Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2012-002091-13 | EudraCT Number | ||
| U1111-1152-3899 | Other Identifier | World Health Organization | |
| 12/SC/0443 | Registry Identifier | NRES |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to determine whether cognitive impairment associated with schizophrenia is attenuated by add-on roflumilast administration to second generation antipsychotics (SGA) in participants with stable schizophrenia.
The drug being tested in this study is called roflumilast. Roflumilast is being tested as an add-on treatment to second generation antipsychotics (SGA) to treat cognitive impairment in people with stable schizophrenia. This study will look at improvement in cognitive impairment associated with schizophrenia in people who take roflumilast as an add-on to SGA.
The study will enroll approximately 22 participants. Participants will be randomly assigned (by chance, like flipping a coin) to one of three treatment groups-which will remain undisclosed to the patient and study doctor during the study (unless there is an urgent medical need) All participants will receive the following treatments at different periods throughout the study:
All participants will be asked to take one tablet at the same time each day throughout the study.
This single-centre trial will be conducted in the United Kingdom. The overall time to participate in this study is up to 64 days. Participants will make 2 screening visits to the clinic and then must be brought to the clinic every day for dosing during each of 3 Treatment Periods. Each Treatment Period will be 8 days in duration. All participants will also make 1 final visit 14 days after last dose of study drug for a follow-up assessment.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo + Roflumilast 100 μg + Roflumilast 250 μg | Experimental | Roflumilast placebo-matching tablets, orally, once, daily, Days 1 through 8, Period 1, followed by a 14 day washout period, followed by roflumilast 100 μg tablets, orally, once, daily, Days 1 through 8, Period 2, followed by a 14 day washout period, followed by roflumilast 250 μg tablets, orally, once, daily, Days 1 through 8, Period 3. All participants will take a stable dose of second generation antipsychotics throughout the duration of the treatment period. |
|
| Roflumilast 100 μg + Roflumilast 250 μg + Placebo | Experimental | Roflumilast 100 μg tablets, orally, once, daily, Days 1 through 8, Period 1, followed by a 14 day washout period, followed by roflumilast 250 μg tablets, orally, once, daily, Days 1 through 8, Period 2, followed by a 14 day washout period, followed by roflumilast placebo-matching tablets, orally, once, daily, Days 1 through 8, Period 3. All participants will take a stable dose of second generation antipsychotics throughout the duration of the treatment period. |
|
| Roflumilast 250 μg + Placebo + Roflumilast 100 μg | Experimental | Roflumilast 250 μg tablets, orally, once, daily, Days 1 through 8, Period 1, followed by a 14 day washout period, followed by roflumilast placebo-matching tablets, orally, once, daily, Days 1 through 8, Period 2, followed by a 14 day washout period, followed by roflumilast 100 μg tablets, orally, once, daily, Days 1 through 8, Period 3. All participants will take a stable dose of second generation antipsychotics throughout the duration of the treatment period. |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roflumilast | Drug | Roflumilast tablets |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in Spatial Span Test Score | The Spatial Span test assesses the participant's working memory. During this task, participants are presented with a board containing blue blocks randomly arranged. The rater first taps out a pattern of blocks, beginning with two blocks and increasing with participant proficiency, and the participant is tasked with tapping the same pattern. After discontinuation of this part of the subtest, the participant is then tasked with tapping out the reverse pattern after the rater's demonstration. These patterns also begin with two blocks and increase with participant proficiency. The total score for this subtest ranges from 0 (worst) to 32 (best). A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) with treatment sequence, study period, and treatment as fixed effects and participant nested within treatment sequence as a random effect was used for analysis. | Baseline and Day 8 of Treatment Periods 1, 2 and 3 |
| Change From Baseline in Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (HVLT) Score | The HVLT assesses the participant's verbal learning. The test consists of a list of 12 words from three taxonomic categories which are presented orally, and the participant is asked to recall as many as possible after each of three learning trials. The key outcome variable for this task is the total correct responses in the three learning trials. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. ANOVA with treatment sequence, study period, and treatment as fixed effects and participant nested within treatment sequence as a random effect was used for analysis. | Baseline and Day 8 of Treatment Periods 1, 2 and 3 |
| Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex Activation During the Rewarded Delayed Response Working Memory | BOLD Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) changes in the blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) - signal, which changes in response to neural activity. Baseline fMRI measurements will be followed by rewarded delayed response Working Memory (WM) task measurements in which participants are required to remember the spatial location of a target stimulus (a dot) relative to a fixation cross. Participants are given feedback indicating success or failure. ANOVA with treatment sequence, study period, and treatment as fixed effects and participant nested within treatment sequence as a random effect. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in the Continuous Performance Test (CPT) | The CPT is a computerized test that assesses the participant's attention and vigilance. The participant was asked to attend to digits flashing on a computer screen and to click the mouse when the same string of digits flashed consecutively. The test consisted of 3 trials: the first contained 2-digit sequences, the second contained 3-digit sequences, and the third contained 4-digit sequences. Scoring was based the number of correct hits. The total score was an average of the 3 trials. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. ANOVA with treatment sequence, study period, and treatment as fixed effects and subject nested within treatment sequence as a random effect was used for analysis. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Medical Director Clinical Science | Takeda | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Denmark Hill | London | United Kingdom |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 30536081 | Derived | Gilleen J, Farah Y, Davison C, Kerins S, Valdearenas L, Uz T, Lahu G, Tsai M, Ogrinc F, Reichenberg A, Williams SC, Mehta MA, Shergill SS. An experimental medicine study of the phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor, roflumilast, on working memory-related brain activity and episodic memory in schizophrenia patients. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2021 May;238(5):1279-1289. doi: 10.1007/s00213-018-5134-y. Epub 2018 Dec 8. |
Not provided
Not provided
Participants with a diagnosis of schizophrenia were enrolled equally in 1 of 3 treatment sequences which determined the order the following 3 treatments were received: placebo, once a day roflumilast 100 μg, roflumilast 250 μg.
Participants took part in the study at 1 investigative site in the United Kingdom from 13 March 2014 to 15 June 2015.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Placebo + Roflumilast 100 μg + Roflumilast 250 μg | Roflumilast placebo-matching tablets, orally, once, daily, Days 1 through 8, Period 1, followed by a 14 day washout period, followed by roflumilast 100 μg tablets, orally, once, daily, Days 1 through 8, Period 2, followed by a 14 day washout period, followed by roflumilast 250 μg tablets, orally, once, daily, Days 1 through 8, Period 3. All participants will take a stable dose of second generation antipsychotics throughout the duration of the treatment period. |
| FG001 | Roflumilast 100 μg + Roflumilast 250 μg + Placebo | Roflumilast 100 μg tablets, orally, once, daily, Days 1 through 8, Period 1, followed by a 14 day washout period, followed by roflumilast 250 μg tablets, orally, once, daily, Days 1 through 8, Period 2, followed by a 14 day washout period, followed by roflumilast placebo-matching tablets, orally, once, daily, Days 1 through 8, Period 3. All participants will take a stable dose of second generation antipsychotics throughout the duration of the treatment period. |
| FG002 | Roflumilast 250 μg + Placebo + Roflumilast 100 μg | Roflumilast 250 μg tablets, orally, once, daily, Days 1 through 8, Period 1, followed by a 14 day washout period, followed by roflumilast placebo-matching tablets, orally, once, daily, Days 1 through 8, Period 2, followed by a 14 day washout period, followed by roflumilast 100 μg tablets, orally, once, daily, Days 1 through 8, Period 3. All participants will take a stable dose of second generation antipsychotics throughout the duration of the treatment period. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment Period 1 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Treatment Period 2 |
| |||||||||||||||||||
| Treatment Period 3 |
|
All randomized participants.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Placebo + Roflumilast 100 μg + Roflumilast 250 μg | Roflumilast placebo-matching tablets, orally, once, daily, Days 1 through 8, Period 1, followed by a 14 day washout period, followed by roflumilast 100 μg tablets, orally, once, daily, Days 1 through 8, Period 2, followed by a 14 day washout period, followed by roflumilast 250 μg tablets, orally, once, daily, Days 1 through 8, Period 3. All participants will take a stable dose of second generation antipsychotics throughout the duration of the treatment period. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Change From Baseline in Spatial Span Test Score | The Spatial Span test assesses the participant's working memory. During this task, participants are presented with a board containing blue blocks randomly arranged. The rater first taps out a pattern of blocks, beginning with two blocks and increasing with participant proficiency, and the participant is tasked with tapping the same pattern. After discontinuation of this part of the subtest, the participant is then tasked with tapping out the reverse pattern after the rater's demonstration. These patterns also begin with two blocks and increase with participant proficiency. The total score for this subtest ranges from 0 (worst) to 32 (best). A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) with treatment sequence, study period, and treatment as fixed effects and participant nested within treatment sequence as a random effect was used for analysis. | Participants from the Pharmacodynamic Analysis Set, all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 pharmacodynamic result post-dose, with data available at both Baseline and Day 8 for analysis. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | score on a scale | Baseline and Day 8 of Treatment Periods 1, 2 and 3 |
