Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 14-C-0150 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Drug supplier suspended further clinical development of Ganetespib
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Background:
- Some people have cancers that don't respond to standard treatments. In these cases, doctors may try to use drugs to slow the growth of the cancer.
Objectives:
- To test the safety and efficacy of the drug combination of ganetespib and ziv-aflibercept.
Eligibility:
- Adults age 18 and over with advanced cancer of the colon, lung, urinary tract, and sarcomas.
Design:
BACKGROUND:
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:
- To establish the safety, tolerability, and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of the combination of ganetespib and Ziv-Aflibercept in patients with refractory gastrointestinal carcinomas, non-squamous non-small cell lung carcinomas, urothelial carcinomas, and sarcomas
SECONDARY OBJECTIVE:
ELIGIBILITY:
STUDY DESIGN:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ganetespib and Ziv-Aflibercept | Experimental | Ganetespib was administered intravenously, over 1 hour, weekly, on days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle. Ziv-aflibercept was administered intravenously, over 1 hour, every 2 weeks, on days 1 and 15 of each 28-day cycle. Ganetespib was started at a dose level of 100 mg/m^2 + ziv-aflibercept at 3 mg/kg or 4 mg/kg. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ziv-Aflibercept | Drug | Ziv-aflibercept is a soluble fusion protein with high binding affinity for vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A), vascular endothelial growth factor B (VEGF-B), and placenta growth factor (PIGF) and thus confers anti-angiogenic activity |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Serious and Non-serious Adverse Events Regardless of Attribution Assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria in Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.0 | Here is the count of participants with serious and non-serious adverse events assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria in Adverse Events (CTCAE v4.0). A non-serious adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence. A serious adverse event is an adverse event or suspected adverse reaction that results in death, a life threatening adverse drug experience, hospitalization, disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions, congenital anomaly/birth defect or important medical events that jeopardize the patient or subject and may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the previous outcomes mentioned. | Date treatment consent signed to date off study, approximately 12 months and 44 days |
| Number of Participants With Grade 2 or Greater Adverse Events Possibly, Probably, or Definitely Related to Administration of the Study Drugs | Adverse Events were graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), Version 4.0. Grade refers to the severity of the Adverse Event. Grade 1 Mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated. Grade 2 Moderate; minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated. Grade 3 Severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling. Grade 4 Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated. Grade 5 Death related to adverse event (AE). AEs were considered possibly attributable to both study drugs, except where otherwise noted. Star (*) symbol indicates that the AE is possibly related to Ziv-aflibercept and unlikely to be related to Ganetespib. | Date treatment consent signed to date off study, approximately 12 months and 44 days |
| Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of the Combination of Ganetespib and Ziv-aflibercept | MTD is defined as the dose level at which no more than 1 of 6 patients experience a dose limiting toxicity (DLT) during the first cycle of the treatment, and the dose level below that at which at least 2 (of <6) patients have a DLT as a result of the drug. Determination of DLT is based on the first cycle of treatment. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Modulation of Hypoxia-Inducible Factor 1 (HIF-1) Alpha | To determine whether the combination of ganetespib and ziv-aflibercept modulated intratumoral Hypoxia-inducible factor 1 (HIF-1)-alpha expression, tumor biopsies were to be analyzed for change in HIF-1-alpha expression by immunofluorescence assay (IFA). Paired pre-and post-combination treatment samples were to be compared for qualitative changes in levels of HIF-1- alpha expression. Cores were to be normalized against the percentage of tumor within the sample. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants Who Had a Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT) | A DLT is defined as an adverse event that is related (possibly, probably, or definitely) to administration of study drugs during cycle one and is a Grade ≥ 3 non-hematological toxicity. Grade ≥3 non-hematological toxicity felt to be related to study medications are: Grade 3 diarrhea if it is refractory to treatment; Grade 3 nausea and vomiting if it is refractory to anti-emetic therapy and unable to be corrected; rise in creatinine to Grade 3, not corrected to Grade 1 or less within 48 hours with intravenous (IV) fluids; Any Grade 4 corrected QT interval (QTc) prolongation; Grade 4 neutropenia ≥5 days or febrile neutropenia,...). |
Patients must have histologically confirmed recurrent or metastatic gastrointestinal carcinomas, non-squamous non-small cell lung carcinomas, urothelial carcinomas, and sarcomas with disease progression after at least one line of standard therapy. Disease should have progressed following all treatments known to prolong survival, unless a given treatment is contraindicated.
