Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to demonstrate whether or not VPD-737, an NK1 receptor antagonist is safe and effective for treatment of prurigo nodularis versus placebo.
The sensation of itch is transmitted to the brain through the nervous system. Several chemicals are involved in transmitting this signal.This trial of VPD 737 is intended to treat this condition by blocking one of the chemicals involved in the transmission of the itch signal. This is an oral drug administered once daily It has been used in other trials and has shown to be safe at the doses used in this trial. The trial will involve once daily pills for 8 weeks. Subject will be asked to fill out questionnaires both electronically and on paper during the study period. Patients will also be monitored for safety and will have blood taken for testing and several points during the trial. Overall participation will last about 14 weeks
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| serlopitant 5 mg tablets | Active Comparator | serlopitant 5 mg tablets |
|
| Placebo tablets | Placebo Comparator | Placebo tablets |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| serlopitant | Drug | NK1 receptor antagonist |
|
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Average Visual Analog Scale at Baseline | At study visits, participants recorded a mark for pruritus severity on a 10-cm horizontal line. This thermometer-type scale was marked with ratings of "no itch" (0 cm) and worst imaginable itch" (10 cm). Average Visual Analog Scale (VAS) (average itch over the past 24 hours) was recorded. Higher scores indicated worse outcome. | At Baseline |
| Average Visual Analog Scale at Week 2 | At study visits, participants recorded a mark for pruritus severity on a 10-cm horizontal line. This thermometer-type scale was marked with ratings of "no itch" (0 cm) and worst imaginable itch" (10 cm). Average VAS (average itch over the past 24 hours) was recorded. Higher scores indicated worse outcome. | At Week 2 |
| Average Visual Analog Scale at Week 4 | At study visits, participants recorded a mark for pruritus severity on a 10-cm horizontal line. This thermometer-type scale was marked with ratings of "no itch" (0 cm) and worst imaginable itch" (10 cm). Average VAS (average itch over the past 24 hours) was recorded. Higher scores indicated worse outcome. | At Week 4 |
| Average Visual Analog Scale at Week 8 | At study visits, participants recorded a mark for pruritus severity on a 10-cm horizontal line. This thermometer-type scale was marked with ratings of "no itch" (0 cm) and worst imaginable itch" (10 cm). Average VAS (average itch over the past 24 hours) was recorded. Higher scores indicated worse outcome. | At Week 8 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Improvement in Pruritus as Reported on Verbal Rating Scale (VRS) - Pruritus | At study visits, participants used the VRS to rate their skin sensations (pruritus, burning, and stinging) using a 5-point scale (0 = not present; 1 = mild present; 2 = moderately present; 3 = severely present; and 4 = very severely present). Higher scores indicated worse outcome. | At Baseline and Week 8 |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Subjects meeting all of the following criteria will be eligible for study entry:
Males or females who are at least 18 years and no more than 80 years of age at Screening.
Must have PN (defined as the presence of pruritic nodules due to chronic pruritus,) of more than 6 weeks duration despite treatment with current therapies such as antihistamines or corticosteroids ("treatment resistant" PN).
Must have PN lesions on both arms, both legs, and/or the trunk (ie, the lesions must not be localized).
Must have a VAS pruritus score of 70 or greater within 72 hours of Baseline.
Males, non-fecund females (ie, surgically sterilized, if procedure was done 12 months before screening or subject is postmenopausal, without menses for 12 months before screening), or females of childbearing potential using an acceptable method of birth control for a period of 35 days before the first dosing, and all females must have a negative pregnancy test at the screening and baseline visits:
Note 1: Acceptable methods of birth control include any one of the following:
abstinence, vasectomized sexual partner, hormonal methods (ie, birth-control pill, hormonal IUD, Depo-Provera, implants, patch, intravaginal device [NuvaRing]), intrauterine device (IUD [copper banded coils]), diaphragm, cervical cap, or condom with spermicidal jelly or foam. Subjects using oral contraceptives must also use a reliable backup method of birth control during the study and until the first menses after the last dose of study medication or for 14 days menses after the last dose of study medication.
Willing and able to understand and provide written informed consent.
