Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2013-003467-60 | EudraCT Number |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
A Phase 2a, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel group, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, efficacy and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic effect of ABT-981 in patients with symptomatic, radiographic, and inflammatory knee osteoarthritis.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| ABT-981 low dose | Experimental | 25 mg ABT-981 subcutaneous (SC) every 2 weeks (E2W) |
|
| ABT-981 medium dose | Experimental | 100 mg ABT-981 SC E2W |
|
| ABT-981 high dose | Experimental | 200 mg ABT-981 SC E2W |
|
| Placebo | Placebo Comparator | Placebo |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ABT-981 | Biological |
|
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Scores of the Index Knee at Week 16 | The WOMAC was developed to assess pain, stiffness, and physical function in subjects with hip and/or knee osteoarthritis. The WOMAC consists of 24 items divided into 3 subscales: Pain (5 items); Stiffness (2 items); and Physical Function (17 items). Each item is rated on an 11-point (0 to 10) numerical rating scale (NRS). The pain sub-score has a range of 0 (no pain) to 50 (maximum pain). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. | Baseline, Week 16 |
| Change From Baseline in Quantitative Synovitis of the Index Knee at Week 26 | Change in synovitis of the index knee was evaluated using quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measurements. MRI quantitative synovitis of the index knee was defined by mean synovial membrane thickness. | Baseline, Week 26 |
| Change From Baseline in Effusion Volume of the Index Knee at Week 26 | Baseline, Week 26 | |
| Change From Baseline in Whole-Organ Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score (WORMS) Semi-Quantitative Synovitis/Effusion Score of the Index Knee at Week 26 | Semi-quantitative synovitis/effusion volume WORMS scores were scored as normal (0), < 33% of maximum estimated distention (1), 33% - 66% of maximum estimated distention (2), or > 66% of maximum estimated distention (3). | Baseline, Week 26 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in WOMAC Physical Function Scores of the Index Knee at Week 16 | The WOMAC was developed to assess pain, stiffness, and physical function in subjects with hip and/or knee osteoarthritis. The WOMAC consists of 24 items divided into 3 subscales: Pain (5 items); Stiffness (2 items); and Physical Function (17 items). Each item is rated on an 11-point (0 to 10) NRS. The WOMAC physical function subscale score was 0 (normal) to 170 (least physical function). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Marc Levesque, MD | AbbVie | Study Chair |
Not provided
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 30653843 | Derived | Fleischmann RM, Bliddal H, Blanco FJ, Schnitzer TJ, Peterfy C, Chen S, Wang L, Feng S, Conaghan PG, Berenbaum F, Pelletier JP, Martel-Pelletier J, Vaeterlein O, Kaeley GS, Liu W, Kosloski MP, Levy G, Zhang L, Medema JK, Levesque MC. A Phase II Trial of Lutikizumab, an Anti-Interleukin-1alpha/beta Dual Variable Domain Immunoglobulin, in Knee Osteoarthritis Patients With Synovitis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019 Jul;71(7):1056-1069. doi: 10.1002/art.40840. Epub 2019 Jun 7. |
Not provided
Not provided
The study included a screening period (approximately 45 days prior to first study drug dose) and a washout period (5 half-lives of the longest acting analgesic used, or 48 hours, whichever was longer, in which all standard of care analgesic medications were discontinued prior to the first study drug dose).
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Placebo | Matching placebo SC E2W |
| FG001 | ABT-981 25 mg | 25 mg ABT-981 SC E2W |
| FG002 | ABT-981 100 mg | 100 mg ABT-981 SC E2W |
| FG003 | ABT-981 200 mg | 200 mg ABT-981 SC E2W |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Modified intent-to-treat population: all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Placebo | Matching placebo SC E2W |
| BG001 | ABT-981 25 mg | 25 mg ABT-981 SC E2W |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Scores of the Index Knee at Week 16 | The WOMAC was developed to assess pain, stiffness, and physical function in subjects with hip and/or knee osteoarthritis. The WOMAC consists of 24 items divided into 3 subscales: Pain (5 items); Stiffness (2 items); and Physical Function (17 items). Each item is rated on an 11-point (0 to 10) numerical rating scale (NRS). The pain sub-score has a range of 0 (no pain) to 50 (maximum pain). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. | Modified Intent to Treat population: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study drug, Last observation carried forward (LOCF; missing responses were imputed by calculation based on the last non-missing post-baseline component values). | Posted | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | score on a scale | Baseline, Week 16 |
|
up to Week 52 (or last dose of study drug) plus 70 days
Safety population: all participants who took at least one dose of study drug.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Placebo | Matching placebo SC E2W |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ADRENAL HAEMORRHAGE | Endocrine disorders | 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NEUTROPENIA | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Global Medical Services | AbbVie | AbbVie | abbvieclinicaltrials@abbvie.com |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D020370 | Osteoarthritis, Knee |
| D010003 | Osteoarthritis |
| D013585 | Synovitis |
| D010146 | Pain |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001168 | Arthritis |
| D007592 | Joint Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
| D012216 | Rheumatic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C000655035 | lutikizumab |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Placebo | Other |
|
| Baseline, Week 16 |
| Change From Baseline in WOMAC Physical Function Scores of the Index Knee at Week 26 | The WOMAC was developed to assess pain, stiffness, and physical function in subjects with hip and/or knee osteoarthritis. The WOMAC consists of 24 items divided into 3 subscales: Pain (5 items); Stiffness (2 items); and Physical Function (17 items). Each item is rated on an 11-point (0 to 10) NRS. The WOMAC physical function subscale score was 0 (normal) to 170 (least physical function). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. | Baseline, Week 26 |
| Change From Baseline in WOMAC Physical Function Scores of the Index Knee at Week 52 | The WOMAC was developed to assess pain, stiffness, and physical function in subjects with hip and/or knee osteoarthritis. The WOMAC consists of 24 items divided into 3 subscales: Pain (5 items); Stiffness (2 items); and Physical Function (17 items). Each item is rated on an 11-point (0 to 10) NRS. The WOMAC physical function subscale score was 0 (normal) to 170 (least physical function). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. | Baseline, Week 52 |
| Change From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Scores of the Index Knee at Week 26 | The WOMAC was developed to assess pain, stiffness, and physical function in subjects with hip and/or knee osteoarthritis. The WOMAC consists of 24 items divided into 3 subscales: Pain (5 items); Stiffness (2 items); and Physical Function (17 items). Each item is rated on an 11-point (0 to 10) numerical rating scale (NRS). The pain sub-score has a range of 0 (no pain) to 50 (maximum pain). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. | Baseline, Week 26 |
| Change From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Scores of the Index Knee at Week 52 | The WOMAC was developed to assess pain, stiffness, and physical function in subjects with hip and/or knee osteoarthritis. The WOMAC consists of 24 items divided into 3 subscales: Pain (5 items); Stiffness (2 items); and Physical Function (17 items). Each item is rated on an 11-point (0 to 10) numerical rating scale (NRS). The pain sub-score has a range of 0 (no pain) to 50 (maximum pain). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. | Baseline, Week 52 |
| Change From Baseline in Global Total Bone Marrow Lesion (BML) Score of the Index Knee Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) at Week 26 | BMLs in 15 regions were measured with MRI, and graded as 0 (normal), 1 (mild; < 25% of region), 2 (moderate; 25% - 50% of region), or 3 (severe; > 50% of region). The global total BML score was the sum of the 15 component scores, and ranged from 0 (normal) to 45 (severe). | Baseline, Week 26 |
| Change From Baseline in Global Total BML Score of the Index Knee MRI at Week 52 | BMLs in 15 regions were measured with MRI, and graded as 0 (normal), 1 (mild; < 25% of region), 2 (moderate; 25% - 50% of region), or 3 (severe; > 50% of region). The global total BML score was the sum of the 15 component scores, and ranged from 0 (normal) to 45 (severe). | Baseline, Week 52 |
| Change From Baseline in Index Knee Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP) Scores at Week 16 | The ICOAP is a multidimensional osteoarthritis-specific measure designed to comprehensively evaluate the pain experience in patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis. The ICOAP includes 11 items (5 constant pain items; 6 intermittent pain items). Each item is rated on a 0 to 4 point scale with a 7-day recall period. The raw maximum intermittent pain score ranges from 0 to 24, transformed to a reported scale of 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst pain). The raw maximum constant pain score ranges from 0 to 20, transformed to a reported scale of 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst pain). | Baseline, Week 16 |
| Change From Baseline in Index Knee ICOAP Scores at Week 26 | The ICOAP is a multidimensional osteoarthritis-specific measure designed to comprehensively evaluate the pain experience in patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis. The ICOAP includes 11 items (5 constant pain items; 6 intermittent pain items). Each item is rated on a 0 to 4 point scale with a 7-day recall period. The raw maximum intermittent pain score ranges from 0 to 24, transformed to a reported scale of 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst pain). The raw maximum constant pain score ranges from 0 to 20, transformed to a reported scale of 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst pain). | Baseline, Week 26 |