Up to 63 Days
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and clinically significant abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Placebo | Roflumilast placebo-matching tablets orally, once, daily on Days 1 through 8. All participants took a stable dose of second generation antipsychotics throughout the duration of the treatment period. |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Suicide attempt | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 18.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Palpitations | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA 18.0 | Systematic Assessment |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medical Director, Clinical Science | Takeda | +1-877-825-3327 | trialdisclosures@takeda.com |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012559 | Schizophrenia |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D019967 | Schizophrenia Spectrum and Other Psychotic Disorders |
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C424423 | Roflumilast |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Placebo | Drug | Roflumilast placebo-matching tablets |
|
| Second generation antipsychotic | Drug | Second Generation Antipsychotic (SGA) medication for standard of care therapy will be sourced and managed locally by the site. |
|
| Baseline and Day 8 of Treatment Periods 1, 2 and 3 |
| Baseline and Day 8 of Treatment Periods 1, 2 and 3 |
| Change From Baseline in Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia: Symbol-Coding | The Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS): Symbol-Coding assesses the participant's speed of processing. The test is a timed paper-and-pencil test in which the participant uses a key to write digits that correspond to nonsense symbols. The key outcome variable for this task is the total number of correct, valid symbols in 90 seconds. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. ANOVA with treatment sequence, study period and treatment group as fixed effects and participant nested within treatment sequence as a random effect. | Baseline and Day 8 of Treatment Periods 1, 2 and 3 |
| Change From Baseline in Category Fluency Animal Naming Scores | The Category Fluency test assesses the participant's speed of processing. The test is administered orally, with the participant naming as many animals as he can in 1 minute. The key outcome variable for the test is the total number of correct, valid category words in 60 seconds. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. ANOVA with treatment sequence, study period, and treatment as fixed effects and participant nested within treatment sequence as a random effect. | Baseline and Day 8 of Treatment Periods 1, 2 and 3 |
| Ventrolateral Prefrontal (VLPF) Cortex and Orbitofrontal (OFX) Cortex Activation During the Shift Trials | BOLD fMRI, a test that measures brain activity, was used during the Shifting Task at VLPF and OFX. Participants worked out which pair in a stimulus set consisting of a face and a building; transparent and overlapping, was the target. 1 pair appeared on the left of the screen, the other on the right. In each trial, participants indicated using a button box which side of the screen they thought the target was located on. Every second response, feedback was presented on the screen for 0.6 seconds, indicating whether or not the stimulus chosen was the target. If both of the last 2 choices were correct, the feedback was the word ''correct'' in green; otherwise, the feedback was the word ''incorrect'' in red. After 3 positive feedback events, a change of target occurred. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. ANOVA with treatment sequence, study period, and treatment as fixed effects and participant nested within treatment sequence as a random effect was used for analysis. | Baseline and Day 8 of Treatment Periods 1, 2 and 3 |
| Ventral Striatum Activation During the Reward Trials | BOLD fMRI, a test that measures brain activity, was used during the Reward Task (Monetary Incentive Delay Test). Participants were instructed to respond as quickly as possible to a light-flash on the display screen. The flash was preceded by an arrow icon that informed participants about the consequences of their response to the flash stimulus. Four conditions were included in the paradigm, as follows:
| Baseline and Day 8 of Treatment Periods 1, 2 and 3 |
| Change From Baseline in P300 Amplitude at the Midline Parietal Electrode (Pz) | Brain electrical activity changes were quantified with electroencephalogram (EEG) battery tests. The P300 occurs after the presentation of a novel, behaviorally relevant target stimulus embedded among irrelevant stimuli. It reflects allocation of attention and activation of immediate memory. The amplitude of P300 indexes brain actions when the mental representation of the stimulus environment is updated, while its latency indexes stimulus classification speed unrelated to response selection processes. The participants are instructed to push a button when hearing the target stimulus, but not when hearing the standard. They are asked to press the button as fast as possible. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. ANOVA with treatment sequence, study period, and treatment as fixed effects and subject nested within treatment sequence as a random effect was used for analysis. | Baseline and Day 8 of Treatment Periods 1, 2 and 3 |
