at 1 year |
|
|
| IKDC Change from Baseline at 2 years |
|
|
|
| Pain Score Change from Baseline at 6 months |
|
|
| Pain Score Change from Baseline at 1 year |
|
|
| Pain Score Change from Baseline at 2 years |
|
|
|
| ADL Score Change from Baseline at 6 months |
|
|
| ADL Score Change from Baseline at 1 year |
|
|
| ADL Score Change from Baseline at 2 years |
|
|
|
| Sport Score Change from Baseline at 6 months |
|
|
| Sport Score Change from Baseline at 1 year |
|
|
| Sport Score Change from Baseline at 2 years |
|
|
|
| Symptom Score Change from Baseline at 6 months |
|
|
| Symptom Score Change from Baseline at 1 year |
|
|
| Symptom Score Change from Baseline at 2 years |
|
|
|
| QOL Score Change from Baseline at 6 months |
|
|
| QOL Score Change from Baseline at 1 year |
|
|
| QOL Score Change from Baseline at 2 years |
|
|
|
| Lysholm Score Change from Baseline at 6 months |
|
|
| Lysholm Score Change from Baseline at 1 year |
|
|
| Lysholm Score Change from Baseline at 2 years |
|
|
|
| Tegner Score Change from Baseline at 6 months |
|
|
| Tegner Score Change from Baseline at 1 year |
|
|
| Tegner Score Change from Baseline at 2 years |
|
|