Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| U01HL069294 | U.S. NIH Grant/Contract | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network | NETWORK |
| National Cancer Institute (NCI) | NIH |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Acute Graft-versus-Host-Disease (GVHD) is an important cause of morbidity and mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). This study aims to determine if any of three new GVHD prophylaxis approaches improves the rate of GVHD and relapse free survival at one year after transplant compared to the current standard prophylaxis regimen.
GVHD is a complication that can occur after a bone marrow or stem cell transplant. The transplant recipient's body is attacked by the newly introduced cells. Only about 40% of patients with acute GVHD have durable responses when treated with corticosteroid therapy. A strategy that helps fewer people suffer from GVHD, without other adverse effects, would be an effective approach to improve survival after allogeneic transplantation.
GVHD incidence can be decreased with various treatment plans. Early transplants were done using post-transplant methotrexate to prevent GVHD. Another drug, cyclosporine, was later shown to work better than methotrexate. Then doctors discovered that the combined use of cyclosporine and methotrexate worked even better than either agent alone. More recently, other calcineurin-inhibitors, such as tacrolimus have been developed as GVHD prophylactic agents due to favorable toxicity profiles in comparison with cyclosporine. Studies have been conducted to compare available treatment combinations for related and unrelated donors. The combination of tacrolimus/methotrexate remains a standard for GVHD prophylaxis.
However, improved GVHD prophylaxis remains a significant clinical need in HSCT. The current clinical trial will test three novel GVHD prophylaxis approaches: tacrolimus/methotrexate and bortezomib (Tac/MTX/Bort), tacrolimus/methotrexate and maraviroc (Tac/MTX/MVC) and tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil and cyclophosphamide (Tac/MMF/Cy). This randomized Phase II clinical trial will compare each intervention arm with a Tac/MTX control.
This study will enroll people who have a cancer of the blood or lymph glands and a stem cell transplant is a treatment option. The study will take at least two years and will include 270 participants - 90 participants in each of three treatment groups. The purpose of this study is to compare three combinations of medications to see whether one or more of them are better than the current standard of care (Tacrolimus/Methotrexate) to prevent GVHD.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tacrolimus/Methotrexate/Bortezomib | Experimental | Participants will receive specified dosage of three different GVHD prophylaxis agents: Tacrolimus, Methotrexate, and Bortezomib. |
|
| Tacrolimus/Methotrexate/Maraviroc | Experimental | Participants will receive specified dosage of three different GVHD prophylaxis agents: Tacrolimus, Methotrexate, and Maraviroc. |
|
| Tacrolimus/MMF/Cyclophosphamide | Experimental | Participants will receive specified dosage of three different GVHD prophylaxis agents: Tacrolimus, Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF), and Cyclophosphamide. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tacrolimus (ARM with Methotrexate) | Drug | Tacrolimus will be given orally at a dose of 0.05 mg/kg or intravenously at a dose of 0.03 mg/kg starting Day -3. The dose of tacrolimus may be rounded to the nearest 0.5 mg for oral formulations. Subsequent dosing will be based on blood levels. The dose should be adjusted accordingly to maintain a suggested level of 5-15 ng/mL. If patients are on medications which alter the metabolism of tacrolimus (e.g. azoles), the initial starting dose and subsequent doses should be altered as per institutional practices. Tacrolimus taper can be initiated at a minimum of 90 days post HSCT if there is no evidence of active GVHD. The rate of tapering will be done according institutional practices but patients should be off tacrolimus by Day 180 post HSCT if there is no evidence of active GVHD. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants With GVHD/Relapse or Progression-free Survival (GRFS) | GRFS is defined as being free of grade III-IV acute GVHD onset, chronic GVHD onset requiring systemic immunosuppressive therapy, disease relapse or progression, and death from any cause. | 1 Year Post-transplant |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants With Grade II-IV Acute GVHD | Acute GVHD is graded according to the scoring system proposed by Przepiorka et al.1995: Skin stage: 0: No rash
Liver stage (based on bilirubin level)*: 0: <2 mg/dL
GI stage*: 0: No diarrhea or diarrhea <500 mL/day
GVHD grade: 0: All organ stages 0 or GVHD not listed as an etiology I: Skin stage 1-2 and liver and GI stage 0 II: Skin stage 3 or liver or GI stage 1 III: Liver stage 2-3 or GI stage 2-4 IV: Skin or liver stage 4 |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Age 18-75 years (patient is older than 18.0 and less than 76.0 years old)
Patients with acute leukemia, chronic myelogenous leukemia or myelodysplasia with no circulating blasts and with less than 5% blasts in the bone marrow.
Patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma, follicular, marginal zone, diffuse large B-cell, Hodgkin's Lymphoma,or mantle cell lymphoma with chemosensitive disease at time of transplantation
Planned reduced intensity conditioning regimen (see eligible regimens in Table 2.4a)
Patients must have a related or unrelated peripheral blood stem cell donor as follows:
Cardiac function: Ejection fraction at rest ≥ 45%
Estimated creatinine clearance greater than 50 mL/minute (using the Cockcroft-Gault formula and actual body weight)
Pulmonary function: Diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) ≥ 40% (adjusted for hemoglobin) and forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) ≥ 50%
Liver function: total bilirubin < 1.5 x the upper limit of normal and alanine aminotransferase (ALT)/aspartate aminotransferase (AST) < 2.5x the upper normal limit. Patients who have been diagnosed with Gilbert's Disease are allowed to exceed the defined bilirubin value of 1.5x the upper limit of normal.
Female subjects (unless postmenopausal for at least 1 year before the screening visit, or surgically sterilized), agree to practice two (2) effective methods of contraception at the same time, or agree to completely abstain from heterosexual intercourse, from the time of signing the informed consent through 12 months post transplant (see Section 2.6.4 for definition of postmenopausal).
Male subjects (even if surgically sterilized), of partners of women of childbearing potential must agree to one of the following: practice effective barrier contraception (see Section 2.6.4 for list of barrier methods), or abstain from heterosexual intercourse from the time of signing the informed consent through 12 months post transplant.
Signed informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Mary Horowitz, MD | Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| City of Hope National Medical Center | Duarte | California | 91010 | United States | ||
| Stanford Hospital and Clinics |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7581076 | Background | Przepiorka D, Weisdorf D, Martin P, Klingemann HG, Beatty P, Hows J, Thomas ED. 1994 Consensus Conference on Acute GVHD Grading. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1995 Jun;15(6):825-8. | |
| 16338616 | Background | Filipovich AH, Weisdorf D, Pavletic S, Socie G, Wingard JR, Lee SJ, Martin P, Chien J, Przepiorka D, Couriel D, Cowen EW, Dinndorf P, Farrell A, Hartzman R, Henslee-Downey J, Jacobsohn D, McDonald G, Mittleman B, Rizzo JD, Robinson M, Schubert M, Schultz K, Shulman H, Turner M, Vogelsang G, Flowers ME. National Institutes of Health consensus development project on criteria for clinical trials in chronic graft-versus-host disease: I. Diagnosis and staging working group report. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2005 Dec;11(12):945-56. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2005.09.004. |
Not provided
Not provided
Results will be published in a manuscript and supporting information submitted to NIH BioLINCC (including data dictionaries, case report forms, data submission documentation, documentation for outcomes dataset, etc where indicated).
Within 6 months of official study closure at participating sites.
