Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Transient receptor potential vanilloid 4 (TRPV4) channel blockade may be promising in the treatment of pulmonary oedema and dyspnoea in heart failure (HF) and acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) patients by re-establishing the alveolar septal barrier. Dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is an established technique for assessing changes in vascular permeability and interstitial water volume. The aim of this study is to establish the potential utility of DCE-MRI as a novel endpoint for dose ranging and proof of mechanism studies of TRPV4 blockers. The DCE-MRI markers of vascular permeability and pulmonary oedema will be measured in subjects with HF (group 2) and healthy volunteers (HV) (group 1) at rest to determine if there is a difference between the two populations. Apart from this, exercise induced changes relative to rest in interstitial volume and exchange rate will be evaluated in both HV and subjects with HF. Additionally, the capability of DCE-MRI to detect changes in interstitial lung fluid in patients with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) (group 3) will be investigated. DCE-MRI markers of pulmonary oedema will be assessed when patients are initially hospitalized with ADHF and subsequently after receiving standard of care treatment to determine whether differences can be detected by this methodology.This study will enrol a sufficient number of subjects to have at least 24 subjects in Group 1 and 2 (group 1:12 HV and group 2: 12 subjects with HF) and atleast 5 subjects in Group 3. For each subject, the MRI data must be of sufficient quality to enable DCE-MRI modelling from 2 Sessions. For group 1 and 2, the subjects will have screening visit and 3 MRI sessions. For the first scanning session, subjects will undergo the baseline procedure. The second imaging session will occur approximately one week later to measure within subject variability. A third imaging session (which will be conducted in 2 visits) will incorporate a bicycle exercise challenge prior to the MRI scan, and this third scan will be performed approximately one to three days after the second imaging session. For group 3: Screening will occur during hospitalization for eligibility. Session 1of MRI will be conducted while the subject is still hospitalized. Session 2 will be conducted within 4 weeks of the first scan, when the signs of pulmonary oedema are considered to be resolved. If a subject's pulmonary oedema has not resolved at Session 2, then the subject will be not be scanned by MRI at Session 2 and will be brought back for Session 3 up to 4 weeks after Session 2 for their second MRI.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Healthy volunteers | Experimental | All subjects will undergo MRI scanning conducted by experienced radiographers and radiologists in the nominated scanning sites, using a 1.5 Tesla (T) system. |
|
| Heart failure patients | Experimental | All subjects will undergo DCE-MRI scanning conducted by experienced radiographers and radiologists in the nominated scanning sites, using a 1.5 T system. |
|
| Acute decompensated heart failure | Experimental | All subjects will undergo DCE-MRI scanning conducted by experienced radiographers and radiologists in the nominated scanning sites, using a 1.5 T system |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DCE-MRI scans | Procedure | Subjects will be placed supine in the scanner and will be prepared for intravenous contrast agent administration. The contrast agent is administered using a power injector before imaging. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Interstitial Volume (ve) in Heart Failure Participants and Healthy Volunteers at Baseline | Interstitial volume (ve) was measured by DCE-MRI. ve for total lung, left lung, right lung, left lung apical, left lung basal, right lung apical, right lung basal has been presented. Session 1 values were considered as Baseline values. | Day 1 |
| Exchange Rate (Ktrans) in Heart Failure Participants and Healthy Volunteers at Baseline | Exchange rate (Ktrans) was measured by DCE-MRI. Ktrans for total lung, left lung, right lung, left lung apical, left lung basal, right lung apical, right lung basal has been presented. Session 1 values were considered as Baseline values. | Day 1 |
| Interstitial Volume (ve) in Heart Failure Participants and Healthy Volunteers Before and Following Exercise | Interstitial volume (ve) was measured by DCE-MRI. ve for total lung, left lung, right lung, left lung apical, left lung basal, right lung apical, right lung basal before and following exercise has been presented. | Day 11 |
| Exchange Rate (Ktrans) in Heart Failure Participants and Healthy Volunteers Before and Following Exercise | Exchange rate (Ktrans) was measured by DCE-MRI. Ktrans for total lung, left lung, right lung, left lung apical, left lung basal, right lung apical, right lung basal before and following exercise has been presented. | Day 11 |
| Change in Interstitial Volume (ve) in ADHF Participants | Interstitial volume (ve) was measured by DCE-MRI. Three participants underwent 3 DCE-MRI scans. The data has been presented for individual participant in each session. The data presented below is only for total lung. | Up to Week 8 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Assessment of Intra-subject Variability in Ve Between Session 1 and Session 2 of DCE-MRI | Coefficient of variation (percentage) of intra-subject variability in Ve between Session 1 and Session 2 for total lung has been presented. | Day 1 (Session 1) and Day 9 (Session 2) |
| Assessment of Intra-subject Variability in Ktrans Between Session 1 and Session 2 of DCE-MRI |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Inclusion Criteria for Heart Failure Group (group 2) - Established diagnosis of mild to moderate heart failure of any aetiology with symptoms defined as corresponding to the New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II or III.
