Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| NCI-2014-00833 | Registry Identifier | NCI Trial ID | |
| UW13115 | Other Identifier | University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center | |
| R01CA176911 | U.S. NIH Grant/Contract | View source | |
| 2014-0391 | Other Identifier | UW-Madison Health Sciences IRB | |
| A539700 | Other Identifier | UW Madison | |
| SMPH\SURGERY\SURGERY | Other Identifier | UW Madison |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| National Cancer Institute (NCI) | NIH |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This phase II trial studies how well thyroid gland removal with or without central lymph node dissection works in treating patients with thyroid cancer or suspected thyroid cancer that has not spread to the lymph nodes (randomized into Arms I and II). Arms I and II are compared to a standard of care (SOC) Arm III to enable comparison of quality of life among various surgical treatments. Currently, the standard treatment for thyroid cancer is total thyroidectomy, or complete removal of the thyroid. The lymph nodes in the central part of the neck may also be surgically removed, called central lymph node dissection. Prophylactic removal of the lymph nodes may increase the risk of life-threatening complications, and may reduce post-surgery quality of life. It may also prevent the cancer from returning and reduce the need for additional surgery. It is not yet known whether recurrence rates and complication levels are lower after thyroid gland removal alone or with central lymph node dissection.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To determine the rate of transient and permanent hypocalcemia
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To determine the rate of voice and swallowing problems.
II. To determine the degree to which quality of life (QOL) is compromised.
III. To determine the degree to which accurate quality of life measures can be extracted from patient interview narratives using natural language processing techniques.
IV. To determine clinical recurrence rates.
OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms, if ineligible into a SOC arm.
Arm I: Patients undergo total thyroidectomy alone.
Arm II: Patients undergo total thyroidectomy with ipsilateral prophylactic central neck dissection (CND).
Arm III: Patients ineligible to be randomized into Arm I or II, Standard of Care (SOC) comparator receiving same follow up.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at day 1, 2 and 6 weeks, and 6 and 12 months.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arm I (no CND) | Experimental | Patients undergo total thyroidectomy alone. |
|
| Arm II (CND) | Experimental | Patients undergo total thyroidectomy with ipsilateral prophylactic CND. |
|
| Arm III (SOC) | Active Comparator | Patients who are not eligible for randomization into Arm I or Arm II, Standard of Care (SOC) group. No specific trial intervention, treated as per patient and physician preference |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thyroidectomy | Procedure | Undergo total thyroidectomy |
| |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants With Transient Hypoparathyroidism, as Defined by a Day 1 Serum Parathyroid Hormone (PTH) Level of < 10 pg/ml | Rate of transient hypoparathyroidism will be assessed in terms of percentage of participants with day 1 serum PTH level of < 10 pg/ml. | Post-operative day 1 |
| Post-operative Serum Calcium (mg/dL) at Day 12 | Post-operative serum calcium (mg/dL) at Day 12 | At day 12 |
| Total Calcium Consumption in First 2 Weeks | Total calcium consumption in first 2 weeks (total mg). Participants were given calcium symptom logs in which to record their calcium consumption between surgery and their first preoperative follow up appointment, approximately two week. | 2 weeks after surgery |
| Number of Participants With Hypocalcemia Symptoms in First 2 Weeks | Number of participants with hypocalcemia symptoms and symptom severity in first two weeks, as defined by presence of clinically significant symptoms of hypocalcemia. Clinically significant symptoms defined as 1 or more episodes of symptoms of hypocalcemia per day for multiple days, symptoms leading to calls to provider for assistance with managing and/or symptoms leading to escalation of dosage of prescribed medications to treat symptoms of hypocalcemia | 2 weeks |
| Hypocalcemia Symptom Severity Scale (Range of 1-5) | Mean number of occurrences of mild (severity 1 - 2) and severe (severity 3 - 5) hypocalcemia symptoms. Participants were asked to record hypocalcemia symptoms between surgery and first postoperative follow-up at approximately two weeks in their provided calcium symptom logs and rank severity on scale of 1 (mild) to 5 (severe). | 2 weeks post surgery |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Rate of Transient and Permanent Hypocalcemia | The rate of transient and permanent hypocalcemia will be determined by assessing the following: I. Post-operative serum calcium (mg/dl) and PTH (pg/ml) at Day 12 and Month 6 II. Total calcium consumption in first 2 weeks (total gm) III. Hypocalcemia symptoms in first 2 weeks (average episodes/day) IV. Hypocalcemia symptom severity scale (range 1-5) V. Requirement for calcium and calcitriol at Month 6 (or, if laboratory values at visit reveal calcium < 8 mg/dL and PTH < 15 pg/ml Data will be analyzed using the methods described above. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
INTRA-OPERATION EXCLUSION CRITERIA (randomization arms only)
