Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Based on recent findings that botulinum toxin injections in the cranial muscles might reduce emotional processing (Havas 2011), an increasing number of popular newspaper tabloids are suggesting a negative effect on cognition. The underlying research articles address the "facial feedback hypothesis". The hypothesis indicates that expressive behaviour, including facial mimic expressions influences the subject's brain via feedback. (Alam 2008) Other systemic neurological diseases, e.g of inflammatory origin, may lead to temporary bilateral facial nerve palsy (BF). During recovery process, the palsy usually remits completely.
The effect of bilateral facial muscle palsy on cognition and emotional possessing has never been evaluated.
The results of this pilot study might provide new information about the effect bilateral facial palsy on emotional processing and cognition and the facial feedback hypothesis.
The aim of this controlled pilot study is to assess cognitive function and emotional processing in patients with bilateral facial palsy. In addition, differences in cognitive function and emotional processing in patients with different manifestations of dystonia should be evaluated.
According to the facial feedback theory, paralysed mimic muscles might alter emotional processing. Therefore, investigators compare patients with bilateral facial muscle palsy and healthy controls. Investigators expect no influence of facial muscle palsy on cognitive functions in any of the tested groups; the investigators expect a mild impairment of emotional processing only in the patients group with bilateral facial muscle palsy (BEB and BF). In addition, the investigators expect no difference in emotional processing in patients with different manifestations of dystonia (BEB and CD) at remission. There might be a slight difference of emotional processing in patients with different manifestations of dystonia (BEB and CD) at time of prominent facial palsy.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blepharospasm | Patients suffering from Blepharospasm | ||
| Cervical Dystonia | Patients suffering from cervical dystonia | ||
| Bilateral facial palsy | Patients suffering from bilateral facial palsy of inflammatory origin | ||
| Healthy Control | Control subjects |
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| I-S-T-2000R- (intelligence-structure-test 2000R) | Test to evaluate Intelligence
| up to four weeks |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Beck's depression-inventory-II | Evaluation of depression (BDI-II; Hautzinger et al., 2009) | up to four weeks |
| Apathy Evaluation Scale | Evaluation of apathy (AES; Luecken et al., 2006) |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Patients:
Control:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Two patient groups with bilateral facial palsy, 31 patients each (group A: BEB, , group C: BF), recruited from the Botulinum toxin outpatient's clinic and general outpatient's clinic of the Medical University of Vienna. Two control groups, 31 patients with CD, recruited from the Botulinum toxin outpatient's clinic of the Medical University of Vienna, and and 31 age-and education-matched HC, will perform neuropsychological testing of approximately 60 minutes duration at time of prominent facial palsy (baseline) and at remission (visit 1). HC age and education matched, will be tested twice.
A total of 124 persons will be tested. All participants will sign an informed consent form. Group A: 31 BEB Group B: 31 CD Group C: 31 BF Group D: 31 HC
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Eduard Auff, Prof., MD | Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna | Vienna | State of Vienna | 1090 | Austria |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20548056 | Background | Havas DA, Glenberg AM, Gutowski KA, Lucarelli MJ, Davidson RJ. Cosmetic use of botulinum toxin-a affects processing of emotional language. Psychol Sci. 2010 Jul;21(7):895-900. doi: 10.1177/0956797610374742. Epub 2010 Jun 14. | |
| 18485989 | Background | Alam M, Barrett KC, Hodapp RM, Arndt KA. Botulinum toxin and the facial feedback hypothesis: can looking better make you feel happier? J Am Acad Dermatol. 2008 Jun;58(6):1061-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2007.10.649. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| up to four weeks |
| 18562330 | Background | Hennenlotter A, Dresel C, Castrop F, Ceballos-Baumann AO, Wohlschlager AM, Haslinger B. The link between facial feedback and neural activity within central circuitries of emotion--new insights from botulinum toxin-induced denervation of frown muscles. Cereb Cortex. 2009 Mar;19(3):537-42. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhn104. Epub 2008 Jun 17. |
| 34496270 | Derived | Platho-Elwischger K, Schmoeger M, Willinger U, Abdel-Aziz C, Algner J, Pretscherer S, Auff E, Kranz G, Turnbull O, Sycha T. Cognitive Performance After Facial Botulinum Toxin Treatment in a Cohort of Neurologic Patients: An Exploratory Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2022 Mar;103(3):402-408. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2021.08.007. Epub 2021 Sep 5. |