Willing and able to comply with study requirements and restrictions including the discontinuation of all current therapies for pruritus.
Subjects must be in good health as determined by medical history, physical examination, and results of Electro Cardio Gram (ECG) and clinical laboratory tests (including urinalysis).
Agreeing to confidential use and storage of all data and use of all anonymized data for publication including scientific publication.
Exclusion Criteria:
Subjects must undergo an appropriate washout period from any sedatives or tranquilizers before enrolling in the study.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Sonja Staender, MD | University of Muenster, Germany | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Study Site 08 | Bonn | 53127 | Germany | |||
| Study Site 06 |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 32936233 | Derived | Kimel M, Zeidler C, Kwon P, Revicki D, Stander S. Validation of Psychometric Properties of the Itch Numeric Rating Scale for Pruritus Associated With Prurigo Nodularis: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Dermatol. 2020 Dec 1;156(12):1354-1358. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2020.3071. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study consisted of a screening period of up to 4 weeks. All the assessments were done at screening as per the schedule of assessment.
The participants were randomized at 15 sites in Germany.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Placebo | Randomized participants took matching placebo tablets for oral administration as 3 tablets at baseline (Day 1) followed by 1 tablet every day at bedtime for 8 weeks. |
| FG001 | Serlopitant |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Placebo | Drug | Placebo |
|
| Number of Participants With Improvement in Burning as Reported on Verbal Rating Scale (VRS) - Burning | At study visits, participants used the VRS to rate their skin sensations (pruritus, burning, and stinging) using a 5-point scale (0 = not present; 1 = mild present; 2 = moderately present; 3 = severely present; and 4 = very severely present). Higher scores indicated worse outcome. | At Baseline and Week 8 |
| Number of Participants With Improvement in Stinging as Reported on Verbal Rating Scale (VRS) - Stinging | At study visits, participants used the VRS to rate their skin sensations (pruritus, burning, and stinging) using a 5-point scale (0 = not present; 1 = mild present; 2 = moderately present; 3 = severely present; and 4 = very severely present). Higher scores indicated worse outcome. | At Baseline and Week 8 |
| Worst Visual Analog Scale (VAS) | At study visits, participants recorded a mark for pruritus severity on a 10-cm horizontal line. This thermometer-type scale was marked with ratings of "no itch" (0 cm) and worst imaginable itch" (10 cm). Worst VAS (worst itch over the past 24 hours) was recorded. Higher scores indicated worse outcome. | At Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, and 8 |
| Number of Participants With Improvement in Pruritus as Reported on Patient Global Assessment (PGA) | The PGA included a question: Did the pruritus improve during the treatment period (yes/no). | At Weeks 2, 4, and 8 |
| Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) | Numeric Rating Scale: Using the patient diary, participants rated the following using an 11-point NRS (0 = no itching; to 10 = worst itch imaginable): average itching over the past 24 hours (Average NRS). Higher scores indicated worse outcome. | At Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, and 8 |
| Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) | At each visit, participants completed a DLQI questionnaire. The DLQI is a validated questionnaire consisting of 10 questions relating to the degree to which the participant's skin condition affected his/her daily activities. The DLQI questionnaire is designed for use in adults, i.e. participants over the age of 16. The scoring of each question is as follows: Very much: scored 3, A lot: scored 2, A little: scored 1, Not at all: scored 0, Not relevant: scored 0, Question 7, 'prevented work or studying': scored 3. The DLQI is calculated by summing the score of each question resulting in a maximum of 30 and a minimum of 0. The higher the score, the more quality of life is impaired. Interpreting the DLQI Scores: 0 - 1: no effect at all on participant's life, 2 - 5: small effect on participant's life, 6 - 10: moderate effect on participant's life, 11 - 20: very large effect on participant's life, 21 - 30: extremely large effect on participant's life. | At Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, and 8 |
