Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2014/2126 | Other Identifier | CSET number |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Innovative Therapies For Children with Cancer Consortium | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Gliomas (DIPG) appear almost exclusively in children and adolescents, representing 15 to 20% of posterior fossa tumours. Even if it is one of the most common malignant brain tumours, there are only 30 to 40 new cases per year in France. Their clinical presentation is stereotyped with a short clinical history and a unique MRI appearance that was usually considered as sufficient to establish the diagnosis. The prognosis of DIPG is always unfavourable; median overall survival is 9 to 10 months in general and most patients will die within two years after diagnosis (Kaplan 1996,Hargrave 2006). Malignant gliomas infiltrating the brainstem represent the greatest challenge of paediatric oncology; despite numerous collaborative studies performed, patients' survival has not significantly increased in thirty years (Hargrave 2009). There is no validated prognostic factor. There is currently no validated treatment except radiotherapy.
Several targeted agents have been tested in DIPG (Pollack 2007 Haas-Kogan 2008, Geoerger, 2011), without knowing whether the target was present in the tumour. A critical review of the paradigms of these trials tells us that there are long term survivors in these studies that is to say patients who may have benefited from the tested therapy, but they are few. So far, the new therapies that have been tried were evaluated one after the other in search of a treatment that would be effective for all patients, measuring the treatment effect on median survival. They were all rejected as ineffective. However the investigators can challenge the endpoint to evaluate efficacy in these trials as the existence of long term survivors (> 18 months, for example) and their number should not been ignored, especially if targeted therapies are considered. The investigators propose a paradigm shift in the choice of treatment; the issue raised would be to give to each patient the treatment associated with the highest likelihood of efficacy based on the specific biological tumour profile.
The development of targeted therapies for malignant gliomas infiltrating the brainstem has been hampered by the absence of biological data. It is therefore crucial to better understand the biology of these tumours. Despite the safety of the biopsy in brainstem tumours, most teams of paediatric neurosurgery limit the use of stereotactic biopsy only for clinically or radiologically unusual forms. Until recently, there has been no systematic genetic study at diagnosis to date and the few available data were confounded by the inclusion of autopsies or clinically and radiologically unusual cases (Louis, 1993; Gilbertson 2003; Okada, 2008; Zarghooni 2010; Broniscer, 2010; Wu, 2012 and Schwartzentruber, 2012).
French teams gathered in the French Society of Paediatric Oncology and the European consortium "Innovative Therapies in Children with Cancer (ITCC)" decided a few years ago to perform biopsies of these tumours for diagnostic confirmation and to ensure the presence of certain therapeutic targets prior to a possible inclusion in a trial evaluating a targeted therapy (Geoerger, 2009; Geoerger, 2010). Part of this experiment was reported by the team of the Necker Hospital in Paris, confirming the low rate of complications of stereotactic biopsy procedure (Roujeau, 2007). The biopsy specimen analysis allowed practicing immunohistochemical, genomic (CGHarray), gene expression (transcriptome) and direct sequencing of candidate genes studies.
In this study, the majority of patients will receive a treatment assumed to specifically target a biological abnormality identified on the biopsy. More importantly, patients will not receive a drug for which the identified target is absent.