| Change From Baseline in Mismatch Negativity (MMN) Amplitude at the Midline Frontal Electrode (Fz) | EEG, a test that measures brain electrical activity was performed during the MMN. The MMN is an auditory event related potential that is elicited by any discriminable change in auditory stimulation irrespective of the participant or participant's attention. The response to stimuli is being recorded by EEG electrodes while participants read a book. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. ANOVA with treatment sequence, study period, and treatment as fixed effects and subject nested within treatment sequence as a random effect was used for analysis. | Baseline and Day 8 of Treatment Periods 1, 2 and 3 |
| Change From Baseline in Amplitude of the C1 Component of the Visual Evoked Potentials at the Midline Occipital Electrode (Oz) | EEG, a test that measures brain electrical activity was used. Participants had a baseline Visual Evoked Potentials (VEP) recording (2 minute checkerboard VEP) followed by a period of high frequency stimulation (2 minutes 9 Hz checkerboard stimulation). The VEP was repeated 2 minutes after the end of high frequency stimulation. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. ANOVA with treatment sequence, study period, and treatment as fixed effects and subject nested within treatment sequence as a random effect was used for analysis. | Baseline and Day 8 of Treatment Periods 1, 2 and 3 |
| Change From Baseline in High Beta/Low Gamma Power During Resting EEG | Participants are asked to open and close their eyes in 30 second alternating blocks to maintain an approximately constant level of arousal. The eyes closed EEG, a test that measures brain electrical activity, is dominated by alpha (8-14Hz) and the eyes open EEG dominated by beta (14-30Hz eyes open) with the two states analyzed separately to increase sensitivity to drug effects in these bands. Ratio is calculated as High Beta/Low Gamma Power. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. ANOVA with treatment sequence, study period, and treatment as fixed effects and subject nested within treatment sequence as a random effect. | Baseline and Day 8 of Treatment Periods 1, 2 and 3 |
| Change From Baseline in Frontal Theta Power (EEG) During N-Back Working Memory Task | EEG, a test that measures brain electrical activity, was performed during the n-back task. In the n-back task participants are required to monitor a series of letters and report when the current letter matches the letter n integers back, where n=1 (1-back) or n=2 (2-back), the latter requiring a greater working memory resources. The task requires continuous updating of information stores. In the 0-back condition (which does not require manipulation of material in working memory), participants respond to the appearance of a pre-specified letter. The task consists of alternating 30-second (s) blocks of 0-back with 1-back, and 2-back conditions, with letters displayed every 2 s for 1 s within each block. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. ANOVA with treatment sequence, study period, and treatment as fixed effects and subject nested within treatment sequence as a random effect was used for analysis. | Baseline and Day 8 of Treatment Periods 1, 2 and 3 |
| Change From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score | PANSS assesses the positive symptoms, negative symptoms, and general psychopathology associated with schizophrenia. The scale consists of 30 items. Each item is rated on a scale from 1 (symptom not present) to 7 (symptoms extremely severe). Positive subscale consists of 7 items which assesses the positive symptoms with subscale score ranging from 7 to 49, where higher score indicates greater severity. Negative subscale consists of 7 items which assesses the negative symptoms with subscale score ranging from 7 to 49, where higher score indicates greater severity. General psychopathology subscale consists of 16 items which assesses the general symptoms of schizophrenia with subscale score ranging from 16 to 96, where higher score indicates greater severity. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. ANOVA with treatment sequence, study period and treatment group as fixed effects and participant nested within treatment sequence as a random effect was used for analysis. | Baseline and Day 8 of Treatment Periods 1, 2 and 3 |
| Percentage of Participants Who Experience at Least 1 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event | An Adverse Event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a drug; it does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) is defined as an adverse event with an onset that occurs after receiving study drug. | From Day 1 until Day 63 |
| Percentage of Participants Who Meet the Markedly Abnormal Criteria for Safety Laboratory Tests | Percentage of participants with markedly abnormal safety laboratory tests (Hematology, Serum Chemistry and Urinalysis) collected throughout the study. | From Day 1 until Day 63 |
| Percentage of Participants Who Meet the Markedly Abnormal Criteria for Vital Sign Measurement | Vital signs were oral body temperature, respiration rate, supine blood pressure (after 5 minutes resting), and pulse rate. | From Day 1 until Day 63 |
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