Inclusion Criteria for Healthy Volunteer Group (group 1)
- Healthy as determined by a responsible and experienced physician, based on a medical evaluation including medical history, brief physical examination, clinical laboratory tests, and Electrocardiogram (ECG).
Inclusion Criteria for Subjects with ADHF (Group 3)
Exclusion criteria:
Exclusion Criteria for Heart Failure Group
Exclusion Criteria for Subjects with ADHF (Group 3)
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| GSK Clinical Trials | GlaxoSmithKline | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSK Investigational Site | Cambridge | CB2 2GG | United Kingdom |
Dynamic Contrast Enhanced-Magnetic Resonance Imaging (DCE-MRI) markers were used to measure vascular permeability and pulmonary edema in HV and par. with HF. Forty one par. were enrolled and 36 entered the study. Three par. did not continue due to habitus and 2 par. did not participate as they required clinical investigations.
This study included healthy volunteers (HV, group 1), participants (par) with heart failure (HF, group 2) and participants with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF, group 3) who were hospitalized with evidence of pulmonary edema and received standard of care treatment.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Healthy Volunteers | Healthy volunteers were placed in supine position under the scanner and intravenous contrast agent was administered. Contrast agent was administered as a bolus using a power injector during the dynamic series. MRI scanning was conducted by experienced radiographers and radiologists in the nominated scanning sites, using a 1.5 Tesla (T) system. |
| FG001 | Heart Failure Participants | Heart failure participants were placed in supine position under the scanner and intravenous contrast agent was administered. Contrast agent was administered as a bolus using a power injector during the dynamic series. MRI scanning was conducted by experienced radiographers and radiologists in the nominated scanning sites, using a 1.5 Tesla (T) system. |
| FG002 | Acute Decompensated Heart Failure Participants | Acute Decompensated Heart Failure participants following hospitalization due to pulmonary oedema was placed in supine position under the scanner and intravenous contrast agent was administered. Contrast agent was administered as a bolus using a power injector during the dynamic series. MRI scanning was conducted by experienced radiographers and radiologists in the nominated scanning sites, using a 1.5 Tesla (T) system. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Healthy Volunteers | Healthy volunteers were placed in supine position under the scanner and intravenous contrast agent was administered. Contrast agent was administered as a bolus using a power injector during the dynamic series. MRI scanning was conducted by experienced radiographers and radiologists in the nominated scanning sites, using a 1.5 Tesla (T) system. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Interstitial Volume (ve) in Heart Failure Participants and Healthy Volunteers at Baseline | Interstitial volume (ve) was measured by DCE-MRI. ve for total lung, left lung, right lung, left lung apical, left lung basal, right lung apical, right lung basal has been presented. Session 1 values were considered as Baseline values. | The Evaluable Population will include participants in safety population who are 40 years and older .The safety Population includes all enrolled participants who have initiated Session 1 DCE-MRI scan | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Liter | Day 1 |
|
Serious adverse events (SAEs) and AEs related to study procedure were planned to be collected from the start of study procedure and up to last visit (Up to Week 8)
SAEs and non-serious AEs related to study procedure were planned to be reported for Safety Population
