DLT was defined as any of the following adverse events (AEs) occurring in the first two cycles of treatment which were attributable to one or both the study drugs: 1) Grade 4 neutropenia, 2) Febrile neutropenia lasting greater than (>) 1 hour, 3) Grade greater than or equal to (>=) 3 neutropenia with infection, 4) Grade >=3 thrombocytopenia with bleeding, 4) Grade 4 thrombocytopenia, 5) Any grade >=3 non-hematologic: non-laboratory toxicities despite maximum supportive therapy or hypertension despite maximal medical therapy, 6) Grade >=3 non-hematologic toxicities resulted in hospitalisation or medical intervention 7) Inability to complete at least 75 percent (%) of axitinib dosing or 2 infusions of pembrolizumab within the DLT observation period (up to 42 days) due to treatment related toxicity. Severity of AEs was graded according to NCI (National Cancer Institute) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.03.

Per protocol analysis set included all enrolled eligible participants who received at least 1 dose of axitinib or pembrolizumab and experienced DLT during first 2 cycles, or complete the observation period for first 2 cycles of treatment. Here, number of participant analyzed (N) = number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant and jeopardized the participants or required treatment to prevent other AE outcomes for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent AEs are events which occurred between first dose of study drug and up to 28 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pre-treatment state.

Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of axitinib or pembrolizumab.

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant and jeopardized the participants or required treatment to prevent other AE outcomes for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent AEs are events which occurred between first dose of study drug and up to 28 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pre-treatment state. Relatedness to study drug was assessed by the investigator.

Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of axitinib or pembrolizumab.

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant and jeopardized the participants or required treatment to prevent other AE outcomes for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. AEs were graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) version 4.03 and coded using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) as Grade 3: Severe, Grade 4: Life threatening, Grade 5: Death related to AE. Participants were counted once according to the maximum grade observed.

Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of axitinib or pembrolizumab.

Laboratory parameters included hematological and biochemistry parameters. Biochemistry parameters included alanine aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, aspartate aminotransferase, bilirubin (total), creatinine, hypercalcemia, hyperglycemia, hyperkalemia, hypermagnesemia, hypernatremia, hypoalbuminemia, hypocalcemia, hypoglycemia, hypokalemia, hypomagnesemia, hyponatremia, hypophosphatemia. Hematology parameters included anemia, haemoglobin increased, lymphocyte count increased, lymphopenia, neutrophils (absolute), platelets and white blood cells. Test abnormalities were graded by NCI CTCAE version 4.03 as Grade 1= mild; Grade 2= moderate; Grade 3= severe and Grade 4= life-threatening or disabling. Only categories with at least 1 participant with abnormality are reported in this outcome measure.

Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of axitinib or pembrolizumab.

Urinalysis parameter included urine protein, urine blood/hemoglobin and urine glucose. Test abnormalities was defined as deviation from normal range. Normal range of 24-hour urine protein test: less than 150 mg of protein per day, urine glucose: 0 to 0.8 mmol/L (millimoles per liter), urine protein: 0 to 20 mg/dL (milligrams per deciliter). Urine blood/hemoglobin abnormality was defined as presence and absence of blood/hemoglobin in urine of participants.

Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of axitinib or pembrolizumab.

Vital signs included blood pressure, pulse rate and weight. Change from baseline values were considered to be clinically significant based on investigator's judgement.

Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of axitinib or pembrolizumab.

ECOG performance status was used to assess how disease affect the daily living abilities of a participant. It was measured on a scale ranging from 0 to 4, where 0=fully active (able to carry on all pre-disease activities without restriction); 1=restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory (able to carry out light/sedentary work); 2=ambulatory and capable of all self-care but unable to carry out any work activities (for more than 50% of waking hours); 3=capable of limited self-care, confined to bed or chair (for >50% of waking hours); 4=completely disabled, not capable of any self-care, totally confined to bed or chair. Higher scores signified =more functional impairment of a participant.

Safety analysis set included all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of axitinib or pembrolizumab.

Objective response rate was defined as percentage of participants with confirmed complete response (CR) or confirmed partial response (PR), as assessed by response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) version 1.1. Confirmed responses were those that persist on repeated imaging for at least 4 weeks after initial documentation of response. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions and the reduction in short axis of any pathological lymph nodes to <10 mm. PR was defined as a 30% or more decrease in the sum of longest dimensions of the target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of longest dimensions.

Response evaluable analysis set included all participants who received study treatment with an adequate baseline tumor assessment (using standard RECIST version 1.1 criteria).

DR:date of first documentation of objective tumour response(OR) confirmed to date of first documentation of PD/death due to any cause,whichever occurred first.PD per RECIST 1.1:>=20%increase in sum of longest dimensions(LD) of target lesions,reference to smallest sum of LD recorded since treatment started/appearance of 1 or more new lesions/increase of at least 5mm addition to relative increase of 20%.DR calculated only for participants with confirmed OR.Participants lacking evaluation of tumour response after date of first study drug dose was censored on date of first dose unless death occurred prior to 18 weeks.If participants had at least 1 on-study assessment,PFS was censored on date of last evaluable tumour disease assessment documenting absence of PD for participants who were alive and progression free at time of analysis/had documentation of PD/death after>=2 consecutive missed tumour assessments/given anti-tumour treatment other than study drug prior to documented PD/death.

Response evaluable analysis set included all participants who received study treatment with an adequate baseline tumor assessment (using standard RECIST version 1.1 criteria). Here, "N" signifies number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

TTR was defined as the time from first dose of study treatment to the first documentation of objective tumor response (CR or PR) that was subsequently confirmed.