| Pruritus-specific Quality of Life (ItchyQoL) | At each visit, participants completed an ItchyQoL questionnaire. The ItchyQoL is a validated questionnaire consisting of 22 questions based on the concerns and issues pertinent to participants with pruritus. Items should be scored for the following answers: Never: 1, Rarely: 2, Sometimes: 3, Often: 4, All the time:5. Higher scores indicated worse outcome. Total Score is obtained by calculating the unweighted mean of all ItchyQoL questions. | At Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, and 8 |
| Patient Benefit Index, Version for Patients With Pruritus (PBI-P) | At Visits 2 and 5 (or Early termination) only, participants completed the standardized and validated PBI-P questionnaire. Prior to treatment, the first page of the questionnaire, the Patient Needs Questionnaire (PNQ), was administered to determine how different benefits of therapy were relevant for the individual participant. After treatment, using the Patient Benefit Questionnaire (PBQ), participants were asked to evaluate the extent to which the benefits they indicated were important to them were, in fact, realized. From all the items taken together, a weighted total benefit value was calculated, which represented the patient relevant therapy benefits. The mean score greater than 1 is considered to represent a clinically relevant improvement. The items are rated on a 5-point scale with values from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very), allowing for "does/did not apply to me" = 5; and missing value = -9. Higher scores indicated better outcome. | At Week 8 / End of Treatment |
| Number of Participants With Improvement in PN Lesions as Reported on Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) | Using the IGA, physicians rated change in PN lesions (if any) from +5 ("markedly improved") to -5 ("markedly worse"). Higher scores indicated better outcome. | At Week 8 |
| Number of Participants With Improvement on Prurigo Activity Score (PAS) | Using the PAS, physicians described, localized, counted, and measured PN lesions. One of the 7 items was: Activity Stage (Stage 0-4: 0 = 0%, 1 = 1-25%, 2 = 26-50%, 3 = 51-75%, 4 = > 75%) a. Prurigo lesions with excoriations/crusts Participants with PAS activity stage (prurigo lesions with excoriations/crusts) is presented in the below table. | At Day 1 and Week 8 |
| Participants With Rescue Medication Usage | Rescue medications included cetirizine hydrochloride, desloratadine, levocetirizine, and loratadine. | Pre-treatment, upto 8 Weeks |
| Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) | An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not considered drug related. An AE (also referred to as an adverse experience) could be any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a study drug, without any judgment about causality. | From the time of informed consent (Screening) until the last study visit (follow-up phone call, Week 10) |
| Dresden |
| 01307 |
| Germany |
| Study Site 12 | Düsseldorf | 40225 | Germany |
| Study Site 02 | Frankfurt | 60590 | Germany |
| Study Site 09 | Hamburg | 20246 | Germany |
| Study Site 05 | Heidelberg | 69120 | Germany |
| Study Site 03 | Kiel | 24105 | Germany |
| Study Site 11 | Leipzig | 04103 | Germany |
| Study Site 04 | Lübeck | 23538 | Germany |
| Study Site 14 | Mainz | 55101 | Germany |
| Study Site 07 | Mitte | 10117 | Germany |
| Study Site 16 | München | 80337 | Germany |
| Study Site 01 | Münster | 48149 | Germany |
| Study Site 15 | Selters | 56242 | Germany |
| Study Site 10 | Tübingen | 72076 | Germany |
Randomized participants took Serlopitant 5 mg tablets for oral administration at a loading dose of 3 tablets at baseline (Day 1) followed by 1 tablet every day at bedtime for 8 weeks.
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
Intent-to-treat (ITT) population - all randomized participants who were treated. This population was analyzed based upon the treatment to which participants were randomized.