Available to the public
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Tacrolimus/Methotrexate/Bortezomib | Participants will receive a GVHD prophylactic regimen of three agents: Tacrolimus, Methotrexate, and Bortezomib. |
| FG001 | Tacrolimus/Methotrexate/Maraviroc |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Jul 17, 2015 | Nov 30, 2018 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
|
| Tacrolimus (ARM with MMF and Cyclophosphamide) | Drug | Tacrolimus will be given orally at a dose of 0.05 mg/kg or intravenously at a dose of 0.03 mg/kg starting Day +5. Serum levels of tacrolimus will be measured at Day 7 and then should be checked weekly thereafter, and the dose adjusted accordingly to maintain a suggested level of 5-15 ng/mL. Tacrolimus taper can be initiated at a minimum of 90 days post HSCT if there is no evidence of active GVHD. The rate of tapering will be done according to institutional practices but patients should be off tacrolimus by Day 180 post HSCT if there is no evidence of active GVHD. |
|
|
| Methotrexate (ARM with Maraviroc) | Drug | Methotrexate will be administered, per institutional practices, at the doses of 15 mg/m2 IV bolus on Day +1, and 10 mg/m2 IV bolus on Days +3, +6 and +11 after hematopoietic stem cell infusion. The Day +1 dose of methotrexate will be given at least 24 hours after the hematopoietic stem cell infusion and at least 30 minutes after the first dose of maraviroc. Dose reduction of MTX due to worsening creatinine clearance after initiation of conditioning regimen, high serum levels or development of oral mucositis is allowed according to institutional practices. |
|
|
| Methotrexate (ARM with Bortezomib) | Drug | Methotrexate will be administered, per institutional practices, at the doses of 15 mg/m2 IV bolus on Day +1, and 10 mg/m2 IV bolus on Days +3, +6 and +11 after hematopoietic stem cell infusion. The Day +1 dose of methotrexate will be given at least 24 hours after the hematopoietic stem cell infusion and at least 30 minutes after the first dose of bortezomib. Dose reduction of MTX due to worsening creatinine clearance after initiation of conditioning regimen, high serum levels or development of oral mucositis is allowed according to institutional practices. |
|
|
| Maraviroc | Drug | Maraviroc will be dosed at 300 mg orally twice a day and will start on Day -3 prior to hematopoietic stem cell infusion, and continue until Day 30 post HSCT. If the patient requires a two-day stem cell infusion, maraviroc treatment will end 30 days after the first infusion day. |
|
|
| Bortezomib | Drug | Bortezomib will be administered at the dose of 1.3 mg/m2 based upon actual body weight (ABW) as an approximately 3-5 second IV push on Days +1, +4, and +7 after hematopoietic stem cell infusion. There must be at least 72 hours between each dose of bortezomib. Subcutaneous administration of bortezomib is not allowed on this protocol. |
|
|
| Mycophenolate mofetil | Drug | MMF will be given at a dose of 15 mg/kg three times a day (TID) based upon ABW with the maximum total daily dose not to exceed 3 grams (1g TID, IV or PO). MMF prophylaxis will start Day 5 and discontinue after the last dose on Day 35, or may be continued if active GVHD is present. |
|
|
| Cyclophosphamide | Drug | Hydration prior to cyclophosphamide may be given according to institutional standards. Mesna will be given in divided doses IV 30 min pre- and at 3, 6, and 8 hours post-cyclophosphamide or administered per institutional standards. Mesna dose will be based on the cyclophosphamide dose being given. The total daily dose of Mesna is equal to 80% of the total daily dose of cyclophosphamide. Cyclophosphamide [50 mg/kg ideal body weight (IBW); if ABW < IBW, use ABW] will be given on Day 3 post-transplant (between 60 and 72 hours after the start of the HSCT) and on Day 4 post-transplant (approximately 24 hours after Day 3 cyclophosphamide). Cyclophosphamide will be given as an IV infusion over 1-2 hours (depending on volume). |
|
|
| Day 180 Post-transplant |
| Percentage of Participants With Grade III-IV Acute GVHD | Acute GVHD is graded according to the scoring system proposed by Przepiorka et al.1995: Skin stage: 0: No rash
Liver stage (based on bilirubin level)*: 0: <2 mg/dL 1.2-3 mg/dL 2.3.01-6 mg/dL 3.6.01-15.0 mg/dL 4.>15 mg/dL GI stage*: 0: No diarrhea or diarrhea <500 mL/day
GVHD grade: 0: All organ stages 0 or GVHD not listed as an etiology I: Skin stage 1-2 and liver and GI stage 0 II: Skin stage 3 or liver or GI stage 1 III: Liver stage 2-3 or GI stage 2-4 IV: Skin or liver stage 4 | Day 180 Post-transplant |