Age greater than or equal to 18 years of age.
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status < 2.
Life expectancy > 3 months.
Patients must have normal organ and marrow function as defined below:
OR
Cardiac function within institutional normal limits on echocardiogram.
Patients must have blood pressure no greater than 140 mmHg (systolic blood pressure) and 90 mmHg (diastolic blood pressure) for eligibility. Initiation or adjustment of antihypertensive medications is permitted prior to study entry provided that the average of three blood pressure measurements at enrollment visit is less than 140/90 mmHg.
The effects of ganetespib on the developing human fetus are unknown. For this reason and because anti-angiogenic agents similar to ziv-aflibercept are known to be teratogenic, women of child-bearing potential and men must agree to use two forms of contraception (hormonal or barrier method of birth control; abstinence; sterilization) prior to study entry, for the duration of study participation, and for 3 months after completing study treatment. Should a woman become pregnant or suspect she is pregnant while she or her partner is participating in this study, she should inform her treating physician immediately. Men treated or enrolled on this protocol must also agree to use two forms of contraception prior to the study, for the duration of study participation, and for 3 months after completion of administration of both ganetespib and ziv-aflibercept.
Ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document.
During the escalation phase of the protocol, patients may have evaluable or measurable disease. During the expansion phase of the protocol, patients must have 1) measurable disease, 2) disease amenable to biopsy and 3) willingness to undergo pre- and post-treatment biopsies.
EXCLUSION CRITERIA:
Patients who have had chemotherapy or radiotherapy within 3 weeks (6 weeks for nitrosoureas or mitomycin C) prior to entering the study or those who have not recovered from adverse events due to agents administered more than 3 weeks earlier.
Patients who are receiving any other investigational agents.
Patients with known active brain metastases or carcinomatous meningitis are excluded from this clinical trial. Patients whose brain metastatic disease status has remained stable for greater than or equal to 4 weeks following treatment of brain metastases are eligible to participate at the discretion of the principal investigator.
Uncontrolled intercurrent illness including, but not limited to, ongoing or active untreated infection, or psychiatric illness/social situations that would limit compliance with study requirements.
Patients with known serious cardiac illness or medical conditions, including but not
limited to:
No major surgery within 4 weeks prior to enrollment or history of gastrointestinal bleeding within 3 months prior to enrollment. No signs or symptoms of active bleeding or nonhealing ulcer will be permitted at study entry. Patients with central pulmonary tumors with evidence of bronchial invasion, or presenting with hemoptysis will be excluded.
Corrected QT interval (QTc) > 470 msec on electrocardiogram (by Bazett's; average of triplicate recordings at the discretion of the principal investigator (PI) will exclude patients from entry on study. Medications that are known to cause QTc interval prolongation are prohibited for patients entering on trial. Patients for whom a given medication that may cause QTc interval prolongation cannot be discontinued, may be eligible at the discretion of the study PI, provided QTc interval criteria is met at enrollment. A comprehensive list of agents with the potential to cause QTc prolongation can be found in Appendix C and at http://crediblemeds.org.
Pregnant women and women who are breastfeeding are excluded from this study because the effects of the study drugs on the developing fetus are unknown.
Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive patients on combination antiretroviral therapy are ineligible because of the potential for pharmacokinetic interactions with ganetespib and zivaflibercept. In addition, these patients are at increased risk of lethal infections when treated with marrow-suppressive therapy. Appropriate studies will be undertaken in patients receiving combination antiretroviral therapy when indicated.