Of the 128 randomized participants, 127 received study drug (63 placebo, 64 serlopitant) and comprised the ITT population.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Placebo | Randomized participants took matching placebo tablets for oral administration as 3 tablets at baseline (Day 1) followed by 1 tablet every day at bedtime for 8 weeks. |
| BG001 | Serlopitant | Randomized participants took Serlopitant 5 mg tablets for oral administration at a loading dose of 3 tablets at baseline (Day 1) followed by 1 tablet every day at bedtime for 8 weeks. |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | Years |
| |||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Average Visual Analog Scale at Baseline | At study visits, participants recorded a mark for pruritus severity on a 10-cm horizontal line. This thermometer-type scale was marked with ratings of "no itch" (0 cm) and worst imaginable itch" (10 cm). Average Visual Analog Scale (VAS) (average itch over the past 24 hours) was recorded. Higher scores indicated worse outcome. | The Intent-to-treat (ITT) population - all randomized participants who were treated. This population was analyzed based upon the treatment to which participants were randomized. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Units on a scale | At Baseline |
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Average Visual Analog Scale at Week 2 | At study visits, participants recorded a mark for pruritus severity on a 10-cm horizontal line. This thermometer-type scale was marked with ratings of "no itch" (0 cm) and worst imaginable itch" (10 cm). Average VAS (average itch over the past 24 hours) was recorded. Higher scores indicated worse outcome. | The ITT population - all randomized participants who were treated. This population was analyzed based upon the treatment to which participants were randomized. Here, overall number of participants analyzed signifies only the participants with available data that were analyzed for the outcome measure. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Units on a scale | At Week 2 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Average Visual Analog Scale at Week 4 | At study visits, participants recorded a mark for pruritus severity on a 10-cm horizontal line. This thermometer-type scale was marked with ratings of "no itch" (0 cm) and worst imaginable itch" (10 cm). Average VAS (average itch over the past 24 hours) was recorded. Higher scores indicated worse outcome. | The ITT population - all randomized participants who were treated. This population was analyzed based upon the treatment to which participants were randomized. Here, overall number of participants analyzed signifies only the participants with available data that were analyzed for the outcome measure. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Units on a scale | At Week 4 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Average Visual Analog Scale at Week 8 | At study visits, participants recorded a mark for pruritus severity on a 10-cm horizontal line. This thermometer-type scale was marked with ratings of "no itch" (0 cm) and worst imaginable itch" (10 cm). Average VAS (average itch over the past 24 hours) was recorded. Higher scores indicated worse outcome. | Intent-to-treat (ITT) population - all randomized participants who were treated. This population was analyzed based upon the treatment to which participants were randomized. Here, overall number of participants analyzed signifies only the participants with available data that were analyzed for the outcome measure. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Units on a scale | At Week 8 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Improvement in Pruritus as Reported on Verbal Rating Scale (VRS) - Pruritus | At study visits, participants used the VRS to rate their skin sensations (pruritus, burning, and stinging) using a 5-point scale (0 = not present; 1 = mild present; 2 = moderately present; 3 = severely present; and 4 = very severely present). Higher scores indicated worse outcome. | The ITT population - all randomized participants who were treated. This population was analyzed based upon the treatment to which participants were randomized. Here, number analyzed in each row signifies only the participants with available data that were analyzed for each parameter. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | At Baseline and Week 8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Improvement in Burning as Reported on Verbal Rating Scale (VRS) - Burning | At study visits, participants used the VRS to rate their skin sensations (pruritus, burning, and stinging) using a 5-point scale (0 = not present; 1 = mild present; 2 = moderately present; 3 = severely present; and 4 = very severely present). Higher scores indicated worse outcome. | The ITT population - all randomized participants who were treated. This population was analyzed based upon the treatment to which participants were randomized. Here, number analyzed in each row signifies only the participants with available data that were analyzed for each parameter. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | At Baseline and Week 8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Improvement in Stinging as Reported on Verbal Rating Scale (VRS) - Stinging | At study visits, participants used the VRS to rate their skin sensations (pruritus, burning, and stinging) using a 5-point scale (0 = not present; 1 = mild present; 2 = moderately present; 3 = severely present; and 4 = very severely present). Higher scores indicated worse outcome. | The ITT population - all randomized participants who were treated. This population was analyzed based upon the treatment to which participants were randomized. Here, number analyzed in each row signifies only the participants with available data that were analyzed for each parameter. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | At Baseline and Week 8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Worst Visual Analog Scale (VAS) | At study visits, participants recorded a mark for pruritus severity on a 10-cm horizontal line. This thermometer-type scale was marked with ratings of "no itch" (0 cm) and worst imaginable itch" (10 cm). Worst VAS (worst itch over the past 24 hours) was recorded. Higher scores indicated worse outcome. | The ITT population - all randomized participants who were treated. This population was analyzed based upon the treatment to which participants were randomized. Here, number analyzed in each row signifies only the participants with available data that were analyzed for each parameter. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Units on a scale | At Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, and 8 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Improvement in Pruritus as Reported on Patient Global Assessment (PGA) | The PGA included a question: Did the pruritus improve during the treatment period (yes/no). | The ITT population - all randomized participants who were treated. This population was analyzed based upon the treatment to which participants were randomized. Here, number analyzed in each row signifies only the participants with available data that were analyzed for each parameter. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | At Weeks 2, 4, and 8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) | Numeric Rating Scale: Using the patient diary, participants rated the following using an 11-point NRS (0 = no itching; to 10 = worst itch imaginable): average itching over the past 24 hours (Average NRS). Higher scores indicated worse outcome. | The ITT population - all randomized participants who were treated. This population was analyzed based upon the treatment to which participants were randomized. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Units on a scale | At Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, and 8 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) | At each visit, participants completed a DLQI questionnaire. The DLQI is a validated questionnaire consisting of 10 questions relating to the degree to which the participant's skin condition affected his/her daily activities. The DLQI questionnaire is designed for use in adults, i.e. participants over the age of 16. The scoring of each question is as follows: Very much: scored 3, A lot: scored 2, A little: scored 1, Not at all: scored 0, Not relevant: scored 0, Question 7, 'prevented work or studying': scored 3. The DLQI is calculated by summing the score of each question resulting in a maximum of 30 and a minimum of 0. The higher the score, the more quality of life is impaired. Interpreting the DLQI Scores: 0 - 1: no effect at all on participant's life, 2 - 5: small effect on participant's life, 6 - 10: moderate effect on participant's life, 11 - 20: very large effect on participant's life, 21 - 30: extremely large effect on participant's life. | The ITT population - all randomized participants who were treated. This population was analyzed based upon the treatment to which participants were randomized. Here, number analyzed in each row signifies only the participants with available data that were analyzed for each parameter. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Units on a scale | At Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, and 8 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Pruritus-specific Quality of Life (ItchyQoL) | At each visit, participants completed an ItchyQoL questionnaire. The ItchyQoL is a validated questionnaire consisting of 22 questions based on the concerns and issues pertinent to participants with pruritus. Items should be scored for the following answers: Never: 1, Rarely: 2, Sometimes: 3, Often: 4, All the time:5. Higher scores indicated worse outcome. Total Score is obtained by calculating the unweighted mean of all ItchyQoL questions. | The ITT population - all randomized participants who were treated. This population was analyzed based upon the treatment to which participants were randomized. Here, number analyzed in each row signifies only the participants with available data that were analyzed for each parameter. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Units on a scale | At Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, and 8 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Patient Benefit Index, Version for Patients With Pruritus (PBI-P) | At Visits 2 and 5 (or Early termination) only, participants completed the standardized and validated PBI-P questionnaire. Prior to treatment, the first page of the questionnaire, the Patient Needs Questionnaire (PNQ), was administered to determine how different benefits of therapy were relevant for the individual participant. After treatment, using the Patient Benefit Questionnaire (PBQ), participants were asked to evaluate the extent to which the benefits they indicated were important to them were, in fact, realized. From all the items taken together, a weighted total benefit value was calculated, which represented the patient relevant therapy benefits. The mean score greater than 1 is considered to represent a clinically relevant improvement. The items are rated on a 5-point scale with values from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very), allowing for "does/did not apply to me" = 5; and missing value = -9. Higher scores indicated better outcome. | The ITT population - all randomized participants who were treated. This population was analyzed based upon the treatment to which participants were randomized. Here, overall number of participants analyzed signifies only the participants with available data that were analyzed for the outcome measure. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Units on a scale | At Week 8 / End of Treatment |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Improvement in PN Lesions as Reported on Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) | Using the IGA, physicians rated change in PN lesions (if any) from +5 ("markedly improved") to -5 ("markedly worse"). Higher scores indicated better outcome. | The ITT population - all randomized participants who were treated. This population was analyzed based upon the treatment to which participants were randomized. Here, overall number of participants analyzed signifies only the participants with available data that were analyzed for the outcome measure. