Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| University of Brasilia | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The aim of this trial is to compare and evaluate the effects of hypnosis in cancer patients, to reduce the level of pain, anxiety and depression. The comparison was made through the scores on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS).
Volunteers cancer patients of both gender, aged between 40 and 70 years, susceptible to hypnosis, with pain scores ≥ 3 measured by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), will be randomized into two groups of 12 participants each. They might or might not present metastasis, whether or not performed cancer surgery, regardless of the location of the primary tumor, with or without concomitant surgical indication. It will be used the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at 3 different times: at baseline, after 7 days and after 2 weeks of the first assessment. It will be done, in the hypnosis group, an hypnosis intervention. It consists of two 40-minute sessions, with an interval of 7 days between them, emphasizing the pain blocking, the well-being of the patient and the reduction of the symptoms of anxiety and depression. Then, it will be evaluated the intensity of the pain as well as depression and anxiety in both groups. Finally, the results of both groups will be compared.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hypnosis | Experimental | Use of hypnosis in the reduction of the levels of pain, depression and anxiety. |
|
| Control | Active Comparator | Comparison of the effects of hypnosis between the control group and the experimental group regarding pain, anxiety and depression with the application of the scales. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hypnosis | Behavioral | The hypnosis intervention consists of two 40-minute sessions, with an interval of 7 days between them, emphasizing the pain blocking, the well-being of the patient and the reduction of the symptoms of anxiety and depression of the same. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change of Pain Score in the Visual Analogue Scale | Comparison was made through the scores in the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) to measure the effect of hypnosis in pain among the 12 patients of the hypnosis group comparing to the 11 patients of the control group. The scale ranged from 0 to 10 points, without subscales. The better outcome occurs when the mean of the second or the third week decrease 3 points comparing with the first week, or when the mean of the third week decrease 3 points comparing with the second week. | The study was done with each patient in the first three consecutive weeks after randomization |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change of Anxiety and Depression in the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) | Comparison was made through the scores in the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) to measure the effect of hypnosis in anxiety and depression among the 12 patients of the hypnosis group comparing to the 11 patients of the control group. The scale has 14 items, seven of which are directed to the evaluation of anxiety (HADS-A) and seven to depression (HADS-D). Each item can be scored from zero to three, establishing a score range of 0 to 21 points for each subscale. The better outcome occurs when the mean is lower or equal to 9 for each subscale. The subscales are independent for each result of depression and anxiety. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Patient not suggestible to hypnosis
Psychotropic drug users,
Patients with severe psychiatric disorder, except depression and anxiety
,- Patient terminally ill cancer
Patients with tumor or cancer metastasis in the central nervous system, _ Deaf and people with mental disabilities and cognitive.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| GIL MONTENEGRO, DOUTORANDO | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UNB- Universidade de Brasilia | Brasília | Federal District | 70910900 | Brazil |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17135649 | Background | Bardia A, Barton DL, Prokop LJ, Bauer BA, Moynihan TJ. Efficacy of complementary and alternative medicine therapies in relieving cancer pain: a systematic review. J Clin Oncol. 2006 Dec 1;24(34):5457-64. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.08.3725. | |
| 18154865 | Background | Lalla RV, Sonis ST, Peterson DE. Management of oral mucositis in patients who have cancer. Dent Clin North Am. 2008 Jan;52(1):61-77, viii. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2007.10.002. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Were excluded: 3 patients weren't suggestible, 3 patients who had terminal cancer, 2 patients who reported low scores, and 7 patients for other reasons such as religious issues or not accepting the technique. One patient dropped out the treatment because he had limited mobility to return to the hospital.