| Percentage of Participants With Chronic GVHD | Chronic GVHD is classified per 2005 NIH Consensus Criteria (Filipovich et al. 2005) into categories of severity: none, mild, moderate, and severe. Occurrence of chronic GVHD is defined as the occurrence of mild, moderate, or severe chronic GVHD per this classification. | 1 Year Post-transplant |
| Percentage of Participants With Chronic GVHD Requiring Immunosupressive Therapy | Chronic GVHD is classified per 2005 NIH Consensus Criteria (Filipovich et al. 2005) into categories of severity: none, mild, moderate, and severe. Occurrence of chronic GVHD is defined as the occurrence of mild, moderate, or severe chronic GVHD per this classification. This endpoint considers the occurrence of chronic GVHD that necessitated initiation of immunosuppressive therapy for treatment. | 1 Year Post-transplant |
| Percentage of Participants With Disease Relapse or Progression | Relapse is defined by either morphological or cytogenetic evidence of acute leukemia or MDS consistent with pretransplant features, or radiologic evidence of lymphoma. Progression of disease applies to patients with lymphoproliferative diseases (lymphoma or chronic lymphocytic leukemia) not in remission prior to transplantation and is defined as increase in size of prior sites of disease or evidence of new sites of disease. | 1 Year Post-transplant |
| Percentage of Participants With Transplant-Related Mortality (TRM) | TRM is defined as death without prior disease relapse or progression. | 1 Year Post-transplant |
| Percentage of Participants With Disease-free Survival | Disease-free survival is defined as being alive and free of disease relapse or progression. | 1 Year Post-transplant |
| Percentage of Participants With GVHD-free Survival | GVHD-free survival is defined as being alive without previous onset of Grade III-IV acute GVHD or chronic GVHD requiring immunosuppressive therapy. | 1 Year Post-transplant |
| Percentage of Participants With Overall Survival | 1 Year Post-transplant |
| Percentage of Participants With Neutrophil Recovery | Neutrophil recovery is defined as achieving an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ 500/mm^3 for three consecutive measurements on three different days. | Days 28 and 100 Post-transplant |
| Percentage of Participants With Platelet Recovery | Platelet recovery is defined as the first day of a sustained platelet count >20,000/mm^3 with no platelet transfusion in the preceding seven days. | Days 60 and 100 Post-transplant |
| Donor Cell Engraftment | Donor cell engraftment will be assessed with donor/recipient chimerism. Chimerism may be evaluated in bone marrow, whole blood, or CD3 fractions. Full donor chimerism is defined as the presence of ≥ 95% of donor cells as a proportion of total cells. Mixed chimerism is defined as the presence of donor cells, as a proportion of total cells, of < 95% but > 5% in the bone marrow or peripheral blood. Full and mixed chimerism will be evidence of donor cell engraftment. Donor cells of ≤ 5% will be considered as graft rejection. | Days 28 and 100 Post-transplant |
| Primary Cause of Death | 1 Year Post-transplant |
| Stanford |
| California |
| 94305 |
| United States |
| University of Florida College of Medicine (Shands) | Gainesville | Florida | 32611 | United States |
| H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center | Tampa | Florida | 33624 | United States |
| Emory University | Atlanta | Georgia | 30322 | United States |
| BMT Program at Northside Hospital | Atlanta | Georgia | 30342 | United States |
| Loyola University Medical Center | Maywood | Illinois | 60153 | United States |
| University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics | Iowa City | Iowa | 52242 | United States |
| University of Kansas Hospital | Westwood | Kansas | 66205 | United States |
| Johns Hopkins University | Baltimore | Maryland | 22218 | United States |
| Dana Farber Cancer Institute/Massachusetts General Hospital | Boston | Massachusetts | 02114 | United States |
| Dana Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham & Women's | Boston | Massachusetts | 02215 | United States |
| Karmanos Cancer Institute/BMT | Detroit | Michigan | 48201 | United States |
| University of Minnesota | Minneapolis | Minnesota | 55455 | United States |
| Mayo Clinic - Rochester | Rochester | Minnesota | 55905 | United States |
| Washington University/Barnes Jewish Hospital | St Louis | Missouri | 63130 | United States |
| University of Nebraska Medical Center | Omaha | Nebraska | 68198 | United States |
| Roswell Park Cancer Institute | Buffalo | New York | 14263 | United States |
| Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center | Manhattan | New York | 10065 | United States |