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Healthy Volunteers | Healthy volunteers were placed in supine position under the scanner and intravenous contrast agent was administered. Contrast agent was administered as a bolus using a power injector during the dynamic series. MRI scanning was conducted by experienced radiographers and radiologists in the nominated scanning sites, using a 1.5 Tesla (T) system. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSK Response Center | GlaxoSmithKline | 866-435-7343 | GSKClinicalSupportHD@gsk.com |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Apr 8, 2016 | Feb 13, 2018 | Prot_000.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Apr 28, 2017 | Feb 13, 2018 | SAP_001.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006333 | Heart Failure |
| D011654 | Pulmonary Edema |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006331 | Heart Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
| D008171 | Lung Diseases |
| D012140 | Respiratory Tract Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C090600 | gadobutrol |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Gadobutrol | Other | Gadobutrol at a dose less than or equal to 0.1 millimoles per kilogram (mmol/kg) will be given intravenously as a bolus using a power injector. |
|
| Change in Exchange Rate (Ktrans) in ADHF Participants |
Exchange rate (Ktrans) was measured by DCE-MRI. Three participants underwent 3 DCE-MRI scans. The data has been presented for individual participant in each session. The data presented below is only for total lung. |
| Up to Week 8 |
Coefficient of variation (percentage) of intra-subject variability in Ktrans between Session 1 and Session 2 for total lung has been presented. |
| Day 1 (Session 1) and Day 9 (Session 2) |
| BG001 |
| Heart Failure Participants |
Heart failure participants were placed in supine position under the scanner and intravenous contrast agent was administered. Contrast agent was administered as a bolus using a power injector during the dynamic series. MRI scanning was conducted by experienced radiographers and radiologists in the nominated scanning sites, using a 1.5 Tesla (T) system. |
| BG002 | Acute Decompensated Heart Failure Participants | Acute Decompensated Heart Failure participants following hospitalization due to pulmonary oedema was placed in supine position under the scanner and intravenous contrast agent was administered. Contrast agent was administered as a bolus using a power injector during the dynamic series. MRI scanning was conducted by experienced radiographers and radiologists in the nominated scanning sites, using a 1.5 Tesla (T) system. |
| BG003 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| OG001 | Heart Failure Participants | Heart failure participants were placed in supine position under the scanner and intravenous contrast agent was administered. Contrast agent was administered as a bolus using a power injector during the dynamic series. MRI scanning was conducted by experienced radiographers and radiologists in the nominated scanning sites, using a 1.5 Tesla (T) system. |
|
|
|
| Primary | Exchange Rate (Ktrans) in Heart Failure Participants and Healthy Volunteers at Baseline | Exchange rate (Ktrans) was measured by DCE-MRI. Ktrans for total lung, left lung, right lung, left lung apical, left lung basal, right lung apical, right lung basal has been presented. Session 1 values were considered as Baseline values. | The Evaluable Population | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Liter/minute | Day 1 |
|
|
|
|
| Primary | Interstitial Volume (ve) in Heart Failure Participants and Healthy Volunteers Before and Following Exercise | Interstitial volume (ve) was measured by DCE-MRI. ve for total lung, left lung, right lung, left lung apical, left lung basal, right lung apical, right lung basal before and following exercise has been presented. | The Evaluable Population | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Liter | Day 11 |
|
|
|
|
| Primary | Exchange Rate (Ktrans) in Heart Failure Participants and Healthy Volunteers Before and Following Exercise | Exchange rate (Ktrans) was measured by DCE-MRI. Ktrans for total lung, left lung, right lung, left lung apical, left lung basal, right lung apical, right lung basal before and following exercise has been presented. | The Evaluable Population | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Liter/minute | Day 11 |
|
|
|
|
