Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The primary objective of A-PLUS trial is to evaluate and compare the efficacy of induction BEEP (bevacizumab preconditioning followed by etoposide and cisplatin) followed by whole bran radiotherapy (WBRT) with WBRT alone in the controlling of brain metastases (BM) in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients who have not previously received WBRT.
In past 2 years, the research team has demonstrated that BEEP regimen is a highly effective treatment for brain metastases of breast cancer progressing from WBRT by a multi-center phase II study (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01281696). The basic concept of preconditioning, as referred to starting bevacizumab 1 day before chemotherapy, is that the effect of bevacizumab induced tumor vascular normalization takes time to mature.
The investigators hypothesized that as induction BEEP decreased the size of brain tumors, the effectiveness of WBRT would be maximized. The investigators expect this integrated approach will do greater benefit to MBC patients with BM, irrespective of subtype.
Brain metastasis (BM) occurs in about 20% to 35% of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients. In contrast to recent advances in systemic treatment of MBC, there is much room for improvement in treatment of BM. At present, the standard treatment for inoperable/not suitable for radiosurgery BM is whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT), but with only a median overall survival (OS) of 6 to 12 months and a high brain relapse rate ranging from 30% to 100%.
In MBC, 70% to 80% of patients with BM are presented with more than two brain metastatic tumors and are not candidate for both surgical treatment and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Unlike patients with solitary or oligo-brain metastatic tumors, for whom the addition of local treatments such as surgery or SRS has been shown to improve OS and relapse rate; for patients with multiple brain metastases, WBRT remained the only standard treatment and improvements are desperately awaited.
Brain was once considered as a "sanctuary" area for systemic drugs due to the protection of blood-brain-barrier (BBB). Although some preclinical studies suggest that the BBB could be disrupted during the growth of brain metastatic tumor, the amount of chemotherapy drugs be delivered to brain tissue was still far lower than that could be achieved in serum. Bevacizumab, a vascular endothelial growth factor antibody, has shown the ability to "normalize" the peri-tumoral vessels in preclinical models. The investigators hypothesized that with the addition of bevacizumab, the chemotherapy drugs-etoposide and cisplatin, which were shown also to have some activity for BM-will be delivered more efficiently into the once "sanctuary" brain parenchyma, thus increasing the efficacy of BM treatment.
Recently, the research team have demonstrated that bevacizumab preconditioning followed by etoposide and cisplatin (BEEP) is a highly effective treatment for brain metastases of breast cancer progressing from radiotherapy by a multi-center phase II study. The basic concept of preconditioning, as referred to starting bevacizumab 1 day before chemotherapy, is that normalization effect takes time to mature. In that study, 35 patients were enrolled. Twenty seven patients (77.2%; 95%CI 59.9-89.6) achieved brain tumor volumetric response, defined as a ≥50% reduction in the volumetric sum of all measurable brain lesions in the absence of increasing steroid use, development of new brain lesion, or progressive neurologic symptoms. With a median follow-up of 11.0 months, the median CNS progression free survival (PFS) was 6.7 months (95% CI 5.1 to 8.3 months), and OS was 9.4 months (95% CI 7.3 to 11.5 months).
At present, lapatinib is the only molecular targeted agent proven effective for MBC patients with BM. The CNS response rate of first-line lapatinib plus capecitabine was 65% in WBRT-naïve, HER2-positive MBC patients with BM. However, the median CNS PFS is still disappointingly short at 5.5 months and the result is limited to MBC patients who are HER2-positive.
It has been demonstrated that brain tumor size is a predictor of WBRT failure. Given the high response rate of BEEP for BM in our phase II trial, the investigators hypothesized that as induction BEEP decreased the size of BM, the effectiveness of WBRT would also be enhanced. This integrated approach will do greater benefit to MBC patients with BM, irrespective of subtype. Hence, the investigators plan to conduct this randomized phase II trial to evaluate the efficacy of induction BEEP followed by WBRT.
Sub study of A-PLUS: A Integrated Study of MRI and PET of The Brain in Evaluation of Neurocognitive Outcomes of Patients with Brain Metastasis Treated by Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy.
