Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| ITI International Team for Implantology, Switzerland | OTHER |
| Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) | OTHER_GOV |
| Straumann Canada Ltd. | UNKNOWN |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study is a randomized clinical trial to compare patient satisfaction and prosthetic outcomes with lower dentures retained by one or two implants. The investigators long-term objective is to establish evidence of the cost-effectiveness of a single implant intervention for improving tolerance to complete dentures. The investigators MAIN AIM will be to investigate patient satisfaction between and within groups with mandibular dentures retained by one or two implants over five years, and SECONDARILY to investigate the survival of implants, and the frequency of events to maintain the dentures and prosthetic attachments as clinically serviceable. Furthermore, multivariate analysis can assess the prediction of patient satisfaction with implant dentures based on various possible factors including age, health, demography and socioeconomic status, number of implants, and maintenance needs. Patient satisfaction will be measured by means of Visual Analogue Scales (VAS) including a measure of overall satisfaction and various specific aspects of satisfaction such as appearance, stability and comfort of the dentures.
The CENTRAL HYPOTHESIS is that mandibular complete dentures retained by single implants are at least as satisfying to patients over a five years period as those retained by two implants for the same period.
The SECONDARY HYPOTHESES are that:
i) there is no difference over five years between groups in the survival of original implants, or in the number of events for maintenance of the dentures or implant attachments; and ii) using each treatment group as it's own control, there is no change in patient satisfaction with lower dentures retained by either one or two implants during the five year loading period.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 implant | Active Comparator | Participants receive the following: 1 implant placed surgically in the mandibular midline; Soft reline of the existing complete lower denture; 2.25mm ball patrix placed on 1 healed implant; and Reline with 1 retentive matrix in the lower denture. |
|
| 2 implants | Active Comparator | Participants receive the following: 2 implants placed surgically in the mandibular canine sites; Soft reline of the existing complete lower denture; 2.25mm ball patrices placed on 2 healed implants; and Reline with 2 retentive matrices in the lower denture. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 implant placed surgically in the mandibular midline | Procedure | Participants receive an implant in the mandibular midline using a surgical flap procedure with local anaesthesia. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Self-assessed VAS satisfaction with the mandibular denture | Self-assessed satisfaction is measured on a 10 cm uninterrupted visual analogue scale (VAS) representing a continuum of feelings, with "unsatisfied" at one end and "satisfied" at the other. Each participant makes a global assessment of their satisfaction by marking an X on the line at a point corresponding to their response to the question: "How would you evaluate your 'overall satisfaction' with your lower denture?". A research assistant translates the mark into a number from 0 to 100 by superimposing a template with numbered intervals from 0 to 100 mm. | Annually during 10 years after attaching the mandibular implant denture |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in self-assessed VAS satisfaction with the mandibular denture | Self-assessed satisfaction is measured on a 10 cm uninterrupted visual analogue scale (VAS) representing a continuum of feelings, with "unsatisfied" at one end and "satisfied" at the other. Each participant makes a global assessment of their satisfaction by marking an X on the line at a point corresponding to their response to the question: "How would you evaluate your 'overall satisfaction' with your lower denture?". A research assistant translates the mark into a number from 0 to 100 by superimposing a template with numbered intervals from 0 to 100 mm. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Stephen R. Bryant, DDS, PhD | University of British Columbia | Principal Investigator |
| Michael I. MacEntee, LDS, PhD | University of British Columbia | Study Director |
| Joanne N. Walton, DDS | University of British Columbia | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Department of Oral Health Sciences, University of British Columbia | Vancouver | British Columbia | V6T 1Z3 | Canada |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 16335167 | Background | Walton JN, MacEntee MI. Choosing or refusing oral implants: a prospective study of edentulous volunteers for a clinical trial. Int J Prosthodont. 2005 Nov-Dec;18(6):483-8. | |
| 18548957 | Background | Walton JN, MacEntee MI. Screening and enrolling subjects in a randomized clinical trial involving implant dentures. Int J Prosthodont. 2008 May-Jun;21(3):210-4. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| 2 implants placed surgically in the mandibular canine sites | Procedure | Participants receive implants bilaterally in the site of the mandibular canines using a surgical flap procedure with local anaesthesia. |
