Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-001027-20 | EudraCT Number |
Not provided
Not provided
Recruitment issues due to marketing authorization of study drug
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this trial is to investigate the efficacy of the treatment with canakinumab in participants with Adult-onset Still's Disease (AOSD) and active joint involvement.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Canakinumab | Experimental | Participants received canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to a maximum of 300 mg subcutaneous (SC) injection, once in morning on Day 0, Weeks 4, 8, and 12 in Part I of the core study. Participants with response (change in DAS score > 1.2 at Week 12) continued to receive same dose of canakinumab in Part II for Weeks 12, 16, and 20. Participants who had remission (change in DAS score > 1.2 and no signs of systemic activity for adult-onset Still's disease at Week 20) entered Long-term extension (LTE) phase and received same dose of canakinumab at Weeks 24 and 28, which was down titrated to 2 mg/kg if applicable from Week 28 up to Month 27. |
|
| Placebo | Placebo Comparator | Participants received placebo, SC injection, once in morning on Day 0, Weeks 4, 8, and 12 in Part I of the core study. Participants with response (change in DAS score > 1.2 at Week 12) continued to receive placebo at Weeks 12, 16, and 20. Non-responders (who had change in DAS score ≤ 1.2) were unblinded to receive canakinumab 4 mg/kg (up to 300 mg maximum), SC injection, at Weeks 12, 16, and 20. Participants who had remission (change in DAS score > 1.2 and no signs of systemic activity for adult-onset Still's disease at Week 20) entered Long-term extension (LTE) phase and received same dose of canakinumab at Weeks 24 and 28, which was down titrated to 2 mg/kg if applicable from Week 28 up to Month 27. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Canakinumab | Drug | Canakinumab, single-dose 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg administered subcutaneously. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Core Study Part I: Percentage of Responders as Assessed by Disease Activity Score 28 Joints (DAS28) Score at Week 12 | Responders included participants with change in disease activity score based on 28 joint counts and ESR (DAS28) score > 1.2. The DAS28 score index is a composite score of weighted components including tender joint counts of 28, swollen joint counts of 28, patient global assessment of disease activity score, and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) value. Total score ranged between 0-10. A DAS28-ESR score of 5.1 or above = high disease activity, a value between 3.2 and 5.1 = moderate disease activity and value between 2.6 and 3.2 = low disease activity, value < 2.6 = disease remission. | Week 12 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Core Study Part I: Change From Baseline (CFB) in Disease Activity Score 28 Joints Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS28 [ESR]) Score | The DAS28 index is a composite score of weighted components including tender joint counts of 28, swollen joint counts of 28, patient global assessment of disease activity score, and ESR value.Total score ranged between 0-10. A DAS28-ESR score of 5.1 or above = high disease activity, a value between 3.2 and 5.1 = moderate disease activity and value between 2.6 and 3.2 = low disease activity, value < 2.6 = disease remission. A positive change in score indicates worsening, and a negative change indicates improvement. Least squares (LS) mean was calculated by mixed linear model for repeated measures (MMRM) analyses. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Eugen Feist, Prof. Dr. | Charité University Berlin Germany | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Charité Campus Mitte | Berlin | 10117 | Germany | |||
| Immanuel Krankenhaus Berlin |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 26589963 | Derived | Nirmala N, Brachat A, Feist E, Blank N, Specker C, Witt M, Zernicke J, Martini A, Junge G. Gene-expression analysis of adult-onset Still's disease and systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis is consistent with a continuum of a single disease entity. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2015 Nov 20;13:50. doi: 10.1186/s12969-015-0047-3. |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Related Info | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
A total of 36 participants entered in Part I to receive canakinumab/placebo. Out of 31, 5 participants from canakinumab arm, and 3 from placebo arm did not enter Part II, 23 participants entered Part II and received canakinumab or placebo up to Week 24. 7 participants who achieved clinical remission entered LTE Phase to receive canakinumab.
Participants with adult-onset Still's disease (AOSD) took part in the study from June 21, 2012 to May 5, 2018 at 14 investigative sites located in Germany to participate in two double-blind parts - Part I (Up to Week 12) and Part II (Up to Week 24) and one open-label Long-Term Extension (LTE) phase (Up to Month 27).