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Rebecca Sippel | University of Wisconsin, Madison | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of Wisconsin | Madison | Wisconsin | 53792 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 40954474 | Derived | Knigge MA, Robbins D, Thibeault S, Connor N, Sippel R. Secondary analyses of swallowing efficiency and safety outcomes following thyroidectomy versus thyroidectomy plus prophylactic central neck dissection. Thyroid Res. 2025 Sep 16;18(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s13044-025-00264-5. | |
| 33759836 | Derived | Sippel RS, Robbins SE, Poehls JL, Pitt SC, Chen H, Leverson G, Long KL, Schneider DF, Connor NP. A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial: No Clear Benefit to Prophylactic Central Neck Dissection in Patients With Clinically Node Negative Papillary Thyroid Cancer. Ann Surg. 2020 Sep 1;272(3):496-503. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004345. |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center Homepage | View source |
Not provided
117 participants consented. 27 participants were excluded from the study before assignment to arms (15 participants withdrew before surgery, 12 participants did not meet intraoperative inclusion criteria). 90 participants were allocated in 3 arms
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Arm I (no CND) | Patients undergo total thyroidectomy alone. Thyroidectomy: Undergo total thyroidectomy Quality-of-life assessment: Voice evaluation, interviews, ancillary studies |
| FG001 | Arm II (CND) |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Jan 17, 2020 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| entral lymph node dissection (CLND) |
| Procedure |
Undergo total thyroidectomy with ipsilateral prophylactic CND |
|
| Quality-of-life assessment | Other | Voice evaluation, interviews, ancillary studies |
|
| Percentage of Participants That Required Calcium and Calcitriol at Month 6 | Requirement for calcium and calcitriol at Month 6 (or, if laboratory values at visit reveal calcium < 8 mg/dL and PTH <15 pg/ml) | At Month 6 |
| Post-operative Serum PTH (pg/ml) at Month 6 | At Month 6 |
| Post-operative Serum Calcium Level at Month 6 | Post-operative serum calcium (mg/dL) at Month 6 | At Month 6 |
| Post-operative day 1 - Month 6 |
| Rate of Voice and Swallowing Problems | The rate of voice and swallowing problems will be determined by assessing the following: I. Phonation threshold pressure, in centimeters of water II. Dysphonia severity index (DSI) score (+5 to -5) III. Grade Roughness Breathiness Asthenia Strain (GRBAS) score (0-3) IV. Voice quality parameters as measured by Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) (0-100 on visual analog scale) V. Vocal fold vibratory and movement parameters as measured by stroboscopy assessment (1-4) VI. Glottal function index score VII. Penetration-Aspiration score as measured by videofluoroscopic swallow study (0-8) Data will be analyzed using the methods described above. | Post operative day 1 - up to 1 year |
| Degree to Which Quality of Life (QOL) is Compromised | The degree to which quality (QOL) is compromised will be determined by assessing the following: I. Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) Mental Composite Scale (MCS) score II. Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) Physical Composite Scale (PCS) score III. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ) Core-30 (C30) score IV. Thyroid Cancer Specific Quality of Life (ThyCA-QOL) score V. 10-item Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10) dysphagia inventory score VI. Voice Handicap Index (VHI) score VII. Themes and codes from interview transcripts assessed using qualitative research methods Data will be analyzed using the methods described above. | Post-operative day 1 - up to 1 year |
| Clinical Recurrence Rates | Clinical recurrence rates will be determined by assessing the following: I. Percent of patients with a recombinant thyroid-stimulating hormone (rTSH) stimulated thyroglobulin level < 1 ng/ml one year after surgery II. Unstimulated thyroglobulin level prior to beginning week 6 radioactive iodine treatment III. Stimulated thyroglobulin at the time of week 6 radioactive iodine treatment IV. Incidence of unstimulated thyroglobulin > 1 ng/mL at 6 months V. Incidence of stimulated thyroglobulin > 2 ng/mL at 1 year VI. Incidence of biopsy-proven disease identification on neck ultrasound or iodine-131 (I-131) uptake up to 5 years post-surgery Data will be analyzed using the methods described above. | Week 6 - up to 5 years |
| Degree to Which Accurate Quality of Life (QOL) Measures Can be Extracted From Patient Interview Narratives Using Natural Language Processing Techniques | The degree to which accurate quality of life (QOL) measures can be extracted from patient interview narratives using natural language process techniques will allow for the development of computer algorithms that convert patient narrative text into simple quality of life measures. Data will be analyzed using the methods described above. | Post-operative day 1 - up to 1 year |
| 29710208 | Derived | Kletzien H, Macdonald CL, Orne J, Francis DO, Leverson G, Wendt E, Sippel RS, Connor NP. Comparison Between Patient-Perceived Voice Changes and Quantitative Voice Measures in the First Postoperative Year After Thyroidectomy: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018 Nov 1;144(11):995-1003. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2018.0309. |
Patients undergo total thyroidectomy with ipsilateral prophylactic CND.
