Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Essential tremor is the most common adult-onset movement disorder, and essential voice tremor is the vocal manifestation of essential tremor. While nearly all essential tremor patients experience hand tremor, many also manifest head tremor and voice tremor. Essential voice tremor can lead to increased vocal effort, decreased intelligibility, and misconstrued emotional state. Only one medication, propranolol, is FDA-approved to treat essential tremor. Propranolol is not felt to be nearly as effective for axial tremors (head, trunk, neck) as it is for extremity tremors. However, this has not been studied with any objective assessment in a prospective way for EVT. For patients with essential voice tremor, the limited published data suggests that botulinum toxin has been shown to lead to functional voice improvement. Botulinum toxin, though also not well-studied with objective voice outcomes, is a commonly used clinical therapy for treatment of essential voice tremor. While it is used more often for essential voice tremor than propranolol therapy, botulinum toxin also has not been prospectively studied with validated, objective voice outcome measures. The investigators would like to determine if propranolol has any significant effect on vocal tremor. The investigators would also like to determine, in an objective way, the effect of botulinum toxin on vocal tremor. If effective, propranolol would provide an affordable and non-invasive alternative or addition to botulinum toxin injections for patients with essential voice tremor.
Specific Aims
• Determine the effect of propranolol on vocal tremor in the treatment-seeking population.
To date, the nonselective beta-blocker propranolol remains the only agent approved for the treatment of essential tremor (ET). For ET, immediate and sustained release formations of propranolol are equally effective, while other beta-blockers like nadolol and timolol are not as effective. While propranolol improves tremor in greater than half of patients with essential tremor, its effects on tremor are not evenly distributed. Improvement in tremor symptoms is greater for limb tremor than axial tremor, and therefore propranolol is not commonly used for the treatment of essential voice tremor (EVT). However, its effect on essential voice tremor has never been objectively, prospectively studied. Our aim is to objectively determine the effect of propranolol on essential voice tremor in the treatment-seeking population by evaluating patients with EVT before and after propranolol therapy.
• Determine the effect of botulinum toxin injections on vocal tremor in the treatment-seeking population.
More recently, botulinum toxin A has been used for the treatment of EVT. Chemical denervation with botulinum toxin is only modestly effective in reducing limb tremor in ET and complicated by side effects of weakness. However, botulinum toxin seems to be more effective in treating EVT than other manifestations of ET. While prior studies have not enlisted validated assessments of voice quality to measure the effect of botulinum toxin injections on EVT, they have shown subjective improvement in acoustic measures of tremor and ratings of videotaped speech after therapy with botulinum toxin. Our aim is to objectively determine the effect of botulinum toxin on vocal tremor in the treatment-seeking population by evaluating patients with EVT before and after botulinum therapy.
Voice Evaluations and Medications
For the first evaluation, a research coordinator will collect demographics and patient reported data. This data will result from providing patient questionnaires and recording the patient's voice. VRQOL data will be collected by having the patient answer ten statements on a 1-5 scale, such as "I have trouble speaking loudly or being heard in noisy situations" or "I run out of air and need to take frequent breaths." QUEST data will be also recorded to a 30-item essential tremor-specific questionnaire. Patient will also complete a global voice rating of a 0-7 scoring of "How would you rate your voice today?" After these subjective questionnaires, patient will participate in a vocal recording using prompts and passages from the validated CAPE-V voice assessment tool.
After a discussion of the risks and benefits of propranolol therapy, the patient will then be given a prescription by the principal investigator for propranolol.
The second evaluation will occur at an office visit two weeks after initiating propranolol therapy. Again, this will consist of patient-reported V-RQOL, QUEST, and global voice rating data. Patient will participate in a second vocal recording using prompts and passages from the validated CAPE-V voice assessment tool.
At this second evaluation, patient will receive botulinum toxin injections. The risks and benefits of botulinum toxin therapy will be explained to the patient, and bilateral injections will take place.
