Neotech RAM Cannula Versus Conventional Binasal Prong Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) to Treat Respiratory Distress in Low Birth Weight Neonates

Neotech RAM Cannula Versus Conventional Binasal Prong Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) to Treat Respiratory Distress in Low Birth Weight Neonates

The purpose of this study is to determine if the RAM cannula is as effective as conventional binasal prongs to deliver CPAP to low birth weight infants with respiratory distress.

Inclusion Criteria:

• Low Birth Weight Infant
• Currently on continuous positive aireway pressure of 5-7 cm water pressure
• Receiving continuous positive airway pressure support for > 24 hrs prior to enrollment
• Fraction of inspired oxygen requirement of 23-50%

Exclusion Criteria:

• Fraction of inspired oxygen > 50%
• Congenital defects of head, pulmonary or cardiovascular systems
• Chromosomal abnormalities/genetic syndromes
• Invasive Surgical Procedure within 24 hrs prior to enrollment
• Enrollment in separate clinical trial that has ongoing data collection