Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Children's Bureau - Administration for Children and Families | OTHER |
| Illinois Department of Children and Family Services. | UNKNOWN |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The Trauma Focus Model for Reducing Long-Term Foster Care Project with the Illinois Department of Children and Family Services (DCFS) is implementing a trauma-focused intervention, Trauma Affect Regulation: Guide for Education and Therapy (TARGET) to increase permanency rates for a target population of children identified as being most at risk of long-term foster care.
The Illinois Department of Children and Family Services (DCFS) is one of six recipients of the Permanency Innovations Initiative Grant. These funds support the statewide implementation of Trauma Affect Regulation: Guide for Education and Therapy (TARGET) in Illinois. TARGET is a manualized, psycho-educational intervention designed to address complex trauma and difficulties with emotional regulation and relational engagement that occur across a wide range of trauma-related difficulties, including trauma-related and behavioral symptoms. The aim of this intervention is to address the key barriers to permanence for the target population. This population includes youth ages 11-16 who are placed in traditional, relative, and specialized foster homes throughout the state of Illinois, have been in foster care for at least 2 years, and are experiencing mental health challenges and/or at least one placement change. The three key barriers to permanency are: (1) children's need to improve emotional regulation and reduce symptom severity, particularly disruptive behaviors; (2) biological parents' skills in regulating their emotions so they are better able to complete services and address the underlying issues related to their involvement in the child welfare system; (3) foster parents and other placement resources skills in understanding and addressing the needs and disruptive behaviors of the children in their care with trauma histories.
The local evaluation will examine the effectiveness of the TARGET program in increasing permanency rates for foster youth in the target population. The main hypothesis to be tested is that addressing unstable child affect & behavior secondary to trauma using an intervention that improves both youth modulation skills as well as foster parent capacity to respond appropriately to youth will stabilize placements and improve youth ability to engage with potential permanency resources, thus facilitating progress toward permanence. The evaluation involves randomly assigning eligible foster youth to receive TARGET services or receive services as usual. The evaluators collect proximal and distal outcomes from multiple administrative data sources. Additionally, the evaluation includes the collection of key proximal outcomes through the use of interviews with foster youth, their foster parents and biological parents deemed eligible for participation in the project.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment | Experimental |
| |
| Comparison | No Intervention |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trauma Affect Regulation: Guide for Education and Therapy (TARGET) | Other | The intervention is called the Trauma Affect Regulation: Guide for Education and Therapy (TARGET). TARGET is a manualized, psycho-educational intervention delivered in 10 - 12 sessions. TARGET is designed to address complex trauma and difficulties with emotional regulation and relational engagement that occur across a wide range of trauma-related difficulties, including trauma-related and behavioral symptoms. The full TARGET model consists of learning 7 essential core skills. These skills are called the FREEDOM steps: Focus, Recognize triggers, Emotion self-check, Evaluate thoughts, Define goals, Options, and Make a contribution. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Time to stable permanence | Measured by administrative data from the Adoption and Foster Care Analysis and Reporting System (AFCARS) | Measured from the date of random assignment to the discharge date or to the end of the study period for cases that did not discharge |
| Placement stability | Measured by administrative data from the Adoption and Foster Care Analysis and Reporting System (AFCARS) | Measured at initial study enrollment and at the 8, 14, 20, and 26-month mark of enrollment in the study |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Foster parent skills in responding to youth's emotional and behavioral dysregulation | Measured by Parenting Practices Chicago Survey (PPCS) (Gorman-Smith et al., 1996) | completed by study youth at initial study enrollment and at 6 months after baseline data collection |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Biological parent ability to regulate their own emotions and behaviors and experience of trauma-related symptoms | Measured by Abbreviated Dysregulation Inventory (ADI) (Mezzich et al., 2001) | completed by biological parents of study youth at initial study enrollment and at 6 months after baseline data collection |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Andrea Sedlak, PhD. | Westat | Study Director |
| Mark Testa, PhD. | University of North Carolina | Principal Investigator |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014947 | Wounds and Injuries |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D004522 | Educational Status |
| D013812 | Therapeutics |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012959 | Socioeconomic Factors |
| D011154 | Population Characteristics |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
|
| Biological parent service completion |
Measured by administrative data from the Administrative Case Review (ACR) |
| Measured at initial study enrollment and at the 8, 14, 20, and 26-month mark of enrollment in the study |
| Biological parent contact with youth | Measured by Parent Contact with Youth (PCY) Instrument (questions modified from the Illinois Adult Connections Study) | completed by study youth at initial study enrollment and at 6 months after baseline data collection |
| Change in Youth trauma-related and mental health symptoms | Measured by: 1) administrative data from the Child and Adolescent Needs and Strength (CANS) tool and 2) the Trauma Symptoms Checklist for Children (TSCC) (Briere, 1996) | 1) Measured at initial study enrollment and at the 8, 14, 20, and 26-month mark of enrollment in the study and 2) completed by study youth at initial study enrollment and at 6 months after baseline data collection |
| Youth capacity to form and maintain relationships. | Measured by: 1) administrative data from the Child and Adolescent Needs and Strength (CANS) tool and 2) Youth Social Support Instrument (YSS) (LONGSCAN, 1998) | Measured 1) at initial study enrollment and at the 8, 14, 20, and 26-month mark of enrollment in the study and 2) completed by study youth at initial study enrollment and at 6 months after baseline data collection |
| Youth capacity to regulate their emotions and behavior | Measured by: 1) administrative data from the Child and Adolescent Needs and Strength (CANS) tool and 2) the Abbreviated Dysregulation Inventory (ADI) (Mezzich et al., 2001) | Measured 1) at initial study enrollment and at the 8, 14, 20, and 26-month mark of enrollment in the study and 2) completed by both study youth and their current caregiver at initial study enrollment and at 6 months after baseline data collection |
| Change in support for biological and foster parents | Measured by Social Provisions Scale (SPS) (Russell & Cutrona, 1984) completed by both biological and foster parents of study youth | Measured at initial study enrollment and at 6 months after baseline data collection |
| Change in Youth traumatic events | Measured by administrative data from the Child and Adolescent Needs and Strength (CANS) tool | Measured at initial study enrollment and at the 8, 14, 20, and 26-month mark of enrollment in the study |
| Youth emotional permanency | Measured by Youth Emotional Permanency (YEP) Instrument (questions from the current Illinois Adult Connections Study and the Supportive Connections Inventory developed for the Arizona PII evaluation) completed by youth | Measured at initial study enrollment and at 6 months after baseline data collection |
| Frequencies of change in direction of youth permanency | Measured by administrative data from the Integrated Database (IDB) | collected at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months |
| Permanency rates | Measured by administrative data from the Adoption and Foster Care Analysis and Reporting System (AFCARS) collected every 6 months throughout the study duration. | collected at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months |
| Timely permanence | Measured by administrative data from the Adoption and Foster Care Analysis and Reporting System (AFCARS) | collected at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months |
| Placement stability after legal permanency | Measured by administrative data from the Adoption and Foster Care Analysis and Reporting System (AFCARS) | collected at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months |
| Repeat maltreatment following legal permanence | Measured by administrative data from the Adoption and Foster Care Analysis and Reporting System (AFCARS) | collected at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months |