The participants of A-PLUS trial may be enrolled in an additional study of this trial. This additional prospective study aims to investigate the neurocognitive outcomes of patients with brain metastases treated by radiotherapy and chemotherapy. The evaluations include neurocognitive assessments, serial MRI and FDG PET-CT (Integrated MR-PET) at before and after the study treatment. A total of 80 participants will be enrolled. The study protocol was approved by the NTUH REC, No. 201412046MINA.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inductional BEEP regimen | Experimental | Induction BEEP regimen: Every 3 weeks a cycle for a total of 3 cycles (around 2 months)
WBRT: 3000cGy in 10 fractions |
|
| WBRT alone | No Intervention | standard WBRT: 3000cGy in 10 fractions |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BEEP regimen | Drug | Bevacizumab 15mg/kg IVF on D1, Etoposide 70 mg/m2 IVF QD, D2-4, Cisplatin 70 mg/m2 IVF on D2, repeat every 3 weeks, for 3 cycles |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| The Brain-specific progression free survival (BS-PFS) | To evaluate and compare the brain-specific progression free survival (BS-PFS) of the two treatment arms based on RECIST 1.1. | 2.5 years |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| The 2-month brain-specific objective response rate (BS-ORR) | To compare the 2-month brain-specific objective response rate (BS-ORR) of the two treatment arms based on volumetric analysis (CNS composite response criteria). | 2 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| The BS-PFS based on volumetric analysis (CNS composite response criteria) | To compare the BS-PFS of the two treatment arms based on volumetric analysis (CNS composite response criteria). | 2.5 years |
| The 8-month BS-PFSR based on volumetric analysis (CNS composite response criteria) |
Inclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Yen-Shen Lu, M.D, Ph.D. | National Taiwan Unversity Hospital | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital | Kaohsiung City | Taiwan | ||||
| Shuang Ho Hospital |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 38127335 | Derived | Chen TW, Dai MS, Tseng LM, Chen SC, Chao TY, Chao TC, Chang YC, Chiu CF, Liu CT, Lin CH, Liu CY, Chen YF, Chang DY, Yu JC, Rau KM, Hsieh YY, Shen SC, Huang SM, Cheng AL, Lu YS. Whole-Brain Radiotherapy Alone vs Preceded by Bevacizumab, Etoposide, and Cisplatin for Untreated Brain Metastases From Breast Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2024 Mar 1;10(3):325-334. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.5456. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001943 | Breast Neoplasms |
| D001932 | Brain Neoplasms |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D001941 | Breast Diseases |
| D012871 | Skin Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000068258 | Bevacizumab |
| D005047 | Etoposide |
| D002945 | Cisplatin |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D061067 | Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized |
| D000911 | Antibodies, Monoclonal |
| D000906 | Antibodies |
| D007136 | Immunoglobulins |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
To compare the 8-month BS-PFSR of the two treatment arms based on volumetric analysis (CNS composite response criteria). |
| 8 months |
| The BS-ORR based on volumetric analysis (CNS composite response criteria) | To evaluate and compare the BS-ORR of the two treatment arms based on volumetric analysis (CNS composite response criteria). | 5 months |
| The 8-month BS-PFSR based on RECIST 1.1 | To compare the 8-month BS-PFSR of the two treatment arms based on RECIST 1.1. | 8 months |
| The progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) | To observe the difference of the PFS and OS between the two treatment arms. | 2.5 years |
| The extra-CNS tumor progression free survival (PFS) based on RECIST 1.1 | To evaluate and compare extra-CNS tumor progression free survival (PFS) of the two treatment arms (and followed by physician/investigator choice of systemic therapy) based on RECIST 1.1. | 2.5 years |
| The time-to-improvement of neurological function | To evaluate the difference of time-to-improvement of neurological function between the two treatment arms. | 3 months |
| Number of participants with adverse events | To evaluate and compare the safety profile of the two treatment arms according CTCAE 4.0. | 3 months |
| New Taipei City |
| Taiwan |
| China Medical University Hospital | Taichung | Taiwan |
| National Taiwan University Hospital | Taipei | 100 | Taiwan |
| Tri-Service General Hospital | Taipei | 114 | Taiwan |
| Mackay Memorial Hospital | Taipei | Taiwan |
| Taipei Veterans General Hospital | Taipei | Taiwan |
| Chang Gung Memorial Hospital-LinKou | Taoyuan | Taiwan |
| D017437 |
| Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases |
| D016543 | Central Nervous System Neoplasms |
| D009423 | Nervous System Neoplasms |
| D001927 | Brain Diseases |
| D002493 | Central Nervous System Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D007162 |
| Immunoproteins |
| D001798 | Blood Proteins |
| D011506 | Proteins |
| D000602 | Amino Acids, Peptides, and Proteins |
| D012712 | Serum Globulins |
| D005916 | Globulins |
| D011034 | Podophyllotoxin |
| D013764 | Tetrahydronaphthalenes |
| D009281 | Naphthalenes |
| D011084 | Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons |
| D006841 | Hydrocarbons, Aromatic |
| D006844 | Hydrocarbons, Cyclic |
| D006838 | Hydrocarbons |
| D009930 | Organic Chemicals |
| D011083 | Polycyclic Compounds |
| D005960 | Glucosides |
| D006027 | Glycosides |
| D002241 | Carbohydrates |
| D017606 | Chlorine Compounds |
| D007287 | Inorganic Chemicals |
| D017672 | Nitrogen Compounds |
| D017671 | Platinum Compounds |