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | At Week 8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Improvement on Prurigo Activity Score (PAS) | Using the PAS, physicians described, localized, counted, and measured PN lesions. One of the 7 items was: Activity Stage (Stage 0-4: 0 = 0%, 1 = 1-25%, 2 = 26-50%, 3 = 51-75%, 4 = > 75%) a. Prurigo lesions with excoriations/crusts Participants with PAS activity stage (prurigo lesions with excoriations/crusts) is presented in the below table. | The ITT population - all randomized participants who were treated. This population was analyzed based upon the treatment to which participants were randomized. Here, number analyzed in each row signifies only the participants with available data that were analyzed for each day and week. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | At Day 1 and Week 8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Participants With Rescue Medication Usage | Rescue medications included cetirizine hydrochloride, desloratadine, levocetirizine, and loratadine. | The ITT population - all randomized participants who were treated. This population was analyzed based upon the treatment to which participants were randomized. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Pre-treatment, upto 8 Weeks |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) | An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not considered drug related. An AE (also referred to as an adverse experience) could be any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a study drug, without any judgment about causality. | Safety population - participants who received at least one dose of study drug. This population was analyzed based upon the actual treatment received. Participants with dosing errors were assigned to a treatment group based upon the treatment they received most often. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | From the time of informed consent (Screening) until the last study visit (follow-up phone call, Week 10) |
|
From the time of informed consent (Screening) until the last study visit (follow-up phone call, Week 10).
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Placebo | Randomized participants took matching placebo tablets for oral administration as 3 tablets at baseline (Day 1) followed by 1 tablet every day at bedtime for 8 weeks. | 0 | 63 | 2 | 63 | 20 | 63 |
| EG001 | Serlopitant | Randomized participants took Serlopitant 5 mg tablets for oral administration at a loading dose of 3 tablets at baseline (Day 1) followed by 1 tablet every day at bedtime for 8 weeks. | 0 | 64 | 3 | 64 | 31 | 64 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bradycardia | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA version 17 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vertigo | Ear and labyrinth disorders | MedDRA version 17 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dizziness | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA version 17 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Syncope | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA version 17 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Depression | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA version 17 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Respiratory failure | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA version 17 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Actinic elastosis | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA version 17 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Neurodermatitis | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA version 17 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA version 17 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Fatigue | General disorders | MedDRA version 17 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Oedema peripheral | General disorders | MedDRA version 17 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nasopharyngitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA version 17 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Urinary tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA version 17 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dizziness | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA version 17 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA version 17 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pruritus | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA version 17 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Iain Stuart, PhD. | Menlo Therapeutics Inc. (formerly Tigercat Pharma, Inc.) | 1- 800-775-7936 | Iain.Stuart@foamix.com |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003876 | Dermatitis, Atopic |
| D017512 | Lichenoid Eruptions |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012873 | Skin Diseases, Genetic |
| D030342 | Genetic Diseases, Inborn |
| D009358 | Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities |
| D003872 | Dermatitis |
| D012871 | Skin Diseases |
| D017437 | Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases |
| D017443 | Skin Diseases, Eczematous |
| D006969 | Hypersensitivity, Immediate |
| D006967 | Hypersensitivity |
| D007154 | Immune System Diseases |
| D017444 | Skin Diseases, Papulosquamous |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C551592 | serlopitant |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Male |
|
| Participants |
|
|
|
| Participants |
|
|
|
| Participants |
|
|
|
| Participants |
|
|
| Participants |
|
|
| Participants |
|
|
| Participants |
|
|
|
|
|
| Serlopitant |
Randomized participants took Serlopitant 5 mg tablets for oral administration at a loading dose of 3 tablets at baseline (Day 1) followed by 1 tablet every day at bedtime for 8 weeks. |
|
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
| Serlopitant |
Randomized participants took Serlopitant 5 mg tablets for oral administration at a loading dose of 3 tablets at baseline (Day 1) followed by 1 tablet every day at bedtime for 8 weeks. |
|
|
|
|
| Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|