Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Study was completed as per amended protocol. Protocol was amended to close enrollment earlier than initially planned (study continued as per plan).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Boehringer Ingelheim | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of the study is to compare the efficacy of treatment with afatinib plus letrozole to treatment with letrozole alone in women diagnosed with a specific type of breast cancer.
This is an open-label, multicenter, international, randomized, Phase II clinical trial that will assess the efficacy and safety of letrozole in combination with afatinib(oral epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR ) inhibitor) versus letrozole monotherapy for the first-line treatment of postmenopausal women with ER+, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) negative advanced breast cancer with low ER expression.
In order to assess the level of estrogen receptor (ER) expression we will use a semi-quantitative scoring system (McClelland, 1990) defined as :
H-score = (% of cells stained at intensity category 1x1) + (% of cells stained at intensity category 2x2) + (% of cells stained at intensity category 3x3).
This formula results in an H-score in the range of 0-300 where 300 equals 100% of tumor cells stained strongly (i.e., 3+). Low ER expression will be defined as tumor sample with H-score below 160 (Finn, 2009).
All subjects who consented for the study must submit a tumor sample to the designated central laboratory for central confirmation of ER / Progesterone receptor (PR) and HER2 statuses and determination of the H-score. This will be assessed prior to randomization.
Subjects with HER2 negative, ER+ advanced breast cancer with low ER expression defined as H-score between 1 and 159 will enter screening phase and perform the required screening assessments.
Eligible subjects will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio and stratified according to sites of disease (bone only disease vs. other) and prior administration of hormonal therapy in neo/adjuvant setting (Yes vs. No) to either:
Arm A : Continuous regimen of oral letrozole 2.5 mg until progression of disease or any other study treatment discontinuation criteria.
or Arm B : Continuous regimen of oral letrozole 2.5 mg daily plus oral afatinib 30 mg daily until progression of disease or any other study treatment discontinuation criteria.
IN ADDITION the following applies whichever comes first:
Once the patient is discontinued from trial treatment and has undergone the End of Treatment Visit, she will be permanently discontinued from the trial and treated as per local clinical practice.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arm A | Active Comparator | Continuous regimen of oral Letrozole 2.5 mg daily |
|
| Arm B | Experimental | Continuous regimen of oral Letrozole 2.5 mg daily plus oral Afatinib 30 mg daily |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Letrozole | Drug |
| ||
| Afatinib |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Progression Free Survival (PFS) | Progression Free Survival (PFS) is defined as the time from randomization until date of progression (assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors - RECIST) or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. For evaluation of PFS, the randomization date for each patient was the "start date". If the status at the last assessment date was "Non-complete response/ Non-progressive disease" or "Complete response", then the patient was considered "censored". If the status at the last assessment for any tumor was "Progressive disease", then the patient was considered as having an event. Progressive disease is defined using RECIST v1 .1 as a ≥ 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions compared with the smallest-sum longest diameter recorded or the appearance of one or more target or non-target new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. | Tumor assessments were every 12 weeks up to 9 months (average) for subjects in Arm A or up to 14 months (average) for subjects in Arm B. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Survival (OS) | Overall Survival is defined as the time from randomization until death to any cause. For subjects in which treatment is discontinued for reasons different than Progression Disease: after treatment and up to documentation of disease progression: Overall Survival is assessed every 12 weeks | Under treatment: every 4 wks up to 9 months (average) for subject in the Arm A or up to 14 months (average) for subjects in Arm B. After documentation of disease progression up to the end of the study: every 6 months up to 42 months |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Richard Finn, MD | University of California, Los Angeles | Study Chair |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| St. Jude Heritage Healthcare | Fullerton | California | 92835 | United States | ||
| University of California Los Angeles Hematology Oncology |
For all patients consented on the trial, a tumor sample was sent to the central lab for testing of ER/PR and HER2 and determination of the H-score. This was assessed prior to randomization. Patients with HER2 negative, ER+ advanced breast cancer with low ER expression defined as H-score between 1 and 159 entered screening phase.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Arm A | Letrozole 2.5 mg |