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Core Study Part I: Canakinumab | Participants received canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, subcutaneous (SC) injection, once in morning at Baseline (Day 0), Weeks 4, 8, and 12. |
| FG001 | Core Study Part I: Placebo | Participants received placebo, SC injection, once in morning at Baseline (Day 0), Weeks 4, 8, and 12. |
| FG002 | Core Study Part II: Canakinumab Responders | Participants with response (change in DAS score > 1.2 at Week 12) continued to receive canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, SC injection, once in the morning for Weeks 12, 16, and 20. |
| FG003 | Core Study Part II: Placebo Responders | Participants with response (change in DAS score > 1.2 at Week 12) continued to receive placebo, SC injection, once in morning for Weeks 12, 16, and 20. |
| FG004 | Core Study Part II: Placebo Non-responders | Placebo Non-responders (change in DAS score ≤ 1.2 at Week 12) who switched to canakinumab were unblinded to receive canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, SC injection, once in the morning at Weeks 12, 16, and 20. |
| FG005 | LTE Phase: Canakinumab | Participants with remission (change in DAS score > 1.2 and no signs of systemic activity for adult-onset Still's disease at Week 20) received canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, SC injection at Weeks 24 and 28, which was down titrated to 2 mg/kg up to 150 mg maximum if applicable after Week 28 up to Month 27 (Week 117). |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Core Study Part I |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Core Study Part 2 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| LTE Phase |
|
Intention-to-treat (ITT) population included all participants who did not violate any of the following inclusion criteria: diagnosis of adult-onset Still's disease and disease activity based on DAS28 score of ≥ 3.2 at Screening.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Core Study Part I: Canakinumab | Participants received canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, subcutaneous (SC) injection, once in morning at Baseline (Day 0), Weeks 4, 8, and 12. |
| BG001 | Core Study Part I: Placebo |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Core Study Part I: Percentage of Responders as Assessed by Disease Activity Score 28 Joints (DAS28) Score at Week 12 | Responders included participants with change in disease activity score based on 28 joint counts and ESR (DAS28) score > 1.2. The DAS28 score index is a composite score of weighted components including tender joint counts of 28, swollen joint counts of 28, patient global assessment of disease activity score, and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) value. Total score ranged between 0-10. A DAS28-ESR score of 5.1 or above = high disease activity, a value between 3.2 and 5.1 = moderate disease activity and value between 2.6 and 3.2 = low disease activity, value < 2.6 = disease remission. | Intention-to-treat (ITT) population included all participants who did not violate any of the following inclusion criteria: diagnosis of adult-onset Still's disease and disease activity based on DAS28 score of ≥ 3.2 at Screening. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | Week 12 |
|
Up to Month 27
Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. 2 participants of the placebo group in Part I received canakinumab at Week 4, as protocol violation, thus, Safety Analysis Set included those additional 2 participants in the canakinumab group.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Core Study Part I: Canakinumab | Participants received canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, subcutaneous (SC) injection, once in morning at Baseline (Day 0), Weeks 4, 8, and 12. |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abdominal pain upper | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Systematic Assessment |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lymphadenopathy | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Systematic Assessment |
The study terminated prior to the planned completion date due to recruitment issues because of the marketing authorization of the study drug.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prof. Dr Eugen Feist | Helios Fachklinik Vogelsang-Gommern GmbH, Germany | +49 30 450 513 192 | eugen.feist@charite.de |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Oct 20, 2017 | Jul 6, 2020 | Prot_000.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | May 9, 2018 | Jul 6, 2020 | SAP_001.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C541220 | canakinumab |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Placebo | Drug | Matching placebo administered subcutaneously. |
|
| Baseline, Weeks 4, 8 and 12 |
| Core Study Part I: CFB in DAS28 C-reactive Protein (CRP) Score | The DAS28 index is a composite score of weighted components including tender joint counts of 28, swollen joint counts of 28, patient global assessment of disease activity score, and CRP value. Total score ranged between 0-10. A DAS28-CRP score of 5.1 or above = high disease activity, a value between 3.2 and 5.1 = moderate disease activity and value between 2.6 and 3.2 = low disease activity, value < 2.6 = disease remission. A positive change in score indicates worsening, and a negative change indicates improvement. LS mean was calculated by MMRM analyses. | Baseline, Weeks 4, 8 and 12 |
| Core Study Part I: CFB in American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Component: 68 Tender Joint Count (TJC) | The 68 TJC included the 8 distal interphalangeal (IP), 10 proximal IP and 10 metacarpophalangeal (MTP) joints of hands, the 10 MTP and 10 proximal IP joints of feet, the 2 wrists, 2 elbows, 2 shoulders, 2 acromioclavicular, 2 sternoclavicular, 2 temporomandibular, 2 hip, 2 knee, 2 talo-tibial, and 2 mid-tarsal joints. Joint tenderness was graded present (1) or absent (0). Total score is calculated by adding the scores, which range from 0 (no tender joint) to 68 (all tender joints). Lower scores indicate no tender joint and higher scores indicate worsening tender joints. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. LS mean was calculated by MMRM analyses. | Baseline, Weeks 4, 8 and 12 |
| Core Study Part I: CFB in ACR Component: 66 Swollen Joint Count (SJC) | The 66 SJC included the 8 distal interphalangeal (IP), 10 proximal IP and 10 metacarpophalangeal (MTP) joints of hands, the 10 MTP and 10 proximal IP joints of feet, the 2 wrists, 2 elbows, 2 shoulders, 2 acromioclavicular, 2 sternoclavicular, 2 temporomandibular, 2 knee, 2 talo-tibial, and 2 mid-tarsal joints. Swelling was graded present (1) or absent (0). Total score is calculated by adding the scores, which range from 0 (no swollen joint) to 66 (all swollen joints). Lower scores indicate no swollen joint and higher scores indicate worsening swollen joints. A negative change in Baseline indicates improvement. LS mean was calculated by MMRM analyses. | Baseline, Weeks 4, 8 and 12 |
| Core Study Part I: CFB in the 28 TJC | A total of 28 joints were assessed for tenderness. The number of tender joints could range from 0 to 28, where higher values represented more tender joints. The change from Baseline to any time points was averaged among all participants, where negative changes indicated an improvement in disease activity. LS mean was calculated by MMRM analyses. | Baseline, Weeks 4, 8 and 12 |
| Core Study Part I: CFB in the 28 SJC | A total of 28 joints were assessed for swelling. The number of swollen joints could range from 0 to 28, where higher values represented more swollen joints. The change from Baseline to any time point was averaged among all participants, where negative changes indicated an improvement in disease activity. LS mean was calculated by MMRM analyses. | Baseline, Weeks 4, 8 and 12 |