The recruitment process was conducted from March to December 2015. Thirty nine patients were invited. They had cancer of digestive tract from both genders, of 40-70 years, with pain scores ≥ 3 by (EVA). Were excluded: patients that used psychotropic drugs, with psychiatric disorders, terminally ill cancer, hearing impaired and mentally disabled.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Hypnosis | Use of hypnosis in the reduction of the levels of pain, depression and anxiety. Hypnosis: The hypnosis intervention consists of two sessions of 40-minute, with an interval of 7 days between them, emphasizing the pain blocking, the well-being of the patient and the reduction of the symptoms of anxiety and depression. |
| FG001 | Control | Comparison of the effects of hypnosis between the control group and the hypnosis group regarding pain, anxiety and depression with the application of the scales. Control x Hypnosis Group: The control and hypnosis groups respond in 3 different distinct moments, with the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for the evaluation of pain, and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) to evaluate the depression and the anxiety. The first evaluation will be made before the research. The second within an interval of 7 days, so being that in the experimental group the same will happen after the hypnosis session and in the control group, after the follow-up visit. The third evaluation will occur two weeks later, in order to provide a follow-up to assess the efficacy of the technique. The experimental group and the control group will be compared in relation to the intensity of the pain, depression and anxiety. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Participated in the study, patients with cancer of the digestive tract of the Clinic Palliative Care of Brasilia Base Hospital (HBDF) who present pain ≥ 3 on the Visual Analogue Scale
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Hypnosis | Use of hypnosis to reduct the levels of pain, depression and anxiety. Hypnosis: The hypnosis intervention consists of two sessions of 40-minute, with an interval of 7 days between them, emphasizing the pain blocking, the well-being of the patient and the reduction of the symptoms of anxiety and depression of the same. |
| BG001 |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Change of Pain Score in the Visual Analogue Scale | Comparison was made through the scores in the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) to measure the effect of hypnosis in pain among the 12 patients of the hypnosis group comparing to the 11 patients of the control group. The scale ranged from 0 to 10 points, without subscales. The better outcome occurs when the mean of the second or the third week decrease 3 points comparing with the first week, or when the mean of the third week decrease 3 points comparing with the second week. | 24 cancer patients were allocated. They were aged between 40-70 years, of both genders, with pain scores ≥ 3 measured by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). One patient of the control group left the research. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | The study was done with each patient in the first three consecutive weeks after randomization |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Hypnosis | Use of hypnosis in the reduction of the levels of pain, depression and anxiety. Hypnosis: The hypnosis intervention consists of two 40-minute sessions, with an interval of 7 days between them, emphasizing the pain blocking, the well-being of the patient and the reduction of the symptoms of anxiety and depression of the same. |
Not provided
Not provided
The hypnosis group were not blinded to the intervention. A short follow-up was given to each patient. The use of drugs was imbalanced among participants.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gil Montenegro | Universidade de Brasília | 556181487323 | prof.gilmontenegro@gmail.com |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010146 | Pain |
| D001519 | Behavior |
| D001008 | Anxiety Disorders |
| D003863 | Depression |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006990 | Hypnosis |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D026441 | Mind-Body Therapies |
| D000529 | Complementary Therapies |
| D013812 | Therapeutics |
| D011613 | Psychotherapy |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Control | Behavioral | The control and experimental groups respond in 3 different moments to Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for the evaluation of pain, and to Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) to evaluate depression and the anxiety. The first meeting will be made before the hypnosis. In the second meeting, within an interval of 7 days, the scales will be applied in all patients. Before applying the scales, the hypnosis group will be submitted to the session. The third meeting will occur two weeks later, where the scales will be only applied to compare the groups. |
|
| The study was done with each patient in the first three consecutive weeks after randomization |
| 17728216 | Background | Montgomery GH, Bovbjerg DH, Schnur JB, David D, Goldfarb A, Weltz CR, Schechter C, Graff-Zivin J, Tatrow K, Price DD, Silverstein JH. A randomized clinical trial of a brief hypnosis intervention to control side effects in breast surgery patients. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007 Sep 5;99(17):1304-12. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djm106. Epub 2007 Aug 28. |
| 21400251 | Background | Porter LS, Keefe FJ. Psychosocial issues in cancer pain. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2011 Aug;15(4):263-70. doi: 10.1007/s11916-011-0190-6. |
| 6622622 | Background | Spiegel D, Bloom JR. Group therapy and hypnosis reduce metastatic breast carcinoma pain. Psychosom Med. 1983 Aug;45(4):333-9. doi: 10.1097/00006842-198308000-00007. |