| Primary | Change in Interstitial Volume (ve) in ADHF Participants | Interstitial volume (ve) was measured by DCE-MRI. Three participants underwent 3 DCE-MRI scans. The data has been presented for individual participant in each session. The data presented below is only for total lung. | The safety population will include all enrolled participants who have initiated at least one session of DCE-MRI or Lung Ultrasound Scan | Posted | Number | Liter | Up to Week 8 |
|
|
|
| Primary | Change in Exchange Rate (Ktrans) in ADHF Participants | Exchange rate (Ktrans) was measured by DCE-MRI. Three participants underwent 3 DCE-MRI scans. The data has been presented for individual participant in each session. The data presented below is only for total lung. | The Safety Population | Posted | Number | Liter/minute | Up to Week 8 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Assessment of Intra-subject Variability in Ve Between Session 1 and Session 2 of DCE-MRI | Coefficient of variation (percentage) of intra-subject variability in Ve between Session 1 and Session 2 for total lung has been presented. | The Evaluable Population | Posted | Number | Percentage | Day 1 (Session 1) and Day 9 (Session 2) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Assessment of Intra-subject Variability in Ktrans Between Session 1 and Session 2 of DCE-MRI | Coefficient of variation (percentage) of intra-subject variability in Ktrans between Session 1 and Session 2 for total lung has been presented. | The Evaluable Population | Posted | Number | Percentage | Day 1 (Session 1) and Day 9 (Session 2) |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 17 |
| 0 |
| 17 |
| 0 |
| 17 |
| EG001 | Heart Failure Patients | Heart failure participants were placed in supine position under the scanner and intravenous contrast agent was administered. Contrast agent was administered as a bolus using a power injector during the dynamic series. MRI scanning was conducted by experienced radiographers and radiologists in the nominated scanning sites, using a 1.5 Tesla (T) system. | 0 | 12 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
| EG002 | Acute Decompensated Heart Failure | Acute Decompensated Heart Failure participants following hospitalization due to pulmonary oedema was placed in supine position under the scanner and intravenous contrast agent was administered. Contrast agent was administered as a bolus using a power injector during the dynamic series. MRI scanning was conducted by experienced radiographers and radiologists in the nominated scanning sites, using a 1.5 Tesla (T) system. | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
GSK agreements may vary with individual investigators, but will not prohibit any investigator from publishing. GSK supports the publication of results from all centers of a multi-center trial but requests that reports based on single-site data not precede the primary publication of the entire clinical trial.
| Right lung |
|
| Left lung apical |
|
| Left lung basal |
|
| Right lung apical |
|
| Right lung basal |
|
| ANOVA |
| 0.6992 |
estimates of left lung |
| Mean Difference (Final Values) |
| 0.0136 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -0.0580 |
| 0.0852 |
| Other |
Ktrans was fitted using a repeat measure ANOVA model with terms including participant population (HF or HV), visit (i.e. sessions), interaction of participant population and visit, with participant ID as block of the repeat factor |
| ANOVA | 0.5778 | estimates of right lung | Mean Difference (Final Values) | -0.0258 | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.1201 | 0.0684 | Other | Ktrans was fitted using a repeat measure ANOVA model with terms including participant population (HF or HV), visit (i.e. sessions), interaction of participant population and visit, with participant ID as block of the repeat factor |
| ANOVA | 0.9899 | estimates of left lung apical | Mean Difference (Final Values) | 0.0005 | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.0738 | 0.0747 | Other | Ktrans was fitted using a repeat measure ANOVA model with terms including participant population (HF or HV), visit (i.e. sessions), interaction of participant population and visit, with participant ID as block of the repeat factor |