| Change From Baseline in Index Knee ICOAP Scores at Week 52 | The ICOAP is a multidimensional osteoarthritis-specific measure designed to comprehensively evaluate the pain experience in patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis. The ICOAP includes 11 items (5 constant pain items; 6 intermittent pain items). Each item is rated on a 0 to 4 point scale with a 7-day recall period. The raw maximum intermittent pain score ranges from 0 to 24, transformed to a reported scale of 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst pain). The raw maximum constant pain score ranges from 0 to 20, transformed to a reported scale of 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst pain). | Baseline, Week 52 |
| Change From Baseline In Index Knee Pain Intensity at Week 16 | The index knee pain intensity was assessed in 3 different ways using an 11 -point NRS (0 to 10 points representing 'no pain' to 'worst possible pain'). Subjects were asked to enter: 1) average pain intensity during the past week (7-day recall period); 2) the worst pain during activity over the past 24 hours; 3) pain intensity before and after a 40 meter walk (performance pain, before and after). The 40 meter fast paced walk test is a test of short distance walking activity, walking speed over short distances and changing direction during walking. Individuals taking the test should walk as quickly but as safely as possible, without running, along a walkway and then turn around, and repeat again for a total distance of 40 m (132 feet). The total time taken to walk the 40 meters is recorded. | Baseline, Week 16 |
| Change From Baseline In Index Knee Pain Intensity at Week 26 | The index knee pain intensity was assessed in 3 different ways using an 11 -point NRS (0 to 10 points representing 'no pain' to 'worst possible pain'). Subjects were asked to enter: 1) average pain intensity during the past week (7-day recall period); 2) the worst pain during activity over the past 24 hours; 3) pain intensity before and after a 40 meter walk (performance pain, before and after). The 40 meter fast paced walk test is a test of short distance walking activity, walking speed over short distances and changing direction during walking. Individuals taking the test should walk as quickly but as safely as possible, without running, along a walkway and then turn around, and repeat again for a total distance of 40 m (132 feet). The total time taken to walk the 40 meters is recorded. | Baseline, Week 26 |
| Change From Baseline In Index Knee Pain Intensity at Week 52 | The index knee pain intensity was assessed in 3 different ways using an 11 -point NRS (0 to 10 points representing 'no pain' to 'worst possible pain'). Subjects were asked to enter: 1) average pain intensity during the past week (7-day recall period); 2) the worst pain during activity over the past 24 hours; 3) pain intensity before and after a 40 meter walk (performance pain, before and after). The 40 meter fast paced walk test is a test of short distance walking activity, walking speed over short distances and changing direction during walking. Individuals taking the test should walk as quickly but as safely as possible, without running, along a walkway and then turn around, and repeat again for a total distance of 40 m (132 feet). The total time taken to walk the 40 meters is recorded. | Baseline, Week 52 |
| Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Arthritis of the Index Knee at Week 16 | The PGA is a single item for evaluating overall osteoarthritis disease activity. PGA is assessed using an 11-point NRS of 0 to 10 points (representing best to worst disease status, respectively), with a 7-day recall period. | Baseline, Week 16 |
| Change From Baseline in PGA of Arthritis of the Index Knee at Week 26 | The PGA is a single item for evaluating overall osteoarthritis disease activity. PGA is assessed using an 11-point NRS of 0 to 10 points (representing best to worst disease status, respectively), with a 7-day recall period. | Baseline, Week 26 |
| Change From Baseline in PGA of Arthritis of the Index Knee at Week 52 | The PGA is a single item for evaluating overall osteoarthritis disease activity. PGA is assessed using an 11-point NRS of 0 to 10 points (representing best to worst disease status, respectively), with a 7-day recall period. | Baseline, Week 52 |
| Change From Baseline in Cartilage Volume of the Index Knee at Week 26 | Cartilage volume of the global knee, the medial central condyle + plateau, and the medial condyle + plateau was measured using MRI. | Baseline, Week 26 |
| Change From Baseline in Cartilage Volume of the Index Knee at Week 52 | Cartilage volume of the global knee, the medial central condyle + plateau, and the medial condyle + plateau was measured using MRI. | Baseline, Week 52 |
| Change From Baseline in Cartilage Thickness of the Index Knee at Week 26 | Cartilage thickness of the global knee, the medial central condyle + plateau, and the medial condyle + plateau was measured using MRI. | Baseline, Week 26 |
| Change From Baseline in Cartilage Thickness of the Index Knee at Week 52 | Cartilage thickness of the global knee, the medial central condyle + plateau, and the medial condyle + plateau was measured using MRI. | Baseline, Week 52 |
| Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Clinical Trials/Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT/OARSI) Response Rate at Week 16 | Percentage of participants classified as OMERACT-OARSI responders at Week 16. A subject was considered an OMERACT-OARSI responder if any of the following 3 criteria were met: 1. WOMAC Pain (in 0 - 100 scale) improvement ≥ 50% and absolute reduction ≥ 20 as compared to the baseline; or 2. WOMAC Function (in normalized 0 - 100 scale) improvement ≥ 50% and absolute reduction ≥ 20 as compared to the baseline; or 3. At least 2 of the following 3 are met: WOMAC Pain improvement ≥ 20% and absolute reduction (in normalized 0 - 100 scale) ≥ 10 as compared to the baseline; WOMAC Function improvement ≥ 20% and absolute reduction (in normalized 0 - 100 scale) ≥ 10 as compared to the baseline; PGA improvement ≥ 20% and absolute change (in normalized 0 - 100 scale) ≥ 10 as compared to the baseline. Response rate 95% confidence interval based on normal approximation. | Week 16 |
| Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Clinical Trials/Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT/OARSI) Response Rate at Week 26 | Percentage of participants classified as OMERACT-OARSI responders at Week 26. A subject was considered an OMERACT-OARSI responder if any of the following 3 criteria were met: 1. WOMAC Pain (in 0 - 100 scale) improvement ≥ 50% and absolute reduction ≥ 20 as compared to the baseline; or 2. WOMAC Function (in normalized 0 - 100 scale) improvement ≥ 50% and absolute reduction ≥ 20 as compared to the baseline; or 3. At least 2 of the following 3 are met: WOMAC Pain improvement ≥ 20% and absolute reduction (in normalized 0 - 100 scale) ≥ 10 as compared to the baseline; WOMAC Function improvement ≥ 20% and absolute reduction (in normalized 0 - 100 scale) ≥ 10 as compared to the baseline; PGA improvement ≥ 20% and absolute change (in normalized 0 - 100 scale) ≥ 10 as compared to the baseline. Response rate 95% confidence interval based on normal approximation. | Week 26 |
| Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Clinical Trials/Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT/OARSI) Response Rate at Week 52 | Percentage of participants classified as OMERACT-OARSI responders at Week 52. A subject was considered an OMERACT-OARSI responder if any of the following 3 criteria were met: 1. WOMAC Pain (in 0 - 100 scale) improvement ≥ 50% and absolute reduction ≥ 20 as compared to the baseline; or 2. WOMAC Function (in normalized 0 - 100 scale) improvement ≥ 50% and absolute reduction ≥ 20 as compared to the baseline; or 3. At least 2 of the following 3 are met: WOMAC Pain improvement ≥ 20% and absolute reduction (in normalized 0 - 100 scale) ≥ 10 as compared to the baseline; WOMAC Function improvement ≥ 20% and absolute reduction (in normalized 0 - 100 scale) ≥ 10 as compared to the baseline; PGA improvement ≥ 20% and absolute change (in normalized 0 - 100 scale) ≥ 10 as compared to the baseline. Response rate 95% confidence interval based on normal approximation. | Week 52 |
| Adverse Event |
|
| Lack of Efficacy |
|
| Other |
|
| Withdrawal by Subject |
|
| Lost to Follow-up |
|
| BG002 |
| ABT-981 100 mg |
100 mg ABT-981 SC E2W |
| BG003 | ABT-981 200 mg | 200 mg ABT-981 SC E2W |
| BG004 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
Matching placebo SC E2W
| OG001 | ABT-981 25 mg | 25 mg ABT-981 SC E2W |
| OG002 | ABT-981 100 mg | 100 mg ABT-981 SC E2W |
| OG003 | ABT-981 200 mg | 200 mg ABT-981 SC E2W |
|
|
|
| Primary | Change From Baseline in Quantitative Synovitis of the Index Knee at Week 26 | Change in synovitis of the index knee was evaluated using quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measurements. MRI quantitative synovitis of the index knee was defined by mean synovial membrane thickness. | Modified Intent to Treat population: all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug, observed cases. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | mm | Baseline, Week 26 |
|
|
|
|
| Primary | Change From Baseline in Effusion Volume of the Index Knee at Week 26 | Modified Intent to Treat population: all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug, observed cases. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | mL | Baseline, Week 26 |
|
|
|
|
| Primary | Change From Baseline in Whole-Organ Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score (WORMS) Semi-Quantitative Synovitis/Effusion Score of the Index Knee at Week 26 | Semi-quantitative synovitis/effusion volume WORMS scores were scored as normal (0), < 33% of maximum estimated distention (1), 33% - 66% of maximum estimated distention (2), or > 66% of maximum estimated distention (3). | Modified Intent to Treat population: all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug, observed cases. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | score on a scale | Baseline, Week 26 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in WOMAC Physical Function Scores of the Index Knee at Week 16 | The WOMAC was developed to assess pain, stiffness, and physical function in subjects with hip and/or knee osteoarthritis. The WOMAC consists of 24 items divided into 3 subscales: Pain (5 items); Stiffness (2 items); and Physical Function (17 items). Each item is rated on an 11-point (0 to 10) NRS. The WOMAC physical function subscale score was 0 (normal) to 170 (least physical function). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. | Modified intent to Treat population: all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug, LOCF (missing responses were imputed by calculation based on the last non-missing post-baseline component values). | Posted | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | score on a scale | Baseline, Week 16 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in WOMAC Physical Function Scores of the Index Knee at Week 26 | The WOMAC was developed to assess pain, stiffness, and physical function in subjects with hip and/or knee osteoarthritis. The WOMAC consists of 24 items divided into 3 subscales: Pain (5 items); Stiffness (2 items); and Physical Function (17 items). Each item is rated on an 11-point (0 to 10) NRS. The WOMAC physical function subscale score was 0 (normal) to 170 (least physical function). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. | Modified Intent to Treat population: all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug, LOCF (missing responses were imputed by calculation based on the last non-missing post-baseline component values). | Posted | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | score on a scale | Baseline, Week 26 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in WOMAC Physical Function Scores of the Index Knee at Week 52 | The WOMAC was developed to assess pain, stiffness, and physical function in subjects with hip and/or knee osteoarthritis. The WOMAC consists of 24 items divided into 3 subscales: Pain (5 items); Stiffness (2 items); and Physical Function (17 items). Each item is rated on an 11-point (0 to 10) NRS. The WOMAC physical function subscale score was 0 (normal) to 170 (least physical function). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. | Modified Intent to Treat population: all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug, LOCF (missing responses were imputed by calculation based on the last non-missing post-baseline component values). | Posted | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | score on a scale | Baseline, Week 52 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Scores of the Index Knee at Week 26 | The WOMAC was developed to assess pain, stiffness, and physical function in subjects with hip and/or knee osteoarthritis. The WOMAC consists of 24 items divided into 3 subscales: Pain (5 items); Stiffness (2 items); and Physical Function (17 items). Each item is rated on an 11-point (0 to 10) numerical rating scale (NRS). The pain sub-score has a range of 0 (no pain) to 50 (maximum pain). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. | Modified intent to Treat population: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study drug, LOCF (missing responses were imputed by calculation based on the last non-missing post-baseline component values). | Posted | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | score on a scale | Baseline, Week 26 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Scores of the Index Knee at Week 52 | The WOMAC was developed to assess pain, stiffness, and physical function in subjects with hip and/or knee osteoarthritis. The WOMAC consists of 24 items divided into 3 subscales: Pain (5 items); Stiffness (2 items); and Physical Function (17 items). Each item is rated on an 11-point (0 to 10) numerical rating scale (NRS). The pain sub-score has a range of 0 (no pain) to 50 (maximum pain). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. | Modified intent to Treat population: all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug, LOCF (missing responses were imputed by calculation based on the last non-missing post-baseline component values). | Posted | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | score on a scale | Baseline, Week 52 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Global Total Bone Marrow Lesion (BML) Score of the Index Knee Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) at Week 26 | BMLs in 15 regions were measured with MRI, and graded as 0 (normal), 1 (mild; < 25% of region), 2 (moderate; 25% - 50% of region), or 3 (severe; > 50% of region). The global total BML score was the sum of the 15 component scores, and ranged from 0 (normal) to 45 (severe). | Modified Intent to Treat population: all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug, observed cases. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | score on a scale | Baseline, Week 26 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Global Total BML Score of the Index Knee MRI at Week 52 | BMLs in 15 regions were measured with MRI, and graded as 0 (normal), 1 (mild; < 25% of region), 2 (moderate; 25% - 50% of region), or 3 (severe; > 50% of region). The global total BML score was the sum of the 15 component scores, and ranged from 0 (normal) to 45 (severe). | Modified Intent to Treat population: all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug, observed cases. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | score on a scale | Baseline, Week 52 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Index Knee Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP) Scores at Week 16 | The ICOAP is a multidimensional osteoarthritis-specific measure designed to comprehensively evaluate the pain experience in patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis. The ICOAP includes 11 items (5 constant pain items; 6 intermittent pain items). Each item is rated on a 0 to 4 point scale with a 7-day recall period. The raw maximum intermittent pain score ranges from 0 to 24, transformed to a reported scale of 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst pain). The raw maximum constant pain score ranges from 0 to 20, transformed to a reported scale of 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst pain). | Modified Intent to Treat population: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study drug, observed cases. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | score on a scale | Baseline, Week 16 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Index Knee ICOAP Scores at Week 26 | The ICOAP is a multidimensional osteoarthritis-specific measure designed to comprehensively evaluate the pain experience in patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis. The ICOAP includes 11 items (5 constant pain items; 6 intermittent pain items). Each item is rated on a 0 to 4 point scale with a 7-day recall period. The raw maximum intermittent pain score ranges from 0 to 24, transformed to a reported scale of 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst pain). The raw maximum constant pain score ranges from 0 to 20, transformed to a reported scale of 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst pain). | Modified Intent to Treat population: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study drug, observed cases. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | score on a scale | Baseline, Week 26 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Index Knee ICOAP Scores at Week 52 | The ICOAP is a multidimensional osteoarthritis-specific measure designed to comprehensively evaluate the pain experience in patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis. The ICOAP includes 11 items (5 constant pain items; 6 intermittent pain items). Each item is rated on a 0 to 4 point scale with a 7-day recall period. The raw maximum intermittent pain score ranges from 0 to 24, transformed to a reported scale of 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst pain). The raw maximum constant pain score ranges from 0 to 20, transformed to a reported scale of 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst pain). | Modified Intent to Treat population: all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug, observed cases. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | score on a scale | Baseline, Week 52 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline In Index Knee Pain Intensity at Week 16 | The index knee pain intensity was assessed in 3 different ways using an 11 -point NRS (0 to 10 points representing 'no pain' to 'worst possible pain'). Subjects were asked to enter: 1) average pain intensity during the past week (7-day recall period); 2) the worst pain during activity over the past 24 hours; 3) pain intensity before and after a 40 meter walk (performance pain, before and after). The 40 meter fast paced walk test is a test of short distance walking activity, walking speed over short distances and changing direction during walking. Individuals taking the test should walk as quickly but as safely as possible, without running, along a walkway and then turn around, and repeat again for a total distance of 40 m (132 feet). The total time taken to walk the 40 meters is recorded. | Modified Intent to Treat population: all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug, observed cases. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | units on a scale | Baseline, Week 16 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline In Index Knee Pain Intensity at Week 26 | The index knee pain intensity was assessed in 3 different ways using an 11 -point NRS (0 to 10 points representing 'no pain' to 'worst possible pain'). Subjects were asked to enter: 1) average pain intensity during the past week (7-day recall period); 2) the worst pain during activity over the past 24 hours; 3) pain intensity before and after a 40 meter walk (performance pain, before and after). The 40 meter fast paced walk test is a test of short distance walking activity, walking speed over short distances and changing direction during walking. Individuals taking the test should walk as quickly but as safely as possible, without running, along a walkway and then turn around, and repeat again for a total distance of 40 m (132 feet). The total time taken to walk the 40 meters is recorded. | Modified Intent to Treat population: all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug, observed cases. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | units on a scale | Baseline, Week 26 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline In Index Knee Pain Intensity at Week 52 | The index knee pain intensity was assessed in 3 different ways using an 11 -point NRS (0 to 10 points representing 'no pain' to 'worst possible pain'). Subjects were asked to enter: 1) average pain intensity during the past week (7-day recall period); 2) the worst pain during activity over the past 24 hours; 3) pain intensity before and after a 40 meter walk (performance pain, before and after). The 40 meter fast paced walk test is a test of short distance walking activity, walking speed over short distances and changing direction during walking. Individuals taking the test should walk as quickly but as safely as possible, without running, along a walkway and then turn around, and repeat again for a total distance of 40 m (132 feet). The total time taken to walk the 40 meters is recorded. | Modified Intent to Treat population: all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug, observed cases. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | units on a scale | Baseline, Week 52 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Arthritis of the Index Knee at Week 16 | The PGA is a single item for evaluating overall osteoarthritis disease activity. PGA is assessed using an 11-point NRS of 0 to 10 points (representing best to worst disease status, respectively), with a 7-day recall period. | Modified Intent to Treat population: all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug, observed cases. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | units on a scale | Baseline, Week 16 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in PGA of Arthritis of the Index Knee at Week 26 | The PGA is a single item for evaluating overall osteoarthritis disease activity. PGA is assessed using an 11-point NRS of 0 to 10 points (representing best to worst disease status, respectively), with a 7-day recall period. | Modified Intent to Treat population: all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug, observed cases. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | units on a scale | Baseline, Week 26 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in PGA of Arthritis of the Index Knee at Week 52 | The PGA is a single item for evaluating overall osteoarthritis disease activity. PGA is assessed using an 11-point NRS of 0 to 10 points (representing best to worst disease status, respectively), with a 7-day recall period. | Modified Intent to Treat population: all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug, observed cases. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | units on a scale | Baseline, Week 52 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Cartilage Volume of the Index Knee at Week 26 | Cartilage volume of the global knee, the medial central condyle + plateau, and the medial condyle + plateau was measured using MRI. | Modified Intent to Treat population: all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug, observed cases. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | mm^3 | Baseline, Week 26 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Cartilage Volume of the Index Knee at Week 52 | Cartilage volume of the global knee, the medial central condyle + plateau, and the medial condyle + plateau was measured using MRI. | Modified Intent to Treat population: all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug, observed cases. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | mm^3 | Baseline, Week 52 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Cartilage Thickness of the Index Knee at Week 26 | Cartilage thickness of the global knee, the medial central condyle + plateau, and the medial condyle + plateau was measured using MRI. | Modified Intent to Treat population: all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug, observed cases. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | mm | Baseline, Week 26 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Cartilage Thickness of the Index Knee at Week 52 | Cartilage thickness of the global knee, the medial central condyle + plateau, and the medial condyle + plateau was measured using MRI. | Modified Intent to Treat population: all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug, observed cases. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | mm | Baseline, Week 52 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Clinical Trials/Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT/OARSI) Response Rate at Week 16 | Percentage of participants classified as OMERACT-OARSI responders at Week 16. A subject was considered an OMERACT-OARSI responder if any of the following 3 criteria were met: 1. WOMAC Pain (in 0 - 100 scale) improvement ≥ 50% and absolute reduction ≥ 20 as compared to the baseline; or 2. WOMAC Function (in normalized 0 - 100 scale) improvement ≥ 50% and absolute reduction ≥ 20 as compared to the baseline; or 3. At least 2 of the following 3 are met: WOMAC Pain improvement ≥ 20% and absolute reduction (in normalized 0 - 100 scale) ≥ 10 as compared to the baseline; WOMAC Function improvement ≥ 20% and absolute reduction (in normalized 0 - 100 scale) ≥ 10 as compared to the baseline; PGA improvement ≥ 20% and absolute change (in normalized 0 - 100 scale) ≥ 10 as compared to the baseline. Response rate 95% confidence interval based on normal approximation. | Modified Intent to Treat population: all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug, LOCF. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | Week 16 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Clinical Trials/Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT/OARSI) Response Rate at Week 26 | Percentage of participants classified as OMERACT-OARSI responders at Week 26. A subject was considered an OMERACT-OARSI responder if any of the following 3 criteria were met: 1. WOMAC Pain (in 0 - 100 scale) improvement ≥ 50% and absolute reduction ≥ 20 as compared to the baseline; or 2. WOMAC Function (in normalized 0 - 100 scale) improvement ≥ 50% and absolute reduction ≥ 20 as compared to the baseline; or 3. At least 2 of the following 3 are met: WOMAC Pain improvement ≥ 20% and absolute reduction (in normalized 0 - 100 scale) ≥ 10 as compared to the baseline; WOMAC Function improvement ≥ 20% and absolute reduction (in normalized 0 - 100 scale) ≥ 10 as compared to the baseline; PGA improvement ≥ 20% and absolute change (in normalized 0 - 100 scale) ≥ 10 as compared to the baseline. Response rate 95% confidence interval based on normal approximation. | Modified Intent to Treat population: all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug, LOCF. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | Week 26 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Clinical Trials/Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT/OARSI) Response Rate at Week 52 | Percentage of participants classified as OMERACT-OARSI responders at Week 52. A subject was considered an OMERACT-OARSI responder if any of the following 3 criteria were met: 1. WOMAC Pain (in 0 - 100 scale) improvement ≥ 50% and absolute reduction ≥ 20 as compared to the baseline; or 2. WOMAC Function (in normalized 0 - 100 scale) improvement ≥ 50% and absolute reduction ≥ 20 as compared to the baseline; or 3. At least 2 of the following 3 are met: WOMAC Pain improvement ≥ 20% and absolute reduction (in normalized 0 - 100 scale) ≥ 10 as compared to the baseline; WOMAC Function improvement ≥ 20% and absolute reduction (in normalized 0 - 100 scale) ≥ 10 as compared to the baseline; PGA improvement ≥ 20% and absolute change (in normalized 0 - 100 scale) ≥ 10 as compared to the baseline. Response rate 95% confidence interval based on normal approximation. | Modified Intent to Treat population: all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug, LOCF. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | Week 52 |
|
|
|
|
| 8 |
| 85 |
| 66 |
| 85 |
| EG001 | ABT-981 25 mg | 25 mg ABT-981 SC E2W | 11 | 89 | 63 | 89 |
| EG002 | ABT-981 100 mg | 100 mg ABT-981 SC E2W | 8 | 85 | 65 | 85 |
| EG003 | ABT-981 200 mg | 200 mg ABT-981 SC E2W | 4 | 88 | 75 | 88 |
| COLITIS | Gastrointestinal disorders | 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| ENTERITIS | Gastrointestinal disorders | 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| ENTEROCOLITIS | Gastrointestinal disorders | 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| PANCREATITIS | Gastrointestinal disorders | 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| SMALL INTESTINAL OBSTRUCTION | Gastrointestinal disorders | 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| CHOLECYSTITIS | Hepatobiliary disorders | 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| LIVER DISORDER | Hepatobiliary disorders | 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| APPENDICITIS | Infections and infestations | 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| DIVERTICULITIS | Infections and infestations | 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| PERITONITIS | Infections and infestations | 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| PNEUMONIA | Infections and infestations | 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| URINARY TRACT INFECTION | Infections and infestations | 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| ANKLE FRACTURE | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| CERVICAL VERTEBRAL FRACTURE | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| CONCUSSION | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| FALL | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| HIP FRACTURE | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| HUMERUS FRACTURE | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| JOINT INJURY | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| LACERATION | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| PROCEDURAL INTESTINAL PERFORATION | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| RADIUS FRACTURE | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| ROAD TRAFFIC ACCIDENT | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| SKULL FRACTURE | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| TIBIA FRACTURE | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| UPPER LIMB FRACTURE | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| BACK PAIN | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| OSTEOARTHRITIS | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| BASAL CELL CARCINOMA | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| COLON ADENOMA | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| INVASIVE DUCTAL BREAST CARCINOMA | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| LUNG CANCER METASTATIC | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| AQUEDUCTAL STENOSIS | Nervous system disorders | 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| BRAIN OEDEMA | Nervous system disorders | 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| CEREBRAL HAEMORRHAGE | Nervous system disorders | 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| HYDROCEPHALUS | Nervous system disorders | 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| PARKINSON'S DISEASE | Nervous system disorders | 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| SEIZURE | Nervous system disorders | 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| SYNCOPE | Nervous system disorders | 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| NEPHROLITHIASIS | Renal and urinary disorders | 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| ALVEOLITIS ALLERGIC | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| ASTHMA | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| DYSPNOEA | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| HYPERTENSION | Vascular disorders | 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| DIARRHOEA | Gastrointestinal disorders | 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| NAUSEA | Gastrointestinal disorders | 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| FATIGUE | General disorders | 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| INJECTION SITE ERYTHEMA | General disorders | 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| INJECTION SITE PAIN | General disorders | 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| INJECTION SITE RASH | General disorders | 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| INJECTION SITE REACTION | General disorders | 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| PAIN | General disorders | 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| BRONCHITIS | Infections and infestations | 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| INFLUENZA | Infections and infestations | 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| NASOPHARYNGITIS | Infections and infestations | 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| SINUSITIS | Infections and infestations | 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| UPPER RESPIRATORY TRACT INFECTION | Infections and infestations | 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| URINARY TRACT INFECTION | Infections and infestations | 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| CONTUSION | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| FALL | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| LIGAMENT SPRAIN | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| NEUTROPHIL COUNT DECREASED | Investigations | 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| ARTHRALGIA | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| BACK PAIN | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| MUSCULOSKELETAL PAIN | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| MYALGIA | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| PAIN IN EXTREMITY | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| DIZZINESS | Nervous system disorders | 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| HEADACHE | Nervous system disorders | 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| COUGH | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| OROPHARYNGEAL PAIN | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| PRURITUS | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| RASH | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| HYPERTENSION | Vascular disorders | 19.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
AbbVie requests that any investigator or institution that plans on presenting/publishing results disclosure, provide written notification of their request 60 days prior to their presentation/publication. AbbVie requests that no presentation/publication will be instituted until 12 months after a study is completed, or after the first presentation/publication whichever occurs first. A delay may be proposed of a presentation/publication if AbbVie needs to secure patent or proprietary protection.
| D009461 |
| Neurologic Manifestations |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
| ANCOVA |
| 0.52 |
P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 100 mg dose group and Placebo at each postbaseline time point was from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, and K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. |
| LS Mean Difference |
| -0.03 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -0.11 |
| 0.056 |
| Superiority |
| ANCOVA | 0.159 | P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 200 mg dose group and Placebo at each postbaseline time point was from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, and K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. | LS Mean Difference | 0.06 | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.023 | 0.139 | Superiority |
| ANCOVA |
| 0.542 |
P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 100 dose group and Placebo at each post-baseline time point was from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, and K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. |
| LS Mean Difference |
| -1.07 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -4.515 |
| 2.377 |
| Superiority |
| ANCOVA | 0.385 | P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 200 dose group and Placebo at each post-baseline time point was from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, and K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. | LS Mean Difference | -1.52 | 2-Sided | 95 | -4.95 | 1.916 | Superiority |
| ANCOVA |
| 0.095 |
P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 100 mg dose group and Placebo at each postbaseline time point was from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, and K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. |
| LS Mean Difference |
| -0.15 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -0.324 |
| 0.026 |
| Superiority |
| ANCOVA | 0.106 | P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 200 mg dose group and Placebo at each postbaseline time point was from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, and K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. | LS Mean Difference | -0.14 | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.314 | 0.03 | Superiority |
| ANCOVA |
| 0.109 |
P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 100 mg dose group and placebo at each postbaseline time point is from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. |
| LS Mean Difference |
| -7.6 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -16.83 |
| 1.69 |
| Superiority |
| ANCOVA | 0.465 | P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 200 mg dose group and placebo at each postbaseline time point is from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. | LS Mean Difference | -3.4 | 2-Sided | 95 | -12.58 | 5.76 | Superiority |
| ANCOVA |
| 0.065 |
P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 100 mg dose group and placebo at each postbaseline time point is from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. |
| LS Mean Difference |
| -9.2 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -18.95 |
| 0.56 |
| Superiority |
| ANCOVA | 0.145 | P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 200 mg dose group and placebo at each postbaseline time point is from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. | LS Mean Difference | -7.2 | 2-Sided | 95 | -16.84 | 2.49 | Superiority |
| ANCOVA |
| 0.295 |
P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 100 mg dose group and placebo at each postbaseline time point is from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. |
| LS Mean Difference |
| -5.8 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -16.77 |
| 5.11 |
| Superiority |
| ANCOVA | 0.218 | P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 200 mg dose group and placebo at each postbaseline time point is from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. | LS Mean Difference | -6.8 | 2-Sided | 95 | -17.63 | 4.04 | Superiority |
| ANCOVA |
| 0.075 |
P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 100 mg dose group and placebo at each postbaseline time point is from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. |
| LS Mean Difference |
| -2.7 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -5.67 |
| 0.28 |
| Superiority |
| ANCOVA | 0.107 | P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 200 mg dose group and placebo at each postbaseline time point is from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. | LS Mean Difference | -2.4 | 2-Sided | 95 | -5.33 | 0.52 | Superiority |
| ANCOVA |
| 0.186 |
P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 100 mg dose group and placebo at each postbaseline time point is from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. |
| LS Mean Difference |
| -2.2 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -5.39 |
| 1.05 |
| Superiority |
| ANCOVA | 0.157 | P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 200 mg dose group and placebo at each postbaseline time point is from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. | LS Mean Difference | -2.3 | 2-Sided | 95 | -5.46 | 0.88 | Superiority |
| ANCOVA |
| 0.564 |
P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 100 mg dose group and Placebo at each postbaseline time point was from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, and K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. |
| LS Mean Difference |
| -0.1 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -0.6 |
| 0.33 |
| Superiority |
| ANCOVA | 0.966 | P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 200 mg dose group and Placebo at each postbaseline time point was from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, and K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. | LS Mean Difference | 0 | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.45 | 0.47 | Superiority |
| ANCOVA |
| 0.953 |
P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 100 mg dose group and Placebo at each postbaseline time point was from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, and K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. |
| LS Mean Difference |
| 0 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -0.55 |
| 0.58 |
| Superiority |
| ANCOVA | 0.83 | P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 200 mg dose group and Placebo at each postbaseline time point was from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, and K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. | LS Mean Difference | -0.1 | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.61 | 0.49 | Superiority |
| Constant Pain |
|
Intermittent pain |
| ANCOVA |
| 0.699 |
P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 100 mg dose group and Placebo at each postbaseline time point was from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, and K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. |
| LS Mean Difference |
| -1.1 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -6.9 |
| 4.63 |
| Superiority |
| Intermittent pain | ANCOVA | 0.636 | P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 200 mg dose group and Placebo at each postbaseline time point was from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, and K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. | LS Mean Difference | 1.4 | 2-Sided | 95 | -4.37 | 7.14 | Superiority |
| Constant pain | ANCOVA | 0.756 | P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 25 mg dose group and Placebo at each postbaseline time point was from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, and K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. | LS Mean Difference | 0.9 | 2-Sided | 95 | -4.91 | 6.76 | Superiority |
| Constant pain | ANCOVA | 0.068 | P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 100 mg dose group and Placebo at each postbaseline time point was from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, and K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. | LS Mean Difference | -5.6 | 2-Sided | 95 | -11.55 | 0.42 | Superiority |
| Constant pain | ANCOVA | 0.649 | P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 200 mg dose group and Placebo at each postbaseline time point was from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, and K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. | LS Mean Difference | -1.4 | 2-Sided | 95 | -7.34 | 4.58 | Superiority |
| Constant Pain |
|
Intermittent pain |
| ANCOVA |