| University of North Carolina Hospital at Chapel Hill | Chapel Hill | North Carolina | 27514 | United States |
| Cleveland Clinic Foundation | Cleveland | Ohio | 44106 | United States |
| University Hospitals of Cleveland/Case Western | Cleveland | Ohio | 44106 | United States |
| Ohio State/Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital | Columbus | Ohio | 43210 | United States |
| Oregon Health & Science University | Portland | Oregon | 97239 | United States |
| University of Pennsylvania Cancer Center | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | 19104 | United States |
| Medical University of South Carolina | Charleston | South Carolina | 29425 | United States |
| University of Texas/MD Anderson Cancer Center | Houston | Texas | 77030 | United States |
| Texas Transplant Institute | San Antonio | Texas | 78229 | United States |
| University of Utah Med School | Salt Lake City | Utah | 84112 | United States |
| Virginia Commonwealth University MCV Hospitals | Richmond | Virginia | 23284 | United States |
| 30824040 | Derived | Bolanos-Meade J, Reshef R, Fraser R, Fei M, Abhyankar S, Al-Kadhimi Z, Alousi AM, Antin JH, Arai S, Bickett K, Chen YB, Damon LE, Efebera YA, Geller NL, Giralt SA, Hari P, Holtan SG, Horowitz MM, Jacobsohn DA, Jones RJ, Liesveld JL, Logan BR, MacMillan ML, Mielcarek M, Noel P, Pidala J, Porter DL, Pusic I, Sobecks R, Solomon SR, Weisdorf DJ, Wu J, Pasquini MC, Koreth J. Three prophylaxis regimens (tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and cyclophosphamide; tacrolimus, methotrexate, and bortezomib; or tacrolimus, methotrexate, and maraviroc) versus tacrolimus and methotrexate for prevention of graft-versus-host disease with haemopoietic cell transplantation with reduced-intensity conditioning: a randomised phase 2 trial with a non-randomised contemporaneous control group (BMT CTN 1203). Lancet Haematol. 2019 Mar;6(3):e132-e143. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(18)30221-7. |
Participants will receive a GVHD prophylactic regimen of three agents: Tacrolimus, Methotrexate, and Maraviroc.
| FG002 | Tacrolimus/MMF/Cyclophosphamide | Participants will receive a GVHD prophylactic regimen of three agents: Tacrolimus, Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF), and Cyclophosphamide. |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Tacrolimus/Methotrexate/Bortezomib | Participants will receive a GVHD prophylactic regimen of three agents: Tacrolimus, Methotrexate, and Bortezomib. |
| BG001 | Tacrolimus/Methotrexate/Maraviroc | Participants will receive a GVHD prophylactic regimen of three agents: Tacrolimus, Methotrexate, and Maraviroc. |
| BG002 | Tacrolimus/MMF/Cyclophosphamide | Participants will receive a GVHD prophylactic regimen of three agents: Tacrolimus, Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF), and Cyclophosphamide. |
| BG003 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Median | Full Range | years |
| |||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| HCT-CI Comorbidity Index | The HCT-CI is a measure of comorbidities present in hematopoietic cell transplant patients. It is scored on an integer-valued scale from 0-29, with greater values indicating greater levels of comorbidity. | Count of Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||||||
| Karnofsky Performance Score | KPS describes patient-perceived global quality of life and functioning on a scale of 0-100. 100: No evidence of disease; 90: Normal activity. Minor signs or symptoms of disease; 80: Normal activity with effort. Some signs or symptoms of disease; 70: Cares for self. Unable to continue normal activity; 60: Needs occasional assistance, but cares for most personal needs; 50: Needs considerable assistance and medical care; 40: Disabled. Needs special care and assistance; 30: Severely disabled. Hospital admission indicated; 20: Very sick. Active supportive therapy needed; 10: Moribund; 0: Dead | Count of Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||||||
| HLA Matching and Donor Type | For related donors, HLA matching was performed on 6 markers using HLA-A and -B at intermediate resolution and -DRB1 at high resolution. For unrelated donors, matching was performed on 8 markers using HLA-A, -B, -C and -DRB1 at high resolution. | Count of Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||||||
| Primary Diagnosis | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Time from Diagnosis to Transplant | Median | Full Range | months |
| |||||||||||||||
