Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The dermal substitute NEVELIA® has received CE marking in July 9, 2013. Its use in the NEVAL protocol will be in accordance with its leaflet, i.e. for the treatment of burns or in case of reconstructive plastic surgery.
The matric implantation will be followed by autologous skin grafting when the neodermis formation will be observed.
The NEVAL protocol is a descriptive study conducted in order to confirm the clinical evidence of safety and performance of NEVELIA®, as described in the literature on equivalent products.
This dermal substitute consists of an inner biodegradable dermal substitute made of bovine collagen (collagen of type I), covered with an outer silicone membrane. Its porosity and the speed of degradation allow the act of recolonization by the fibroblasts and initiation of the vascularization process within 3 weeks. The application procedure requires removement of the silicone layer and wound covering with an ultra-thin epidermal graft, possibly meshed. This surgical procedure is well-known and permits an ultra-thin epidermal graft.
All the patients will be treated with NEVELIA®, prior to autologous skin grafting within 3 weeks after its application. Then, three follow-up visits will be planned: post operatively, at 6 and 12 months.
The objectives are:
Primary objective: To assess the type and frequency of complications
Secondary objectives:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| NEVELIA® | Experimental | NEVELIA® implantation according to the intended use in the leaflet, prior to autologous skin grafting planned 3 weeks after its application. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NEVELIA® implantation | Device | Skin substitute implantation followed by ultra-thin epidermal graft |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Assessment of the type and frequency of complications related to NEVELIA® | Up to 12 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Take rate of NEVELIA® | At Day 21 | |
| Take rate of skin graft | At Day 28, 6 and 12 months | |
| Satisfaction rate of physician and patient |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sophie AMAT-JARLIER | Contact | +33478567280 | s.amatjarlier@symatese.com | |
| Chantal BELIN | Contact | +33478567280 | c.belin@symatese.com |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Vincent Casoli, MD PhD | Centre François Xavier Michelet - CHU de Bordeaux, FRANCE | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Centre François Xavier Michelet - CHU de Bordeaux | Bordeaux | 33076 | France |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19864266 | Background | Shevchenko RV, James SL, James SE. A review of tissue-engineered skin bioconstructs available for skin reconstruction. J R Soc Interface. 2010 Feb 6;7(43):229-58. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2009.0403. Epub 2009 Oct 28. | |
| 17435787 | Background | Clark RA, Ghosh K, Tonnesen MG. Tissue engineering for cutaneous wounds. J Invest Dermatol. 2007 May;127(5):1018-29. doi: 10.1038/sj.jid.5700715. |
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Date | Date Unknown |
|---|---|---|
| Release | Jan 26, 2023 | |
| Reset | Nov 9, 2023 | |
| Release | Nov 14, 2024 | |
| Reset | Jan 3, 2025 |
Not provided
Not provided
| Release Date | Unrelease Date | Unrelease Date Unknown | Reset Date | MCP Release Number |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 26, 2023 | Nov 9, 2023 | |||
| Nov 14, 2024 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| At 6 and 12 months |
| Quality of healed skin | Vancouver score | At 6 and 12 months |
| Re-operation rate | At 12 months |
| 17314974 | Background | MacNeil S. Progress and opportunities for tissue-engineered skin. Nature. 2007 Feb 22;445(7130):874-80. doi: 10.1038/nature05664. |
| 17825993 | Background | Pham C, Greenwood J, Cleland H, Woodruff P, Maddern G. Bioengineered skin substitutes for the management of burns: a systematic review. Burns. 2007 Dec;33(8):946-57. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2007.03.020. Epub 2007 Sep 7. |
| 20930698 | Background | Koenen W, Felcht M, Goerdt S, Faulhaber J. Skin substitutes in dermatosurgery. G Ital Dermatol Venereol. 2010 Oct;145(5):637-49. |
| 20116939 | Background | Chaouat M, Zakine G, Mimoun M. [Principles of the local treatment: Surgical processing]. Pathol Biol (Paris). 2011 Jun;59(3):e57-61. doi: 10.1016/j.patbio.2009.12.003. Epub 2010 Feb 8. French. |
| Jan 3, 2025 |