Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Supraglottic airway devices (SADs) are well established in anesthetic practice. Among these devices ,classic laryngeal airway has been typically widely used. The self-pressurised air-Q (air-Q) is newly developed supraglottic airway devices. It is a new single-use device that may optimise the airway sealing while reducing the potential for postoperative complications such as sore throat. The overall structure of the air-Q SP is identical to the original air-Q, except with regard to the inflatable cuff. The aim of this randomized trial was to compare the clinical performance of the classic LMA and the air-Q SP.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1)C-LMA group | Experimental |
| |
| 2)Air-Q group | Active Comparator |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Insertion of C-LMA | Device | After induction of general anesthesia, C-LMA or Air-Q was inserted according to randomly allocated group. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| airway leak pressure measured after device insertion | Airway leak pressure was determined by adjusting the expiratory valve of the breathing circle to 40 cmH2O (fixed fresh gas flow 3 L/min) and recording the pressure when equilibrium was reached. | within 5min to 10 min insertion of each device |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Insertion time | Insertion time was defined as the time from the attending anesthesiologist picking up the LMA until the confirmation on capnography. | During and 1 min after insertion of each device |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Ease of insertion | Ease of insertion was graded from 1 to 4. | During and 1 min after insertion of each device |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Human research Protection Center, Gangnam Severance Hospital, | Seoul | 120-752 | South Korea |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 29524199 | Derived | Ha SH, Kim MS, Suh J, Lee JS. Self-pressurized air-Q(R) intubating laryngeal airway versus the LMA(R) Classic: a randomized clinical trial. Can J Anaesth. 2018 May;65(5):543-550. doi: 10.1007/s12630-018-1082-6. Epub 2018 Feb 6. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Insertion of air-Q according | Device | After induction of general anesthesia, C-LMA or Air-Q was inserted according to randomly allocated group. |
|