Four weeks after botulinum toxin injection, the patient will undergo the third voice assessment. Again, this will consist of patient-reported V-RQOL, QUEST, and global voice rating data. Patient will participate in a third vocal recording using prompts and passages from the validated CAPE-V voice assessment tool.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Propranolol/Botulinum | Experimental | After baseline analysis, patient will be given a prescription by the principal investigator for propranolol. This prescription will consist of a starting dose of generic immediate-release at 10 mg three times per day (30 mg each day) with an increase in dose in 5-7 days if there is no effect (60 mg each day) and if the patient had demonstrated no side effects. Dose may be increased to 240 mg each day depending on patient improvement and side effect profile. After second evaluation, patient will receive botulinum toxin injections. The risks and benefits of botulinum toxin therapy will be explained to the patient, and bilateral injections will take place. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Propranolol | Drug | After a discussion of the risks and benefits of propranolol therapy, the patient will then be given a prescription by the principal investigator for propranolol. This prescription will consist of a starting dose of generic immediate-release at 10 mg three times daily (30 mg each day) with an increase in dose in 5-7 days if there is no effect (60 mg each day) and if the patient had demonstrated no side effects. Dose may be increased to 240 mg each day depending on patient improvement and side effect profile. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Quality of Life in Essential Tremor (QUEST) Questionnaire Score | The QUEST questionnaire is a 30 item self-reported essential tremor-specific quality of life scale that asks participants to rate responses (never/no, rarely, sometimes, frequently, always/yes, or not applicable). Total scores range between 0 to 100 where 0 is the best score and 100 is the worst score. A higher score indicates a lower quality of life. | Baseline, 2 weeks, 6 weeks |
| Change in Voice-Related Quality Of Life (VRQOL) Questionnaire Score | The VRQOL is a ten question self-reported measure that asks patients to rate responses from 1-5 (1=none, not a problem, 2=a small amount, 3=a moderate (medium) amount, 4=a lot, 5=problem is as "bad as it can be"). Total scores range from 0 to 100. A higher score indicates more problems interfering with day to day activities. | Baseline, 2 weeks, 6 weeks |
| Change in Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) Score | The CAPE-V is a clinically validated perceptual voice assessment tool that is used to describe the severity of auditory-perceptual attributes of a voice problem, in a way that can be communicated among clinicians. Participant's speech is recorded and evaluated by trained "listeners". Listeners indicate overall tremor severity by making a tick mark on a 1 to 100 mm visual analog scale. Total scores range from 0 to 100 where 0 is the best score and 100 is the worst score. | Baseline, 2 weeks, 6 weeks |
| Change in Global Voice Rating | Patient-Reported Measure • 0-7 ranking | Baseline, 2 weeks, 6 weeks |
| Change in Acoustic Spectrograms | Objective Voice Assessment • Using the Computerized Speech Laboratory speech and voice analysis system (KayPENTAX, Montvale, NJ) |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
If the patient has received botulinum toxin injections for EVT previously, a three-month washout period is necessary before participation.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Michael Johns, MD | Emory Voice Center | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emory Voice Center | Atlanta | Georgia | 30308 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20066728 | Background | Sulica L, Louis ED. Clinical characteristics of essential voice tremor: a study of 34 cases. Laryngoscope. 2010 Mar;120(3):516-28. doi: 10.1002/lary.20702. | |
| 23881742 | Background | Zesiewicz TA, Shaw JD, Allison KG, Staffetti JS, Okun MS, Sullivan KL. Update on treatment of essential tremor. Curr Treat Options Neurol. 2013 Aug;15(4):410-23. doi: 10.1007/s11940-013-0239-4. |
Not provided
Not provided
Participants who previously received botulinum toxin injections for essential voice tremor (EVT) underwent a three month washout period prior to participation.
Participants were recruited from the Emory Voice Center from August 2014 to February 2015.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Propranolol/Botulinum | After baseline analysis, patient will be given a prescription by the principal investigator for propranolol. This prescription will consist of a starting dose of generic immediate-release at 10 mg three times per day (30 mg each day) with an increase in dose in 5-7 days if there is no effect (60 mg each day) and if the patient had demonstrated no side effects. Dose may be increased to 240 mg each day depending on patient improvement and side effect profile. After second evaluation, patient will receive botulinum toxin injections. The risks and benefits of botulinum toxin therapy will be explained to the patient, and bilateral injections will take place. Propranolol: After a discussion of the risks and benefits of propranolol therapy, the patient will then be given a prescription by the principal investigator for propranolol. This prescription will consist of a starting dose of generic immediate-release at 10 mg three times daily (30 mg each day) with an increase in dose in 5-7 days |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Propranolol/Botulinum | After baseline analysis, participants were given a prescription by the principal investigator for propranolol. This prescription consisted of a starting dose of generic immediate-release at 10 mg three times per day (30 mg each day) with an increase in dose in 5-7 days if there is no effect (60 mg each day) and if the participant demonstrated no side effects. Dose was increased up to 240 mg a day depending on participant improvement and side effect profile. After second evaluation, participants received botulinum toxin injections. The risks and benefits of botulinum toxin therapy were explained to the participant, and bilateral injections took place. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Change in Quality of Life in Essential Tremor (QUEST) Questionnaire Score | The QUEST questionnaire is a 30 item self-reported essential tremor-specific quality of life scale that asks participants to rate responses (never/no, rarely, sometimes, frequently, always/yes, or not applicable). Total scores range between 0 to 100 where 0 is the best score and 100 is the worst score. A higher score indicates a lower quality of life. | Participants who completed all three study visits (Baseline Visit 1, Visit 2, and Visit 3). | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline, 2 weeks, 6 weeks |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Propranolol/Botulinum | After baseline analysis, participants were given a prescription by the principal investigator for propranolol. This prescription consisted of a starting dose of generic immediate-release at 10 mg three times per day (30 mg each day) with an increase in dose in 5-7 days if there is no effect (60 mg each day) and if the participant demonstrated no side effects. Dose was increased up to 240 mg a day depending on participant improvement and side effect profile. After second evaluation, participants received botulinum toxin injections. The risks and benefits of botulinum toxin therapy were explained to the participant, and bilateral injections took place. |
Not provided
Not provided
The study lacks a placebo or control group, with participants representing their own internal controls. Additionally, inter-rater reliability among listeners for the CAPE-V outcome measure analysis was low.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dr. Michael Johns | Emory University | 323-865-9839 |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D020329 | Essential Tremor |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009069 | Movement Disorders |
| D002493 | Central Nervous System Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011433 | Propranolol |
| D001905 | Botulinum Toxins |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D050198 | Phenoxypropanolamines |
| D011412 | Propanolamines |
| D000605 | Amino Alcohols |
| D000438 | Alcohols |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
|
| Botulinum Toxin | Procedure | At the second evaluation, patient will receive botulinum toxin injections. The risks and benefits of botulinum toxin therapy will be explained to the patient, and bilateral injections will take place. |
|
| baseline, 2 weeks, 6 weeks |
| 23553653 | Background | Gurey LE, Sinclair CF, Blitzer A. A new paradigm for the management of essential vocal tremor with botulinum toxin. Laryngoscope. 2013 Oct;123(10):2497-501. doi: 10.1002/lary.24073. Epub 2013 Apr 1. |
| 15364688 | Background | Adler CH, Bansberg SF, Hentz JG, Ramig LO, Buder EH, Witt K, Edwards BW, Krein-Jones K, Caviness JN. Botulinum toxin type A for treating voice tremor. Arch Neurol. 2004 Sep;61(9):1416-20. doi: 10.1001/archneur.61.9.1416. |
| 10622521 | Background | Hogikyan ND, Sethuraman G. Validation of an instrument to measure voice-related quality of life (V-RQOL). J Voice. 1999 Dec;13(4):557-69. doi: 10.1016/s0892-1997(99)80010-1. |
| 16103000 | Background | Troster AI, Pahwa R, Fields JA, Tanner CM, Lyons KE. Quality of life in Essential Tremor Questionnaire (QUEST): development and initial validation. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2005 Sep;11(6):367-73. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2005.05.009. |
| Participants |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
|
|
| Primary | Change in Voice-Related Quality Of Life (VRQOL) Questionnaire Score | The VRQOL is a ten question self-reported measure that asks patients to rate responses from 1-5 (1=none, not a problem, 2=a small amount, 3=a moderate (medium) amount, 4=a lot, 5=problem is as "bad as it can be"). Total scores range from 0 to 100. A higher score indicates more problems interfering with day to day activities. | Participants who completed all three study visits (Baseline Visit 1, Visit 2, and Visit 3). | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline, 2 weeks, 6 weeks |
|
|
|
| Primary | Change in Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) Score | The CAPE-V is a clinically validated perceptual voice assessment tool that is used to describe the severity of auditory-perceptual attributes of a voice problem, in a way that can be communicated among clinicians. Participant's speech is recorded and evaluated by trained "listeners". Listeners indicate overall tremor severity by making a tick mark on a 1 to 100 mm visual analog scale. Total scores range from 0 to 100 where 0 is the best score and 100 is the worst score. | Participants who completed all three study visits (Baseline Visit 1, Visit 2, and Visit 3). | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline, 2 weeks, 6 weeks |
|
|
|
| Primary | Change in Global Voice Rating | Patient-Reported Measure • 0-7 ranking | Data were not collected as investigators found the Voice Related Quality of Life (VRQOL) scale to be a better measure. | Posted | Baseline, 2 weeks, 6 weeks |
|
|
| Primary | Change in Acoustic Spectrograms | Objective Voice Assessment • Using the Computerized Speech Laboratory speech and voice analysis system (KayPENTAX, Montvale, NJ) | Data were not collected as investigators found the Voice Related Quality of Life (VRQOL) scale to be a better measure. | Posted | baseline, 2 weeks, 6 weeks |
|
|
| 0 |
| 18 |
| 0 |
| 18 |
Not provided
Not provided
| D009930 |
| Organic Chemicals |
| D020005 | Propanols |
| D000588 | Amines |
| D009281 | Naphthalenes |
| D011084 | Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons |
| D006841 | Hydrocarbons, Aromatic |
| D006844 | Hydrocarbons, Cyclic |
| D006838 | Hydrocarbons |
| D011083 | Polycyclic Compounds |
| D008666 | Metalloendopeptidases |
| D010450 | Endopeptidases |
| D010447 | Peptide Hydrolases |
| D006867 | Hydrolases |
| D004798 | Enzymes |
| D045762 | Enzymes and Coenzymes |
| D045726 | Metalloproteases |
| D001426 | Bacterial Proteins |
| D011506 | Proteins |
| D000602 | Amino Acids, Peptides, and Proteins |
| D001427 | Bacterial Toxins |
| D014118 | Toxins, Biological |
| D001685 | Biological Factors |
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|