| 0.409 |
P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 100 mg dose group and Placebo at each postbaseline time point was from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, and K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. |
| LS Mean Difference |
| -2.6 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -8.82 |
| 3.6 |
| Superiority |
| Intermittent pain | ANCOVA | 0.338 | P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 200 mg dose group and Placebo at each postbaseline time point was from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, and K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. | LS Mean Difference | -3 | 2-Sided | 95 | -9.24 | 3.18 | Superiority |
| Constant pain | ANCOVA | 0.817 | P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 25 mg dose group and Placebo at each postbaseline time point was from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, and K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. | LS Mean Difference | 0.7 | 2-Sided | 95 | -5.59 | 7.08 | Superiority |
| Constant pain | ANCOVA | 0.544 | P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 100 mg dose group and Placebo at each postbaseline time point was from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, and K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. | LS Mean Difference | -2 | 2-Sided | 95 | -8.37 | 4.43 | Superiority |
| Constant pain | ANCOVA | 0.437 | P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 200 mg dose group and Placebo at each postbaseline time point was from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, and K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. | LS Mean Difference | -2.5 | 2-Sided | 95 | -8.91 | 3.86 | Superiority |
| Constant Pain |
|
Intermittent pain |
| ANCOVA |
| 0.909 |
P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 100 mg dose group and Placebo at each postbaseline time point was from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, and K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. |
| LS Mean Difference |
| -0.4 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -7.65 |
| 6.81 |
| Superiority |
| Intermittent pain | ANCOVA | 0.278 | P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 200 mg dose group and Placebo at each postbaseline time point was from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, and K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. | LS Mean Difference | -4.0 | 2-Sided | 95 | -11.23 | 3.25 | Superiority |
| Constant pain | ANCOVA | 0.732 | P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 25 mg dose group and Placebo at each postbaseline time point was from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, and K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. | LS Mean Difference | -1.2 | 2-Sided | 95 | -8.42 | 5.92 | Superiority |
| Constant pain | ANCOVA | 0.216 | P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 100 mg dose group and Placebo at each postbaseline time point was from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, and K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. | LS Mean Difference | -4.6 | 2-Sided | 95 | -11.86 | 2.69 | Superiority |
| Constant pain | ANCOVA | 0.014 | P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 200 mg dose group and Placebo at each postbaseline time point was from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, and K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. | LS Mean Difference | -9.2 | 2-Sided | 95 | -16.42 | -1.88 | Superiority |
| Activity Pain |
|
| Performance Pain (Before) |
|
| Performance Pain (After) |
|
7-day recall period |
| ANCOVA |
| 0.451 |
P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 100 mg dose group and Placebo at each postbaseline time point was from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, and K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. |
| LS Mean Difference |
| -0.2 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -0.86 |
| 0.38 |
| Superiority |
| 7-day recall period | ANCOVA | 0.331 | P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 200 mg dose group and Placebo at each postbaseline time point was from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, and K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. | LS Mean Difference | 0.3 | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.31 | 0.93 | Superiority |
| Activity pain | ANCOVA | 0.932 | P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 25 mg dose group and Placebo at each postbaseline time point was from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, and K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. | LS Mean Difference | 0.0 | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.73 | 0.67 | Superiority |
| Activity pain | ANCOVA | 0.344 | P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 100 mg dose group and Placebo at each postbaseline time point was from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, and K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. | LS Mean Difference | -0.3 | 2-Sided | 95 | -1.07 | 0.37 | Superiority |
| Activity pain | ANCOVA | 0.489 | P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 200 mg dose group and Placebo at each postbaseline time point was from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, and K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. | LS Mean Difference | 0.3 | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.47 | 0.97 | Superiority |
| Performance pain (before) | ANCOVA | 0.498 | P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 25 mg dose group and Placebo at each postbaseline time point was from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, and K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. | LS Mean Difference | 0.2 | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.42 | 0.85 | Superiority |
| Performance pain (before) | ANCOVA | 0.637 | P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 100 mg dose group and Placebo at each postbaseline time point was from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, and K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. | LS Mean Difference | 0.2 | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.8 | 0.49 | Superiority |
| Performance pain (before) | ANCOVA | 0.367 | P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 200 mg dose group and Placebo at each postbaseline time point was from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, and K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. | LS Mean Difference | 0.3 | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.35 | 0.94 | Superiority |
| Performance pain (after) | ANCOVA | 0.67 | P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 25 mg dose group and Placebo at each postbaseline time point was from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, and K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. | LS Mean Difference | 0.1 | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.51 | 0.79 | Superiority |
| Performance pain (after) | ANCOVA | 0.776 | P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 100 mg dose group and Placebo at each postbaseline time point was from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, and K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. | LS Mean Difference | -0.1 | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.76 | 0.57 | Superiority |
| Performance pain (after) | ANCOVA | 0.387 | P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 200 mg dose group and Placebo at each postbaseline time point was from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, and K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. | LS Mean Difference | 0.3 | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.37 | 0.96 | Superiority |
|
| Activity Pain |
|
|
| Performance Pain (Before) |
|
|
| Performance Pain (After) |
|
|
7-day recall period |
| ANCOVA |
| 0.122 |
P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 100 mg dose group and Placebo at each postbaseline time point was from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, and K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. |
| LS Mean Difference |
| -0.6 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -1.26 |
| 0.15 |
| Superiority |
| 7-day recall period | ANCOVA | 0.507 | P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 200 mg dose group and Placebo at each postbaseline time point was from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, and K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. | LS Mean Difference | -0.2 | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.94 | 0.47 | Superiority |
| Activity pain | ANCOVA | 0.892 | P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 25 mg dose group and Placebo at each postbaseline time point was from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, and K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. | LS Mean Difference | -0.1 | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.85 | 0.74 | Superiority |
| Activity pain | ANCOVA | 0.433 | P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 100 mg dose group and Placebo at each postbaseline time point was from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, and K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. | LS Mean Difference | -0.3 | 2-Sided | 95 | -1.12 | 0.48 | Superiority |
| Activity pain | ANCOVA | 0.92 | P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 200 mg dose group and Placebo at each postbaseline time point was from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, and K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. | LS Mean Difference | 0.0 | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.84 | 0.76 | Superiority |
| Performance pain (before) | ANCOVA | 0.957 | P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 25 mg dose group and Placebo at each postbaseline time point was from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, and K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. | LS Mean Difference | 0.0 | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.68 | 0.71 | Superiority |
| Performance pain (before) | ANCOVA | 0.222 | P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 100 mg dose group and Placebo at each postbaseline time point was from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, and K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. | LS Mean Difference | -0.4 | 2-Sided | 95 | -1.13 | 0.26 | Superiority |
| Performance pain (before) | ANCOVA | 0.209 | P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 200 mg dose group and Placebo at each postbaseline time point was from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, and K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. | LS Mean Difference | -0.4 | 2-Sided | 95 | -1.15 | 0.25 | Superiority |