| Core Study Part I: CFB in ACR Component: Acute Phase Reactant CRP | A negative change from Baseline in CRP level indicates an improvement. LS mean was calculated by MMRM analyses. | Baseline, Weeks 4, 8 and 12 |
| Core Study Part I: CFB in ACR Component: Acute Phase Reactant ESR | A negative change from Baseline in ESR level indicates an improvement. LS mean was calculated by MMRM analyses. | Baseline, Weeks 4, 8 and 12 |
| Core Study Part I: CFB in Serum Ferritin Level at Week 12 | LS mean was calculated by MMRM analyses. | Week 12 |
| Core Study Part I: Percentage of Responders With Fever Episodes | Fever is defined as an oral or rectal body temperature greater than 38 degrees Celsius (°C). | Week 12 |
| Core Study Part I: CFB in ACR Component: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity Score | The physician's global assessment of disease activity was assessed using a numerical rating scale of 0-10 where 0= no disease activity and 10= activity to maximal disease activity. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. LS mean was calculated by MMRM analyses. | Baseline, Weeks 4, 8 and 12 |
| Core Study Part I: CFB in ACR Component: Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity Score | The participant's global assessment of disease activity was assessed using a numerical rating scale of 0-10, where 0= no disease activity and 10= maximal disease activity. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. LS mean was calculated by MMRM analyses. | Baseline, Weeks 4, 8 and 12 |
| Core Study Part I: CFB in ACR Component: Participant's Global Assessment of Pain Score | The participant's global assessment of pain was assessed using a numerical rating scale of 0-10, where 0= no disease activity and 10= maximal disease activity. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. LS mean was calculated by MMRM analyses. | Baseline, Weeks 4, 8 and 12 |
| Core Study Part I: CFB in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score | The HAQ measures physical disability and functional status. It has 4 dimensions: disability, pain, drug side effects and dollar costs. The HAQ score is calculated by summing the computed scores for each category and dividing by the number of categories answered. It ranges from 0 (without any difficulty) to 3 (unable to do). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. LS mean was calculated by MMRM analyses. | Baseline, Week 12 |
| Core Study Part I: Percentage of Responders With American College of Rheumatology Response of 20 (ACR20) | ACR20 response was defined as a ≥ 20% improvement (reduction) compared with Baseline for both 68 TJC and 66 SJC, as well as for three of the additional five ACR core set variables: Participant's Assessment of Pain over the previous 24 hours: using a NRS left end of the line 0=no pain to right end of the line 10=unbearable pain; Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity over the previous 24 hours using a NRS where left end of the line 0=no disease activity to right end of the line 10=maximum disease activity; HAQ-DI 20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; and acute-phase reactant ESR. | Baseline, Week 12 |
| Core Study Part I: Percentage of Responders With ACR30 | ACR30 response was defined as a ≥ 30% improvement (reduction) compared with Baseline for both 68 TJC and 66 SJC, as well as for three of the additional five ACR core set variables: Participant's Assessment of Pain over the previous 24 hours: using a NRS left end of the line 0=no pain to right end of the line 10=unbearable pain; Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity over the previous 24 hours using a NRS where left end of the line 0=no disease activity to right end of the line 10=maximum disease activity; HAQ 20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; and acute-phase reactant ESR. | Baseline, Week 12 |
| Core Study Part I: Percentage of Responders With Modified ACR30 | A participant was considered responder if he/she had achieved the incidence of modified adapted response (ACR30 criteria) of at least a 30% improvement in no intermittent fever and had at least 30% improvement in at least 6 of the following 7 measures: tender and swollen 68-joint counts, participant's assessment of pain, participant's global assessment of disease activity, physician's global assessment of disease activity, participant's functional capacity (HAQ-DI score) and acute phase reactant- ESR. Participant were modified ACR30 responders at a given post-randomization visit if they satisfied the modified ACR30 criteria, respectively. | Baseline, Week 12 |
| Core Study Part I: Percentage of Responders With ACR50 | ACR50 response was defined as a ≥ 50% improvement (reduction) compared with Baseline for both 68 TJC and 66 SJC, as well as for three of the additional five ACR core set variables: Participant's Assessment of Pain over the previous 24 hours: using a NRS left end of the line 0=no pain to right end of the line 10=unbearable pain; Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity over the previous 24 hours using a NRS where left end of the line 0=no disease activity to right end of the line 10=maximum disease activity; HAQ-DI 20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; and acute-phase reactant ESR. | Baseline, Week 12 |
| Core Study Part I: Percentage of Responders With ACR70 | ACR70 response was defined as a ≥ 70% improvement (reduction) compared with Baseline for both 68 TJC and 66 SJC, as well as for three of the additional five ACR core set variables: Participant's Assessment of Pain over the previous 24 hours: using a NRS left end of the line 0=no pain to right end of the line 10=unbearable pain; Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity over the previous 24 hours using a NRS where left end of the line 0=no disease activity to right end of the line 10=maximum disease activity; HAQ-DI 20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; and acute-phase reactant ESR. | Baseline, Week 12 |
| Core Study Part I: Percentage of Responders With ACR90 | ACR90 response was defined as a ≥ 90% improvement (reduction) compared with Baseline for both 68 TJC and 66 SJC, as well as for three of the additional five ACR core set variables: Participant's Assessment of Pain over the previous 24 hours: using a NRS left end of the line 0=no pain to right end of the line 10=unbearable pain; Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity over the previous 24 hours using a NRS where left end of the line 0=no disease activity to right end of the line 10=maximum disease activity; HAQ-DI 20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; and acute-phase reactant ESR. | Baseline, Week 12 |
| Core Study Part I: Percentage of Responders With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response | EULAR response is based on DAS28-ESR and DAS28-CRP scores. The DAS28 index is a composite score of weighted components including tender joint counts of 28, swollen joint counts of 28, subject global assessment of disease activity score, and ESR or CRP value. A DAS28-CRP or ESR score of 5.1 or above = high disease activity, a value between 3.2 and 5.1 = moderate disease activity and value between 2.6 and 3.2 = low disease activity, value < 2.6 = disease remission. EULAR response has 3 categories: EULAR Good response: DAS28 ≤ 3.2 and a change from Baseline < -1.2. EULAR Moderate response: DAS28 >3.2 to ≤ 5.1 or a change from Baseline < -0.6 to ≥ -1.2 or EULAR No response: DAS28 >5.1 or a change from Baseline < -0.6 to ≤ -1.2. | Baseline, Week 12 |