| ANOVA | 0.2912 | estimates of left lung basal | Mean Difference (Final Values) | 0.0396 | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.0360 | 0.1153 | Other | Ktrans was fitted using a repeat measure ANOVA model with terms including participant population (HF or HV), visit (i.e. sessions), interaction of participant population and visit, with participant ID as block of the repeat factor |
| ANOVA | 0.4592 | estimates of right lung apical | Mean Difference (Final Values) | -0.0362 | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.1355 | 0.0631 | Other | Ktrans was fitted using a repeat measure ANOVA model with terms including participant population (HF or HV), visit (i.e. sessions), interaction of participant population and visit, with participant ID as block of the repeat factor |
| ANOVA | 0.7936 | estimates of right lung basal | Mean Difference (Final Values) | -0.0118 | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.1036 | 0.0800 | Other | Ktrans was fitted using a repeat measure ANOVA model with terms including participant population (HF or HV), visit (i.e. sessions), interaction of participant population and visit, with participant ID as block of the repeat factor |
| Pre-exercise; Left lung |
|
| Post-exercise; Left lung |
|
| Pre-exercise; Right lung |
|
| Post-exercise; Right lung |
|
| Pre-exercise; Left lung apical |
|
| Post-exercise; Left lung apical |
|
| Pre-exercise; Left lung basal |
|
| Post-exercise; Left lung basal |
|
| Pre-exercise; Right lung apical |
|
| Post-exercise; Right lung apical |
|
| Pre-exercise; Right lung basal |
|
| Post-exercise; Right lung basal |
|
| ANOVA |
estimates of left lung- Pre-exercise |
| 0.0026 |
estimates of left lung- Pre-exercise |
| Mean Difference (Final Values) |
| 0.1366 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| 0.0523 |
| 0.2209 |
| Other |
Ve was fitted using a repeat measure ANOVA model with terms including participant population (HF or HV), visit (i.e. sessions), interaction of participant population and visit, with participant ID as block of the repeat factor |
| ANOVA | 0.0328 | estimates of right lung- Pre-exercise | Mean Difference (Final Values) | 0.1067 | 2-Sided | 95 | 0.0094 | 0.2040 | Other | Ve was fitted using a repeat measure ANOVA model with terms including participant population (HF or HV), visit (i.e. sessions), interaction of participant population and visit, with participant ID as block of the repeat factor |
| ANOVA | 0.0158 | estimates of left lung apical-Pre-exercise | Mean Difference (Final Values) | 0.1145 | 2-Sided | 95 | 0.0235 | 0.2056 | Other | Ve was fitted using a repeat measure ANOVA model with terms including participant population (HF or HV), visit (i.e. sessions), interaction of participant population and visit, with participant ID as block of the repeat factor |
| ANOVA | 0.0002 | estimates of left lung basal-Pre-exercise | Mean Difference (Final Values) | 0.1776 | 2-Sided | 95 | 0.0917 | 0.2635 | Other | Ve was fitted using a repeat measure ANOVA model with terms including participant population (HF or HV), visit (i.e. sessions), interaction of participant population and visit, with participant ID as block of the repeat factor |
| ANOVA | 0.0658 | estimates of right lung apical-Pre-exercise | Mean Difference (Final Values) | 0.0956 | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.0067 | 0.1979 | Other | Ve was fitted using a repeat measure ANOVA model with terms including participant population (HF or HV), visit (i.e. sessions), interaction of participant population and visit, with participant ID as block of the repeat factor |
| ANOVA | 0.0150 | estimates of right lung basal-Pre-exercise | Mean Difference (Final Values) | 0.1194 | 2-Sided | 95 | 0.0251 | 0.2137 | Other | Ve was fitted using a repeat measure ANOVA model with terms including participant population (HF or HV), visit (i.e. sessions), interaction of participant population and visit, with participant ID as block of the repeat factor |
| ANOVA | 0.0015 | estimates of total lung-Post-exercise | Mean Difference (Final Values) | 0.1428 | 2-Sided | 95 | 0.0598 | 0.2259 | Other | Ve was fitted using a repeat measure ANOVA model with terms including participant population (HF or HV), visit (i.e. sessions), interaction of participant population and visit, with participant ID as block of the repeat factor |
| ANOVA | <.0001 | estimates of left lung-Post-exercise | Mean Difference (Final Values) | 0.1776 | 2-Sided | 95 | 0.1057 | 0.2496 | Other | Ve was fitted using a repeat measure ANOVA model with terms including participant population (HF or HV), visit (i.e. sessions), interaction of participant population and visit, with participant ID as block of the repeat factor |
| ANOVA | 0.0114 | estimates of right lung-Post-exercise | Mean Difference (Final Values) | 0.1260 | 2-Sided | 95 | 0.0308 | 0.2212 | Other | Ve was fitted using a repeat measure ANOVA model with terms including participant population (HF or HV), visit (i.e. sessions), interaction of participant population and visit, with participant ID as block of the repeat factor |
| ANOVA | 0.0002 | estimates of left lung apical-Post-exercise | Mean Difference (Final Values) | 0.1464 | 2-Sided | 95 | 0.0774 | 0.2153 | Other | Ve was fitted using a repeat measure ANOVA model with terms including participant population (HF or HV), visit (i.e. sessions), interaction of participant population and visit, with participant ID as block of the repeat factor |
| ANOVA | <.0001 | estimates of left lung basal-Post-exercise | Mean Difference (Final Values) | 0.2137 | 2-Sided | 95 | 0.1266 | 0.3008 | Other | Ve was fitted using a repeat measure ANOVA model with terms including participant population (HF or HV), visit (i.e. sessions), interaction of participant population and visit, with participant ID as block of the repeat factor |
| ANOVA | 0.0250 | estimates of right lung apical-Post-exercise | Mean Difference (Final Values) | 0.1111 | 2-Sided | 95 | 0.0151 | 0.2071 | Other | Ve was fitted using a repeat measure ANOVA model with terms including participant population (HF or HV), visit (i.e. sessions), interaction of participant population and visit, with participant ID as block of the repeat factor |
| ANOVA | 0.0052 | estimates of right lung basal-Post-exercise | Mean Difference (Final Values) | 0.1458 | 95 | 0.0475 | 0.2442 | Other | Ve was fitted using a repeat measure ANOVA model with terms including participant population (HF or HV), visit (i.e. sessions), interaction of participant population and visit, with participant ID as block of the repeat factor |
| Pre-exercise; Left lung |
|
| Post-exercise; Left lung |
|
| Pre-exercise; Right lung |
|
| Post-exercise; Right lung |
|
| Pre-exercise; Left lung apical |
|
| Post-exercise; Left lung apical |
|
| Pre-exercise; Left lung basal |
|
| Post-exercise; Left lung basal |
|
| Pre-exercise; Right lung apical |
|
| Post-exercise; Right lung apical |
|
| Pre-exercise; Right lung basal |
|
| Post-exercise; Right lung basal |
|
| ANOVA |
| 0.2704 |
estimates of left lung-Pre-exercise |
| Mean Difference (Final Values) |
| -0.0423 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -0.1196 |
| 0.0349 |
| Other |
Ktrans was fitted using a repeat measure ANOVA model with terms including participant population (HF or HV), visit (i.e. sessions), interaction of participant population and visit, with participant ID as block of the repeat factor |
| ANOVA | 0.2072 | estimates of right lung-Pre-exercise | Mean Difference (Final Values) | -0.0515 | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.1334 | 0.0303 | Other | Ktrans was fitted using a repeat measure ANOVA model with terms including participant population (HF or HV), visit (i.e. sessions), interaction of participant population and visit, with participant ID as block of the repeat factor |
| ANOVA | 0.1307 | estimates of left lung apical-Pre-exercise | Mean Difference (Final Values) | -0.0603 | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.1398 | 0.0191 | Other | Ktrans was fitted using a repeat measure ANOVA model with terms including participant population (HF or HV), visit (i.e. sessions), interaction of participant population and visit, with participant ID as block of the repeat factor |
| ANOVA | 0.8427 | estimates of left lung basal-Pre-exercise | Mean Difference (Final Values) | -0.0078 | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.0879 | 0.0722 | Other | Ktrans was fitted using a repeat measure ANOVA model with terms including participant population (HF or HV), visit (i.e. sessions), interaction of participant population and visit, with participant ID as block of the repeat factor |