Substrates of cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) or cytochrome P450 2C19 (CYP2C19):
Inhibitors of P-Glycoprotein Efflux Transporters: Concomitant medications that are strong inhibitors of P-glycoprotein efflux transporters should be used with caution during the study; examples of these medications include:
Concurrent anticoagulation will be permitted providing the patient is receiving a stable dose of anticoagulants before study entry. Patients receiving anticoagulants will be eligible for this trial. Evidence of clinically significant bleeding diathesis or underlying coagulopathy (e.g., INR > 1.5 without vitamin K antagonist therapy) will not be permitted.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Alice P Chen, M.D. | National Cancer Institute (NCI) | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, 9000 Rockville Pike | Bethesda | Maryland | 20892 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21376230 | Background | Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell. 2011 Mar 4;144(5):646-74. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013. | |
| 23008289 | Background | Bottsford-Miller JN, Coleman RL, Sood AK. Resistance and escape from antiangiogenesis therapy: clinical implications and future strategies. J Clin Oncol. 2012 Nov 10;30(32):4026-34. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.41.9242. Epub 2012 Sep 24. |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| NIH Clinical Center Detailed Web Page | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The escalation of dose was not performed as planned for this study due to toxicity and early termination of the trial.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Dose Level 1: Ganetespib 100 mg/m^2 + Ziv-Aflibercept 4 mg/kg | Ganetespib was administered intravenously, over 1 hour, weekly, on days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle. Ziv-aflibercept was administered intravenously, over 1 hour, every 2 weeks, on days 1 and 15 of each 28-day cycle. Ganetespib was started at a dose level of 100 mg/m^2 and ziv-aflibercept at 4 mg/kg. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICF | No | No | Yes | Informed Consent Form | Feb 3, 2016 | Oct 30, 2017 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Ganetespib | Drug | Ganetespib is a non-geldamycin synthetic inhibitor of Hsp90 with activity against multiple cancer cell lines and tumor xenografts in preclinical models. |
|
|
| Cycle one (28 days) |
| Cycle 2, Day 7 |
| Modulation of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Expression | To evaluate for tumor distribution of EGFR, patients were to undergo 89Zr-immuno-positron emission tomography (PET) imaging with 89Zr-labeled EGFR-targeting panitumumab antibody evaluate modulation of EGFR client protein prior to and after treatment with the combination of ganetespib and ziv-aflibercept. Panitumumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody that targets EGFR and competes with endogenous ligands to block stimulation of EGFR. 89z-immuno-PET imaging with panitumumab as a targeting ligand allows for quantification of EGFR within tumors. | Cycle 1 Day 16 |
| Number of Participants According to Best Response Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1) | Radiologic response assessments by computed tomography (CT) scans were performed at baseline and every two cycles to evaluate tumor response based on the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), version 1.1. Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria for target lesions: Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Stable Disease (SD), neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for a Partial Response nor sufficient increase to qualify for Progressive Disease (PD); PD, 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions; Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions. | Baseline and every 2 months up to 5 months |
| Number of Cycles on Treatment | The number of 28-day treatment cycles (ganetespib on days 1, 8, and 15; ziv-aflibercept on days 1 and 15) administered to each evaluable patient. Number represents treatment cycles that were started; not all cycles were completed. | up to 5 months |
| Cycle one (28 days) |
| 18220746 | Background | Stravopodis DJ, Margaritis LH, Voutsinas GE. Drug-mediated targeted disruption of multiple protein activities through functional inhibition of the Hsp90 chaperone complex. Curr Med Chem. 2007;14(29):3122-38. doi: 10.2174/092986707782793925. |
| 29853657 | Derived | Meehan R, Kummar S, Do K, O'Sullivan Coyne G, Juwara L, Zlott J, Rubinstein L, Doroshow JH, Chen AP. A Phase I Study of Ganetespib and Ziv-Aflibercept in Patients with Advanced Carcinomas and Sarcomas. Oncologist. 2018 Nov;23(11):1269-e125. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0203. Epub 2018 May 31. |
| FG001 |
| Dose Level -1: Ganetespib 100 mg/m^2 + Ziv-Aflibercept 3 mg/kg |
Ganetespib was administered intravenously, over 1 hour, weekly, on days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle. Ziv-aflibercept was administered intravenously, over 1 hour, every 2 weeks, on days 1 and 15 of each 28-day cycle. Ganetespib was administered at a level of 100 mg/m^2 and ziv-aflibercept at 3 mg/kg. |
| Treated |
|
| Evaluable for Response |
|
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Dose Level 1: Ganetespib 100 mg/m^2 + Ziv-Aflibercept 4 mg/kg | Ganetespib was administered intravenously, over 1 hour, weekly, on days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle. Ziv-aflibercept was administered intravenously, over 1 hour, every 2 weeks, on days 1 and 15 of each 28-day cycle. Ganetespib was started at a dose level of 100 mg/m^2 and ziv-aflibercept at 4 mg/kg. |
| BG001 | Dose Level -1: Ganetespib 100 mg/m^2 + Ziv-Aflibercept 3 mg/kg | Ganetespib was administered intravenously, over 1 hour, weekly, on days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle. Ziv-aflibercept was administered intravenously, over 1 hour, every 2 weeks, on days 1 and 15 of each 28-day cycle. Ganetespib was administered at a level of 100 mg/m^2 and ziv-aflibercept at 3 mg/kg. |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Age, Continuous | Median | Full Range | years |