| Donor/Recipient Sex Matching | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Donor/Recipient Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Status | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Percentage of Participants With GVHD/Relapse or Progression-free Survival (GRFS) | GRFS is defined as being free of grade III-IV acute GVHD onset, chronic GVHD onset requiring systemic immunosuppressive therapy, disease relapse or progression, and death from any cause. | Posted | Number | 90% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | 1 Year Post-transplant |
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Grade II-IV Acute GVHD | Acute GVHD is graded according to the scoring system proposed by Przepiorka et al.1995: Skin stage: 0: No rash
Liver stage (based on bilirubin level)*: 0: <2 mg/dL
GI stage*: 0: No diarrhea or diarrhea <500 mL/day
GVHD grade: 0: All organ stages 0 or GVHD not listed as an etiology I: Skin stage 1-2 and liver and GI stage 0 II: Skin stage 3 or liver or GI stage 1 III: Liver stage 2-3 or GI stage 2-4 IV: Skin or liver stage 4 | Posted | Number | 90% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | Day 180 Post-transplant |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Grade III-IV Acute GVHD | Acute GVHD is graded according to the scoring system proposed by Przepiorka et al.1995: Skin stage: 0: No rash
Liver stage (based on bilirubin level)*: 0: <2 mg/dL 1.2-3 mg/dL 2.3.01-6 mg/dL 3.6.01-15.0 mg/dL 4.>15 mg/dL GI stage*: 0: No diarrhea or diarrhea <500 mL/day
GVHD grade: 0: All organ stages 0 or GVHD not listed as an etiology I: Skin stage 1-2 and liver and GI stage 0 II: Skin stage 3 or liver or GI stage 1 III: Liver stage 2-3 or GI stage 2-4 IV: Skin or liver stage 4 | Posted | Number | 90% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | Day 180 Post-transplant |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Chronic GVHD | Chronic GVHD is classified per 2005 NIH Consensus Criteria (Filipovich et al. 2005) into categories of severity: none, mild, moderate, and severe. Occurrence of chronic GVHD is defined as the occurrence of mild, moderate, or severe chronic GVHD per this classification. | Posted | Number | 90% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | 1 Year Post-transplant |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Chronic GVHD Requiring Immunosupressive Therapy | Chronic GVHD is classified per 2005 NIH Consensus Criteria (Filipovich et al. 2005) into categories of severity: none, mild, moderate, and severe. Occurrence of chronic GVHD is defined as the occurrence of mild, moderate, or severe chronic GVHD per this classification. This endpoint considers the occurrence of chronic GVHD that necessitated initiation of immunosuppressive therapy for treatment. | Posted | Number | 90% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | 1 Year Post-transplant |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Disease Relapse or Progression | Relapse is defined by either morphological or cytogenetic evidence of acute leukemia or MDS consistent with pretransplant features, or radiologic evidence of lymphoma. Progression of disease applies to patients with lymphoproliferative diseases (lymphoma or chronic lymphocytic leukemia) not in remission prior to transplantation and is defined as increase in size of prior sites of disease or evidence of new sites of disease. | Posted | Number | 90% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | 1 Year Post-transplant |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Transplant-Related Mortality (TRM) | TRM is defined as death without prior disease relapse or progression. | Posted | Number | 90% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | 1 Year Post-transplant |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Disease-free Survival | Disease-free survival is defined as being alive and free of disease relapse or progression. | Posted | Number | 90% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | 1 Year Post-transplant |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With GVHD-free Survival | GVHD-free survival is defined as being alive without previous onset of Grade III-IV acute GVHD or chronic GVHD requiring immunosuppressive therapy. | Posted | Number | 90% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | 1 Year Post-transplant |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Overall Survival | Posted | Number | 90% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | 1 Year Post-transplant |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Neutrophil Recovery | Neutrophil recovery is defined as achieving an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ 500/mm^3 for three consecutive measurements on three different days. | Posted | Number | 90% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | Days 28 and 100 Post-transplant |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Platelet