| BG001 | Roflumilast 100 μg + Roflumilast 250 μg + Placebo | Roflumilast 100 μg tablets, orally, once, daily, Days 1 through 8, Period 1, followed by a 14 day washout period, followed by roflumilast 250 μg tablets, orally, once, daily, Days 1 through 8, Period 2, followed by a 14 day washout period, followed by roflumilast placebo-matching tablets, orally, once, daily, Days 1 through 8, Period 3. All participants will take a stable dose of second generation antipsychotics throughout the duration of the treatment period. |
| BG002 | Roflumilast 250 μg + Placebo + Roflumilast 100 μg | Roflumilast 250 μg tablets, orally, once, daily, Days 1 through 8, Period 1, followed by a 14 day washout period, followed by roflumilast placebo-matching tablets, orally, once, daily, Days 1 through 8, Period 2, followed by a 14 day washout period, followed by roflumilast 100 μg tablets, orally, once, daily, Days 1 through 8, Period 3. All participants will take a stable dose of second generation antipsychotics throughout the duration of the treatment period. |
| BG003 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Number | participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| Height | Mean | Standard Deviation | cm |
|
| Weight | Mean | Standard Deviation | kg |
|
| Body Mass Index (BMI) | Mean | Standard Deviation | kg/m^2 |
|
| Tobacco Classification | Number | participants |
|
| Caffeine Classification | Number | participants |
|
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| OG000 | Placebo | Roflumilast placebo-matching tablets orally, once, daily on Days 1 through 8. All participants took a stable dose of second generation antipsychotics throughout the duration of the treatment period. |
| OG001 | Roflumilast 100 μg | Roflumilast 100 μg tablets, orally, once, daily, Days 1 through 8. All participants took a stable dose of second generation antipsychotics throughout the duration of the treatment period. |
| OG002 | Roflumilast 250 μg | Roflumilast 250 μg tablets, orally, once, daily, Days 1 through 8. All participants took a stable dose of second generation antipsychotics throughout the duration of the treatment period. |
|
|
|
| Primary | Change From Baseline in Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (HVLT) Score | The HVLT assesses the participant's verbal learning. The test consists of a list of 12 words from three taxonomic categories which are presented orally, and the participant is asked to recall as many as possible after each of three learning trials. The key outcome variable for this task is the total correct responses in the three learning trials. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. ANOVA with treatment sequence, study period, and treatment as fixed effects and participant nested within treatment sequence as a random effect was used for analysis. | Participants from the Pharmacodynamic Analysis Set, all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 pharmacodynamic result post-dose, with data available at both Baseline and Day 8 for analysis. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | correct responses | Baseline and Day 8 of Treatment Periods 1, 2 and 3 |
|
|
|
|
| Primary | Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex Activation During the Rewarded Delayed Response Working Memory | BOLD Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) changes in the blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) - signal, which changes in response to neural activity. Baseline fMRI measurements will be followed by rewarded delayed response Working Memory (WM) task measurements in which participants are required to remember the spatial location of a target stimulus (a dot) relative to a fixation cross. Participants are given feedback indicating success or failure. ANOVA with treatment sequence, study period, and treatment as fixed effects and participant nested within treatment sequence as a random effect. | Participants from the Pharmacodynamic Analysis Set, all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 pharmacodynamic result post-dose, with data available for analysis. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | unitless parameter estimates | Baseline and Day 8 of Treatment Periods 1, 2 and 3 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in the Continuous Performance Test (CPT) | The CPT is a computerized test that assesses the participant's attention and vigilance. The participant was asked to attend to digits flashing on a computer screen and to click the mouse when the same string of digits flashed consecutively. The test consisted of 3 trials: the first contained 2-digit sequences, the second contained 3-digit sequences, and the third contained 4-digit sequences. Scoring was based the number of correct hits. The total score was an average of the 3 trials. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. ANOVA with treatment sequence, study period, and treatment as fixed effects and subject nested within treatment sequence as a random effect was used for analysis. | Participants from the Pharmacodynamic Analysis Set, all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 pharmacodynamic result post-dose, with data available for analysis. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | correct hits | Baseline and Day 8 of Treatment Periods 1, 2 and 3 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia: Symbol-Coding | The Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS): Symbol-Coding assesses the participant's speed of processing. The test is a timed paper-and-pencil test in which the participant uses a key to write digits that correspond to nonsense symbols. The key outcome variable for this task is the total number of correct, valid symbols in 90 seconds. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. ANOVA with treatment sequence, study period and treatment group as fixed effects and participant nested within treatment sequence as a random effect. | Participants from the Pharmacodynamic Analysis Set, all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 pharmacodynamic result post-dose, with data available for analysis. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | correct symbols | Baseline and Day 8 of Treatment Periods 1, 2 and 3 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Category Fluency Animal Naming Scores | The Category Fluency test assesses the participant's speed of processing. The test is administered orally, with the participant naming as many animals as he can in 1 minute. The key outcome variable for the test is the total number of correct, valid category words in 60 seconds. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. ANOVA with treatment sequence, study period, and treatment as fixed effects and participant nested within treatment sequence as a random effect. | Participants from the Pharmacodynamic Analysis Set, all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 pharmacodynamic result post-dose, with data available for analysis. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | correct words | Baseline and Day 8 of Treatment Periods 1, 2 and 3 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Ventrolateral Prefrontal (VLPF) Cortex and Orbitofrontal (OFX) Cortex Activation During the Shift Trials | BOLD fMRI, a test that measures brain activity, was used during the Shifting Task at VLPF and OFX. Participants worked out which pair in a stimulus set consisting of a face and a building; transparent and overlapping, was the target. 1 pair appeared on the left of the screen, the other on the right. In each trial, participants indicated using a button box which side of the screen they thought the target was located on. Every second response, feedback was presented on the screen for 0.6 seconds, indicating whether or not the stimulus chosen was the target. If both of the last 2 choices were correct, the feedback was the word ''correct'' in green; otherwise, the feedback was the word ''incorrect'' in red. After 3 positive feedback events, a change of target occurred. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. ANOVA with treatment sequence, study period, and treatment as fixed effects and participant nested within treatment sequence as a random effect was used for analysis. | Participants from the Pharmacodynamic Analysis Set, all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 pharmacodynamic result post-dose, with data available for analysis. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | unitless parameter estimates | Baseline and Day 8 of Treatment Periods 1, 2 and 3 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Ventral Striatum Activation During the Reward Trials | BOLD fMRI, a test that measures brain activity, was used during the Reward Task (Monetary Incentive Delay Test). Participants were instructed to respond as quickly as possible to a light-flash on the display screen. The flash was preceded by an arrow icon that informed participants about the consequences of their response to the flash stimulus. Four conditions were included in the paradigm, as follows:
| Participants from the Pharmacodynamic Analysis Set, all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 pharmacodynamic result post-dose, with data available for analysis. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | unitless parameter estimates | Baseline and Day 8 of Treatment Periods 1, 2 and 3 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in P300 Amplitude at the Midline Parietal Electrode (Pz) | Brain electrical activity changes were quantified with electroencephalogram (EEG) battery tests. The P300 occurs after the presentation of a novel, behaviorally relevant target stimulus embedded among irrelevant stimuli. It reflects allocation of attention and activation of immediate memory. The amplitude of P300 indexes brain actions when the mental representation of the stimulus environment is updated, while its latency indexes stimulus classification speed unrelated to response selection processes. The participants are instructed to push a button when hearing the target stimulus, but not when hearing the standard. They are asked to press the button as fast as possible. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. ANOVA with treatment sequence, study period, and treatment as fixed effects and subject nested within treatment sequence as a random effect was used for analysis. | Participants from the Pharmacodynamic Analysis Set, all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 pharmacodynamic result post-dose, with data available for analysis at Baseline and Day 8. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | microvolts (μV) | Baseline and Day 8 of Treatment Periods 1, 2 and 3 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Mismatch Negativity (MMN) Amplitude at the Midline Frontal Electrode (Fz) | EEG, a test that measures brain electrical activity was performed during the MMN. The MMN is an auditory event related potential that is elicited by any discriminable change in auditory stimulation irrespective of the participant or participant's attention. The response to stimuli is being recorded by EEG electrodes while participants read a book. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. ANOVA with treatment sequence, study period, and treatment as fixed effects and subject nested within treatment sequence as a random effect was used for analysis. | Participants from the Pharmacodynamic Analysis Set, all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 pharmacodynamic result post-dose, with data available for analysis at Baseline and Day 8. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | μV | Baseline and Day 8 of Treatment Periods 1, 2 and 3 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Amplitude of the C1 Component of the Visual Evoked Potentials at the Midline Occipital Electrode (Oz) | EEG, a test that measures brain electrical activity was used. Participants had a baseline Visual Evoked Potentials (VEP) recording (2 minute checkerboard VEP) followed by a period of high frequency stimulation (2 minutes 9 Hz checkerboard stimulation). The VEP was repeated 2 minutes after the end of high frequency stimulation. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. ANOVA with treatment sequence, study period, and treatment as fixed effects and subject nested within treatment sequence as a random effect was used for analysis. | Participants from the Pharmacodynamic Analysis Set, all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 pharmacodynamic result post-dose, with data available for analysis. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | μV | Baseline and Day 8 of Treatment Periods 1, 2 and 3 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in High Beta/Low Gamma Power During Resting EEG | Participants are asked to open and close their eyes in 30 second alternating blocks to maintain an approximately constant level of arousal. The eyes closed EEG, a test that measures brain electrical activity, is dominated by alpha (8-14Hz) and the eyes open EEG dominated by beta (14-30Hz eyes open) with the two states analyzed separately to increase sensitivity to drug effects in these bands. Ratio is calculated as High Beta/Low Gamma Power. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. ANOVA with treatment sequence, study period, and treatment as fixed effects and subject nested within treatment sequence as a random effect. | Participants from the Pharmacodynamic Analysis Set, all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 pharmacodynamic result post-dose, with data available for analysis at Baseline and Day 8. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | ratio | Baseline and Day 8 of Treatment Periods 1, 2 and 3 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Frontal Theta Power (EEG) During N-Back Working Memory Task | EEG, a test that measures brain electrical activity, was performed during the n-back task. In the n-back task participants are required to monitor a series of letters and report when the current letter matches the letter n integers back, where n=1 (1-back) or n=2 (2-back), the latter requiring a greater working memory resources. The task requires continuous updating of information stores. In the 0-back condition (which does not require manipulation of material in working memory), participants respond to the appearance of a pre-specified letter. The task consists of alternating 30-second (s) blocks of 0-back with 1-back, and 2-back conditions, with letters displayed every 2 s for 1 s within each block. A positive change from Baseline indicates improvement. ANOVA with treatment sequence, study period, and treatment as fixed effects and subject nested within treatment sequence as a random effect was used for analysis. | Participants from the Pharmacodynamic Analysis Set, all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 pharmacodynamic result post-dose, with data available for analysis at Baseline and Day 8. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | μV | Baseline and Day 8 of Treatment Periods 1, 2 and 3 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score | PANSS assesses the positive symptoms, negative symptoms, and general psychopathology associated with schizophrenia. The scale consists of 30 items. Each item is rated on a scale from 1 (symptom not present) to 7 (symptoms extremely severe). Positive subscale consists of 7 items which assesses the positive symptoms with subscale score ranging from 7 to 49, where higher score indicates greater severity. Negative subscale consists of 7 items which assesses the negative symptoms with subscale score ranging from 7 to 49, where higher score indicates greater severity. General psychopathology subscale consists of 16 items which assesses the general symptoms of schizophrenia with subscale score ranging from 16 to 96, where higher score indicates greater severity. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. ANOVA with treatment sequence, study period and treatment group as fixed effects and participant nested within treatment sequence as a random effect was used for analysis. | Participants from the Pharmacodynamic Analysis Set, all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 pharmacodynamic result post-dose, with data available for analysis at Baseline and Day 8. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | score on a scale | Baseline and Day 8 of Treatment Periods 1, 2 and 3 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants Who Experience at Least 1 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event | An Adverse Event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a drug; it does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) is defined as an adverse event with an onset that occurs after receiving study drug. | Safety population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | From Day 1 until Day 63 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants Who Meet the Markedly Abnormal Criteria for Safety Laboratory Tests | Percentage of participants with markedly abnormal safety laboratory tests (Hematology, Serum Chemistry and Urinalysis) collected throughout the study. | Safety population, including all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and completed the laboratory tests during treatment. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | From Day 1 until Day 63 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants Who Meet the Markedly Abnormal Criteria for Vital Sign Measurement | Vital signs were oral body temperature, respiration rate, supine blood pressure (after 5 minutes resting), and pulse rate. | Safety population, including all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and completed the vital sign tests on Day 8 of each treatment period. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | From Day 1 until Day 63 |
|
|
|
| 1 |
| 16 |
| 8 |
| 16 |
| EG001 | Roflumilast 100 μg | Roflumilast 100 μg tablets, orally, once, daily, Days 1 through 8. All participants took a stable dose of second generation antipsychotics throughout the duration of the treatment period. | 0 | 17 | 7 | 17 |
| EG002 | Roflumilast 250 μg | Roflumilast 250 μg tablets, orally, once, daily, Days 1 through 8. All participants took a stable dose of second generation antipsychotics throughout the duration of the treatment period. | 0 | 19 | 9 | 19 |
| Toothache | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 18.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Abdominal pain lower | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 18.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 18.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Gingival swelling | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 18.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 18.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 18.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Catheter site bruise | General disorders | MedDRA 18.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Influenza like illness | General disorders | MedDRA 18.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Nasopharyngitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 18.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Beta haemolytic streptococcal infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 18.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Tinea pedis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 18.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Ankle fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 18.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Arthralgia | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 18.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Back pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 18.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pain in extremity | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 18.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 18.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Anxiety | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 18.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Depressed mood | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 18.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Insomnia | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 18.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Middle insomnia | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 18.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Suicidal ideation | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 18.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Eczema | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA 18.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Rash | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA 18.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Rash macular | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA 18.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Scar pain | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA 18.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
Research Organization shall not publish any articles or papers nor make any presentations, nor assist any other person in publishing any articles or papers or in making any presentations relating or referring to the Study or any results, data or insights from or any data, information or materials obtained or generated in the performance of its obligations without the prior written consent of Takeda, which consent may be granted or withheld in Takeda's sole discretion.
| ANOVA |
| 0.069 |
P-values are from ANOVA with treatment sequence, study period, and treatment as fixed effects and subject nested within treatment sequence as a random effect. |
| LS Mean Difference |
| 2.377 |
| Standard Error of the Mean |
| 1.2545 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -0.198 |
| 4.951 |
| No |
| Superiority or Other |
| ANOVA |
| 0.345 |
P-values are from ANOVA with treatment sequence, study period, and treatment as fixed effects and subject nested within treatment sequence as a random effect. |
| LS Mean Difference |
| -0.171 |
| Standard Error of the Mean |
| 0.1757 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -1.193 |
| 0.571 |
| No |
| Superiority or Other |
|
|
| Total General Psychopathology Score |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Urinalysis |
|