| |||||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Diagnosis | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status | The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Scale of Performance Status is graded on a scale of 0 to 5, with higher scores indicating lower levels of functioning in terms of ability to care for oneself, daily activities, and physical abilities (walking, working, etc.). | Count of Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||||||||
| Number of Prior Therapies | Median | Full Range | prior therapies |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Number of Participants With Serious and Non-serious Adverse Events Regardless of Attribution Assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria in Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.0 | Here is the count of participants with serious and non-serious adverse events assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria in Adverse Events (CTCAE v4.0). A non-serious adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence. A serious adverse event is an adverse event or suspected adverse reaction that results in death, a life threatening adverse drug experience, hospitalization, disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions, congenital anomaly/birth defect or important medical events that jeopardize the patient or subject and may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the previous outcomes mentioned. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Date treatment consent signed to date off study, approximately 12 months and 44 days |
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Number of Participants With Grade 2 or Greater Adverse Events Possibly, Probably, or Definitely Related to Administration of the Study Drugs | Adverse Events were graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), Version 4.0. Grade refers to the severity of the Adverse Event. Grade 1 Mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated. Grade 2 Moderate; minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated. Grade 3 Severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling. Grade 4 Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated. Grade 5 Death related to adverse event (AE). AEs were considered possibly attributable to both study drugs, except where otherwise noted. Star (*) symbol indicates that the AE is possibly related to Ziv-aflibercept and unlikely to be related to Ganetespib. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Date treatment consent signed to date off study, approximately 12 months and 44 days |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of the Combination of Ganetespib and Ziv-aflibercept | MTD is defined as the dose level at which no more than 1 of 6 patients experience a dose limiting toxicity (DLT) during the first cycle of the treatment, and the dose level below that at which at least 2 (of <6) patients have a DLT as a result of the drug. Determination of DLT is based on the first cycle of treatment. | An MTD was not established because no MTD data were collected. The trial was terminated before the MTD was reached due to the decision of the drug supplier to suspend further clinical development of ganetespib. | Posted | Cycle one (28 days) |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Modulation of Hypoxia-Inducible Factor 1 (HIF-1) Alpha | To determine whether the combination of ganetespib and ziv-aflibercept modulated intratumoral Hypoxia-inducible factor 1 (HIF-1)-alpha expression, tumor biopsies were to be analyzed for change in HIF-1-alpha expression by immunofluorescence assay (IFA). Paired pre-and post-combination treatment samples were to be compared for qualitative changes in levels of HIF-1- alpha expression. Cores were to be normalized against the percentage of tumor within the sample. | Data were not collected from any participant. Biopsies were to be collected from an expansion cohort treated at the maximum tolerated dose, after the conclusion of the dose escalation phase. Trial was closed before the MTD was established, patients were not enrolled to an expansion phase, and samples for pharmacodynamics analysis were not obtained. | Posted | Cycle 2, Day 7 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Modulation of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Expression | To evaluate for tumor distribution of EGFR, patients were to undergo 89Zr-immuno-positron emission tomography (PET) imaging with 89Zr-labeled EGFR-targeting panitumumab antibody evaluate modulation of EGFR client protein prior to and after treatment with the combination of ganetespib and ziv-aflibercept. Panitumumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody that targets EGFR and competes with endogenous ligands to block stimulation of EGFR. 89z-immuno-PET imaging with panitumumab as a targeting ligand allows for quantification of EGFR within tumors. | Data were not collected from any participant for this Outcome Measure. As the trial was closed before the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was established, patients were not enrolled to an expansion phase, and samples for pharmacodynamics analysis were not obtained. | Posted | Cycle 1 Day 16 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants According to Best Response Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1) | Radiologic response assessments by computed tomography (CT) scans were performed at baseline and every two cycles to evaluate tumor response based on the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), version 1.1. Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria for target lesions: Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Stable Disease (SD), neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for a Partial Response nor sufficient increase to qualify for Progressive Disease (PD); PD, 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions; Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Baseline and every 2 months up to 5 months |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Cycles on Treatment | The number of 28-day treatment cycles (ganetespib on days 1, 8, and 15; ziv-aflibercept on days 1 and 15) administered to each evaluable patient. Number represents treatment cycles that were started; not all cycles were completed. | The number of participants who were evaluable for response | Posted | Median | Full Range | cycles | up to 5 months |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other Pre-specified | Number of Participants Who Had a Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT) | A DLT is defined as an adverse event that is related (possibly, probably, or definitely) to administration of study drugs during cycle one and is a Grade ≥ 3 non-hematological toxicity. Grade ≥3 non-hematological toxicity felt to be related to study medications are: Grade 3 diarrhea if it is refractory to treatment; Grade 3 nausea and vomiting if it is refractory to anti-emetic therapy and unable to be corrected; rise in creatinine to Grade 3, not corrected to Grade 1 or less within 48 hours with intravenous (IV) fluids; Any Grade 4 corrected QT interval (QTc) prolongation; Grade 4 neutropenia ≥5 days or febrile neutropenia,...). | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Cycle one (28 days) |
|
Date treatment consent signed to date off study, approximately 12 months and 44 days
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Dose Level 1: Ganetespib 100 mg/m^2 + Ziv-Aflibercept 4 mg/kg | Ganetespib was administered intravenously, over 1 hour, weekly, on days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle. Ziv-aflibercept was administered intravenously, over 1 hour, every 2 weeks, on days 1 and 15 of each 28-day cycle. Ganetespib was started at a dose level of 100 mg/m^2 and ziv-aflibercept at 4 mg/kg. | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| EG001 | Dose Level -1: Ganetespib 100 mg/m^2 + Ziv-Aflibercept 3 mg/kg | Ganetespib was administered intravenously, over 1 hour, weekly, on days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle. Ziv-aflibercept was administered intravenously, over 1 hour, every 2 weeks, on days 1 and 15 of each 28-day cycle. Ganetespib was administered at a level of 100 mg/m^2 and ziv-aflibercept at 3 mg/kg. | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rectal perforation | Gastrointestinal disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment | Grade 5, Stent placement; surgical complications (unlikely related to study drugs) |
|
| Small intestinal perforation | Gastrointestinal disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment | Grade 5, possibly related to Ziv-Aflibercept |
|
| Sudden death Not Otherwise Specified | General disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment | Grade 5, possibly related to Ziv-Aflibercept |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abdominal pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment | Grade 3, possibly related to study drugs |
|
| Abdominal pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment | Grade 1, possibly related to study drugs |
|
| Abdominal pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment | Grade 2, unlikely related to study drugs |
|
| Abdominal pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment | Grade 1, possibly related to Ziv-Aflibercept |
|
| Activated partial thromboplastin time prolonged | Investigations | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment | Grade 1, unlikely related to study drugs |
|
| Activated partial thromboplastin time prolonged | Investigations | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment | Grade 1, possibly related to study drugs |
|
| Alanine aminotransferase increased | Investigations | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment | Grade 1, possibly related to study drugs |
|
| Alanine aminotransferase increased | Investigations | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment | Grade 2, possibly related to study drugs |
|
| Alkaline phosphatase increased | Investigations | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment | Grade 3, possibly related to study drugs |
|
| Alkaline phosphatase increased | Investigations | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment | Grade 2, unlikely related to study drugs |
|
| Anemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment | Grade 1, possibly related to study drugs |
|
| Anorexia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment | Grade 2, possibly related to study drugs |
|
| Anorexia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment | Grade 1, possibly related to study drugs |
|
| Aspartate aminotransferase increased | Investigations | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment | Grade 1, possibly related to study drugs |
|
| Back pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment | Grade 1, unlikely related to study drugs |
|
| Blurred vision | Eye disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment | Grade 1, possibly related to study drugs |
|
| Bruising | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment | Grade 1, unlikely related to study drugs |
|
| Constipation | Gastrointestinal disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment | Grade 1, possibly related to study drugs |
|
| Constipation | Gastrointestinal disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment | Grade 2, unlikely related to study drugs |
|
| Constipation | Gastrointestinal disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment | Grade 1, unlikely related to study drugs |
|
| Creatinine increased | Investigations | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment | Grade 1, possibly related to Ziv-Aflibercept |
|
| Dehydration | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment | Grade 2, unlikely related to study drugs |
|
| Dehydration | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment | Grade 1, possibly related to study drugs |
|
| Diarrhea | Gastrointestinal disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment | Grade 1, possibly related to study drugs |
|
| Diarrhea | Gastrointestinal disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment | Grade 2, possibly related to study drugs |
|
| Dizziness | Nervous system disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment | Grade 1, possibly related to study drugs |
|
| Electrocardiogram QT corrected interval prolonged | Cardiac disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment | Grade 2, possibly related to study drugs |
