Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| NCI-2014-00642 | Registry Identifier | CTRP (Clinical Trial Reporting Program) | |
| 2013-0954 | |||
| 9604 | Other Identifier | M D Anderson Cancer Center | |
| 9604 | Other Identifier | CTEP | |
| N01CM00039 | U.S. NIH Grant/Contract | View source | |
| P30CA016672 | U.S. NIH Grant/Contract | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This phase II trial studies ziv-aflibercept in treating and perfusion computed tomography perfusion imaging in predicting response in patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors that have spread to other parts of the body or cannot be removed by surgery. Ziv-aflibercept may stop the growth of tumor cells by blocking blood flow to the tumor. Diagnostic procedures, such as computed tomography perfusion, imaging may help measure a patient's response to ziv-aflibercept treatment.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
I. Estimate the objective response rate (RR) of ziv-aflibercept among patients with advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NET)s according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1.
II. Test the following hypotheses: that baseline perfusion computed tomography (CT) parameters can predict which patients with advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) will respond to treatment with ziv-aflibercept.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. Estimate progression free survival (PFS) duration among patients treated with ziv-aflibercept.
II. Evaluate the relationship between response rate and baseline blood volume (BV) and between response rate and baseline permeability surface (PS).
TERTIARY OBJECTIVES:
I. Determine whether post-treatment changes in BV expressed as relative change from baseline correlate with response to ziv-aflibercept.
II. Determine whether post-treatment tumor blood flow (BF) (absolute measurement) correlates with response to ziv-aflibercept.
III. Determine whether post-treatment changes in BF and, BV, expressed as relative change from baseline, correlate with relative change in sum of tumor diameters (RECIST 1.1 measurements).
IV. Determine the effect of ziv-aflibercept therapy on post-treatment blood flow (BF), BV, mean transit time (MTT), and PS at 4 weeks after treatment.
V. Evaluate the changes in tumor perfusion parameters at time of progression.
OUTLINE:
Patients receive ziv-aflibercept intravenously (IV) over 60-120 minutes on day 1. Courses repeat every 21 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients undergo computed tomography perfusion imaging at baseline, day 21 of course 1, and at time of progression.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up periodically.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment (ziv-aflibercept, perfusion CT) | Experimental | Patients receive ziv-aflibercept IV over 60-120 minutes on day 1. Courses repeat every 21 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients undergo computed tomography perfusion imaging at baseline, day 21 of course 1, and at time of progression. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Computed Tomography Perfusion Imaging | Radiation | Undergo computed tomography perfusion imaging |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Objective Response Rate According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 | 90% exact confidence interval was constructed for the overall group. Per Response EvaluationCriteria In SolidTumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1) for target lesions and assessed by CT or MRI: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR)=CR+PR, | Through study completion an average of 19 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Progression Free Survival (PFS) | Calculated for all eligible participants using the Kaplan Meier method and reported with confidence interval. | Through study completion an average of 19 months |
| Baseline Blood Volume (BV) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in BV | Median will be used as cut point for correlation of post-treatment changes in BV expressed as relative change from baseline with response. Response rates will be compared using chi-square test or Fisher's exact test whenever appropriate. Response profiles will be compared using non-parametric test (Wilcoxon rank sum test). | Baseline to 4 weeks after treatment |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Daniel Halperin | M.D. Anderson Cancer Center | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moffitt Cancer Center-International Plaza | Tampa | Florida | 33607 | United States | ||
| Moffitt Cancer Center |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Aflibercept 6 mg /kg IV | Aflibercept 6 mg /kg IV every 3 weeks. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Jan 11, 2018 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Laboratory Biomarker Analysis | Other | Correlative studies |
|
| Ziv-Aflibercept | Biological | Given IV |
|
|
The relationship between response rate and baseline BV will be evaluated. In addition to hypothesis testing using externally generated cut-points, refinement of optimal cut points in baseline BV separating responders and non-responders will be performed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves will be generated. Response rates of perfusion computed tomography (pCT) subgroups defined by these cut-points will be compared using chi-square test. Response profiles of pCT subgroups defined by these cut-points will be compared using non-parametric test (Wilcoxon rank sum test).
| Baseline |
| Baseline Permeability Surface (PS) | The relationship between response rate and baseline PS will be evaluated. In addition to hypothesis testing using externally generated cut-points, refinement of optimal cut points in baseline PS separating responders and non-responders will be performed. ROC curves will be generated. Response rates of pCT subgroups defined by these cut-points will be compared using chi-square test. Response profiles of pCT subgroups defined by these cut-points will be compared using non-parametric test (Wilcoxon rank sum test). | Baseline |
| Post-treatment Tumor Blood Flow (BF) | Median will be used as cut point for correlation of post-treatment tumor BF (absolute measurement) with response. Response rates will be compared using chi-square test or Fisher's exact test whenever appropriate. Response rates will be compared using chi-square test or Fisher's exact test whenever appropriate. | 4 weeks after treatment |
| Post-treatment Change in BF | Continuous parameters in relative change in pCT parameters will be plotted against best relative change in sum of tumor diameters from RECIST 1.1 tumor measurements. Pearson correlation will be used to test statistical significance. Non-parametric test will be used if appropriate. | Baseline to 4 weeks after treatment |
| Post-treatment Change in BV | Continuous parameters in relative change in pCT parameters will be plotted against best relative change in sum of tumor diameters from RECIST 1.1 tumor measurements. Pearson correlation will be used to test statistical significance. Non-parametric test will be used if appropriate. | Baseline to 4 weeks after treatment |
| Change in Participants Parameters | The effect of ziv-aflibercept therapy on post-treatment BF, BV, mean transit time, and PS will be determined. Descriptive statistics of pre and post treatment values will be given. Distribution of pre and post treatment values will be graphed. Treatment induced change in values will be compared using paired-t test. Non-parametric test will be used if appropriate. | Baseline to 4 weeks after treatment |
| Tumor Perfusion Parameters at Time of Progression | Up to 1 year |
| Tampa |
| Florida |
| 33612 |
| United States |
| M D Anderson Cancer Center | Houston | Texas | 77030 | United States |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Aflibercept 6 mg /kg IV | Aflibercept 6 mg /kg IV every 3 weeks. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Full Range | years |
| |||||||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Objective Response Rate According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 | 90% exact confidence interval was constructed for the overall group. Per Response EvaluationCriteria In SolidTumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1) for target lesions and assessed by CT or MRI: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR)=CR+PR, | Eligible patients with baseline perfusion CT imaging. One patient from moffitt was a screen fail however 21 patients were evaluable for response and toxicity. | Posted | Number | 90% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | Through study completion an average of 19 months |
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Progression Free Survival (PFS) | Calculated for all eligible participants using the Kaplan Meier method and reported with confidence interval. | Posted | Median | 95% Confidence Interval | months | Through study completion an average of 19 months |
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Baseline Blood Volume (BV) | The relationship between response rate and baseline BV will be evaluated. In addition to hypothesis testing using externally generated cut-points, refinement of optimal cut points in baseline BV separating responders and non-responders will be performed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves will be generated. Response rates of perfusion computed tomography (pCT) subgroups defined by these cut-points will be compared using chi-square test. Response profiles of pCT subgroups defined by these cut-points will be compared using non-parametric test (Wilcoxon rank sum test). | Due to low response rate data were not collected | Posted | Baseline |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Baseline Permeability Surface (PS) | The relationship between response rate and baseline PS will be evaluated. In addition to hypothesis testing using externally generated cut-points, refinement of optimal cut points in baseline PS separating responders and non-responders will be performed. ROC curves will be generated. Response rates of pCT subgroups defined by these cut-points will be compared using chi-square test. Response profiles of pCT subgroups defined by these cut-points will be compared using non-parametric test (Wilcoxon rank sum test). | Due to low response rate data were not collected | Posted | Baseline |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other Pre-specified | Change in BV | Median will be used as cut point for correlation of post-treatment changes in BV expressed as relative change from baseline with response. Response rates will be compared using chi-square test or Fisher's exact test whenever appropriate. Response profiles will be compared using non-parametric test (Wilcoxon rank sum test). | Due to the low response rate, data for blood volume were not collected | Posted | Baseline to 4 weeks after treatment |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other Pre-specified | Post-treatment Tumor Blood Flow (BF) | Median will be used as cut point for correlation of post-treatment tumor BF (absolute measurement) with response. Response rates will be compared using chi-square test or Fisher's exact test whenever appropriate. Response rates will be compared using chi-square test or Fisher's exact test whenever appropriate. | Response rate was too low to power a valid analysis. | Posted | 4 weeks after treatment |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other Pre-specified | Post-treatment Change in BF | Continuous parameters in relative change in pCT parameters will be plotted against best relative change in sum of tumor diameters from RECIST 1.1 tumor measurements. Pearson correlation will be used to test statistical significance. Non-parametric test will be used if appropriate. | Response rate was too low to power a valid analysis. | Posted | Baseline to 4 weeks after treatment |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other Pre-specified | Post-treatment Change in BV | Continuous parameters in relative change in pCT parameters will be plotted against best relative change in sum of tumor diameters from RECIST 1.1 tumor measurements. Pearson correlation will be used to test statistical significance. Non-parametric test will be used if appropriate. | Response rate was too low to power a valid analysis. | Posted | Baseline to 4 weeks after treatment |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other Pre-specified | Change in Participants Parameters | The effect of ziv-aflibercept therapy on post-treatment BF, BV, mean transit time, and PS will be determined. Descriptive statistics of pre and post treatment values will be given. Distribution of pre and post treatment values will be graphed. Treatment induced change in values will be compared using paired-t test. Non-parametric test will be used if appropriate. | Response rate was too low to power a valid analysis. | Posted | Baseline to 4 weeks after treatment |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Other Pre-specified | Tumor Perfusion Parameters at Time of Progression | No patients underwent perfusion CT at time of progression, no analysis could not be performed. | Posted | Up to 1 year |
|
|
C1D1 and for 30 days after the last dose of study drug.
Patients will be followed until resolution or stabilization of the adverse event.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Aflibercept 6 mg /kg IV | Aflibercept 6 mg /kg IV every 3 weeks. | 1 | 22 | 4 | 22 | 21 | 22 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pain Abdominal | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Hemorrhage Upper GI | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| cholecystitis | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Dehydration | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abdominal pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Alanine aminotransferase increased | Investigations | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Anemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Anorexia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Arthralgia | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Aspartate aminotransferase increased | Investigations | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Constipation | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Creatinine increased | Investigations | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Diarrhea | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Epistaxis | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Fatigue | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Hoarseness | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Hypertension | Vascular disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Mucositis oral | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Neutrophil count decreased | Investigations | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Pain | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Platelet count decreased | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Proteinuria | Renal and urinary disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Sinusitis | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Weight loss | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dr. Daniel M. Halperin/ GI Medical Oncology | UT MD Anderson Cancer Center | 713-792-2828 | DMHalperin@mdanderson.org |
| Aug 16, 2018 |
| Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D018761 | Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1 |
| D013005 | Somatostatinoma |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009377 | Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia |
| D004701 | Endocrine Gland Neoplasms |
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D009378 | Neoplasms, Multiple Primary |
| D009386 | Neoplastic Syndromes, Hereditary |
| D030342 | Genetic Diseases, Inborn |
| D009358 | Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities |
| D004700 | Endocrine System Diseases |
| D018278 | Carcinoma, Neuroendocrine |
| D018358 | Neuroendocrine Tumors |
| D017599 | Neuroectodermal Tumors |
| D009373 | Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal |
| D009370 | Neoplasms by Histologic Type |
| D000230 | Adenocarcinoma |
| D002277 | Carcinoma |
| D009375 | Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial |
| D018273 | Carcinoma, Islet Cell |
| D010190 | Pancreatic Neoplasms |
| D004067 | Digestive System Neoplasms |
| D004066 | Digestive System Diseases |
| D010182 | Pancreatic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003570 | Cytidine Triphosphate |
| C533178 | aflibercept |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003597 | Cytosine Nucleotides |
| D011742 | Pyrimidine Nucleotides |
| D011743 | Pyrimidines |
| D006573 | Heterocyclic Compounds, 1-Ring |
| D006571 | Heterocyclic Compounds |
| D009711 | Nucleotides |
| D009706 | Nucleic Acids, Nucleotides, and Nucleosides |
| D012265 | Ribonucleotides |
Not provided
Not provided
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
|
| Black or African American |
|
| White |
|
| More than one race |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
| Categories |
|---|
|