Thyroidectomy: Undergo total thyroidectomy
Central lymph node dissection: Undergo total thyroidectomy with ipsilateral prophylactic CND
Quality-of-life assessment: Voice evaluation, interviews, ancillary studies
| FG002 | Arm III (SOC) | Patients who are not eligible for randomization into Arm I or Arm II, Standard of Care (SOC) group. No specific trial intervention, treated as per patient and physician preference Quality-of-life assessment: Voice evaluation, interviews, ancillary studies |
| Analyzed for Baseline Measures |
|
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Arm I (no CND) | Patients undergo total thyroidectomy alone. Thyroidectomy: Undergo total thyroidectomy Quality-of-life assessment: Voice evaluation, interviews, ancillary studies |
| BG001 | Arm II (CND) | Patients undergo total thyroidectomy with ipsilateral prophylactic CND. Thyroidectomy: Undergo total thyroidectomy Central lymph node dissection: Undergo total thyroidectomy with ipsilateral prophylactic CND Quality-of-life assessment: Voice evaluation, interviews, ancillary studies |
| BG002 | Arm III (SOC) | Patients who are not eligible for randomization into Arm I or Arm II, Standard of Care (SOC) group. No specific trial intervention, treated as per patient and physician preference Quality-of-life assessment: Voice evaluation, interviews, ancillary studies |
| BG003 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| |||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Percentage of Participants With Transient Hypoparathyroidism, as Defined by a Day 1 Serum Parathyroid Hormone (PTH) Level of < 10 pg/ml | Rate of transient hypoparathyroidism will be assessed in terms of percentage of participants with day 1 serum PTH level of < 10 pg/ml. | 1 participant in the Arm II(CND) was a screen failure. Arm III(SOC) data was not collected for this outcome measure as outcome is a comparison of complication rates between TT and CND arms and does not apply to SOC arm participants. The SOC arm was added later as comparison for the qualitative aims only. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Post-operative day 1 |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Post-operative Serum Calcium (mg/dL) at Day 12 | Post-operative serum calcium (mg/dL) at Day 12 | 1 participant in the Arm II(CND) was a screen failure. Arm III(SOC) data was not collected for this outcome measure as outcome is a comparison of complication rates between TT and CND arms and does not apply to SOC arm participants. The SOC arm was added later as comparison for the qualitative aims only. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | mg/dL | At day 12 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Total Calcium Consumption in First 2 Weeks | Total calcium consumption in first 2 weeks (total mg). Participants were given calcium symptom logs in which to record their calcium consumption between surgery and their first preoperative follow up appointment, approximately two week. | 19 participants in CND arm, 22 in 'no CND' arm returned their calcium symptom log to study staff at the end of the postoperative follow-up period. Missing data is due to participants losing/forgetting to return their calcium symptom logs/lack of clarity in their handwritten log entries. This may also have led to limited reliability/accuracy of the data we were able to collect. SOC arm data was not collected as outcome is a comparison of complication rates between TT and CND arms, N/A to SOC arm. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | mg | 2 weeks after surgery |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Number of Participants With Hypocalcemia Symptoms in First 2 Weeks | Number of participants with hypocalcemia symptoms and symptom severity in first two weeks, as defined by presence of clinically significant symptoms of hypocalcemia. Clinically significant symptoms defined as 1 or more episodes of symptoms of hypocalcemia per day for multiple days, symptoms leading to calls to provider for assistance with managing and/or symptoms leading to escalation of dosage of prescribed medications to treat symptoms of hypocalcemia | In Arm II (CND) 1 participant was lost to screen failure, 1 self-withdrew. Arm III(SOC) data was not collected for this outcome measure as outcome is a comparison of complication rates between TT and CND arms and does not apply to SOC arm participants. The SOC arm was added later as comparison for the qualitative aims only. | Posted | Number | participants | 2 weeks |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Hypocalcemia Symptom Severity Scale (Range of 1-5) | Mean number of occurrences of mild (severity 1 - 2) and severe (severity 3 - 5) hypocalcemia symptoms. Participants were asked to record hypocalcemia symptoms between surgery and first postoperative follow-up at approximately two weeks in their provided calcium symptom logs and rank severity on scale of 1 (mild) to 5 (severe). | Missing data is due to participants losing/forgetting to return their calcium symptom logs/lack of clarity in their handwritten log entries. This may also have led to limited reliability/accuracy of the data we were able to collect. SOC arm data was not collected as outcome is a comparison of complication rates between TT and CND arms, not applicable (N/A) to SOC arm. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | occurrences | 2 weeks post surgery |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Percentage of Participants That Required Calcium and Calcitriol at Month 6 | Requirement for calcium and calcitriol at Month 6 (or, if laboratory values at visit reveal calcium < 8 mg/dL and PTH <15 pg/ml) | In Arm II (CND) 1 participant was lost to screen failure, 1 self-withdrew, 1 was lost to follow up. Arm III(SOC) data was not collected for this outcome measure as outcome is a comparison of complication rates between TT and CND arms and does not apply to SOC arm participants. The SOC arm was added later as comparison for the qualitative aims only. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | At Month 6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Post-operative Serum PTH (pg/ml) at Month 6 | In Arm II (CND) 1 participant was lost to screen failure, 1 self-withdrew, 1 was lost to follow up. Arm III(SOC) data was not collected for this outcome measure as outcome is a comparison of complication rates between TT and CND arms and does not apply to SOC arm participants. The SOC arm was added later as comparison for the qualitative aims only. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | pg/mL | At Month 6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Post-operative Serum Calcium Level at Month 6 | Post-operative serum calcium (mg/dL) at Month 6 | In Arm II (CND) 1 participant was lost to screen failure, 1 self-withdrew, 1 was lost to follow up. Arm III(SOC) data was not collected for this outcome measure as outcome is a comparison of complication rates between TT and CND arms and does not apply to SOC arm participants. The SOC arm was added later as comparison for the qualitative aims only. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | mg/dL | At Month 6 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Rate of Transient and Permanent Hypocalcemia | The rate of transient and permanent hypocalcemia will be determined by assessing the following: I. Post-operative serum calcium (mg/dl) and PTH (pg/ml) at Day 12 and Month 6 II. Total calcium consumption in first 2 weeks (total gm) III. Hypocalcemia symptoms in first 2 weeks (average episodes/day) IV. Hypocalcemia symptom severity scale (range 1-5) V. Requirement for calcium and calcitriol at Month 6 (or, if laboratory values at visit reveal calcium < 8 mg/dL and PTH < 15 pg/ml Data will be analyzed using the methods described above. | Not Posted | Post-operative day 1 - Month 6 | Participants | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Rate of Voice and Swallowing Problems | The rate of voice and swallowing problems will be determined by assessing the following: I. Phonation threshold pressure, in centimeters of water II. Dysphonia severity index (DSI) score (+5 to -5) III. Grade Roughness Breathiness Asthenia Strain (GRBAS) score (0-3) IV. Voice quality parameters as measured by Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) (0-100 on visual analog scale) V. Vocal fold vibratory and movement parameters as measured by stroboscopy assessment (1-4) VI. Glottal function index score VII. Penetration-Aspiration score as measured by videofluoroscopic swallow study (0-8) Data will be analyzed using the methods described above. | Not Posted | Post operative day 1 - up to 1 year | Participants | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Degree to Which Quality of Life (QOL) is Compromised | The degree to which quality (QOL) is compromised will be determined by assessing the following: I. Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) Mental Composite Scale (MCS) score II. Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) Physical Composite Scale (PCS) score III. