An Open, Multi-center, Randomized Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Mitiglinide Versus Acarbose in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in China
An Open, Multi-center, Randomized Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Mitiglinide Versus Acarbose in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in China
Mitiglinide, a benzylsuccinic acid derivative, exerts selective action on the ATP-dependent K (KATP) channel of pancreatic β-cells and reportedly possesses a stronger affinity to the channel compared with other insulinotropic sulphonylurea receptor ligands, namely repaglinide and nateglinide. Preprandial administration of mitiglinide efficiently reduces postprandial hyperglycemia and improves overall glycemic control.
This was a 12-week, open, randomized study for comparing Mitiglinide versus Acarbose. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Mitiglinide vs Acarbose in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Group I (Mitiglinide): Mitiglinide 10 mg three times a day, orally, for 12 weeks Group II (Acarbose): Acarbose 50 mg three times a day, orally, for 12 weeks Total subjects: 248, randomized to 2 groups at ratio of 1:1.
Inclusion Criteria:
Note: Incretin mimetics contain glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist (including GLP-1 analogues) and dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors.
Exclusion Criteria:
Nanjing, Jiangsu, China