| Core Study Part I: Percentage of Responders Achieving Low Disease Activity (LDA) | Percentage of responders were defined as the participants who achieved LDA (DAS28 score < 3.2) at Week 12. The DAS28 index is a composite score of weighted components including tender joint counts of 28, swollen joint counts of 28, participant global assessment of disease activity score, and ESR or CRP value. Total score ranged between 0-10. A DAS28 score greater than 5.1 implies high disease activity, equal to or less than 3.2 low disease activity, and less than 2.6 remissions. | Week 12 |
| Core Study Part I: Percentage of Responders Achieving Disease Remission and Extended Disease Remission | Participants with disease remission: LDA (DAS28 score< 2.6). The DAS28 index is a composite score of weighted components including both 28 TJC an SJC, participant global assessment of disease activity score, and ESR or CRP value. A DAS28 score greater than 5.1: high disease activity, ≤ 3.2: low disease activity, and less than 2.6: remission. Extended remission criteria included DAS28 < 2.6 and no signs of systemic activity for up to two consecutive study visits till Week 12 defined as any of Yamaguchi´s primary classification criteria for AOSD which included fever attacks at 39 °C for more than a week, arthralgia, salmon red, maculate, urticarial or maculo-papular rash and leukocytosis (white blood cells increase) of > 10000/cubic millimeters (mm^3) with > 80% neutrophils. | Week 12 |
| Core Study Part I: Change in Joint Mobility (Degrees of Motion) Assessed by Neutral Zero Method | Number of joints with limitation of motion according to neutral zero method was assessed which included mobility of joints (elbows, wrists, shoulder joints, hip joints, knee joints, and upper ankle joints) within the reference range/degree. Response is defined as an improvement of ≥ 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% from Baseline. A negative change score indicates improvement. LS mean was calculated by MMRM analyses. | Baseline, Week 12 |
| Core Study Part I: CFB in Medical Outcome Short Form (SF-36) Health Survey Score | The SF-36 determines overall quality of life assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 1-4 contribute to physical component summary score (PCS). Items 5-8 contribute to mental component summary score (MCS). Scores on each item are summed and averaged (range = 0 "worst"-100 "best"). Positive numbers indicate improvement from Baseline. LS mean was calculated by MMRM analyses. | Baseline, Week 12 |
| Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | An AE is an adverse medical event which occurs in a participant of the study and which is not necessarily in a causal relationship with the treatment the participant receives. AEs include symptoms of illnesses, as well as every unfavourable and unintended reaction. SAEs are AEs leading to death, are life-threatening, require hospitalizations or prolongation of hospitalizations, represent an innate malformation or a congenital abnormality. | Up to Month 27 |
| Berlin |
| 13125 |
| Germany |
| Med. Klinik I für Innere Medizin Köln | Cologne | 50937 | Germany |
| Universität Erlangen | Erlangen | 91054 | Germany |
| Kliniken Essen-Süd/Krankenhaus St. Josef | Essen | 45239 | Germany |
| Universitätsklinikum der J.W. Goethe-Universität Frankfurt | Frankfurt A. M. | 60590 | Germany |
| Asklepios Klinikum Hamburg Altona | Hamburg | 22763 | Germany |
| Medizinische Hochschule Hannover | Hanover | 30625 | Germany |
| Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg | Heidelberg | 69120 | Germany |
| Universitätskrankenhaus Schleswig Holstein | Kiel | 24105 | Germany |
| Klinikum der Universität München | München | 80336 | Germany |
| Klinikum Südstadt Rostock | Rostock | 18059 | Germany |
| Universitätsklinikum Tübingen | Tübingen | 72076 | Germany |
| Fachkrankenhaus | Vogelsang | 39245 | Germany |
| Adverse Event |
|
| Physician Decision |
|
| Safety Population |
|
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
Participants received placebo, SC injection, once in morning at Baseline (Day 0), Weeks 4, 8, and 12.
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected | Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant. | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Core Study Part I: Canakinumab |
Participants received canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, subcutaneous (SC) injection, once in morning at Baseline (Day 0), Weeks 4, 8, and 12. |
| OG001 | Core Study Part I: Placebo | Participants received placebo, SC injection, once in morning at Baseline (Day 0), Weeks 4, 8, and 12. |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Core Study Part I: Change From Baseline (CFB) in Disease Activity Score 28 Joints Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS28 [ESR]) Score | The DAS28 index is a composite score of weighted components including tender joint counts of 28, swollen joint counts of 28, patient global assessment of disease activity score, and ESR value.Total score ranged between 0-10. A DAS28-ESR score of 5.1 or above = high disease activity, a value between 3.2 and 5.1 = moderate disease activity and value between 2.6 and 3.2 = low disease activity, value < 2.6 = disease remission. A positive change in score indicates worsening, and a negative change indicates improvement. Least squares (LS) mean was calculated by mixed linear model for repeated measures (MMRM) analyses. | ITT population included all participants who did not violate any of the following inclusion criteria: diagnosis of adult-onset Still's disease and disease activity based on DAS28 score of ≥ 3.2 at Screening. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses at the given timepoint. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | score on a scale | Baseline, Weeks 4, 8 and 12 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Core Study Part I: CFB in DAS28 C-reactive Protein (CRP) Score | The DAS28 index is a composite score of weighted components including tender joint counts of 28, swollen joint counts of 28, patient global assessment of disease activity score, and CRP value. Total score ranged between 0-10. A DAS28-CRP score of 5.1 or above = high disease activity, a value between 3.2 and 5.1 = moderate disease activity and value between 2.6 and 3.2 = low disease activity, value < 2.6 = disease remission. A positive change in score indicates worsening, and a negative change indicates improvement. LS mean was calculated by MMRM analyses. | ITT population included all participants who did not violate any of the following inclusion criteria: diagnosis of adult-onset Still's disease and disease activity based on DAS28 score of ≥ 3.2 at Screening. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses at the given timepoint. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | score on a scale | Baseline, Weeks 4, 8 and 12 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Core Study Part I: CFB in American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Component: 68 Tender Joint Count (TJC) | The 68 TJC included the 8 distal interphalangeal (IP), 10 proximal IP and 10 metacarpophalangeal (MTP) joints of hands, the 10 MTP and 10 proximal IP joints of feet, the 2 wrists, 2 elbows, 2 shoulders, 2 acromioclavicular, 2 sternoclavicular, 2 temporomandibular, 2 hip, 2 knee, 2 talo-tibial, and 2 mid-tarsal joints. Joint tenderness was graded present (1) or absent (0). Total score is calculated by adding the scores, which range from 0 (no tender joint) to 68 (all tender joints). Lower scores indicate no tender joint and higher scores indicate worsening tender joints. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. LS mean was calculated by MMRM analyses. | ITT population included all participants who did not violate any of the following inclusion criteria: diagnosis of adult-onset Still's disease and disease activity based on DAS28 score of ≥ 3.2 at Screening. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses at the given timepoint. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | tender joints | Baseline, Weeks 4, 8 and 12 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Core Study Part I: CFB in ACR Component: 66 Swollen Joint Count (SJC) | The 66 SJC included the 8 distal interphalangeal (IP), 10 proximal IP and 10 metacarpophalangeal (MTP) joints of hands, the 10 MTP and 10 proximal IP joints of feet, the 2 wrists, 2 elbows, 2 shoulders, 2 acromioclavicular, 2 sternoclavicular, 2 temporomandibular, 2 knee, 2 talo-tibial, and 2 mid-tarsal joints. Swelling was graded present (1) or absent (0). Total score is calculated by adding the scores, which range from 0 (no swollen joint) to 66 (all swollen joints). Lower scores indicate no swollen joint and higher scores indicate worsening swollen joints. A negative change in Baseline indicates improvement. LS mean was calculated by MMRM analyses. | ITT population included all participants who did not violate any of the following inclusion criteria: diagnosis of adult-onset Still's disease and disease activity based on DAS28 score of ≥ 3.2 at Screening. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses at the given timepoint. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | swollen joints | Baseline, Weeks 4, 8 and 12 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Core Study Part I: CFB in the 28 TJC | A total of 28 joints were assessed for tenderness. The number of tender joints could range from 0 to 28, where higher values represented more tender joints. The change from Baseline to any time points was averaged among all participants, where negative changes indicated an improvement in disease activity. LS mean was calculated by MMRM analyses. | ITT population included all participants who did not violate any of the following inclusion criteria: diagnosis of adult-onset Still's disease and disease activity based on DAS28 score of ≥ 3.2 at Screening. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses at the given timepoint. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | tender joints | Baseline, Weeks 4, 8 and 12 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Core Study Part I: CFB in the 28 SJC | A total of 28 joints were assessed for swelling. The number of swollen joints could range from 0 to 28, where higher values represented more swollen joints. The change from Baseline to any time point was averaged among all participants, where negative changes indicated an improvement in disease activity. LS mean was calculated by MMRM analyses. | ITT population included all participants who did not violate any of the following inclusion criteria: diagnosis of adult-onset Still's disease and disease activity based on DAS28 score of ≥ 3.2 at Screening. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses at the given timepoint. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | swollen joints | Baseline, Weeks 4, 8 and 12 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Core Study Part I: CFB in ACR Component: Acute Phase Reactant CRP | A negative change from Baseline in CRP level indicates an improvement. LS mean was calculated by MMRM analyses. | ITT population included all participants who did not violate any of the following inclusion criteria: diagnosis of adult-onset Still's disease and disease activity based on DAS28 score of ≥ 3.2 at Screening. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses at the given timepoint. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | milligrams per liter (mg/L) | Baseline, Weeks 4, 8 and 12 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Core Study Part I: CFB in ACR Component: Acute Phase Reactant ESR | A negative change from Baseline in ESR level indicates an improvement. LS mean was calculated by MMRM analyses. | ITT population included all participants who did not violate any of the following inclusion criteria: diagnosis of adult-onset Still's disease and disease activity based on DAS28 score of ≥ 3.2 at Screening. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses at the given timepoint. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | millimeter per hour (mm/h) | Baseline, Weeks 4, 8 and 12 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Core Study Part I: CFB in Serum Ferritin Level at Week 12 | LS mean was calculated by MMRM analyses. | ITT population included all participants who did not violate any of the following inclusion criteria: diagnosis of adult-onset Still's disease and disease activity based on DAS28 score of ≥ 3.2 at Screening. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses at the given timepoint. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL) | Week 12 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Core Study Part I: Percentage of Responders With Fever Episodes | Fever is defined as an oral or rectal body temperature greater than 38 degrees Celsius (°C). | ITT population included all participants who did not violate any of the following inclusion criteria: diagnosis of adult-onset Still's disease and disease activity based on DAS28 score of ≥ 3.2 at Screening. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Week 12 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Core Study Part I: CFB in ACR Component: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity Score | The physician's global assessment of disease activity was assessed using a numerical rating scale of 0-10 where 0= no disease activity and 10= activity to maximal disease activity. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. LS mean was calculated by MMRM analyses. | ITT population included all participants who did not violate any of the following inclusion criteria: diagnosis of adult-onset Still's disease and disease activity based on DAS28 score of ≥ 3.2 at Screening. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses at the given timepoint. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | score on a scale | Baseline, Weeks 4, 8 and 12 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Core Study Part I: CFB in ACR Component: Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity Score | The participant's global assessment of disease activity was assessed using a numerical rating scale of 0-10, where 0= no disease activity and 10= maximal disease activity. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. LS mean was calculated by MMRM analyses. | ITT population included all participants who did not violate any of the following inclusion criteria: diagnosis of adult-onset Still's disease and disease activity based on DAS28 score of ≥ 3.2 at Screening. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses at the given timepoint. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | score on a scale | Baseline, Weeks 4, 8 and 12 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Core Study Part I: CFB in ACR Component: Participant's Global Assessment of Pain Score | The participant's global assessment of pain was assessed using a numerical rating scale of 0-10, where 0= no disease activity and 10= maximal disease activity. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. LS mean was calculated by MMRM analyses. | ITT population included all participants who did not violate any of the following inclusion criteria: diagnosis of adult-onset Still's disease and disease activity based on DAS28 score of ≥ 3.2 at Screening. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses at the given timepoint. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | score on a scale | Baseline, Weeks 4, 8 and 12 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Core Study Part I: CFB in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score | The HAQ measures physical disability and functional status. It has 4 dimensions: disability, pain, drug side effects and dollar costs. The HAQ score is calculated by summing the computed scores for each category and dividing by the number of categories answered. It ranges from 0 (without any difficulty) to 3 (unable to do). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. LS mean was calculated by MMRM analyses. | ITT population included all participants who did not violate any of the following inclusion criteria: diagnosis of adult-onset Still's disease and disease activity based on DAS28 score of ≥ 3.2 at Screening. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses at the given timepoint. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | score on a scale | Baseline, Week 12 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Core Study Part I: Percentage of Responders With American College of Rheumatology Response of 20 (ACR20) | ACR20 response was defined as a ≥ 20% improvement (reduction) compared with Baseline for both 68 TJC and 66 SJC, as well as for three of the additional five ACR core set variables: Participant's Assessment of Pain over the previous 24 hours: using a NRS left end of the line 0=no pain to right end of the line 10=unbearable pain; Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity over the previous 24 hours using a NRS where left end of the line 0=no disease activity to right end of the line 10=maximum disease activity; HAQ-DI 20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; and acute-phase reactant ESR. | ITT population included all participants who did not violate any of the following inclusion criteria: diagnosis of adult-onset Still's disease and disease activity based on DAS28 score of ≥ 3.2 at Screening. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | Baseline, Week 12 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Core Study Part I: Percentage of Responders With ACR30 | ACR30 response was defined as a ≥ 30% improvement (reduction) compared with Baseline for both 68 TJC and 66 SJC, as well as for three of the additional five ACR core set variables: Participant's Assessment of Pain over the previous 24 hours: using a NRS left end of the line 0=no pain to right end of the line 10=unbearable pain; Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity over the previous 24 hours using a NRS where left end of the line 0=no disease activity to right end of the line 10=maximum disease activity; HAQ 20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; and acute-phase reactant ESR. | ITT population included all participants who did not violate any of the following inclusion criteria: diagnosis of adult-onset Still's disease and disease activity based on DAS28 score of ≥ 3.2 at Screening. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | Baseline, Week 12 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Core Study Part I: Percentage of Responders With Modified ACR30 | A participant was considered responder if he/she had achieved the incidence of modified adapted response (ACR30 criteria) of at least a 30% improvement in no intermittent fever and had at least 30% improvement in at least 6 of the following 7 measures: tender and swollen 68-joint counts, participant's assessment of pain, participant's global assessment of disease activity, physician's global assessment of disease activity, participant's functional capacity (HAQ-DI score) and acute phase reactant- ESR. Participant were modified ACR30 responders at a given post-randomization visit if they satisfied the modified ACR30 criteria, respectively. | ITT population included all participants who did not violate any of the following inclusion criteria: diagnosis of adult-onset Still's disease and disease activity based on DAS28 score of ≥ 3.2 at Screening. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | Baseline, Week 12 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Core Study Part I: Percentage of Responders With ACR50 | ACR50 response was defined as a ≥ 50% improvement (reduction) compared with Baseline for both 68 TJC and 66 SJC, as well as for three of the additional five ACR core set variables: Participant's Assessment of Pain over the previous 24 hours: using a NRS left end of the line 0=no pain to right end of the line 10=unbearable pain; Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity over the previous 24 hours using a NRS where left end of the line 0=no disease activity to right end of the line 10=maximum disease activity; HAQ-DI 20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; and acute-phase reactant ESR. | ITT population included all participants who did not violate any of the following inclusion criteria: diagnosis of adult-onset Still's disease and disease activity based on DAS28 score of ≥ 3.2 at Screening. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | Baseline, Week 12 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Core Study Part I: Percentage of Responders With ACR70 | ACR70 response was defined as a ≥ 70% improvement (reduction) compared with Baseline for both 68 TJC and 66 SJC, as well as for three of the additional five ACR core set variables: Participant's Assessment of Pain over the previous 24 hours: using a NRS left end of the line 0=no pain to right end of the line 10=unbearable pain; Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity over the previous 24 hours using a NRS where left end of the line 0=no disease activity to right end of the line 10=maximum disease activity; HAQ-DI 20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; and acute-phase reactant ESR. | ITT population included all participants who did not violate any of the following inclusion criteria: diagnosis of adult-onset Still's disease and disease activity based on DAS28 score of ≥ 3.2 at Screening. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | Baseline, Week 12 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Core Study Part I: Percentage of Responders With ACR90 | ACR90 response was defined as a ≥ 90% improvement (reduction) compared with Baseline for both 68 TJC and 66 SJC, as well as for three of the additional five ACR core set variables: Participant's Assessment of Pain over the previous 24 hours: using a NRS left end of the line 0=no pain to right end of the line 10=unbearable pain; Participant's Global Assessment of Disease Activity and Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity over the previous 24 hours using a NRS where left end of the line 0=no disease activity to right end of the line 10=maximum disease activity; HAQ-DI 20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; and acute-phase reactant ESR. | ITT population included all participants who did not violate any of the following inclusion criteria: diagnosis of adult-onset Still's disease and disease activity based on DAS28 score of ≥ 3.2 at Screening. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | Baseline, Week 12 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Core Study Part I: Percentage of Responders With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response | EULAR response is based on DAS28-ESR and DAS28-CRP scores. The DAS28 index is a composite score of weighted components including tender joint counts of 28, swollen joint counts of 28, subject global assessment of disease activity score, and ESR or CRP value. A DAS28-CRP or ESR score of 5.1 or above = high disease activity, a value between 3.2 and 5.1 = moderate disease activity and value between 2.6 and 3.2 = low disease activity, value < 2.6 = disease remission. EULAR response has 3 categories: EULAR Good response: DAS28 ≤ 3.2 and a change from Baseline < -1.2. EULAR Moderate response: DAS28 >3.2 to ≤ 5.1 or a change from Baseline < -0.6 to ≥ -1.2 or EULAR No response: DAS28 >5.1 or a change from Baseline < -0.6 to ≤ -1.2. | ITT population included all participants who did not violate any of the following inclusion criteria: diagnosis of adult-onset Still's disease and disease activity based on DAS28 score of ≥ 3.2 at Screening. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | Baseline, Week 12 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Core Study Part I: Percentage of Responders Achieving Low Disease Activity (LDA) | Percentage of responders were defined as the participants who achieved LDA (DAS28 score < 3.2) at Week 12. The DAS28 index is a composite score of weighted components including tender joint counts of 28, swollen joint counts of 28, participant global assessment of disease activity score, and ESR or CRP value. Total score ranged between 0-10. A DAS28 score greater than 5.1 implies high disease activity, equal to or less than 3.2 low disease activity, and less than 2.6 remissions. | ITT population included all participants who did not violate any of the following inclusion criteria: diagnosis of adult-onset Still's disease and disease activity based on DAS28 score of ≥ 3.2 at Screening. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | Week 12 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Core Study Part I: Percentage of Responders Achieving Disease Remission and Extended Disease Remission | Participants with disease remission: LDA (DAS28 score< 2.6). The DAS28 index is a composite score of weighted components including both 28 TJC an SJC, participant global assessment of disease activity score, and ESR or CRP value. A DAS28 score greater than 5.1: high disease activity, ≤ 3.2: low disease activity, and less than 2.6: remission. Extended remission criteria included DAS28 < 2.6 and no signs of systemic activity for up to two consecutive study visits till Week 12 defined as any of Yamaguchi´s primary classification criteria for AOSD which included fever attacks at 39 °C for more than a week, arthralgia, salmon red, maculate, urticarial or maculo-papular rash and leukocytosis (white blood cells increase) of > 10000/cubic millimeters (mm^3) with > 80% neutrophils. | ITT population included all participants who did not violate any of the following inclusion criteria: diagnosis of adult-onset Still's disease and disease activity based on DAS28 score of ≥ 3.2 at Screening. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | Week 12 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Core Study Part I: Change in Joint Mobility (Degrees of Motion) Assessed by Neutral Zero Method | Number of joints with limitation of motion according to neutral zero method was assessed which included mobility of joints (elbows, wrists, shoulder joints, hip joints, knee joints, and upper ankle joints) within the reference range/degree. Response is defined as an improvement of ≥ 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% from Baseline. A negative change score indicates improvement. LS mean was calculated by MMRM analyses. | ITT population included all participants who did not violate any of the following inclusion criteria: diagnosis of adult-onset Still's disease and disease activity based on DAS28 score of ≥ 3.2 at Screening. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses at the given timepoint. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | degrees | Baseline, Week 12 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Core Study Part I: CFB in Medical Outcome Short Form (SF-36) Health Survey Score | The SF-36 determines overall quality of life assessing 1) limitations in physical functioning due to health problems; 2) limitations in usual role because of physical health problems; 3) bodily pain; 4) general health perceptions; 5) vitality; 6) limitations in social functioning because of physical or emotional problems; 7) limitations in usual role due to emotional problems; and 8) general mental health. Items 1-4 contribute to physical component summary score (PCS). Items 5-8 contribute to mental component summary score (MCS). Scores on each item are summed and averaged (range = 0 "worst"-100 "best"). Positive numbers indicate improvement from Baseline. LS mean was calculated by MMRM analyses. | ITT population included all participants who did not violate any of the following inclusion criteria: diagnosis of adult-onset Still's disease and disease activity based on DAS28 score of ≥ 3.2 at Screening. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses at the given timepoint. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | score on a scale | Baseline, Week 12 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | An AE is an adverse medical event which occurs in a participant of the study and which is not necessarily in a causal relationship with the treatment the participant receives. AEs include symptoms of illnesses, as well as every unfavourable and unintended reaction. SAEs are AEs leading to death, are life-threatening, require hospitalizations or prolongation of hospitalizations, represent an innate malformation or a congenital abnormality. | Safety Analysis Set included all participants randomized who received at least one dose of the study drug. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Up to Month 27 |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 20 |
| 2 |
| 20 |
| 16 |
| 20 |
| EG001 | Core Study Part I: Placebo | Participants received placebo, SC injection, once in morning at Baseline (Day 0), Weeks 4, 8, and 12. | 0 | 15 | 0 | 15 | 10 | 15 |
| EG002 | Core Study Part II: Canakinumab Responders | Participants with response (change in DAS score > 1.2 at Week 12) continued to receive canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, SC injection, once in the morning for Weeks 12, 16, and 20. | 0 | 14 | 1 | 14 | 13 | 14 |
| EG003 | Core Study Part II: Placebo Responders | Participants with response (change in DAS score > 1.2 at Week 12) continued to receive placebo, SC injection, once in morning for Weeks 12, 16, and 20. | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| EG004 | Core Study Part II: Placebo Non-responders | Placebo Non-responders (change in DAS score ≤ 1.2 at Week 12) who switched to canakinumab were unblinded to receive canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, SC injection, once in the morning at Weeks 12, 16, and 20. | 0 | 7 | 1 | 7 | 6 | 7 |
| EG005 | LTE Phase: Canakinumab | Participants with remission (change in DAS score > 1.2 and no signs of systemic activity for adult-onset Still's disease at Week 20) received canakinumab 4 mg/kg up to 300 mg maximum, SC injection at Weeks 24 and 28, which was down titrated to 2 mg/kg up to 150 mg maximum if applicable after Week 28 up to Month 27 (Week 117). | 0 | 7 | 1 | 7 | 7 | 7 |
