Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| University of Liverpool | OTHER |
| Brigham and Women's Hospital | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Enteric fever, an infection characterised by diarrhoea and rash, is most often caused by a bacteria called Salmonella enterica. After ingesting contaminated food or drink, the Salmonellae travel first to the gut, then the bloodstream, from where they can infect other parts of the body. Antibiotics are used to kill the bacteria, but with increasing rates of antibiotic resistance, this treatment is becoming less effective.
Two Salmonella variants, Typhi and Paratyphi, cause over 30 million cases of enteric fever and more than 200,000 deaths per year, mostly in developing countries. While improved hygiene and sanitation should eventually eliminate enteric fever, reduction of the disease burden in the medium term is achievable through effective vaccination.
Vaccines likely to be available for mass vaccination are effective only against those Salmonella strains that bear the Vi polysaccharide capsule protein. Strains that do not have these capsule proteins, or have no capsule, will not be affected by vaccination and could 'fill' the space vacated by the capsulated strains. Indeed, enteric fever caused by S. Paratyphi A which does not carry the Vi protein, has risen during the past decade and accounts for more than half of all cases in some areas. Thus it is important that effective vaccines are available to protect against infection by both capsulated and noncapsulated Salmonella enterica. To develop such vaccines, we need a complete understanding of the human immune response to both types, including the contribution of immunity in the gut and the bloodstream, immune response to bacterial surface proteins, and the role of antibodies. How much cross-protection there is between the types of typhoidal Salmonellae after natural infection or vaccination is not known, but this is critical to vaccine development.
This project aims to fill in the knowledge gaps highlighted, by fully characterising the infection process and immune response in enteric fever.
There are two main groups in this study. Firstly a group of 40 to 60 volunteers recruited from the community and not previously exposed to typhoidal Salmonella (part A); secondly a group of 20 to 60 volunteers from participants of previous challenge studies conducted by the Oxford Vaccine Group (part B).
Participants in part A and B will be randomly allocated one-to-one to have either S. Typhi or S. Paratyphi. The dose of bacteria has been determined by previous challenge studies to give an attack rate of 60 to 75% in individuals naive to typhoidal Salmonella. The bacteria is then ingested as a drink with a bicarbonate buffer ('the challenge').
In addition to these two groups, a preliminary study involving 3 to 10 participants to act as 'negative controls' will be performed. They will ingest the bicarbonate drink but not be given S. Typhi or S. Paratyphi. This group is not randomised with part A or B, and is unblinded i.e. the participant will be aware that they are not drinking typhoidal Salmonella. The participants will have all the same procedures and investigations as those in part A and B, including endoscopy with biopsies, daily visits during the two week intensive phase, and a course of antibiotics.
Prior to challenge, participants (from parts A, B and negative control group) will undergo endoscopy and tissue biopsies of the gut lining. This procedure will be repeated after the intensive phase and completion of a two week course of antibiotics.
After challenge, participants will be reviewed daily for at least 14 days by study investigators. Samples of blood, stool, saliva and urine will be collected. Participants diagnosed with enteric fever will be treated immediately with antibiotics and samples will be taken as per the protocol. The participants who do not meet criteria for enteric fever will be treated with antibiotics on Day 14.
