Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| ASGE | UNKNOWN |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Introduction: Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding arising from malignant tumors is increasingly recognized as a result of oncological advances and improved detection methods, and stems from local vessel damage and tumor invasion with associated derangements in the hemostatic system(1, 2). Although conventional endoscopic hemostasis methods improve outcomes in UGIB due to peptic ulcers and other non-variceal benign bleeding lesions of the upper, and perhaps the lower GI tract, data on their use in hemorrhagic, upper or lower gastrointestinal neoplasms are scarce and associated with varying success in initial hemostasis and high rebleeding rates(3-7). Other recognized single or multimodality treatment approaches include radiation therapy, interventional angiography, and surgery. All exhibit disappointing rebleeding rates, and in the case of emergency surgery, high mortality(4, 8-11). Challenges associated with bleeding tumors include hematological derangements such as thrombocytopenia, disseminated intravascular coagulation, and neutropenia, as well as the endoscopic manipulation of friable, diffusely bleeding surfaces when attempting hemostasis(2, 12, 13). The recent advent of TC-325 (HemosprayTM) to Canada, Europe and Asia - referred henceforth as TC-325 - may provide a highly adapted novel endoscopic hemostatic therapeutic alternative for this refractory clinical entity, with promising uncontrolled observations having just been published by our group(13) and others(14). More robust controlled evaluative data are now needed. We propose to study the use of TC-325 in upper and lower malignant GI bleeding compared to contemporary standard of care, and more specifically seeks funding for a pilot study to inform a subsequent peer-review application for a larger, more definitive randomized clinical trial (RCT).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control group | Experimental | Current standard endoscopic therapy such as epinephrine injection, sclerotherapy, mechanical (endoclip). contact electrocautery/thermal, and non-contact electrocalcautery (APC) ± radiation therapy, angioembolization, and/or surgery. |
|
| TC-325 | Active Comparator | TC-325 monotherapy on initial endoscopy ± radiation therapy, angioembolization, and/or surgery. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TC-325 monotherapy on initial endoscopy ± radiation therapy, angioembolization, and/or surgery. | Drug |
| ||
| Current standard therapy |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Hemostasis | The main outcome will be rate of immediate hemostasis with application of TC-325 or conventional hemostatic therapy. Immediate hemostasis is defined as the absence of bleeding following 3 minutes of observation after endoscopic therapy. | 3 minutes after endoscopic therapy |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Rebleeding | Rebleeding following randomization | 1, 3, 30, 90 and 180 days following randomization |
| Transfusion | transfusion requirements |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| McGill University Health Center | Montreal | Quebec | H3G 1A4 | Canada |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 31437456 | Derived | Chen YI, Wyse J, Lu Y, Martel M, Barkun AN. TC-325 hemostatic powder versus current standard of care in managing malignant GI bleeding: a pilot randomized clinical trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2020 Feb;91(2):321-328.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.08.005. Epub 2019 Aug 19. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Other |
|
|
| 30 days after randomization |
| length of ICU admission | need for admission to and length of stay in a monitored care unit | 180 days |
| Length of hospitalization | Total length of hospitalization | 180 days |
| Complications | Complications associated with endoscopy | day 1 |
| Additional treatment modalities | Rates of use of additional treatment modalities to stop persistent bleeding or rebleeding after the index event | 30 days |
| Mortality | 180 days |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D004837 | Epinephrine |
| D015911 | Sclerotherapy |
| D011878 | Radiotherapy |
| D013514 | Surgical Procedures, Operative |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D004983 | Ethanolamines |
| D000605 | Amino Alcohols |
| D000438 | Alcohols |
| D009930 | Organic Chemicals |
| D000588 | Amines |
| D015306 | Biogenic Monoamines |
| D001679 | Biogenic Amines |
| D002395 | Catecholamines |
| D002396 | Catechols |
| D010636 | Phenols |
| D001555 | Benzene Derivatives |
| D006841 | Hydrocarbons, Aromatic |
| D006844 | Hydrocarbons, Cyclic |
| D006838 | Hydrocarbons |
| D004358 | Drug Therapy |
| D013812 | Therapeutics |
Not provided
Not provided