| FG001 | Arm B | Letrozole 2.5 mg + Afatinib 30 mg |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Jul 31, 2018 | Nov 20, 2019 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Objective Response Rate (ORR) | Objective response rate (ORR) is defined as the proportion of randomized subjects achieving a best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) as per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST). As per RECIST (version 1.1): CR is defined as disappearance of all target and non target lesions - lymph node (LN) <10mm. PR is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the Sum of Diameters, taking as reference the Baseline Sum of Diameters | Tumor assessment: every 12 weeks up to 9 months (average) for subjects in Arm A or up to 14 months (average) for subjects in Arm B. |
| Time to Tumor Progression (TTP) | As per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST). Time to progression (TTP) is defined as the time interval from date of randomization to date of the first documented objective tumor progression. | Tumor assessments: every 12 weeks up to 9 months (average) for subjects in Arm A or up to 14 months (average) for subjects in Arm B. |
| Number of Participants With Adverse Events | Participants who experienced at least one Treatment Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) are presented. Participants with at least one serious TEAE, those who had at least one TEAE related to letrozole or afatinib (serious/non-serious), including participants who experienced a grade 3/4 TEAE, or who discontinued/died as a result of their TEAE are listed by treatment arm. Adverse events were tabulated by system organ class, preferred term and toxicity grade by treatment arm. For subjects in which treatment was discontinued for reasons different than progression of disease, the assessment was conducted every 12 weeks following treatment, and up to documentation of disease progression. ** Enrollment was closed prematurely due to low recruitment (only 44 participants enrolled) compared to what was initially planned (150 participants), therefore no statistical evaluations were completed. Adverse event data collected are described per arm but no statistical comparison was made. | Under treatment: every 4 wks up to 9 months (average) for subjects in Arm A or up to 14 months (average) for subjects in Arm B. After documentation of disease progression up to the end of the study: every 6 months up to 42 months |
| Los Angeles |
| California |
| 90095 |
| United States |
| West Valley Hematology Oncology Medical Group | Northridge | California | 91328 | United States |
| DBA Torrance Memorial Physician Network/Cancer Care Associates | Redondo Beach | California | 90277 | United States |
| Coastal Integrative Cancer Care | San Luis Obispo | California | 93401 | United States |
| Central Coast Medical Oncology Corporation | Santa Maria | California | 93454 | United States |
| Orlando Health, Inc. | Orlando | Florida | 32806 | United States |
| Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada | Las Vegas | Nevada | 89169 | United States |
| Hope Women's Cancer Centers | Asheville | North Carolina | 28806 | United States |
| University Hospital Clinical Center Banja Luka, Oncology Clinic | Banja Luka | 78000 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| Clinical Center of University in Sarajevo, Clinic for Oncology | Sarajevo | 71000 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| University Clinical Center Tuzla Clinic for Oncology, Hematology and Radiotherapy | Tuzla | 75000 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| Filantropia Clinical Hospital | Bucharest | Romania |
| County Emergency Clinical Hospital Cluj-Napoca Oncology Department | Cluj-Napoca | 400006 | Romania |
| SC Medisprof SRL | Cluj-Napoca | 400058 | Romania |
| County Hospital Ploiesti | Ploieşti | 100337 | Romania |
| County Emergency Hospital "Sf Ioan cel Nou" | Suceava | 720237 | Romania |
| Oncomed SRL Timisoara | Timișoara | Romania |
| Complexo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña | A Coruña | 15006 | Spain |
| Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Albacete | Albacete | 02006 | Spain |
| Hospital General Universitario de Alicante | Alicante | 03010 | Spain |
| Hospital de Especialidades de Jerez de La Frontera | Jerez de la Frontera | 11408 | Spain |
| Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de La Arrixaca | Murcia | 30120 | Spain |
| Hospital Son Llatzer | Palma de Mallorca | 07198 | Spain |
| Hospital Universitari de Sant Joan de Reus | Reus | 43204 | Spain |
| Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet | Zaragoza | 50009 | Spain |
| COMPLETED | Trial terminated early and only 44 patients enrolled, preventing appropriate statistical calculation |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
44 patients were enrolled in the trial; 23 in Arm A and 21 in Arm B. All patients started and completed treatment at the time of reporting.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Arm A | Letrozole 2.5 mg |
| BG001 | Arm B | Letrozole 2.5 mg + Afatinib 30 mg |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected | Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant. | Count of Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||||||