In this first step of the protocol, the patients will thus be allocated to one of the three treatment groups as follows:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| R1: erlotinib versus dasatinib | Experimental | EGFR+ only Tarceva® (erlotinib): 25 mg and 100 mg tablets. The prescribed dose is 125 mg/m²/day orally, once daily. Sprycel® (dasatinib): 20 mg and 50 mg tablets. The prescribed dose is 85 mg/m²/dose, orally, twice daily, i.e. 170 mg/m2/day. |
|
| R2: everolimus versus dasatinib | Experimental | PTEN-loss only Votubia® (everolimus): 2.5 mg tablets. The prescribed dose is 5 mg/m²/day, orally, once daily. Sprycel® (dasatinib): 20 mg and 50 mg tablets. The prescribed dose is 85 mg/m²/dose, orally, twice daily, i.e. 170 mg/m2/day. |
|
| R3: erlotinib versus everolimus versus dasatinib | Experimental | EGFR+ and PTEN-loss or inconclusive biopsy Tarceva® (erlotinib): 25 mg and 100 mg tablets. The prescribed dose is 125 mg/m²/day orally, once daily. Votubia® (everolimus): 2.5 mg tablets. The prescribed dose is 5 mg/m²/day, orally, once daily. Sprycel® (dasatinib): 20 mg and 50 mg tablets. The prescribed dose is 85 mg/m²/dose, orally, twice daily, i.e. 170 mg/m2/day. |
|
| Cohort Dasatinib | Experimental | Neither EGFR overexpression nor loss of PTEN expression Sprycel® (dasatinib): 20 mg and 50 mg tablets. The prescribed dose is 85 mg/m²/dose, orally, twice daily, i.e. 170 mg/m2/day |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Erlotinib | Drug |
| ||
| Everolimus |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Survival | Assessed up two years after randomization |
Not provided
Not provided
Eligibility criteria for the BIOMEDE study (pre-screening for the randomised subtrials)
Non eligibility criteria for the study
Common eligibility criteria for the BIOMEDE randomised subtrials
Patients without classical clinical and radiological diagnostic criteria who fulfil the histological and biological criteria of DIPG are eligible for the trial.
Pilocytic astrocytoma and gangliogliomas are not eligible.
Eligibility criteria for the subtrials Eligibility criteria for the different subtrials will be mainly based on biomarkers assessment as detailed in the table above. In addition, contra-indication and precautions for use to specific drugs will be considered.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jacques GRILL, MD, PhD | Contact | 0142116209 | +33 | jacques.grill@gustaveroussy.fr |
| Perrine CAPOLINO | Contact | 0142114211 | +33 | perrine.capolino@gustaveroussy.fr |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Jacques GRILL, MD, PhD | Gustave Roussy, Cancer Campus, Grand Paris | Study Chair |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gustave Roussy | Recruiting | Villejuif | Val De Marne | 94805 | France |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 42032072 | Derived | Debily MA, Le Teuff G, Kergrohen T, Varlet P, Castel D, Leblond P, Hargrave D, Nysom K, Blomgren K, McCowage GB, Bautista F, van Vuurden D, Jones C, Mackay A, Izquierdo E, Ziegler DS, Moussa A, Barret E, Puget S, Beccaria K, Aquilina K, Riffaud L, Bolle S, Abbou S, Bertozzi AI, De Carli E, Boddaert N, Dangouloff-Ros V, Calmon R, Blanc P, Vassal G, Le Deley MC, Grill J. Targeted therapies plus radiotherapy for diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma: the randomized phase 2 BIOMEDE trial. Nat Med. 2026 Jun;32(6):2201-2215. doi: 10.1038/s41591-026-04354-1. Epub 2026 Apr 24. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000080443 | Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005910 | Glioma |
| D018302 | Neoplasms, Neuroepithelial |
| D017599 | Neuroectodermal Tumors |
| D009373 | Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000069347 | Erlotinib Hydrochloride |
| D000068338 | Everolimus |
| D000069439 | Dasatinib |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011799 | Quinazolines |
| D006574 | Heterocyclic Compounds, 2-Ring |
| D000072471 | Heterocyclic Compounds, Fused-Ring |
| D006571 | Heterocyclic Compounds |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Drug |
|
| Dasatinib | Drug |
|
| D009370 | Neoplasms by Histologic Type |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D009375 | Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial |
| D009380 | Neoplasms, Nerve Tissue |
| D020295 | Brain Stem Neoplasms |
| D015192 | Infratentorial Neoplasms |
| D001932 | Brain Neoplasms |
| D016543 | Central Nervous System Neoplasms |
| D009423 | Nervous System Neoplasms |
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D001927 | Brain Diseases |
| D002493 | Central Nervous System Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D020123 | Sirolimus |
| D018942 | Macrolides |
| D007783 | Lactones |
| D009930 | Organic Chemicals |
| D013844 | Thiazoles |
| D013457 | Sulfur Compounds |
| D001393 | Azoles |
| D006573 | Heterocyclic Compounds, 1-Ring |
| D011743 | Pyrimidines |