| Performance pain (after) | ANCOVA | 0.813 | P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 25 mg dose group and Placebo at each postbaseline time point was from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, and K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. | LS Mean Difference | 0.1 | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.62 | 0.79 | Superiority |
| Performance pain (after) | ANCOVA | 0.135 | P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 100 mg dose group and Placebo at each postbaseline time point was from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, and K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. | LS Mean Difference | -0.5 | 2-Sided | 95 | -1.25 | 0.17 | Superiority |
| Performance pain (after) | ANCOVA | 0.679 | P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 200 mg dose group and Placebo at each postbaseline time point was from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, and K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. | LS Mean Difference | -0.1 | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.85 | 0.57 | Superiority |
| Activity Pain |
|
| Performance Pain (Before) |
|
| Performance Pain (After) |
|
7-day recall period |
| ANCOVA |
| 0.925 |
P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 100 mg dose group and Placebo at each postbaseline time point was from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, and K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. |
| LS Mean Difference |
| 0.0 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -0.75 |
| 0.82 |
| Superiority |
| 7-day recall period | ANCOVA | 0.659 | P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 200 mg dose group and Placebo at each postbaseline time point was from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, and K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. | LS Mean Difference | -0.2 | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.96 | 0.61 | Superiority |
| Activity pain | ANCOVA | 0.633 | P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 25 mg dose group and Placebo at each postbaseline time point was from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, and K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. | LS Mean Difference | -0.2 | 2-Sided | 95 | -1.1 | 0.67 | Superiority |
| Activity pain | ANCOVA | 0.46 | P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 100 mg dose group and Placebo at each postbaseline time point was from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, and K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. | LS Mean Difference | -0.3 | 2-Sided | 95 | -1.23 | 0.56 | Superiority |
| Activity pain | ANCOVA | 0.663 | P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 200 mg dose group and Placebo at each postbaseline time point was from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, and K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. | LS Mean Difference | -0.2 | 2-Sided | 95 | -1.1 | 0.7 | Superiority |
| Performance pain (before) | ANCOVA | 0.696 | P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 25 mg dose group and Placebo at each postbaseline time point was from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, and K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. | LS Mean Difference | -0.1 | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.89 | 0.59 | Superiority |
| Performance pain (before) | ANCOVA | 0.278 | P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 100 mg dose group and Placebo at each postbaseline time point was from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, and K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. | LS Mean Difference | -0.4 | 2-Sided | 95 | -1.16 | 0.34 | Superiority |
| Performance pain (before) | ANCOVA | 0.357 | P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 200 mg dose group and Placebo at each postbaseline time point was from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, and K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. | LS Mean Difference | -0.4 | 2-Sided | 95 | -1.1 | 0.4 | Superiority |
| Performance pain (after) | ANCOVA | 0.761 | P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 200 mg dose group and Placebo at each postbaseline time point was from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, and K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. | LS Mean Difference | -0.1 | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.87 | 0.64 | Superiority |
| ANCOVA | 0.218 | P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 100 mg dose group and Placebo at each postbaseline time point was from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, and K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. | LS Mean Difference | -0.5 | 2-Sided | 95 | -1.02 | 0.51 | Superiority |
| Performance pain (after) | ANCOVA | 0.513 | P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 200 mg dose group and Placebo at each postbaseline time point was from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, and K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. | LS Mean Difference | -0.3 | 2-Sided | 95 | -1.02 | 0.51 | Superiority |
| ANCOVA |
| 0.219 |
P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 100 mg dose group and Placebo at each postbaseline time point was from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, and K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. |
| LS Mean Difference |
| -0.4 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -1.06 |
| 0.24 |
| Superiority |
| ANCOVA | 0.673 | P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 200 mg dose group and Placebo at each postbaseline time point was from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, and K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. | LS Mean Difference | -0.1 | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.79 | 0.51 | Superiority |
| ANCOVA |
| 0.145 |
P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 100 mg dose group and Placebo at each postbaseline time point was from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, and K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. |
| LS Mean Difference |
| -0.5 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -1.26 |
| 0.19 |
| Superiority |
| ANCOVA | 0.527 | P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 200 mg dose group and Placebo at each postbaseline time point was from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, and K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. | LS Mean Difference | -0.2 | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.96 | 0.49 | Superiority |
| ANCOVA |
| 0.738 |
P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 100 mg dose group and Placebo at each postbaseline time point was from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, and K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. |
| LS Mean Difference |
| -0.1 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -0.94 |
| 0.66 |
| Superiority |
| ANCOVA | 0.3 | P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 200 mg dose group and Placebo at each postbaseline time point was from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, and K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. | LS Mean Difference | -0.4 | 2-Sided | 95 | -1.22 | 0.38 | Superiority |
| Medial Central Condyle + Plateau |
|
| Medial Condyle + Plateau |
|
Global knee |
| ANCOVA |
| 0.948 |
P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 100 mg dose group and Placebo at each postbaseline time point was from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, and K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. |
| LS Mean Difference |
| 3.6 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -103.95 |
| 111.10 |
| Superiority |
| Global knee | ANCOVA | 0.523 | P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 200 mg dose group and Placebo at each postbaseline time point was from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, and K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. | LS Mean Difference | -33.1 | 2-Sided | 95 | -134.76 | 68.65 | Superiority |
| Medial central condyle + plateau | ANCOVA | 0.799 | P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 25 mg dose group and Placebo at each postbaseline time point was from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, and K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. | LS Mean Difference | 4.2 | 2-Sided | 95 | -28.47 | 36.95 | Superiority |
| Medial central condyle + plateau | ANCOVA | 0.609 | P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 100 mg dose group and Placebo at each postbaseline time point was from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, and K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. | LS Mean Difference | 9.0 | 2-Sided | 95 | -25.62 | 43.64 | Superiority |
| Medial central condyle + plateau | ANCOVA | 0.923 | P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 200 mg dose group and Placebo at each postbaseline time point was from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, and K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. | LS Mean Difference | 1.6 | 2-Sided | 95 | -30.97 | 34.19 | Superiority |
| Medial condyle + plateau | ANCOVA | 0.937 | P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 25 mg dose group and Placebo at each postbaseline time point was from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, and K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. | LS Mean Difference | 2.1 | 2-Sided | 95 | -49.88 | 54.08 | Superiority |
| Medial condyle + plateau | ANCOVA | 0.882 | P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 100 mg dose group and Placebo at each postbaseline time point was from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, and K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. | LS Mean Difference | 4.1 | 2-Sided | 95 | -50.68 | 58.95 | Superiority |
| Medial condyle + plateau | ANCOVA | 0.602 | P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 200 mg dose group and Placebo at each postbaseline time point was from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, and K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. | LS Mean Difference | 13.8 | 2-Sided | 95 | -38.05 | 65.55 | Superiority |
| Medial Central Condyle + Plateau |
|
| Medial Condyle + Plateau |
|
Global knee |
| ANCOVA |
| 0.97 |
P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 100 mg dose group and Placebo at each postbaseline time point was from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, and K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. |
| LS Mean Difference |
| 2.7 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -140.86 |
| 146.31 |
| Superiority |