| ANOVA | 0.1848 | estimates of right lung apical-Pre-exercise | Mean Difference (Final Values) | -0.0506 | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.1269 | 0.0257 | Other | Ktrans was fitted using a repeat measure ANOVA model with terms including participant population (HF or HV), visit (i.e. sessions), interaction of participant population and visit, with participant ID as block of the repeat factor |
| ANOVA | 0.3408 | estimates of right lung basal-Pre-exercise | Mean Difference (Final Values) | -0.0413 | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.1286 | 0.0461 | Other | Ktrans was fitted using a repeat measure ANOVA model with terms including participant population (HF or HV), visit (i.e. sessions), interaction of participant population and visit, with participant ID as block of the repeat factor |
| ANOVA | 0.3682 | estimates of total lung-Post-excercise | Mean Difference (Final Values) | -0.0267 | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.0866 | 0.0332 | Other | Ktrans was fitted using a repeat measure ANOVA model with terms including participant population (HF or HV), visit (i.e. sessions), interaction of participant population and visit, with participant ID as block of the repeat factor |
| ANOVA | 0.4531 | estimates of left lung-Post-excercise | Mean Difference (Net) | -0.0201 | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.0744 | 0.0342 | Other | Ktrans was fitted using a repeat measure ANOVA model with terms including participant population (HF or HV), visit (i.e. sessions), interaction of participant population and visit, with participant ID as block of the repeat factor |
| ANOVA | 0.5970 | estimates of right lung-Post-excercise | Mean Difference (Final Values) | -0.0188 | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.0909 | 0.0533 | Other | Ktrans was fitted using a repeat measure ANOVA model with terms including participant population (HF or HV), visit (i.e. sessions), interaction of participant population and visit, with participant ID as block of the repeat factor |
| ANOVA | 0.5472 | estimates of left lung apical-Post-excercise | Mean Difference (Final Values) | -0.0159 | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.0693 | 0.0375 | Other | Ktrans was fitted using a repeat measure ANOVA model with terms including participant population (HF or HV), visit (i.e. sessions), interaction of participant population and visit, with participant ID as block of the repeat factor |
| ANOVA | 0.6793 | estimates of left lung basal-Post-excercise | Mean Difference (Final Values) | -0.0125 | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.0742 | 0.0491 | Other | Ktrans was fitted using a repeat measure ANOVA model with terms including participant population (HF or HV), visit (i.e. sessions), interaction of participant population and visit, with participant ID as block of the repeat factor |
| ANOVA | 0.4806 | estimates of right lung apical-Post-excercise | Mean Difference (Final Values) | -0.0249 | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.0964 | 0.0466 | Other | Ktrans was fitted using a repeat measure ANOVA model with terms including participant population (HF or HV), visit (i.e. sessions), interaction of participant population and visit, with participant ID as block of the repeat factor |
| ANOVA | 0.9379 | estimates of right lung basal-Post-excercise | Mean Difference (Final Values) | -0.0029 | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.0789 | 0.0731 | Other | Ktrans was fitted using a repeat measure ANOVA model with terms including participant population (HF or HV), visit (i.e. sessions), interaction of participant population and visit, with participant ID as block of the repeat factor |
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Par. 2; Session 2 |
|
| Par. 3; Session 1 |
|
| Par. 3; Session 2 |
|
| Par. 3 Session 3 |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Par. 2; Session 2 |
|
| Par. 3; Session 1 |
|
| Par. 3; Session 2 |
|
| Par. 3 Session 3 |
|