|
| Electrocardiogram QT corrected interval prolonged | Cardiac disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment | Grade 1, possibly related to study drugs |
|
| Eye infection | Infections and infestations | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment | Grade 2, unlikely related to study drugs |
|
| Fatigue | General disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment | Grade 2, possibly related to study drugs |
|
| Gastritis | Gastrointestinal disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment | Grade 3, possibly related to Ziv-Aflibercept |
|
| Gastrointestinal pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment | Grade 1, unlikely related to study drugs |
|
| Hematuria | Renal and urinary disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment | Grade 1, possibly related to Ziv-Aflibercept |
|
| Hemorrhoidal hemorrhage | Gastrointestinal disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment | Grade 1, unlikely related to study drugs |
|
| Hypercalcemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment | Grade 1, unlikely related to study drugs |
|
| Hyperkalemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment | Grade 1, possibly related to study drugs |
|
| Hypertension | Vascular disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment | Grade 2, unlikely related to study drugs |
|
| Hypertension | Vascular disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment | Grade 1, unlikely related to study drugs |
|
| Hypertension | Vascular disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment | Grade 1, possibly related to study drugs |
|
| Hypertension | Vascular disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment | Grade 1, possibly related to Ziv-Aflibercept |
|
| Hypertension | Vascular disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment | Grade 2, possibly related to Ziv-Aflibercept |
|
| Hyperuricemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment | Grade 1, unlikely related to study drugs |
|
| Hypoalbuminemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment | Grade 1, unlikely related to study drugs |
|
| Hypocalcemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment | Grade 2, possibly related to study drugs |
|
| Hyponatremia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment | Grade 1, possibly related to study drugs |
|
| Hyponatremia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment | Grade 1, unlikely related to study drugs |
|
| Hypophosphatemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment | Grade 2, unlikely related to study drugs |
|
| Infusion related reaction | General disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment | Grade 2, possibly related to study drugs |
|
| Infusion related reaction | General disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment | Grade 1, possibly related to study drugs |
|
| Lymphocyte count decreased | Investigations | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment | Grade 2, possibly related to study drugs |
|
| Lymphocyte count decreased | Investigations | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment | Grade 1, possibly related to study drugs |
|
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment | Grade 1, possibly related to study drugs |
|
| Oral pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment | Grade 1, unlikely related to study drugs |
|
| Platelet count decreased | Investigations | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment | Grade 1, possibly related to study drugs |
|
| Proteinuria | Renal and urinary disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment | Grade 1, possibly related to Ziv-Aflibercept |
|
| Rectal hemorrhage | Gastrointestinal disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment | Grade 1, unlikely related to study drugs |
|
| Serum amylase increased | Investigations | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment | Grade 1, possibly related to study drugs |
|
| Urinary tract infection | Infections and infestations | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment | Grade 2, unlikely related to study drugs |
|
| Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment | Grade 1, possibly related to study drugs |
|
| Weight loss | Investigations | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment | Grade 1, possibly related to study drugs |
|
| Weight loss | Investigations | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment | Grade 1, unlikely related to study drugs |
|
| Shoulder pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment | Grade 2, unlikely related to study drugs |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alice P. Chen, M.D. | National Cancer Institute | (240) 781-3320 | chenali@mail.nih.gov |
| ICF_000.pdf |
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Mar 20, 2017 | Dec 21, 2017 | Prot_SAP_001.pdf |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D012509 | Sarcoma |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D018204 | Neoplasms, Connective and Soft Tissue |
| D009370 | Neoplasms by Histologic Type |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C533178 | aflibercept |
| C533237 | STA 9090 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| >=65 years |
|
| Male |
|
| Not Hispanic or Latino |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
| Asian |
|
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
|
| Black or African American |
|
| White |
|
| More than one race |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
| Small bowel adenocarcinomas |
|
| Rectal adenocarcinomas |
|
| 1: Restricted in physically strenuous activity |
|
| 2: Unable to carry out any work activities |
|
| 3: Capable of only limited self-care |
|
| 4: Completely disabled |
|
| 5: Dead |
|
Ganetespib was administered intravenously, over 1 hour, weekly, on days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle. Ziv-aflibercept was administered intravenously, over 1 hour, every 2 weeks, on days 1 and 15 of each 28-day cycle. Ganetespib was administered at a level of 100 mg/m^2 and ziv-aflibercept at 3 mg/kg.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Participants |
|
|
|
|