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Menopausal Status | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| ECOG Performance Status | The ECOG Scale of Performance Status is a measurement used to describe a patient's level of functioning in terms of their ability to care for themself, daily activity, and physical ability (walking, working, etc.). Patients with ECOG 0 are in better general condition than patients with ECOG 1: 0 = Fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction. 1 = Restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature, e.g., light house work, office work. | Count of Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||||||
| Weight (kg) | Weight measured in kg. | Mean | Standard Deviation | kg |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Progression Free Survival (PFS) | Progression Free Survival (PFS) is defined as the time from randomization until date of progression (assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors - RECIST) or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. For evaluation of PFS, the randomization date for each patient was the "start date". If the status at the last assessment date was "Non-complete response/ Non-progressive disease" or "Complete response", then the patient was considered "censored". If the status at the last assessment for any tumor was "Progressive disease", then the patient was considered as having an event. Progressive disease is defined using RECIST v1 .1 as a ≥ 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions compared with the smallest-sum longest diameter recorded or the appearance of one or more target or non-target new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. | The timeframe specifies when tumor assessments were performed. Enrollment was closed prematurely due to low recruitment (only 44 participants enrolled) compared to what was initially planned (150 participants), therefore no statistical evaluations were completed (including PFS). | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Tumor assessments were every 12 weeks up to 9 months (average) for subjects in Arm A or up to 14 months (average) for subjects in Arm B. |
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Overall Survival (OS) | Overall Survival is defined as the time from randomization until death to any cause. For subjects in which treatment is discontinued for reasons different than Progression Disease: after treatment and up to documentation of disease progression: Overall Survival is assessed every 12 weeks | The timeframe specifies when tumor assessments were performed. Enrollment was closed prematurely due to low recruitment (only 44 participants enrolled) compared to what was initially planned (150 participants), therefore no statistical evaluations were completed (including OS). | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Under treatment: every 4 wks up to 9 months (average) for subject in the Arm A or up to 14 months (average) for subjects in Arm B. After documentation of disease progression up to the end of the study: every 6 months up to 42 months |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Objective Response Rate (ORR) | Objective response rate (ORR) is defined as the proportion of randomized subjects achieving a best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) as per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST). As per RECIST (version 1.1): CR is defined as disappearance of all target and non target lesions - lymph node (LN) <10mm. PR is defined as at least a 30% decrease in the Sum of Diameters, taking as reference the Baseline Sum of Diameters | The timeframe specifies when tumor assessments were performed. Enrollment was closed prematurely due to low recruitment (only 44 participants enrolled) compared to what was initially planned (150 participants), therefore no statistical evaluations were completed (including ORR). | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Tumor assessment: every 12 weeks up to 9 months (average) for subjects in Arm A or up to 14 months (average) for subjects in Arm B. |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Time to Tumor Progression (TTP) | As per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST). Time to progression (TTP) is defined as the time interval from date of randomization to date of the first documented objective tumor progression. | The timeframe specifies when tumor assessments were performed. Enrollment was closed prematurely due to low recruitment (only 44 participants enrolled) compared to what was initially planned (150 participants), therefore data for TTP was not produced due to the small number of patients (evaluation would not produce meaningful data). | Posted | No | Tumor assessments: every 12 weeks up to 9 months (average) for subjects in Arm A or up to 14 months (average) for subjects in Arm B. |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Adverse Events | Participants who experienced at least one Treatment Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) are presented. Participants with at least one serious TEAE, those who had at least one TEAE related to letrozole or afatinib (serious/non-serious), including participants who experienced a grade 3/4 TEAE, or who discontinued/died as a result of their TEAE are listed by treatment arm. Adverse events were tabulated by system organ class, preferred term and toxicity grade by treatment arm. For subjects in which treatment was discontinued for reasons different than progression of disease, the assessment was conducted every 12 weeks following treatment, and up to documentation of disease progression. ** Enrollment was closed prematurely due to low recruitment (only 44 participants enrolled) compared to what was initially planned (150 participants), therefore no statistical evaluations were completed. Adverse event data collected are described per arm but no statistical comparison was made. | Participants who experienced at least one Treatment Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) are listed. Participants with at least one serious TEAE, those who had at least one TEAE related to letrozole or afatinib (serious/non-serious), including participants who experienced a grade 3/4 TEAE, or who discontinued/died as a result of their TEAE are presented. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Under treatment: every 4 wks up to 9 months (average) for subjects in Arm A or up to 14 months (average) for subjects in Arm B. After documentation of disease progression up to the end of the study: every 6 months up to 42 months |
|
4 years, 3 months (28 August 2014 to 30 November 2018). 28 August 2004 corresponds to the first enrolment in the trial, and 30 November 2018 corresponds to the 'end of data' collection period. All participants were assessed for adverse events (AEs) from their date of enrolment to the end of the observation period, which as per protocol is defined as 30 days following their last treatment intake - during this time serious AEs also had to be reported.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Arm A | Letrozole 2.5 mg | 2 | 23 | 5 | 23 | 16 | 23 |
| EG001 | Arm B | Letrozole 2.5 mg + Afatinib 30 mg | 0 | 21 | 2 | 21 | 20 | 21 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Enteritis | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Haematemesis | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Pyrexia | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Cholecystitis acute | Hepatobiliary disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Cellulitis | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Sepsis | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Multiple Fractures | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Basal Cell Carcinoma | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Malignant Melanoma in Situ | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Subarachnoid Haemorrhage | Nervous system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Stomatitis | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Abdominal Distension | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Fatigue | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Paronychia | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Urinary Tract Infection | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Upper Respiratory Tract Infection | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Weight Increased | Investigations | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Weight Decreased | Investigations | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Arthralgia | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Back Pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Bone Pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Musculoskeletal Pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Myalgia | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Rash | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Dry Skin | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Dermatitis Acneiform | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Pruritus | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Alopecia | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
Enrolment was closed prematurely with only 44 participants enrolled compared to what was initially planned (150 participants). Thus, preventing appropriate statistical evaluation (primary/secondary objectives no longer applicable as per protocol).
No publication, abstract or presentation of the Study will be made without the approval of the Study Steering Committee (SCC). The SSC will be solely responsible for the analysis, interpretation and public disclosure of the results of the trial in accordance with the statistical plan.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Director, Project Management | Translational Research In Oncology (TRIO) | +33 1 58 10 09 09 | TRIO020.contact@trioncology.org |
| Prot_000.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Dec 4, 2014 | Nov 20, 2019 | SAP_001.pdf |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001943 | Breast Neoplasms |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D001941 | Breast Diseases |
| D012871 | Skin Diseases |
| D017437 | Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000077289 | Letrozole |
| D000077716 | Afatinib |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009570 | Nitriles |
| D009930 | Organic Chemicals |
| D014230 | Triazoles |
| D001393 | Azoles |
| D006573 | Heterocyclic Compounds, 1-Ring |
| D006571 | Heterocyclic Compounds |
| D000577 | Amides |
| D011799 | Quinazolines |
| D006574 | Heterocyclic Compounds, 2-Ring |
| D000072471 | Heterocyclic Compounds, Fused-Ring |
Not provided
Not provided
| Between 18 and 65 years |
|
| >=65 years |
|
|
|
|
| United States |
|
|
| Bosnia and Herzegovina |
|
|
| Spain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| OG001 | Arm B | Letrozole 2.5 mg + Afatinib 30 mg |
|
|