Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to determine whether EMG-Biofeedback is effective in the treatment of Fibromyalgia.
The objective of this randomized controlled trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of EMG-biofeedback in patients with Fibromyalgia. The assessors are blinded to the group assignment. There are three time points of assessment: before intervention, at the end of treatment (T1) and 3-months follow-up (T2). Patients are recruited from the waiting list of the Fibromyalgia day hospital program at the University Hospital Munich fulfilling the inclusion criteria. The intervention group is treated with 14 sessions of EMG-biofeedback during eight weeks in addition to usual care. The control group receives usual care only. The main specific aim is to assess the change in fibromyalgia specific health status.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| EMG-Biofeedback and Usual Care | Experimental | Patients in the intervention group started EMG-biofeedback training within three days after inclusion. In total 14 sessions of EMG-biofeedback training were applied. They started with three sessions of therapy in week 1-3 and had one session per week in week 4-8. Patients were encouraged to do a home exercise program, in which they consciously relaxed the muscle analogously to the biofeedback session for about 15 minutes per day. Additionally, they should try to apply the techniques in stressful situations, for example appointments at the dentist's. |
|
| Usual care | No Intervention | The patients in the control group had only two encounters with the therapist in the eight week interval. At these encounters pain was assessed by a visual analogue scale and their trapezius muscle activity was measured during 5 minutes analogously to the intervention group. However, afterwards they did not continue with muscle straining and relaxation. |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EMG-Biofeedback and Usual care | Other | Please refer to arm description |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) | The primary outcome measure was the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ). The FIQ is a disease specific multidimensional self-administered instrument that covers the dimensions physical functioning (11 items), well-being (1 item), work situation (2 items), pain (1 item), fatigue /sleep (2 items), stiffness (2 items) and psychological symptoms (2 items). Scoring ranges from 0 to 80 with the latter number being the worst case. The FIQ Total Score gives a summary of patients' impairment and is recommended as a highly sensitive measure of change in Fibromyalgia treatment programs and clinical studies. In this study the validated German version was used. | Change from baseline to 3 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) | Change from baseline to End of Treatment (8 weeks after baseline) | |
| Short-Form 36 (SF-36) | The SF-36 is a widely used measure of health-related quality of life with 36 items. It yields an eight-scale profile of scores which are Physical Functioning, Role-Physical, Bodily Pain, General Health, Vitality, Social Functioning, Role-Emotional and Mental Health. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Martin B Weigl, MD, MPH | Department of Orthopedics, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University Hospital Munich, Ludwig Maximilians University Munich | Principal Investigator |
| Andreas Winkelmann, MD | Department of Orthopedics, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University Hospital Munich, Ludwig Maximilians University Munich | Principal Investigator |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005356 | Fibromyalgia |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009135 | Muscular Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
| D012216 | Rheumatic Diseases |
| D009468 | Neuromuscular Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Change from baseline to End of treatment (8 weeks after baseline) |
| Short-Form 36 (SF-36) | Change from baseline to 3 months |
| self-rated Patients' Global Clinical Impression of Change Score | Change of health was directly measured by the self-rated Patients' Global Clinical Impression of Change Score, which is a validated measure of overall change compared with study onset, including six possible scores from "very much worse" (score 1) to "very much better" (score 6). | End of Treatment (8 weeks after baseline) |
| self-rated Patients' Global Clinical Impression of Change Score | 3 months |
| Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) | This questionnaire was developed and validated for patients with depression and has been applied in clinical trials of patients with Fibromyalgia as well. It contains 21 items that assess the cognitive, affective and neurovegetative factors associated with depression. | Change from baseline to End of treatment (8 weeks after baseline) |
| Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) | Change from baseline to 3 months |
| Symptom Checklist 90 Revised (SCL-90-R) | the Symptom Checklist 90 Revised (SCL-90-R) was used for measuring psychological distress. It generates 9 specific scales, one additional unspecific scale and three general scores. The 9 dimensions of the scale are as follows: SCL 1 = somatization; SCL 2 = obsessive-compulsive symptoms; SCL 3 = interpersonal sensitivity; SCL 4 = depression; SCL 5 = anxiety; SCL 6 = hostility; SCL 7 = phobic anxiety; SCL 8 = paranoid ideation; SCL 9 = psychoticism. The Global Severity Index serves as a measure of psychological distress. | Change from baseline to 3 Months |
| Tender Point Score | It consists of a body diagram, where patients can rate the pain intensity at 24 locations of the front and the back side of the body. It allows calculating a total score for the whole body, as well as specific local scores. | Change from baseline to End of treatment (8 weeks after baseline) |
| Tender Point Score | Change from baseline to 3 months |
| Tender Point Count | According to the Tender point manual the examiner applied discrete pressure of 4 kg/cm² to each of the 18 Fibromyalgia typical Tender Points. When the patients expressed pain, the tender point was considered positive. | Change from baseline to End of treatment (8 weeks after baseline) |
| Pressure Pain Threshold | For measuring the Pressure Pain Threshold, the assessor first searched for an induration with pressure pain in the trapezius muscle pars descendens on each side of the muscle. The palpated part of the muscle was always located above or on a line between the acromioclavicular joint and the spinous process of vertebrae C 7. These two structures also served as coordinates to write down the exact place of the palpated taut band. Second, using a Fischer dolorimeter with a stamp of 1 cm², the examiner applied vertical pressure to the selected point and successively augmented the pressure until the patient signalled pain. In this way, the pressure pain threshold was measured in kg/cm². | Change from baseline to End of Treatment (8 weeks after baseline) |
| D009422 |
| Nervous System Diseases |