| Cholecystitis | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Cholecystitis acute | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Hepatotoxicity | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (20.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Hand fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (20.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Chondromalacia | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Patellofemoral pain syndrome | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Hypotonia | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Medical device removal | Surgical and medical procedures | MedDRA (20.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Deep vein thrombosis | Vascular disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Eyelid oedema | Eye disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Visual impairment | Eye disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Abdominal pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Abdominal pain upper | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Aphthous ulcer | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Fatigue | General disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Influenza like illness | General disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Injection site rash | General disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pyrexia | General disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Primary biliary cholangitis | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Bronchitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (20.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Gastrointestinal infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (20.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Hand-foot-and-mouth disease | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (20.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Herpes zoster | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (20.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Infected bite | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (20.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Nasopharyngitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (20.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Oral herpes | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (20.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Otitis media | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (20.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Periodontitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (20.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pertussis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (20.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (20.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Rhinitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (20.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Tooth abscess | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (20.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Upper respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (20.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Urinary tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (20.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Fall | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (20.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Meniscus injury | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (20.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Alanine aminotransferase increased | Investigations | MedDRA (20.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Gamma-glutamyltransferase increased | Investigations | MedDRA (20.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Hepatic enzyme increased | Investigations | MedDRA (20.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Transaminases increased | Investigations | MedDRA (20.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Appetite disorder | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Arthralgia | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Back pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Groin pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Joint swelling | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Muscle spasms | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Myalgia | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Neck pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Osteoporosis | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pain in extremity | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pseudarthrosis | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Still's disease | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Tenosynovitis | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Anogenital warts | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA (20.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Carpal tunnel syndrome | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Dizziness | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Intercostal neuralgia | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Sciatica | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Depression | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Sleep disorder | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Dysuria | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Ovarian cyst | Reproductive system and breast disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Vulva cyst | Reproductive system and breast disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Asthma | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Cough | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Dysphonia | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pleurisy | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Alopecia | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Dermatitis allergic | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Hyperhidrosis | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Nail dystrophy | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pruritus | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Rash | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Haematoma | Vascular disorders | MedDRA (20.1) | Systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| CFB at Week 4 |
|
|
| CFB at Week 8 |
|
|
| CFB at Week 12 |
|
|
| CFB at Week 4 |
|
|
| CFB at Week 8 |
|
|
| CFB at Week 12 |
|
|
| CFB at Week 4 |
|
|
| CFB at Week 8 |
|
|
| CFB at Week 12 |
|
|
| CFB at Week 4 |
|
|
| CFB at Week 8 |
|
|
| CFB at Week 12 |
|
|
| CFB at Week 4 |
|
|
| CFB at Week 8 |
|
|
| CFB at Week 12 |
|
|
| CFB at Week 4 |
|
|
| CFB at Week 8 |
|
|
| CFB at Week 12 |
|
|
| CFB at Week 4 |
|
|
| CFB at Week 8 |
|
|
| CFB at Week 12 |
|
|
| CFB at Week 4 |
|
|
| CFB at Week 8 |
|
|
| CFB at Week 12 |
|
|
| CFB at Week 4 |
|
|
| CFB at Week 8 |
|
|
| CFB at Week 12 |
|
|
| CFB at Week 4 |
|
|
| CFB at Week 8 |
|
|
| CFB at Week 12 |
|
|
| CFB at Week 4 |
|
|
| CFB at Week 8 |
|
|
| CFB at Week 12 |
|
|
| CFB at Week 12 |
|
|
EULAR DAS28-CRP Response
| Fisher Exact |
| 0.1756 |
| Difference in Response Rates |
| 25.2 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -9.1 |
| 55.1 |
| Superiority |
Fisher's exact test with a two-tailed level of significance of α = 0.05. |
| Fisher Exact |
| 0.1642 |
| Difference in Response Rates |
| 26.5 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -6.6 |
| 56.0 |
| Superiority |
Fisher's exact test with a two-tailed level of significance of α = 0.05. |
| Extended Remission |
|
DAS28 (CRP) Remission
| Fisher Exact |
| 0.1212 |
| Difference in Response Rates |
| 27.1 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -4.6 |
| 54.6 |
| Superiority |
Fisher's exact test with a two-tailed level of significance of α = 0.05. |
| Extended Remission | Fisher Exact | 0.4018 | Difference in Response Rates | 16.0 | 2-Sided | 95 | -12.6 | 43.4 | Superiority | Fisher's exact test with a two-tailed level of significance of α = 0.05. |
| Week 12 |
|
|
| SF-36 Physical: CFB at Week 12 |
|
|
| SF-36 Mental: Baseline |
|
|
| SF-36 Mental: CFB at Week 12 |
|
|
| SAEs |
|