Recovery | Platelet recovery is defined as the first day of a sustained platelet count >20,000/mm^3 with no platelet transfusion in the preceding seven days. | Posted | Number | 90% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | Days 60 and 100 Post-transplant |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Donor Cell Engraftment | Donor cell engraftment will be assessed with donor/recipient chimerism. Chimerism may be evaluated in bone marrow, whole blood, or CD3 fractions. Full donor chimerism is defined as the presence of ≥ 95% of donor cells as a proportion of total cells. Mixed chimerism is defined as the presence of donor cells, as a proportion of total cells, of < 95% but > 5% in the bone marrow or peripheral blood. Full and mixed chimerism will be evidence of donor cell engraftment. Donor cells of ≤ 5% will be considered as graft rejection. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Days 28 and 100 Post-transplant |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Primary Cause of Death | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 1 Year Post-transplant |
|
|
Up to 1 Year Post-transplant
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Tacrolimus/Methotrexate/Bortezomib | Participants will receive a GVHD prophylactic regimen of three agents: Tacrolimus, Methotrexate, and Bortezomib. | 30 | 93 | 21 | 93 | 0 | 93 |
| EG001 | Tacrolimus/Methotrexate/Maraviroc | Participants will receive a GVHD prophylactic regimen of three agents: Tacrolimus, Methotrexate, and Maraviroc. | 31 | 93 | 14 | 93 | 0 | 93 |
| EG002 | Tacrolimus/MMF/Cyclophosphamide | Participants will receive a GVHD prophylactic regimen of three agents: Tacrolimus, Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF), and Cyclophosphamide. | 27 | 93 | 12 | 93 | 0 | 93 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Atrial fibrillation | Cardiac disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Cardiac Arrest | Cardiac disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Cardiac failure | Cardiac disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Cardiogenic shock | Cardiac disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Cardiomyopathy | Cardiac disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Myocardial ischaemia | Cardiac disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Pericardial effusion | Cardiac disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Abdominal pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Ascites | Gastrointestinal disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Colonic pseudo-obstruction | Gastrointestinal disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Gastrointestinal haemorrhage | Gastrointestinal disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Gastrointestinal perforation | Gastrointestinal disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Ileus | Gastrointestinal disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Intestinal perforation | Gastrointestinal disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Death | General disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Cholecystitis | Hepatobiliary disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Anorectal cellulitis | Infections and infestations | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Appendicitis | Infections and infestations | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Pneumonia | Infections and infestations | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Septic shock | Infections and infestations | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Hyponatraemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Arthralgia | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Arthritis | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Vertebral foraminal stenosis | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Encephalopathy | Nervous system disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Guillain-Barre syndrome | Nervous system disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Haemorrhage intracranial | Nervous system disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Syncope | Nervous system disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Delirium | Psychiatric disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Mental status changes | Psychiatric disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Acute kidney injury | Renal and urinary disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Acute respiratory distress syndrome | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Pulmonary embolism | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Respiratory failure | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Embolism | Vascular disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Hypotension | Vascular disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adam Mendizabal, PhD | The Emmes Corporation | 301-251-1161 | amendizabal@emmes.com |
