Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| NA_00091766 | Other Identifier | JHMIRB |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to assess the performance of a system of intraoperative dynamic dosimetry during prostate seed implantation (brachytherapy) including its new elements, to evaluate and refine technical methods of using the system, as well as confirm its performance and accuracy.
The use of brachytherapy or implantation of radioactive sources into the prostate for adenocarcinoma has advantages over external beam radiation in that a very high dose can be delivered to the tumor while limiting the doses to the surrounding normal tissue (i.e., bowel and bladder). It is established that outcomes after treatment with brachytherapy are related to the technical quality of source placement within the gland. Accurate placement of the radioactive sources with achievement of optimum dose distributions within the prostate is key to the success of brachytherapy with regard to both killing tumor as well as minimizing toxicity.
Due to factors such as deformations of the prostate during needle insertion, needle deviation from intended path during insertion, prostatic edema from needle trauma, and relaxation of tissues as well as source migration after needle removal, the actual source positions upon completion of the procedure may fail to accurately match their intended placement, resulting in variations from the idealized dosimetric plan.
One way to overcome this complex problem is to have the capability of visualizing the sources once they are in the prostate and then continuously updating the dosimetric plan in real time. To this end, we have developed a mechanism whereby ultrasound and fluoroscopy are quantitatively integrated to allow for real-time visualization of source positions intraoperatively. A prior Phase I study performed by this group evaluated a prototype version of this mechanism, resulting in the successful treatment of 6 patients with true intraoperative dynamic dosimetry. Dosimetric outcomes within this cohort of patients was excellent, and the intraoperative doses predicted by the system more accurate than that predicted by the current standard method (ultrasound-based dosimetry).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dynamic dosimetry brachytherapy | Experimental | Cohort treated with dynamic dosimetry brachytherapy |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brachytherapy | Radiation |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Procedure Time | Additional procedure time with the registered ultrasound and fluoroscopy system (RUF) in the intra-operative setting for implantation procedure | at time of implantation procedure |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Seed Reconstruction From Intra-operative Fluoroscopy | Number of patients with all seeds reconstructed from fluoroscopy | up to 30 days post-treatment |
| Number of Participants With Seed Reconstruction Utilizing RUF Versus CT / Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Reconstruction |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
male
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Danny Song, M.D. | The SKCCC at Johns Hopkins | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The SKCCC at Johns Hopkins | Baltimore | Maryland | 21287 | United States |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Dynamic Dosimetry Brachytherapy | Cohort treated with dynamic dosimetry brachytherapy |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Dynamic Dosimetry Brachytherapy | Cohort treated with dynamic dosimetry brachytherapy |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Procedure Time | Additional procedure time with the registered ultrasound and fluoroscopy system (RUF) in the intra-operative setting for implantation procedure | Posted | Mean | Full Range | minutes | at time of implantation procedure |
|
|
AEs were assessed for serious (Grade 3+) and/or unexpected events (those not expected/known risks of treatment); during treatment and up to 60 days after treatment.
This is a research trial that is studying the feasibility and practicability of a new treatment planning system for patients who undergo brachytherapy. There are no expected adverse events associated with this trial, however, the research team will conduct post-follow-ups on all patients enrolled in this trial to report any adverse events (AEs) that are either unexpected or serious.
No AEs or mortality were reported during this period.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Dynamic Dosimetry Brachytherapy | Cohort treated with dynamic dosimetry brachytherapy |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel Song | Johns Hopkins University | 410-502-5875 | dsong2@jhmi.edu |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011471 | Prostatic Neoplasms |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005834 | Genital Neoplasms, Male |
| D014565 | Urogenital Neoplasms |
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001918 | Brachytherapy |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011878 | Radiotherapy |
| D013812 | Therapeutics |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Number of participants with seed reconstruction with RUF versus CT fused with MRI doses for Prostate D90 (dose received by 90% of prostate) |
| 30 days post-treatment |
| Impact of RUF System on Dosimetric Outcomes of Seed Placement as Assessed by Number of Patients With Prostate V100 of 95% or Greater | Number of patients with prostate V100 (the percent of the postimplant MR/CT-based prostate volume that received at least 100% of dose) of 95% or greater | 30 days post-treatment |
| Mean Difference in D90 Between Intra-operative RUF and Standard CT/MRI Based Dosimetry | Mean difference of D90 (% of prescribed dose) between intra-operative RUF and standard CT/MRI based dosimetry | Treatment - 30 days |
| Dosimetric Accuracy Comparison Between Pre and Post Ultrasound (US) Implantation Prostate Edema | Treatment - 30 days |
| Quality of Life (QoL) Assessments | Change in Quality of Life measures based on International Prostate Symptom Score (range 0-35, higher score reflects lower quality of life), Sexual Health Inventory Score (1-25, lower score reflects lower quality of life), Epic-26 Bowel score (0-100, lower score reflects lower quality of life) | baseline, 30 days post-implant, semiannually post treatment until year 2 and then annually until year 5 |
| Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) Outcomes | PSA biochemical failure-free survival at last follow-up visit | up to 5 years |
| Participants |
|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Full Range | years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected | Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant. | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
|
| Secondary | Seed Reconstruction From Intra-operative Fluoroscopy | Number of patients with all seeds reconstructed from fluoroscopy | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | up to 30 days post-treatment |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Seed Reconstruction Utilizing RUF Versus CT / Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Reconstruction | Number of participants with seed reconstruction with RUF versus CT fused with MRI doses for Prostate D90 (dose received by 90% of prostate) | Data was not collected to assess this outcome measure | Posted | 30 days post-treatment |
|
|
| Secondary | Impact of RUF System on Dosimetric Outcomes of Seed Placement as Assessed by Number of Patients With Prostate V100 of 95% or Greater | Number of patients with prostate V100 (the percent of the postimplant MR/CT-based prostate volume that received at least 100% of dose) of 95% or greater | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 30 days post-treatment |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Mean Difference in D90 Between Intra-operative RUF and Standard CT/MRI Based Dosimetry | Mean difference of D90 (% of prescribed dose) between intra-operative RUF and standard CT/MRI based dosimetry | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of prescribed dose | Treatment - 30 days |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Dosimetric Accuracy Comparison Between Pre and Post Ultrasound (US) Implantation Prostate Edema | Data was not collected to assess this outcome measure | Posted | Treatment - 30 days |
|
|
| Secondary | Quality of Life (QoL) Assessments | Change in Quality of Life measures based on International Prostate Symptom Score (range 0-35, higher score reflects lower quality of life), Sexual Health Inventory Score (1-25, lower score reflects lower quality of life), Epic-26 Bowel score (0-100, lower score reflects lower quality of life) | Data was not collected to assess this outcome measure | Posted | baseline, 30 days post-implant, semiannually post treatment until year 2 and then annually until year 5 |
|
|
| Secondary | Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) Outcomes | PSA biochemical failure-free survival at last follow-up visit | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | up to 5 years |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 45 |
| 0 |
| 45 |
| 0 |
| 45 |
Not provided
Not provided
| D005832 |
| Genital Diseases, Male |
| D000091662 | Genital Diseases |
| D000091642 | Urogenital Diseases |
| D011469 | Prostatic Diseases |
| D052801 | Male Urogenital Diseases |