Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study is being done to compare a new, continuous illumination regimen of ALA-PDT (Aminolevulinate-Photodynamic Therapy) to a conventional regimen for treatment of actinic keratoses. The hypothesis is that the continuous illumination approach will be less painful, but equally efficacious, as the old regimen.
This study is being done to compare a modified version of the standard ALA-PDT (Aminolevulinate-Photodynamic Therapy) treatment of actinic keratoses, to a modified version in which light exposure begins immediately after application of the Levulan. We hypothesize that this will yield a therapeutic efficacy equivalent to the standard ALA-PDT regimen, but will cause less pain during the light exposure. The study employs a bilateral design in which the left versus right sides of the treatment area are compared in the exact same patient. There are 3 arms of the study, each having a different time duration of light exposure in the modified regimen to determine which one is most efficacious
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Group 1: 30 minutes | Active Comparator | The first 4 patients enrolled will be considered Group 1, and will receive 30 min of Aminolevulinic acid based photodynamic therapy to Side A. They will be evaluated in terms of erythema immediately post-PDT (Day 1) and on Day 4 . If there is no clinical reaction on Side A after 2 patients, then the dose will be advanced to the next Group. If the post-PDT reaction (erythema at Day 4) on Side A equals or exceeds the reaction on Side B in the majority of the first 4 patients, then the dose will not be escalated and recruitment will continue until 15 patients have been treated (thereby completing the study). If the post-PDT reaction on Side A is less than the reaction on Side B in the majority of the 4 patients, then the protocol will advance to Group 2 |
|
| Group 2: 45 minutes | Active Comparator | Patients in this group will receive 45 min of Aminolevulinic acid based photodynamic therapy to Side A. They will be evaluated for erythema response immediately post-PDT and at Day 4. If there is no clinical reaction on Side A after 2 patients, then the dose will be advanced to the next Group. If the post-PDT reaction (erythema at Day 4) on Side A equals or exceeds the reaction on Side B in the majority of the first 4 patients, then the dose will not be escalated and recruitment will continue until 15 patients have been treated (thereby completing the study). If the post-PDT reaction on Side A is less than the reaction on Side B in the majority of the 4 patients, then the protocol will advance to Group 3. |
|
| Group 3: 60 minutes | Active Comparator | Patients in this group will receive 60 min of Aminolevulinic acid based photodynamic therapy to Side A. They will be evaluated for erythema responses immediately post-PDT and at Day 4. If the post-PDT reaction on Side A equals or exceeds the reaction on Side B in the majority of the first 4 patients, then the dose will not be escalated and recruitment will continue until 15 patients have been treated (thereby completing the study). If the post-PDT reaction on Side A is less than the reaction on Side B in the majority of patients, then the protocol will terminate after 15 patients (total for all groups) have been treated. |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aminolevulinic acid based photodynamic therapy | Procedure | The PDT treatments will be done in two stages. ALA (Levulan® Kerastick™) will be applied to the entire treatment area, and then the longer light exposure (lasting up to 1 hr) will be performed on one-half of the treatment area (Side A). After that, a shorter (16 min 40 sec) light exposure will be done on the other half (Side B). |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| AK clearance | The primary endpoint is treatment efficacy (AK lesion clearance at 3 months). The specific aim of this study is to establish proof-of-principle for the concept that a long delivery period of blue light from the Blu-U device, using the standard fluence rate but starting only 15 min after the application of Levulan and lasting 1 hour (fluence of 360 J/cm2), can provide a clearance rate of AK lesions comparable to a standard regimen of Blu-U light (fluence of 10 J/cm2) beginning 1 hr after LevulanTM application. | at 3 months post-treatment |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Pain during illumination | The secondary endpoint is pain during illumination. The hypothesis is that efficacy at 3 months will be statistically equivalent with the two approaches, but pain will be significantly less with the continuous treatment regimen. | During treatment through post-treatment Day4 |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Edward Maytin, MD, PhD | The Cleveland Clinic | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cleveland Clinic | Cleveland | Ohio | 44195 | United States |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D055623 | Keratosis, Actinic |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011230 | Precancerous Conditions |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D007642 | Keratosis |
| D012871 | Skin Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Patients with actinic keratosis of the face/scalp were enrolled for an intrapatient comparative study of two different regimens for delivering ALA-based PDT treatment. In this contralateral/bilateral study design, each patient served as his/her own control. One side of the face or scalp (Side B), the traditional control regimen of PDT was given (1 h topical drug then 16 min 40 sec of blue light). On the test side (Side A), we administered a new regimen; topical drug was applied and then the blue light immediately started. Three groups of patients (Study arms) had different times of exposure (either 30 min, 45 min, or 60 min). For all patients, the post-treatment course was compared for Sides A vs. B. The primary endpoints were pain during illumination, and lesion clearance at 3 months post-therapy.
Not provided
Not provided
Evaluator assesses photographs without prior knowledge of intervention
|
|
|
| D017437 |
| Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases |