Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Difficulty enrolling subjects
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
To determine the accuracy of unguided versus ultrasound (US) guided knee joint injections in obese patients with no clinically detectable effusion.
Patients with BMI > 30 and no clinically detectable knee effusions, with clinical symptoms and radiographic evidence of knee osteoarthritis or inflammatory arthritis, who have been referred for an intraarticular knee injection with corticosteroid will be randomized to either receive ultrasound guidance or not receive ultrasound guidance for their injection. One group will use the ultrasound guidance to position the needle. The other group will use landmarks to position the needle. For both groups, once the proceduralist is comfortable with needle placement for the injection, contrast dye will be injected and fluoroscopy used, to determine if the needle placement is correct. If it is determined the needle placement is not correct, fluoroscopy will be used to reposition it. Once needle placement is determined to be acceptable, the injection will be given. Patient demographics will be collected, along with pain scores preprocedure and two weeks post-procedure.
Subjects are responsible for all clinical costs associated with the injection.
There is no remuneration offered for study participation.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ultrasound Machine Guided Injection | Active Comparator | Use of ultrasound machine guidance in needle placement into the knee joint |
|
| Unguided Injection | Active Comparator | Needle placement performed without ultrasound machine guidance |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ultrasound machine | Device | Use of ultrasound machine guidance for accurate needle placement into the knee joint |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy of the initial needle placement into the knee joint. | The number of participants with accurate initial needle placement into the knee joint | During the initial needle placement, which can take 1-5 minutes |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Improved clinical efficacy of US guided knee injections compared to unguided knee injections | Comparison of VAS scores 30 minutes after injection between subjects who had ultrasound guided knee injections and those who didn't | 30 minutes post injection |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Detection of knee effusions | Comparison of the accuracy of detecting a knee effusion on clinical examination versus ultrasonographically | During procedure, which can take up to 30 minutes to complete |
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Matthew Pingree, MD | Mayo Clinic | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mayo Clinic in Rochester | Rochester | Minnesota | 55905 | United States |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010003 | Osteoarthritis |
| D001168 | Arthritis |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007592 | Joint Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
| D012216 | Rheumatic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Unguided injection | Device | Needle placement will take place without ultrasound machine guidance |
|
|