|
|
| Soft reline (Coe Comfort) of the existing complete lower denture | Procedure | Participants receive a soft reline of the existing complete lower denture approximately 10 days after placement of the implant(s). |
|
|
| 2.25mm ball patrix placed on 1 healed implant | Device | A 2.25mm ball patrix is screwed onto the 1 implant approximately six weeks after placement of the implant. |
|
|
| 2.25mm ball patrices placed on 2 healed implants | Device | 2.25mm ball patrices are screwed onto the 2 implants approximately six weeks after placement of the implants. |
|
|
| Reline (Ivoclar acrylic-resin) with 1 retentive matrix in the lower denture | Procedure | Participants have their complete lower denture relined with a laboratory-processed acrylic resin to incorporate 1 retentive matrix in the denture-base to retain on the implant. |
|
|
| Reline (Ivoclar acrylic-resin) with 2 retentive matrices in the lower denture | Procedure | Participants have their complete lower denture relined with a laboratory-processed acrylic resin to incorporate 2 retentive matrices in the denture-base to retain on the implants |
|
|
| From baseline (before implants) to each annual followup for 10 years after attaching the mandibular implant denture |
| Cumulative Implant Survival | Cumulative implant survival was judged by the time to the presence of clinical mobility, pain or suppuration associated with the original mandibular implants. | During the 10 years after attaching the mandibular implant denture |
| The frequency of prosthetic maintenance events for the mandibular implant overdenture | The frequency of prosthetic maintenance treatment events for the mandibular denture including adjustment, reattachment, or replacement of implant attachment components, and denture base fractures, relining or rebasing, and denture replacement with a new lower denture. | During 10 years after attaching the mandibular implant denture |
| Time to provide the initial surgical and prosthetic treatment for the mandibular implant overdenture intervention | This is the total professional chair-time recorded to provide the initial surgical and prosthetic treatment for the mandibular implant overdenture intervention. | From baseline (before implants) until attachment of the mandibular implant denture, 6 weeks after implant placement |
| Costs to provide the initial surgical and prosthetic treatment for the mandibular implant overdenture intervention | This is the total cost of components and professional and dental laboratory fees to provide the initial surgical and prosthetic treatment for the mandibular implant overdenture intervention. | From baseline (before implants) until attachment of the mandibular implant denture, 6 weeks after implant placement |
| Time to provide prosthetic maintenance treatment for the mandibular implant overdenture | This is the total professional chair-time recorded to provide prosthetic maintenance treatment for the maxillary denture and the mandibular implant overdenture including contour adjustments, and adjustment, reattachment, or replacement of implant attachment components, and denture repairs, relining or rebasing. | During 1 year after attachment of the mandibular implant denture |
| Costs to provide prosthetic maintenance treatment for the mandibular implant overdenture | This is the total cost of components and professional and dental laboratory fees to provide prosthetic maintenance treatment for the maxillary denture and the mandibular implant overdenture including contour adjustments, and adjustment, reattachment, or replacement of implant attachment components, and denture repairs, relining or rebasing. | During 1 year after attachment of the mandibular implant denture |
| 19639067 | Result | Walton JN, Glick N, Macentee MI. A randomized clinical trial comparing patient satisfaction and prosthetic outcomes with mandibular overdentures retained by one or two implants. Int J Prosthodont. 2009 Jul-Aug;22(4):331-9. |
| 20188240 | Result | Gonda T, Maeda Y, Walton JN, MacEntee MI. Fracture incidence in mandibular overdentures retained by one or two implants. J Prosthet Dent. 2010 Mar;103(3):178-81. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60026-1. |
| 25348544 | Result | Bryant SR, Walton JN, MacEntee MI. A 5-year randomized trial to compare 1 or 2 implants for implant overdentures. J Dent Res. 2015 Jan;94(1):36-43. doi: 10.1177/0022034514554224. Epub 2014 Oct 27. |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000848 | Anodontia |
| D009066 | Mouth, Edentulous |
| D017060 | Patient Satisfaction |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014071 | Tooth Abnormalities |
| D018640 | Stomatognathic System Abnormalities |
| D009057 | Stomatognathic Diseases |
| D014076 | Tooth Diseases |
| D000013 | Congenital Abnormalities |
| D009358 | Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities |
| D009059 | Mouth Diseases |
| D000074822 | Treatment Adherence and Compliance |
| D015438 | Health Behavior |
| D001519 | Behavior |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C043685 | Coe Comfort |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided