Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The aim of this study is to compare the stability of dental implant surface treated by sandblasting abrasive particles and acid subtraction (Control) with hydrophilic surfaces dental implants (chemical) and with a higher surface energy (Test) for a period of 16 weeks after installation. The evaluation will be made by analyzing the resonance frequency (Ostell). The hypothesis to be tested will be that implants with hydrophilic surface show increased secondary stability prior to the implants treated by acid etching.
The selected patients will be randomly divided into two groups by computer-generated list. The control group will receive implant surface treated by acid etching and test group receive implants with hydrophilic surface (Test). Both the test and the control group will undergo the same pre-surgical, surgical and post-surgical protocols.
The evaluation of the implant will be done by the analysis of resonant frequency wich will be performed on each implant with Osstell (Integration Diagnostics AB, Goteborg, Sweden) immediately after implant placement (baseline) and at follow-up sessions (1st, 2nd, 3rd, 5th, 8th, 12th and 16th weeks after installation) and coefficient of implant stability (ISQ) on these dates will be measured on a scale from 0 to 100. The smartpeg be used with special developed Healing without the use of pillars or intermediaries.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental Group | Experimental | At this group the patients will receive dental implants which have a modified SLA surface. These surface have wettability, which could improve and accelerate the osseointegration.Intervention: implant placement. |
|
| Control Group | Active Comparator | The patient of this group will receive implant with conventional surface, SLA (Sandblasted and Acid-Etched Surface).Intervention: implant placement. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Implant surgery | Procedure | Dental implant surgery with two different kinds of implant surface (SLA and modified SLA) |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Loss of implant | If the implant has been not integrated to the bone! | 4 months after surgery |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Implant stability (ISQ) | If the implant get successively and it has been integrated to bone. The stability will be evaluated at the surgery day (T0), one week after surgery (T1),after 2 weeks (T2), after 3 weeks (T3), after 5 weeks (T4), after 8 weeks (T5), after 12 weeks (T6) and after 16 weeks (T7). | Baseline, 1 to 16 weeks (4 months) |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dentistry School - University of São Paulo | São Paulo | São Paulo | 05508-000 | Brazil |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20450357 | Background | Bornstein MM, Wittneben JG, Bragger U, Buser D. Early loading at 21 days of non-submerged titanium implants with a chemically modified sandblasted and acid-etched surface: 3-year results of a prospective study in the posterior mandible. J Periodontol. 2010 Jun;81(6):809-18. doi: 10.1902/jop.2010.090727. | |
| 18837448 | Background |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Schwarz F, Wieland M, Schwartz Z, Zhao G, Rupp F, Geis-Gerstorfer J, Schedle A, Broggini N, Bornstein MM, Buser D, Ferguson SJ, Becker J, Boyan BD, Cochran DL. Potential of chemically modified hydrophilic surface characteristics to support tissue integration of titanium dental implants. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2009 Feb;88(2):544-57. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.31233. |
| 20072738 | Result | Degidi M, Piattelli A, Shibli JA, Perrotti V, Iezzi G. Bone formation around one-stage implants with a modified sandblasted and acid-etched surface: human histologic results at 4 weeks. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2009 Dec;29(6):607-13. |