Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This is a randomised control trial comparing two different prosthetic designs used in total knee arthroplasty. Participants were randomised to receive either of the two prostheses and then were followed up of a period of 7 years, looking at pain, range of motion and impact on quality of life. The literature and joint registry of Australia shows that one of the prosthesis may be inferior to the other. Our research team hypothesised that this was not the case and that previous elicited differences were related to other factors.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Randomised group 1 | Experimental | This study is looking at a group of patients with knee osteoarthritis or other pathology requiring total knee arthroplasty. This group of patients were randomised to receive either a mobile bearing prosthesis or a fixed bearing prosthesis. |
|
| Randomised group 2 | Experimental | This study is looking at a group of patients with knee osteoarthritis or other pathology requiring total knee arthroplasty. This group of patients were randomised to receive either a mobile bearing prosthesis or a fixed bearing prosthesis. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fixed bearing prosthesis | Device |
| ||
| Mobile bearing prosthesis |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Visual pain analogue score | Participants asked to rate their level of pain on a scale | 6 weeks |
| Range of motion | The range of motion of the joint was assessed in both flexion and extension | 6 weeks |
| Activities of Daily Living | Questionnaire looking at how the intervention impacts of activities of daily living | 6 weeks |
| X-ray analysis of joint alignment | Using X-rays, the knee was assessed for mechanical and anatomical alignment | 5-7 year |
| Visual pain analogue score | 6 months | |
| visual pain analogue score | 12 months | |
| visual analogue pain score | 5-7 years | |
| range of motion | 6 months | |
| range of motion | 1 year | |
| range of motion | 5-7 years | |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dr Dean Pepper, orthopaedic surgeon private rooms | Port Macquarie | New South Wales | 2444 | Australia |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010003 | Osteoarthritis |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001168 | Arthritis |
| D007592 | Joint Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
| D012216 | Rheumatic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Device |
|
| activities of daily living |
| 6 months |
| activities of daily living | 1 year |
| activities of daily living | 5-7 years |