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ) Core-30 (C30) score IV. Thyroid Cancer Specific Quality of Life (ThyCA-QOL) score V. 10-item Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10) dysphagia inventory score VI. Voice Handicap Index (VHI) score VII. Themes and codes from interview transcripts assessed using qualitative research methods Data will be analyzed using the methods described above. | Not Posted | Post-operative day 1 - up to 1 year | Participants | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Clinical Recurrence Rates | Clinical recurrence rates will be determined by assessing the following: I. Percent of patients with a recombinant thyroid-stimulating hormone (rTSH) stimulated thyroglobulin level < 1 ng/ml one year after surgery II. Unstimulated thyroglobulin level prior to beginning week 6 radioactive iodine treatment III. Stimulated thyroglobulin at the time of week 6 radioactive iodine treatment IV. Incidence of unstimulated thyroglobulin > 1 ng/mL at 6 months V. Incidence of stimulated thyroglobulin > 2 ng/mL at 1 year VI. Incidence of biopsy-proven disease identification on neck ultrasound or iodine-131 (I-131) uptake up to 5 years post-surgery Data will be analyzed using the methods described above. | Not Posted | Week 6 - up to 5 years | Participants | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Degree to Which Accurate Quality of Life (QOL) Measures Can be Extracted From Patient Interview Narratives Using Natural Language Processing Techniques | The degree to which accurate quality of life (QOL) measures can be extracted from patient interview narratives using natural language process techniques will allow for the development of computer algorithms that convert patient narrative text into simple quality of life measures. Data will be analyzed using the methods described above. | Not Posted | Post-operative day 1 - up to 1 year | Participants |
1 year
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Arm I (no CND) | Patients undergo total thyroidectomy alone. Thyroidectomy: Undergo total thyroidectomy Quality-of-life assessment: Voice evaluation, interviews, ancillary studies | 0 | 30 | 0 | 30 | 23 | 30 |
| EG001 | Arm II (CND) | Patients undergo total thyroidectomy with ipsilateral prophylactic CND. Thyroidectomy: Undergo total thyroidectomy Central lymph node dissection: Undergo total thyroidectomy with ipsilateral prophylactic CND Quality-of-life assessment: Voice evaluation, interviews, ancillary studies | 0 | 29 | 0 | 29 | 25 | 29 |
| EG002 | Arm III (SOC) | Patients who are not eligible for randomization into Arm I or Arm II, Standard of Care (SOC) group. No specific trial intervention, treated as per patient and physician preference Quality-of-life assessment: Voice evaluation, interviews, ancillary studies | 0 | 30 | 0 | 30 | 9 | 30 |
Not provided
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| biochemical hypopcalcemia | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Non-systematic Assessment | Serum calcium <8.0 mg/dL at any single time point |
| |
| symptomatic hypoparathyroidism | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| |
| nerve injury | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Non-systematic Assessment | Injury to or dysfunction of the recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) or superior laryngeal nerve (SLN) as complication of thyroid surgery |
| |
| significant voice changes not otherwise characterized | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Non-systematic Assessment | If patient needs further voice evaluations beyond two-week time point, this is indication of significant voice change(s) |
| |
| biochemical hypoparathyroidism | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Non-systematic Assessment | Serum PTH level <10 pg/ml |
| |
| symptomatic hypocalcemia | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Non-systematic Assessment | Significant symptomatic hypocalcemia |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dr. Rebecca Sippel | University of Wisconsin, Madison | 608-263-1387 | sippel@surgery.wisc.edu |
| Sep 8, 2020 |
| Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000077273 | Thyroid Cancer, Papillary |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000231 | Adenocarcinoma, Papillary |
| D000230 | Adenocarcinoma |
| D002277 | Carcinoma |
| D009375 | Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial |
| D009370 | Neoplasms by Histologic Type |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D013964 | Thyroid Neoplasms |
| D004701 | Endocrine Gland Neoplasms |
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D006258 | Head and Neck Neoplasms |
| D004700 | Endocrine System Diseases |
| D013959 | Thyroid Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D013965 | Thyroidectomy |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D013507 | Endocrine Surgical Procedures |
| D013514 | Surgical Procedures, Operative |
Not provided
Not provided
| Male |
|
| Not Hispanic or Latino |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
| Asian |
|
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
|
| Black or African American |
|
| White |
|
| More than one race |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
| Participants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|