Response evaluable analysis set included all participants who received study treatment with an adequate baseline tumor assessment (using standard RECIST version 1.1 criteria). Here, "N" signifies number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

PFS: time from date of first dose of study drug to the date of first documented PD or death on study due to any cause. PD as per RECIST v1.1 defined as at least a 20% increase in sum of longest dimensions of target lesions, reference to smallest sum of longest dimensions recorded since treatment started, or appearance of 1 or more new lesions or increase of at least 5 mm in addition to relative increase of 20%. Participants lacking an evaluation of tumor response after date of first study drug dose had event time censored on date of first dose unless death occurred prior to 18 weeks. If participants had at least 1 on-study assessment, PFS data was censored on date of last evaluable tumor disease assessment documenting absence of PD for participants who were alive and progression free at the time of analysis or had documentation of PD or had death after >=2 consecutive missed tumor assessments or were given anti-tumor treatment other than study drug prior to documented PD or death.

Response evaluable analysis set included all participants who received study treatment with an adequate baseline tumor assessment (using standard RECIST version 1.1 criteria).

OS was defined as the time from the first dose of study drug to the date of death due to any cause. For participants still alive at the time of analysis, the OS time was censored on the last date the participants were known to be alive.

Response evaluable analysis set included all participants who received study treatment with an adequate baseline tumor assessment (using standard RECIST version 1.1 criteria).

Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameter analysis population included all treated participants who had at least 1 of the PK parameters of interest of any of the study drugs. Here "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed"= participants evaluable for this outcome measure and "Number Analyzed" = participants evaluable for specific rows.

PK parameter analysis population included all treated participants who had at least 1 of the PK parameters of interest of any of the study drugs. Here "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed"= participants evaluable for this outcome measure and "Number Analyzed" = participants evaluable for specific rows.

PK parameter analysis population included all treated participants who had at least 1 of the PK parameters of interest of any of the study drugs. Here "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed"= participants evaluable for this outcome measure and "Number Analyzed" = participants evaluable for specific rows.

Drug clearance is a quantitative measure of the rate at which a drug substance is removed from the blood (rate at which a drug is metabolized or eliminated by normal biological processes).

PK parameter analysis population included all treated participants who had at least 1 of the PK parameters of interest of any of the study drugs. Here "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed"= participants evaluable for this outcome measure and "Number Analyzed" = participants evaluable for specific rows.

Volume of distribution is defined as the theoretical volume in which the total amount of drug would need to be uniformly distributed to produce the desired plasma concentration of a drug. Apparent volume of distribution after oral dose (Vz/F) is influenced by the fraction absorbed.

PK parameter analysis population included all treated participants who had at least 1 of the PK parameters of interest of any of the study drugs. Here "Overall Number of Participants Analyzed"= participants evaluable for this outcome measure and "Number Analyzed" = participants evaluable for specific rows.

PK parameter analysis population included all treated participants who had at least 1 of the PK parameters of interest of any of the study drugs.

PD-L1- tumor proportion score was defined as the percentage of viable tumor cells showing partial or complete membrane staining at any intensity. Participants with positive or negative scores were reported. PD-L1 negative: if tumor proportion score was less than 1%; PD-L1 positive: if the tumor proportion score greater than or equal to 1%.

Tumor biomarker analysis set included all treated participants who had at least one screening biomarker assessment, and had received at least one dose of any study drug. Here, "N" signifies number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.

Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) promotes cancer progression by inducing angiogenesis via VEGF receptors, signals directly through receptors VEGFR-1 and VEGFR-2. Change in biomarkers related to VEGFR signal transduction pathways after axitinib treatment was assessed. Plasma VEGF concentration evaluations were performed using samples from peripheral blood plasma, bone marrow aspirate, bone marrow (Core) biopsy and bone marrow clot. The VEGFR, axitinib and mechanistic target of rapamycin inhibitor everolimus are used individually in subsequent lines of therapy for advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC).

PDL1 analyses didn't find any statistically significant associations between PDL1 status and response, hence data for this outcome measure (a sub-analyses on PDL1 positive participants) was not further collected and analyzed.

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) promotes cancer progression by inducing angiogenesis via VEGF receptors, signals directly through receptors VEGFR-1 and VEGFR-2. Change in biomarkers related to VEGFR signal transduction pathways after axitinib treatment was assessed. Mononuclear (MNC) cell VEGF receptor expression and phosphorylation was assessed by in situ western blot analysis. VEGFR-1 and VEGFR-2 evaluations were performed using samples from peripheral blood plasma, bone marrow aspirate, bone marrow (Core) biopsy and bone marrow clot. The VEGFR, axitinib and mechanistic target of rapamycin inhibitor everolimus are used individually in subsequent lines of therapy for advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC).

Tumor biomarker analysis set included all treated participants who had at least one screening biomarker assessment, and had received at least one dose of any study drug. Here "Number Analyzed" signifies number of participants evaluable for specified rows.

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) promotes cancer progression by inducing angiogenesis via VEGF receptors, signals directly through receptors VEGFR-1 and VEGFR-2. Change in biomarkers related to VEGFR signal transduction pathways after axitinib treatment was assessed. Mononuclear (MNC) cell VEGF receptor expression and phosphorylation was assessed by in situ western blot analysis. VEGFR-1 and VEGFR-2 evaluations were performed using samples from peripheral blood plasma, bone marrow aspirate, bone marrow (Core) biopsy and bone marrow clot. The VEGFR, axitinib and mechanistic target of rapamycin inhibitor everolimus are used individually in subsequent lines of therapy for advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC).

Tumor biomarker analysis set included all treated participants who had at least one screening biomarker assessment, and had received at least one dose of any study drug. Here "Number Analyzed" signifies number of participants evaluable for specified rows.

Tumor biomarker analysis set included all treated participants who had at least one screening biomarker assessment, and had received at least one dose of any study drug. Here "Number Analyzed" signifies number of participants evaluable for specified rows.