Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Posterior lumbar epidural fat commonly had been considered a simple space-filling tissue. Anatomic studies on posterior epidural space and its contents are few, including semifluid property. In other words, there has not been studied thoroughly regarding the significance and role of posterior epidural fat in lumbar spine. In adults, epidural fat situated in the posterior triangle limited by the lamina, the ligamentum flavum, and the posterior surface of thecal sac. The fat tissue was covered by a thin membrane of connective tissue, which were free under this layer. The anterior surface of this membrane lay close to the dura mater without any attachment.
To date, the epidural fat has been resected routinely by pituitary forcep and suction drainage during posterior lumbar surgery. However, the investigators focused on the role of epidural fat, which might be associated with postoperative outcome. The investigators thought that this peculiar character, epidural fat, should be caused by certain etiologies. In general, each tissue, such as epidural fat, has its inherited features and significance, thereby the epidural fat has also specific role. However, there has not been fully studies regarding it. Thus, the investigators aimed to evaluate the impact of the posterior epidural fat on the postoperative outcomes such as pain intensity and functional outcomes by whether the epidural fat would be resected or not during posterior decompressive surgery. The investigators hypothesized that the epidural fat would be associated with postoperative pain intensitive, functional outcomes, and complications of the surgery such as failed back surgery syndrome. In this study, new device for resection of epidural fat was not utilized, but just resected with conventional devices such as pituitary forcep.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Resection of epidural fat | Experimental | During surgical procedure, epidural fat was resected fully. |
|
| No resection of epidural fat | Active Comparator | During surgical procedure, the epidural fat was not resected. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Resection of epidural fat | Procedure | During surgical procedure, the epidural fat with pituitary forcep and rongeur was resected. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Pain score on the VAS | Pain intensity at lower back and radiating pain on the lower extremity were separately recorded at postoperative 1 month using visual analogue scale (VAS). | Postoperative 1 month |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Functional outcomes with Oswestry disability index (ODI) and SF-12 | Functional outcome was assessed using ODI and SF-12 at the follow-up times. | postoperative 3 and 12 months |
| The extent of epidural fibrosis |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Armed Forces Yangju Hospital | Yangju | Gyounggido | South Korea |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D013130 | Spinal Stenosis |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D013122 | Spinal Diseases |
| D001847 | Bone Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| No resection of epidural fat | Procedure | During surgical procedure, the epidural fat with pituitary forcep and rongeur was not resected. |
|
the extent of epidural fibrosis was measured with the angle of leg raise at the postoperative 1 month.
| Postoperative 1 month |
| The change at postoperative enhanced MRI | epidural inflammation and postoperative change at the posterior epidural area of the affected segment was evaluated by postoperative enhanced L-spine MRI. | 3, 12 months |