| 1502290 | Background | Trijsburg RW, van Knippenberg FC, Rijpma SE. Effects of psychological treatment on cancer patients: a critical review. Psychosom Med. 1992 Jul-Aug;54(4):489-517. doi: 10.1097/00006842-199207000-00011. |
| 21035021 | Background | Landier W, Tse AM. Use of complementary and alternative medical interventions for the management of procedure-related pain, anxiety, and distress in pediatric oncology: an integrative review. J Pediatr Nurs. 2010 Dec;25(6):566-79. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2010.01.009. Epub 2010 Mar 12. |
| Control |
Comparison of the effects of hypnosis between the control group and the experimental group regarding pain, anxiety and depression with the application of the scales. Control : The control and experimental groups respond in 3 different moments to Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for the evaluation of pain, and to Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) to evaluate depression and the anxiety. The first meeting was made before the hypnosis. In the second meeting, within an interval of 7 days, the scales were applied in all patients. Before applying the scales, the hypnosis group was submitted to the session. The third meeting occurred two weeks later, where the scales were only applied to compare the groups. |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| Pain | The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) consist in a straight line in ascending order from left to right, which may be numbered from 0 to 10, in which the patient report pain intensity. Values above 03 are already considered significant for pain. | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale |
|
| Anxiety | The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) has 14 questions, seven are aimed at evaluating anxiety (HADS-A) and seven for depression (HADS-D). Each item can be scored from 0 to 3, establish a maximum score of 21 points for each subscale. Values ≥ 9 for each subscales indicate the symptom. | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale |
|
| Depression | The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale has 14 questions, seven are aimed at evaluating anxiety (HADS-A) and seven for depression (HADS-D). Each item can be scored from zero to three, establish a maximum score of 21 points for each scale adopted as the cut points for both ≥ 9 subscales to the symptom diagnosis | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale |
|
Use of hypnosis to change the levels of pain.
Hypnosis: The hypnosis intervention consists of two 40-minute sessions, with an interval of 7 days between them, emphasizing the pain blocking, the well-being of the patient and the reduction of the symptoms.
| OG001 | Control | Comparison of the effects of hypnosis between the control group and the hypnosis group regarding pain with the application of the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Control x Hypnosis Group: The control and the hypnosis groups respond in 3 different distinct moments, using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) to evaluate the pain. The first evaluation was made before the research. The second within an interval of 7 days, so being that in the experimental group the same will happen after the hypnosis session and in the control group after the follow-up visit. The third evaluation was made two weeks later, in order to provide a follow-up to assess the efficacy of the technique. |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change of Anxiety and Depression in the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) | Comparison was made through the scores in the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) to measure the effect of hypnosis in anxiety and depression among the 12 patients of the hypnosis group comparing to the 11 patients of the control group. The scale has 14 items, seven of which are directed to the evaluation of anxiety (HADS-A) and seven to depression (HADS-D). Each item can be scored from zero to three, establishing a score range of 0 to 21 points for each subscale. The better outcome occurs when the mean is lower or equal to 9 for each subscale. The subscales are independent for each result of depression and anxiety. | Were allocated 24 cancer patients, aged between 40-70 years, of both genders, with depression and anxiety score ≥ 9 in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). One patient of the control group left the research. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | The study was done with each patient in the first three consecutive weeks after randomization |
|
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 12 |
| 0 |
| 12 |
| EG001 | Control | Comparison of the effects of hypnosis between the control group and the experimental group regarding pain, anxiety and depression with the application of the scales. Control x Experimental Group: The control and experimental groups respond in 3 different distinct moments, with the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for the evaluation of pain, and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) to evaluate the depression and the anxiety. The first evaluation will be made before the research. The second within an interval of 7 days, so being that in the experimental group the same will happen after the hypnosis session and in the control group after the follow-up visit. The third evaluation will be two weeks later, in order to provide a follow-up to assess the efficacy of the technique. The experimental group and the control group will be compared in relation to the intensity of the pain, depression and anxiety | 0 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
Not provided
Not provided
| D001526 | Behavioral Symptoms |
| D004191 |
| Behavioral Disciplines and Activities |
| Anxiety Third Week |
|
| Depression First Week |
|
| Depression Second Week |
|
| Depression Third Week |
|
| Mean Difference (Final Values) |
| 1.5 |
| 2-Sided |
| Superiority or Other |