| Global knee | ANCOVA | 0.713 | P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 200 mg dose group and Placebo at each postbaseline time point was from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, and K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. | LS Mean Difference | -26.1 | 2-Sided | 95 | -165.47 | 113.32 | Superiority |
| Medial central condyle + plateau | ANCOVA | 0.272 | P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 25 mg dose group and Placebo at each postbaseline time point was from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, and K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. | LS Mean Difference | -25.1 | 2-Sided | 95 | -70.12 | 19.88 | Superiority |
| Medial central condyle + plateau | ANCOVA | 0.64 | P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 100 mg dose group and Placebo at each postbaseline time point was from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, and K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. | LS Mean Difference | 11.1 | 2-Sided | 95 | -35.63 | 57.8 | Superiority |
| Medial central condyle + plateau | ANCOVA | 0.608 | P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 200 mg dose group and Placebo at each postbaseline time point was from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, and K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. | LS Mean Difference | -11.8 | 2-Sided | 95 | -56.94 | 33.38 | Superiority |
| Medial condyle + plateau | ANCOVA | 0.319 | P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 25 mg dose group and Placebo at each postbaseline time point was from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, and K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. | LS Mean Difference | -40.3 | 2-Sided | 95 | -119.88 | 39.3 | Superiority |
| Medial condyle + plateau | ANCOVA | 0.56 | P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 100 mg dose group and Placebo at each postbaseline time point was from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, and K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. | LS Mean Difference | 24.4 | 2-Sided | 95 | -58.05 | 106.91 | Superiority |
| Medial condyle + plateau | ANCOVA | 0.489 | P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 200 mg dose group and Placebo at each postbaseline time point was from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, and K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. | LS Mean Difference | -28.1 | 2-Sided | 95 | -107.97 | 51.82 | Superiority |
| Medial Central Condyle + Plateau |
|
| Medial Condyle + Plateau |
|
Global knee |
| ANCOVA |
| 0.929 |
P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 100 mg dose group and Placebo at each postbaseline time point was from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, and K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. |
| LS Mean Difference |
| -0.001 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -0.017 |
| 0.015 |
| Superiority |
| Global knee | ANCOVA | 0.543 | P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 200 mg dose group and Placebo at each postbaseline time point was from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, and K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. | LS Mean Difference | -0.005 | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.02 | 0.01 | Superiority |
| Medial central condyle + plateau | ANCOVA | 0.752 | P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 25 mg dose group and Placebo at each postbaseline time point was from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, and K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. | LS Mean Difference | 0.008 | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.043 | 0.059 | Superiority |
| Medial central condyle + plateau | ANCOVA | 0.691 | P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 100 mg dose group and Placebo at each postbaseline time point was from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, and K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. | LS Mean Difference | 0.011 | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.042 | 0.064 | Superiority |
| Medial central condyle + plateau | ANCOVA | 0.71 | P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 200 mg dose group and Placebo at each postbaseline time point was from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, and K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. | LS Mean Difference | 0.01 | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.041 | 0.06 | Superiority |
| Medial condyle + plateau | ANCOVA | 0.965 | P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 25 mg dose group and Placebo at each postbaseline time point was from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, and K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. | LS Mean Difference | 0.0 | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.019 | 0.02 | Superiority |
| Medial condyle + plateau | ANCOVA | 0.885 | P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 100 mg dose group and Placebo at each postbaseline time point was from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, and K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. | LS Mean Difference | -0.002 | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.022 | 0.019 | Superiority |
| Medial condyle + plateau | ANCOVA | 0.887 | P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 200 mg dose group and Placebo at each postbaseline time point was from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, and K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. | LS Mean Difference | 0.001 | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.018 | 0.021 | Superiority |
| Medial Central Condyle + Plateau |
|
| Medial Condyle + Plateau |
|
Global knee |
| ANCOVA |
| 0.952 |
P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 100 mg dose group and Placebo at each postbaseline time point was from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, and K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. |
| LS Mean Difference |
| -0.001 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -0.02 |
| 0.019 |
| Superiority |
| Global knee | ANCOVA | 0.765 | P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 200 mg dose group and Placebo at each postbaseline time point was from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, and K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. | LS Mean Difference | -0.003 | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.022 | 0.016 | Superiority |
| Medial central condyle + plateau | ANCOVA | 0.258 | P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 25 mg dose group and Placebo at each postbaseline time point was from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, and K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. | LS Mean Difference | -0.04 | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.11 | 0.03 | Superiority |
| Medial central condyle + plateau | ANCOVA | 0.535 | P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 100 mg dose group and Placebo at each postbaseline time point was from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, and K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. | LS Mean Difference | 0.023 | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.049 | 0.094 | Superiority |
| Medial central condyle + plateau | ANCOVA | 0.866 | P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 200 mg dose group and Placebo at each postbaseline time point was from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, and K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. | LS Mean Difference | -0.006 | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.076 | 0.064 | Superiority |
| Medial condyle + plateau | ANCOVA | 0.413 | P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 25 mg dose group and Placebo at each postbaseline time point was from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, and K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. | LS Mean Difference | -0.012 | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.041 | 0.017 | Superiority |
| Medial condyle + plateau | ANCOVA | 0.445 | P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 100 mg dose group and Placebo at each postbaseline time point was from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, and K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. | LS Mean Difference | 0.012 | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.018 | 0.042 | Superiority |
| Medial condyle + plateau | ANCOVA | 0.835 | P-value for test of difference between ABT-981 200 mg dose group and Placebo at each postbaseline time point was from an ANCOVA model with treatment, age, and K-L grade as the main factors and baseline as a covariate. | LS Mean Difference | -0.003 | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.032 | 0.026 | Superiority |
| Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel |
| 0.435 |
P-value for test of difference between each ABT-981 dose group and Placebo was from a Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test using age group and K-L grade as stratification factors. |
| Response Rate Difference |
| 5.5 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -8.9 |
| 19.9 |
| Superiority |
| Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | 0.435 | P-value for test of difference between each ABT-981 dose group and Placebo was from a Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test using age group and K-L grade as stratification factors. | Response Rate Difference | 5.5 | 2-Sided | 95 | -8.9 | 19.9 | Superiority |
| Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel |
| 0.581 |
P-value for test of difference between each ABT-981 dose group and Placebo was from a Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test using age group and K-L grade as stratification factors. |
| Response Rate Difference |
| 4.3 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -10.1 |
| 18.7 |
| Superiority |
| Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | 0.146 | P-value for test of difference between each ABT-981 dose group and Placebo was from a Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test using age group and K-L grade as stratification factors. | Response Rate Difference | 10.4 | 2-Sided | 95 | -3.5 | 24.3 | Superiority |
| Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel |
| 0.964 |
P-value for test of difference between each ABT-981 dose group and Placebo was from a Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test using age group and K-L grade as stratification factors. |
| Response Rate Difference |
| 0.8 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -12.8 |
| 14.5 |
| Superiority |
| Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | 0.763 | P-value for test of difference between each ABT-981 dose group and Placebo was from a Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test using age group and K-L grade as stratification factors. | Response Rate Difference | 2.1 | 2-Sided | 95 | -11.3 | 15.6 | Superiority |