Enteric fever is diagnosed if any of the following apply:
A proportion of participants from Part A and B will be offered the optional procedures of enteric string tests (also called Enterotest) and/or Wireless Video Capsule Endoscopies (WCE). Participants consenting to these procedures will be selected sequentially until the quota has been filled for each group.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Part A | Active Comparator | Cohort naive to typhoidal Salmonella challenged with either S. Typhi or S. Paratyphi |
|
| Part B | Active Comparator | Cohort previously challenged with S. Typhi or Paratyphi re-challenged with either S. Typhi or S. Paratyphi. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Salmonella Typhi | Biological |
| ||
| Salmonella Paratyphi |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Measure the attack rate after challenge with S. Typhi or S. Paratyphi A in naïve and previously challenged individuals. | Based on clinical and/or microbiological proven enteric fever infection. | 12 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| To describe the human clinical response to S. Typhi or S. Paratyphi A in antigen-naïve and previously challenged individuals. | The clinical response after challenge or re-challenge using participant symptom profiles, laboratory parameters (including inflammatory markers, blood count, liver function tests and microbiological culture results) will be used. | 12 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Exploratory immunology to investigate the innate, humoral, cell-mediated and mucosal responses to challenge with S. Typhi or S. Paratyphi A in naïve and previously challenged individuals. | Novel assays performed on peripheral blood, faeces, urine, saliva and mucosal biopsies, including assays for CD1 and MR1 restricted T cell responses and whole blood and peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) killing assays. |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Andrew Pollard, FRCPCH, PhD | University of Oxford | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oxford Vaccine Group | Oxford | Oxfordshire | OX3 7LE | United Kingdom |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 33079959 | Background | Gibani MM, Jin C, Shrestha S, Moore M, Norman L, Voysey M, Jones E, Blackwell L, Thomaides-Brears H, Hill J, Blohmke CJ, Dobinson HC, Baker P, Jones C, Campbell D, Mujadidi YF, Plested E, Preciado-Llanes L, Napolitani G, Simmons A, Gordon MA, Angus B, Darton TC, Cerundulo V, Pollard AJ. Homologous and heterologous re-challenge with Salmonella Typhi and Salmonella Paratyphi A in a randomised controlled human infection model. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020 Oct 20;14(10):e0008783. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008783. eCollection 2020 Oct. | |
| 31877141 |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Homologous and heterologous re-challenge with Salmonella Typhi and Salmonella Paratyphi A in a randomised controlled human infection model | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014435 | Typhoid Fever |
| D010284 | Paratyphoid Fever |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012480 | Salmonella Infections |
| D004756 | Enterobacteriaceae Infections |
| D016905 | Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections |
| D001424 | Bacterial Infections |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Biological |
|
| To describe the characteristics of bacterial dynamics after challenge in naïve and previously exposed individuals, including onset and duration of bacteraemia, bacterial burden at diagnosis, bacterial burden in enteric fluid, and stool shedding. | Microbiological culture (qualitative and quantitative) and polymerase chain reaction to detect and characterise S. Typhi or S. Paratyphi A in blood, stool and enteric fluid. | 12 months |
| To determine the gut luminal mucosal response to challenge with S. Typhi and S. Paratyphi. | Mucosal inflammation as determined by (1) macroscopic appearance of mucosal inflammation as seen on endoscopy and wireless video capsule endoscopy (judged by experienced endoscopists), (2) inflammatory markers such as calprotectin and lactoferrin performed on stool and duodenal secretions. | 12 months |
| To describe the human immune response to challenge or re-challenge, including the innate, humoral, cell-mediated and mucosal responses. | Assessed by immunological laboratory assays including quantitative and functional assays of the humoral (e.g. ELISA, enzyme-linked immunospot, serum bactericidal assay and opsonophagocytosis assay), mucosal (secretory immunoglobulin A measurement), and cell-mediated (multi-chromatic flow cytometry, mass cytometry, cytokine measurement) immune response. | 12 months |
| Determine host genetic features influencing: • clinical manifestations of challenge with typhi/paratyphi • alteration of those responses through epigenetic changes • and control of gene and protein expression. | Assessed by laboratory and high-throughput assays including:
| 12 months |
| 5 years |
| To investigate how the human microbiome influences and interacts with a challenge of S. Typhi or S. Paratyphi A | Samples of stool and enteric fluid to measure the constituent microbiological flora by assays such as pyrosequencing and related metagenomic studies. | 5 years |
| Investigate new molecular techniques for detection of S. Typhi and/or S. Paratyphi in clinical samples. | Use of novel methodologies to prepare bacterial DNA/RNA and development of sensitive quantitative and qualitative PCR assays for blood, stool and duodenal secretions. | 5 years |
| Derived |
| Jin C, Gibani MM, Pennington SH, Liu X, Ardrey A, Aljayyoussi G, Moore M, Angus B, Parry CM, Biagini GA, Feasey NA, Pollard AJ. Treatment responses to Azithromycin and Ciprofloxacin in uncomplicated Salmonella Typhi infection: A comparison of Clinical and Microbiological Data from a Controlled Human Infection Model. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019 Dec 26;13(12):e0007955. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007955. eCollection 2019 Dec. |
| Related Info | View source |
| Related Info | View source |
| D001423 | Bacterial Infections and Mycoses |
| D007239 | Infections |