| Prot_000.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Nov 9, 2016 | Nov 30, 2018 | SAP_001.pdf |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D015464 | Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive |
| D000754 | Anemia, Refractory, with Excess of Blasts |
| D015451 | Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell |
| D016393 | Lymphoma, B-Cell |
| D008224 | Lymphoma, Follicular |
| D016403 | Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse |
| D006689 | Hodgkin Disease |
| D054198 | Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma |
| D015470 | Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007951 | Leukemia, Myeloid |
| D007938 | Leukemia |
| D009370 | Neoplasms by Histologic Type |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D009196 | Myeloproliferative Disorders |
| D001855 | Bone Marrow Diseases |
| D006402 | Hematologic Diseases |
| D006425 | Hemic and Lymphatic Diseases |
| D002908 | Chronic Disease |
| D020969 | Disease Attributes |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
| D000753 | Anemia, Refractory |
| D000740 | Anemia |
| D009190 | Myelodysplastic Syndromes |
| D015448 | Leukemia, B-Cell |
| D007945 | Leukemia, Lymphoid |
| D008232 | Lymphoproliferative Disorders |
| D008206 | Lymphatic Diseases |
| D007160 | Immunoproliferative Disorders |
| D007154 | Immune System Diseases |
| D008228 | Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin |
| D008223 | Lymphoma |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D016559 | Tacrolimus |
| D008727 | Methotrexate |
| D003520 | Cyclophosphamide |
| D000077592 | Maraviroc |
| D000069286 | Bortezomib |
| D009173 | Mycophenolic Acid |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D018942 | Macrolides |
| D007783 | Lactones |
| D009930 | Organic Chemicals |
| D000630 | Aminopterin |
| D011622 | Pterins |
| D011621 | Pteridines |
| D006574 | Heterocyclic Compounds, 2-Ring |
| D000072471 | Heterocyclic Compounds, Fused-Ring |
| D006571 | Heterocyclic Compounds |
| D010752 | Phosphoramide Mustards |
| D009588 | Nitrogen Mustard Compounds |
| D009150 | Mustard Compounds |
| D006846 | Hydrocarbons, Halogenated |
| D006838 | Hydrocarbons |
| D063088 | Phosphoramides |
| D009943 | Organophosphorus Compounds |
| D003510 | Cyclohexanes |
| D003516 | Cycloparaffins |
| D006840 | Hydrocarbons, Alicyclic |
| D006844 | Hydrocarbons, Cyclic |
| D014230 | Triazoles |
| D001393 | Azoles |
| D006573 | Heterocyclic Compounds, 1-Ring |
| D001897 | Boronic Acids |
| D000148 | Acids, Noncarboxylic |
| D000143 | Acids |
| D007287 | Inorganic Chemicals |
| D001896 | Boron Compounds |
| D011719 | Pyrazines |
| D002208 | Caproates |
| D000144 | Acids, Acyclic |
| D002264 | Carboxylic Acids |
| D005227 | Fatty Acids |
| D008055 | Lipids |
Not provided
Not provided
| Male |
|
| Not Hispanic or Latino |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
| Asian |
|
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
|
| Black or African American |
|
| White |
|
| More than one race |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
| 1-2 |
|
| 3 or greater |
|
| 90 |
|
| 80 |
|
| 70 |
|
| Matched Other Relative (6/6) |
|
| Matched Unrelated (8/8) |
|
| Mismatched Unrelated (7/8) |
|
| Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) |
|
| Chronic Myelogeneous Leukemia (CML) |
|
| Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) |
|
| Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) |
|
| Follicular Lymphoma |
|
| Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma |
|
| Mantle Cell Lymphoma |
|
| Hodgkin's Lymphoma |
|
| Male donor / Female Recipient |
|
| Female donor / Male Recipient |
|
| Female donor / Female Recipient |
|
| Donor Positive / Recipient Negative |
|
| Donor Negative / Recipient Positive |
|
| Donor Negative / Recipient Negative |
|
| OG002 |
| Tacrolimus/MMF/Cyclophosphamide |
Participants will receive a GVHD prophylactic regimen of three agents: Tacrolimus, Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF), and Cyclophosphamide. |
|
|
| OG002 |
| Tacrolimus/MMF/Cyclophosphamide |
Participants will receive a GVHD prophylactic regimen of three agents: Tacrolimus, Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF), and Cyclophosphamide. |
|
|
| Participants |
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
| Graft Rejection |
|
| Dead |
|
| No Assay Performed |
|